Home Sports Talk

2024 college football thread

18911131422

Comments

  • Basebal21Basebal21 Posts: 3,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coolstanley said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:
    If Bama loses this game, it will go down as the upset of the century.

    Appalachian State beating Michigan was this century.

    And, by point spread, Stanford beating USC five weeks later after being 41-point underdogs was also bigger.

    Michigan weren't ranked #1. Michigan was a mediocre team during that timeframe.

    Michigan was 11-2 the year before and had a strong argument for playing in the national title game. And returned basically every starter. App State was 1-AA.

    There's no way that losing a road conference game is a bigger upset than a home loss to a 1-AA when you're top 5.

    Michigan was losing to Ohio State every year. They finished 9-4 that year. Comparing those Michigan teams to today's Bama playoff teams is apples and oranges.

    Apples and oranges is correct. One team lost to a conference opponent on the road, the other lost to a FCS team at home.


    Since then, APP State has beat two sec teams..Texas A@M and South Carolina.

    How often does a #1 lose to an unranked?

    I really dont get your obsession with number 1. 1-4 will be conference champions. You want OSU to be #1 win the B!G and theres a chance, theres 0 chance if they dont

    The fact is that App State beating Michigan as an FCS school at Michigan when Michigan was #5 20 years ago is a much worse loss. Its also weird to once again be defending your arch rival Michigan

    I think the Alabama loss is worse. When was the last time Vanderbilt won anything? They couldn't even beat Georgia State a few weeks ago for heavens sake.

    The Vandy team that beat Bama was far far more talented than the App State team that beat Michigan

    Wisconsin 2-6 against the SEC since 2007

  • bgrbgr Posts: 1,715 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:
    If Bama loses this game, it will go down as the upset of the century.

    Appalachian State beating Michigan was this century.

    And, by point spread, Stanford beating USC five weeks later after being 41-point underdogs was also bigger.

    Michigan weren't ranked #1. Michigan was a mediocre team during that timeframe.

    Michigan was 11-2 the year before and had a strong argument for playing in the national title game. And returned basically every starter. App State was 1-AA.

    There's no way that losing a road conference game is a bigger upset than a home loss to a 1-AA when you're top 5.

    Michigan was losing to Ohio State every year. They finished 9-4 that year. Comparing those Michigan teams to today's Bama playoff teams is apples and oranges.

    Apples and oranges is correct. One team lost to a conference opponent on the road, the other lost to a FCS team at home.


    Since then, APP State has beat two sec teams..Texas A@M and South Carolina.

    How often does a #1 lose to an unranked?

    I really dont get your obsession with number 1. 1-4 will be conference champions. You want OSU to be #1 win the B!G and theres a chance, theres 0 chance if they dont

    The fact is that App State beating Michigan as an FCS school at Michigan when Michigan was #5 20 years ago is a much worse loss. Its also weird to once again be defending your arch rival Michigan

    I think the Alabama loss is worse. When was the last time Vanderbilt won anything? They couldn't even beat Georgia State a few weeks ago for heavens sake.

    The Vandy team that beat Bama was far far more talented than the App State team that beat Michigan

    If only we had a hot tub and some energy drinks we could have them play Alabama.

  • Basebal21Basebal21 Posts: 3,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bgr said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:
    If Bama loses this game, it will go down as the upset of the century.

    Appalachian State beating Michigan was this century.

    And, by point spread, Stanford beating USC five weeks later after being 41-point underdogs was also bigger.

    Michigan weren't ranked #1. Michigan was a mediocre team during that timeframe.

    Michigan was 11-2 the year before and had a strong argument for playing in the national title game. And returned basically every starter. App State was 1-AA.

    There's no way that losing a road conference game is a bigger upset than a home loss to a 1-AA when you're top 5.

    Michigan was losing to Ohio State every year. They finished 9-4 that year. Comparing those Michigan teams to today's Bama playoff teams is apples and oranges.

    Apples and oranges is correct. One team lost to a conference opponent on the road, the other lost to a FCS team at home.


    Since then, APP State has beat two sec teams..Texas A@M and South Carolina.

    How often does a #1 lose to an unranked?

    I really dont get your obsession with number 1. 1-4 will be conference champions. You want OSU to be #1 win the B!G and theres a chance, theres 0 chance if they dont

    The fact is that App State beating Michigan as an FCS school at Michigan when Michigan was #5 20 years ago is a much worse loss. Its also weird to once again be defending your arch rival Michigan

    It’s a valid question. It happens pretty rarely. But you’re also right about the transfer portal…. It’s making FPI obsolete before our eyes. We can’t look back 4 years at a program anymore to weigh their strength. With FPI broken SOR is corrupted. Everything is blowing up in how teams are being ranked. That’s the original point. There’s a bias.

    Thats why its called an upset. For the NFL people now paying attention to college football its not the 1990s anymore when the Cowboys and 49ers had 3rd string guys better than starters on other teams. Joe Burrow is a great example, he had to work real hard to graduate early so he could transfer from OSU to go play at LSU as a graduate transfer. Had that happened this year he could have just transferred after spring practices whether he didnt like the look of the team or didnt get the job. Thats what guys do now the leave instead of sit for 3 years.

    Theres guys playing at schools that they may just plan on being there a year or two and then transfer into a bigger program. The rankings for the most part have been fine they just arent cut and dry anymore. Were going to have at least 8 teams with a loss if not two losses in the playoffs and at least two if not all of the conference champions will have at least one loss. Texas has to run the table for the SEC, OSU or Oregon has to run the table and they play each other, Miami is currently losing bad in the second half and theyre the last hope for the ACC to be undefeated, BYU and Iowa State are the only hope for the Big 12 which isnt realistic.

    5 of the top 11 teams already lost tonight and its looking like 6. 4 were to unranked teams and if Cal wins 5 of the 6 will be to unraked teams. Its just a completely different world now with the super conferences and everything else. Catching a loss at some point should be expected for everyone

    Wisconsin 2-6 against the SEC since 2007

  • bgrbgr Posts: 1,715 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Basebal21 said:

    @bgr said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:
    If Bama loses this game, it will go down as the upset of the century.

    Appalachian State beating Michigan was this century.

    And, by point spread, Stanford beating USC five weeks later after being 41-point underdogs was also bigger.

    Michigan weren't ranked #1. Michigan was a mediocre team during that timeframe.

    Michigan was 11-2 the year before and had a strong argument for playing in the national title game. And returned basically every starter. App State was 1-AA.

    There's no way that losing a road conference game is a bigger upset than a home loss to a 1-AA when you're top 5.

    Michigan was losing to Ohio State every year. They finished 9-4 that year. Comparing those Michigan teams to today's Bama playoff teams is apples and oranges.

    Apples and oranges is correct. One team lost to a conference opponent on the road, the other lost to a FCS team at home.


    Since then, APP State has beat two sec teams..Texas A@M and South Carolina.

    How often does a #1 lose to an unranked?

    I really dont get your obsession with number 1. 1-4 will be conference champions. You want OSU to be #1 win the B!G and theres a chance, theres 0 chance if they dont

    The fact is that App State beating Michigan as an FCS school at Michigan when Michigan was #5 20 years ago is a much worse loss. Its also weird to once again be defending your arch rival Michigan

    It’s a valid question. It happens pretty rarely. But you’re also right about the transfer portal…. It’s making FPI obsolete before our eyes. We can’t look back 4 years at a program anymore to weigh their strength. With FPI broken SOR is corrupted. Everything is blowing up in how teams are being ranked. That’s the original point. There’s a bias.

    Thats why its called an upset. For the NFL people now paying attention to college football its not the 1990s anymore when the Cowboys and 49ers had 3rd string guys better than starters on other teams. Joe Burrow is a great example, he had to work real hard to graduate early so he could transfer from OSU to go play at LSU as a graduate transfer. Had that happened this year he could have just transferred after spring practices whether he didnt like the look of the team or didnt get the job. Thats what guys do now the leave instead of sit for 3 years.

    Theres guys playing at schools that they may just plan on being there a year or two and then transfer into a bigger program. The rankings for the most part have been fine they just arent cut and dry anymore. Were going to have at least 8 teams with a loss if not two losses in the playoffs and at least two if not all of the conference champions will have at least one loss. Texas has to run the table for the SEC, OSU or Oregon has to run the table and they play each other, Miami is currently losing bad in the second half and theyre the last hope for the ACC to be undefeated, BYU and Iowa State are the only hope for the Big 12 which isnt realistic.

    5 of the top 11 teams already lost tonight and its looking like 6. 4 were to unranked teams and if Cal wins 5 of the 6 will be to unraked teams. Its just a completely different world now with the super conferences and everything else. Catching a loss at some point should be expected for everyone

    That’s an amazing story. You can’t understand what I said so you try to drown me with word soup. Yuck.

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 7,839 ✭✭✭✭✭

    you'll never be able to outrun a bad diet

  • coolstanleycoolstanley Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:
    If Bama loses this game, it will go down as the upset of the century.

    Appalachian State beating Michigan was this century.

    And, by point spread, Stanford beating USC five weeks later after being 41-point underdogs was also bigger.

    Michigan weren't ranked #1. Michigan was a mediocre team during that timeframe.

    Michigan was 11-2 the year before and had a strong argument for playing in the national title game. And returned basically every starter. App State was 1-AA.

    There's no way that losing a road conference game is a bigger upset than a home loss to a 1-AA when you're top 5.

    Michigan was losing to Ohio State every year. They finished 9-4 that year. Comparing those Michigan teams to today's Bama playoff teams is apples and oranges.

    Apples and oranges is correct. One team lost to a conference opponent on the road, the other lost to a FCS team at home.


    Since then, APP State has beat two sec teams..Texas A@M and South Carolina.

    How often does a #1 lose to an unranked?

    I really dont get your obsession with number 1. 1-4 will be conference champions. You want OSU to be #1 win the B!G and theres a chance, theres 0 chance if they dont

    The fact is that App State beating Michigan as an FCS school at Michigan when Michigan was #5 20 years ago is a much worse loss. Its also weird to once again be defending your arch rival Michigan

    I think the Alabama loss is worse. When was the last time Vanderbilt won anything? They couldn't even beat Georgia State a few weeks ago for heavens sake.

    The Vandy team that beat Bama was far far more talented than the App State team that beat Michigan

    So talented they lost to Georgia State.

    2007 APP state won the National championship in their division, and two players were selected in the 2008 draft. One of those two players is a Super Bowl MVP.

    Terry Bradshaw was AMAZING!!

    Ignore list -Basebal21

  • Basebal21Basebal21 Posts: 3,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bgr said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @bgr said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:
    If Bama loses this game, it will go down as the upset of the century.

    Appalachian State beating Michigan was this century.

    And, by point spread, Stanford beating USC five weeks later after being 41-point underdogs was also bigger.

    Michigan weren't ranked #1. Michigan was a mediocre team during that timeframe.

    Michigan was 11-2 the year before and had a strong argument for playing in the national title game. And returned basically every starter. App State was 1-AA.

    There's no way that losing a road conference game is a bigger upset than a home loss to a 1-AA when you're top 5.

    Michigan was losing to Ohio State every year. They finished 9-4 that year. Comparing those Michigan teams to today's Bama playoff teams is apples and oranges.

    Apples and oranges is correct. One team lost to a conference opponent on the road, the other lost to a FCS team at home.


    Since then, APP State has beat two sec teams..Texas A@M and South Carolina.

    How often does a #1 lose to an unranked?

    I really dont get your obsession with number 1. 1-4 will be conference champions. You want OSU to be #1 win the B!G and theres a chance, theres 0 chance if they dont

    The fact is that App State beating Michigan as an FCS school at Michigan when Michigan was #5 20 years ago is a much worse loss. Its also weird to once again be defending your arch rival Michigan

    It’s a valid question. It happens pretty rarely. But you’re also right about the transfer portal…. It’s making FPI obsolete before our eyes. We can’t look back 4 years at a program anymore to weigh their strength. With FPI broken SOR is corrupted. Everything is blowing up in how teams are being ranked. That’s the original point. There’s a bias.

    Thats why its called an upset. For the NFL people now paying attention to college football its not the 1990s anymore when the Cowboys and 49ers had 3rd string guys better than starters on other teams. Joe Burrow is a great example, he had to work real hard to graduate early so he could transfer from OSU to go play at LSU as a graduate transfer. Had that happened this year he could have just transferred after spring practices whether he didnt like the look of the team or didnt get the job. Thats what guys do now the leave instead of sit for 3 years.

    Theres guys playing at schools that they may just plan on being there a year or two and then transfer into a bigger program. The rankings for the most part have been fine they just arent cut and dry anymore. Were going to have at least 8 teams with a loss if not two losses in the playoffs and at least two if not all of the conference champions will have at least one loss. Texas has to run the table for the SEC, OSU or Oregon has to run the table and they play each other, Miami is currently losing bad in the second half and theyre the last hope for the ACC to be undefeated, BYU and Iowa State are the only hope for the Big 12 which isnt realistic.

    5 of the top 11 teams already lost tonight and its looking like 6. 4 were to unranked teams and if Cal wins 5 of the 6 will be to unraked teams. Its just a completely different world now with the super conferences and everything else. Catching a loss at some point should be expected for everyone

    That’s an amazing story. You can’t understand what I said so you try to drown me with word soup. Yuck.

    Im sorry you dont want to talk college football. My fault for trying

    Wisconsin 2-6 against the SEC since 2007

  • Basebal21Basebal21 Posts: 3,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coolstanley said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:
    If Bama loses this game, it will go down as the upset of the century.

    Appalachian State beating Michigan was this century.

    And, by point spread, Stanford beating USC five weeks later after being 41-point underdogs was also bigger.

    Michigan weren't ranked #1. Michigan was a mediocre team during that timeframe.

    Michigan was 11-2 the year before and had a strong argument for playing in the national title game. And returned basically every starter. App State was 1-AA.

    There's no way that losing a road conference game is a bigger upset than a home loss to a 1-AA when you're top 5.

    Michigan was losing to Ohio State every year. They finished 9-4 that year. Comparing those Michigan teams to today's Bama playoff teams is apples and oranges.

    Apples and oranges is correct. One team lost to a conference opponent on the road, the other lost to a FCS team at home.


    Since then, APP State has beat two sec teams..Texas A@M and South Carolina.

    How often does a #1 lose to an unranked?

    I really dont get your obsession with number 1. 1-4 will be conference champions. You want OSU to be #1 win the B!G and theres a chance, theres 0 chance if they dont

    The fact is that App State beating Michigan as an FCS school at Michigan when Michigan was #5 20 years ago is a much worse loss. Its also weird to once again be defending your arch rival Michigan

    I think the Alabama loss is worse. When was the last time Vanderbilt won anything? They couldn't even beat Georgia State a few weeks ago for heavens sake.

    The Vandy team that beat Bama was far far more talented than the App State team that beat Michigan

    So talented they lost to Georgia State.

    2007 APP state won the National championship in their division, and two players were selected in the 2008 draft. One of those two players is a Super Bowl MVP.

    Ive never seen an OSU fan defend their arch rival Michigan more. I'll just leave it that one was an FCS team one is a conference opponent. Even Michigan fans know it. None of it is remotely relevant.

    Wisconsin 2-6 against the SEC since 2007

  • bgrbgr Posts: 1,715 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Basebal21 said:

    @bgr said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @bgr said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:
    If Bama loses this game, it will go down as the upset of the century.

    Appalachian State beating Michigan was this century.

    And, by point spread, Stanford beating USC five weeks later after being 41-point underdogs was also bigger.

    Michigan weren't ranked #1. Michigan was a mediocre team during that timeframe.

    Michigan was 11-2 the year before and had a strong argument for playing in the national title game. And returned basically every starter. App State was 1-AA.

    There's no way that losing a road conference game is a bigger upset than a home loss to a 1-AA when you're top 5.

    Michigan was losing to Ohio State every year. They finished 9-4 that year. Comparing those Michigan teams to today's Bama playoff teams is apples and oranges.

    Apples and oranges is correct. One team lost to a conference opponent on the road, the other lost to a FCS team at home.


    Since then, APP State has beat two sec teams..Texas A@M and South Carolina.

    How often does a #1 lose to an unranked?

    I really dont get your obsession with number 1. 1-4 will be conference champions. You want OSU to be #1 win the B!G and theres a chance, theres 0 chance if they dont

    The fact is that App State beating Michigan as an FCS school at Michigan when Michigan was #5 20 years ago is a much worse loss. Its also weird to once again be defending your arch rival Michigan

    It’s a valid question. It happens pretty rarely. But you’re also right about the transfer portal…. It’s making FPI obsolete before our eyes. We can’t look back 4 years at a program anymore to weigh their strength. With FPI broken SOR is corrupted. Everything is blowing up in how teams are being ranked. That’s the original point. There’s a bias.

    Thats why its called an upset. For the NFL people now paying attention to college football its not the 1990s anymore when the Cowboys and 49ers had 3rd string guys better than starters on other teams. Joe Burrow is a great example, he had to work real hard to graduate early so he could transfer from OSU to go play at LSU as a graduate transfer. Had that happened this year he could have just transferred after spring practices whether he didnt like the look of the team or didnt get the job. Thats what guys do now the leave instead of sit for 3 years.

    Theres guys playing at schools that they may just plan on being there a year or two and then transfer into a bigger program. The rankings for the most part have been fine they just arent cut and dry anymore. Were going to have at least 8 teams with a loss if not two losses in the playoffs and at least two if not all of the conference champions will have at least one loss. Texas has to run the table for the SEC, OSU or Oregon has to run the table and they play each other, Miami is currently losing bad in the second half and theyre the last hope for the ACC to be undefeated, BYU and Iowa State are the only hope for the Big 12 which isnt realistic.

    5 of the top 11 teams already lost tonight and its looking like 6. 4 were to unranked teams and if Cal wins 5 of the 6 will be to unraked teams. Its just a completely different world now with the super conferences and everything else. Catching a loss at some point should be expected for everyone

    That’s an amazing story. You can’t understand what I said so you try to drown me with word soup. Yuck.

    Im sorry you dont want to talk college football. My fault for trying

    You’re only telling me that it’s OK that Alabama lost to Vanderbilt buried in a whimsical story of the impact on parity of the transfer portal.

    My comment was that there is a real bias in the rankings because FPI is exposed and the main reason is the transfer portal. Since 1990 how many #1s have been undefeated? I can think back maybe 15 years and there’s 7? My point is that there might not have been a loss with as wide of a FPI margin in history.

    If you want to respond to me that’s fine, but don’t lament my consternation when you fail to stay on topic.

  • Basebal21Basebal21 Posts: 3,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What an insane choke job by Cal to let Miami come back and win

    Wisconsin 2-6 against the SEC since 2007

  • Basebal21Basebal21 Posts: 3,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bgr said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @bgr said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @bgr said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:
    If Bama loses this game, it will go down as the upset of the century.

    Appalachian State beating Michigan was this century.

    And, by point spread, Stanford beating USC five weeks later after being 41-point underdogs was also bigger.

    Michigan weren't ranked #1. Michigan was a mediocre team during that timeframe.

    Michigan was 11-2 the year before and had a strong argument for playing in the national title game. And returned basically every starter. App State was 1-AA.

    There's no way that losing a road conference game is a bigger upset than a home loss to a 1-AA when you're top 5.

    Michigan was losing to Ohio State every year. They finished 9-4 that year. Comparing those Michigan teams to today's Bama playoff teams is apples and oranges.

    Apples and oranges is correct. One team lost to a conference opponent on the road, the other lost to a FCS team at home.


    Since then, APP State has beat two sec teams..Texas A@M and South Carolina.

    How often does a #1 lose to an unranked?

    I really dont get your obsession with number 1. 1-4 will be conference champions. You want OSU to be #1 win the B!G and theres a chance, theres 0 chance if they dont

    The fact is that App State beating Michigan as an FCS school at Michigan when Michigan was #5 20 years ago is a much worse loss. Its also weird to once again be defending your arch rival Michigan

    It’s a valid question. It happens pretty rarely. But you’re also right about the transfer portal…. It’s making FPI obsolete before our eyes. We can’t look back 4 years at a program anymore to weigh their strength. With FPI broken SOR is corrupted. Everything is blowing up in how teams are being ranked. That’s the original point. There’s a bias.

    Thats why its called an upset. For the NFL people now paying attention to college football its not the 1990s anymore when the Cowboys and 49ers had 3rd string guys better than starters on other teams. Joe Burrow is a great example, he had to work real hard to graduate early so he could transfer from OSU to go play at LSU as a graduate transfer. Had that happened this year he could have just transferred after spring practices whether he didnt like the look of the team or didnt get the job. Thats what guys do now the leave instead of sit for 3 years.

    Theres guys playing at schools that they may just plan on being there a year or two and then transfer into a bigger program. The rankings for the most part have been fine they just arent cut and dry anymore. Were going to have at least 8 teams with a loss if not two losses in the playoffs and at least two if not all of the conference champions will have at least one loss. Texas has to run the table for the SEC, OSU or Oregon has to run the table and they play each other, Miami is currently losing bad in the second half and theyre the last hope for the ACC to be undefeated, BYU and Iowa State are the only hope for the Big 12 which isnt realistic.

    5 of the top 11 teams already lost tonight and its looking like 6. 4 were to unranked teams and if Cal wins 5 of the 6 will be to unraked teams. Its just a completely different world now with the super conferences and everything else. Catching a loss at some point should be expected for everyone

    That’s an amazing story. You can’t understand what I said so you try to drown me with word soup. Yuck.

    Im sorry you dont want to talk college football. My fault for trying

    You’re only telling me that it’s OK that Alabama lost to Vanderbilt buried in a whimsical story of the impact on parity of the transfer portal.

    My comment was that there is a real bias in the rankings because FPI is exposed and the main reason is the transfer portal. Since 1990 how many #1s have been undefeated? I can think back maybe 15 years and there’s 7? My point is that there might not have been a loss with as wide of a FPI margin in history.

    If you want to respond to me that’s fine, but don’t lament my consternation when you fail to stay on topic.

    I dont lament anything. I enjoy sports debate some dont. Vandy beating Bama doesnt even break the top 10 of college football upsets

    Michigan was -33 against an FCS team at home. James Madison was +33.5 when they beat VT in Blacksburg. Syracuse was +37 when they beat Louisville in Louisville the same year Michigan lost to App State. Stanford was +40.5 that same year beating USC.

    Theres plenty of bigger upsets by far less talented teams before the portal was allowed and before the super conferences

    Wisconsin 2-6 against the SEC since 2007

  • coolstanleycoolstanley Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Vanderbilt being 0 for 60 against top 5 teams is the worst record of any team in history.

    I wasn't shocked when a mediocre Michigan team lost to APP state.
    I was shocked when a #1 Alabama team who just beat Georgia 7 days ago, lost to Vanderbilt.

    Cal blew a 35-10 lead.

    Terry Bradshaw was AMAZING!!

    Ignore list -Basebal21

  • BullsitterBullsitter Posts: 5,649 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My TOP 12 this week are,
    .
    1. Texas
    2. OSU
    3. Oregon
    4. Penn State
    5. Indiana
    6. BYU
    7. Iowa State
    8. Miami
    9. Georgia
    10. Clemson
    11. Ole Miss
    12. A&M

  • BullsitterBullsitter Posts: 5,649 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What team do you guys pull for?

    BGR?
    GALAXY27?

  • bgrbgr Posts: 1,715 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Bullsitter said:
    What team do you guys pull for?

    BGR?
    GALAXY27?

    My team growing up was the badgers and they are still my home team. Gophers are my adopted team as that’s where I went to school for undergrad. Prep your jokes for these easy targets! ;)

    Great wins by both yesterday. Gotta love big red stomping the boiler makers. They used to drive through stadium village and dinkytown with that stupid converted fire engine blaring the horn from 6-7am on game days.

  • bgrbgr Posts: 1,715 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Basebal21 said:

    @bgr said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @bgr said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @bgr said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:

    @Tabe said:

    @coolstanley said:
    If Bama loses this game, it will go down as the upset of the century.

    Appalachian State beating Michigan was this century.

    And, by point spread, Stanford beating USC five weeks later after being 41-point underdogs was also bigger.

    Michigan weren't ranked #1. Michigan was a mediocre team during that timeframe.

    Michigan was 11-2 the year before and had a strong argument for playing in the national title game. And returned basically every starter. App State was 1-AA.

    There's no way that losing a road conference game is a bigger upset than a home loss to a 1-AA when you're top 5.

    Michigan was losing to Ohio State every year. They finished 9-4 that year. Comparing those Michigan teams to today's Bama playoff teams is apples and oranges.

    Apples and oranges is correct. One team lost to a conference opponent on the road, the other lost to a FCS team at home.


    Since then, APP State has beat two sec teams..Texas A@M and South Carolina.

    How often does a #1 lose to an unranked?

    I really dont get your obsession with number 1. 1-4 will be conference champions. You want OSU to be #1 win the B!G and theres a chance, theres 0 chance if they dont

    The fact is that App State beating Michigan as an FCS school at Michigan when Michigan was #5 20 years ago is a much worse loss. Its also weird to once again be defending your arch rival Michigan

    It’s a valid question. It happens pretty rarely. But you’re also right about the transfer portal…. It’s making FPI obsolete before our eyes. We can’t look back 4 years at a program anymore to weigh their strength. With FPI broken SOR is corrupted. Everything is blowing up in how teams are being ranked. That’s the original point. There’s a bias.

    Thats why its called an upset. For the NFL people now paying attention to college football its not the 1990s anymore when the Cowboys and 49ers had 3rd string guys better than starters on other teams. Joe Burrow is a great example, he had to work real hard to graduate early so he could transfer from OSU to go play at LSU as a graduate transfer. Had that happened this year he could have just transferred after spring practices whether he didnt like the look of the team or didnt get the job. Thats what guys do now the leave instead of sit for 3 years.

    Theres guys playing at schools that they may just plan on being there a year or two and then transfer into a bigger program. The rankings for the most part have been fine they just arent cut and dry anymore. Were going to have at least 8 teams with a loss if not two losses in the playoffs and at least two if not all of the conference champions will have at least one loss. Texas has to run the table for the SEC, OSU or Oregon has to run the table and they play each other, Miami is currently losing bad in the second half and theyre the last hope for the ACC to be undefeated, BYU and Iowa State are the only hope for the Big 12 which isnt realistic.

    5 of the top 11 teams already lost tonight and its looking like 6. 4 were to unranked teams and if Cal wins 5 of the 6 will be to unraked teams. Its just a completely different world now with the super conferences and everything else. Catching a loss at some point should be expected for everyone

    That’s an amazing story. You can’t understand what I said so you try to drown me with word soup. Yuck.

    Im sorry you dont want to talk college football. My fault for trying

    You’re only telling me that it’s OK that Alabama lost to Vanderbilt buried in a whimsical story of the impact on parity of the transfer portal.

    My comment was that there is a real bias in the rankings because FPI is exposed and the main reason is the transfer portal. Since 1990 how many #1s have been undefeated? I can think back maybe 15 years and there’s 7? My point is that there might not have been a loss with as wide of a FPI margin in history.

    If you want to respond to me that’s fine, but don’t lament my consternation when you fail to stay on topic.

    I dont lament anything. I enjoy sports debate some dont. Vandy beating Bama doesnt even break the top 10 of college football upsets

    Michigan was -33 against an FCS team at home. James Madison was +33.5 when they beat VT in Blacksburg. Syracuse was +37 when they beat Louisville in Louisville the same year Michigan lost to App State. Stanford was +40.5 that same year beating USC.

    Theres plenty of bigger upsets by far less talented teams before the portal was allowed and before the super conferences

    You’re talking about betting lines and I’m talking about FPI. FPI has historically been about 70% accurate in predicting outcomes in FBS. It’s a big deal that it’s broken and I like it.

    You’re totally welcome to keep talking about the app state upset but remember…. there were a few things working for app state too.

    1. It was the opener.
    2. APP state was a very good program even if it was a FCS school. This wasn’t their first win against a ranked FBS school.
    3. Michigan wasn’t a great team that year. They also lost to Wisconsin.

    Their defense, especially their secondary, was a complete liability. As far as biggest upsets in history I also don’t think Vandy/Bama is #1 but I think it might have been the largest FPI margin in history. Does that specific detail make sense? I’m trying to highlight what I’m saying again so you don’t continue thinking I’m saying something else. I’m talking about FPI which is a core mechanism, if not the only piece, of how teams are ranked. I’ve never liked FPI because I find it unfair, and now, with the transfer portal, it’s being exposed as BS.

    Fun fact: badgers QB that year went to my highschool. I was never a Donovan fan though. If I’m being honest I preferred Barry ball. Different times.

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 7,839 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 6, 2024 6:37AM

    @Bullsitter said:
    What team do you guys pull for?

    BGR?
    GALAXY27?

    bull i was being tough on your team yesterday but truthfully i have nothing against Bama -- it was a veiled attempt to keep basebal on the straight and narrow. if Ohio St had been #1 and lost at Northwestern, rest assured there would have been nary a mention of parity or portal rolling off his fingers. it would have been all about fraudulence. but that's what he's known for -- bobbing, weaving and spinning like a record to protect his special (needs) ideology without budging one iota.

    you, on the other hand, always keep it honest and i respect that -- as evidenced by your top 12 up above that doesn't include Alabama. if basebal posted his 12 he'd probably still have them hugging the top spot because of parity, portal, the greenhouse effect, and Devin Wiliams tipping his pitches to Pete Alonso

    to answer your question, i don't have one. i've lived in Texas my entire life but i don't like UT. they're the collegiate version of Jerry Jones' franchise -- it's one big dog and pony show with lots of pomp and circumstance that yields few positive results. the Horns have their own network and are constantly talked up like they are God's gift to college football, yet they haven't won a title in almost two decades. very, very Dallas Cowboys-esque.

    with that said, they're attempting to shed the paper tigers label this season. i wouldn't mind if they won. i'm just not an advocate of all talk, zero action teams...........even if it's one in my neck of the woods.

    you'll never be able to outrun a bad diet

  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 30,638 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Absolutely crazy day of games yesterday

    Alabama coming off that huge win against Georgia last week gets caught sleeping in Vanderbilt.

    Tennessee was a shocker, I thought they were going to really be a top contender

    Missouri losing to A&M was something I was surprised at but I think one of you guys called it.

    Cal should be absolutely ashamed of themselves for losing to Miami after having such a commanding lead! .

  • BullsitterBullsitter Posts: 5,649 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I was just curious.

    Speaking of being tough on Bama, nobody is tougher on Bama than Bama fans. I'm a member of BAMA ON3 and it's in meltdown mode. They're griping because DeBoer wore a t-shirt. They want the DC gone. They want one player to be held out in next weeks game. The younger Bama fans that grew up under Saban are having the toughest time.... B)

    DeBoer knows the honeymoon is over.

  • BullsitterBullsitter Posts: 5,649 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Talking about DeBoer's shirt..... :p
    .

  • ElMagoStrikeZoneElMagoStrikeZone Posts: 513 ✭✭✭
    edited October 6, 2024 7:44AM

    No.1 Team in the country is the swarm of loonies that dumped the goalposts into the Cumberland River.

    Gobble.

  • bgrbgr Posts: 1,715 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Bullsitter said:
    Talking about DeBoer's shirt..... :p
    .

    In fairness he doesn’t have the body for a medium. Haha.

  • BullsitterBullsitter Posts: 5,649 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bgr said:

    @Bullsitter said:
    Talking about DeBoer's shirt..... :p
    .

    In fairness he doesn’t have the body for a medium. Haha.

    .
    .
    Ain't that the truth......he looked like a tall Alvarez.... B)

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 7,839 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cal was up 35-10 with 8:06 left in the 3rd. from that point on, the Canes scored 4 touchdowns. along the way they converted:

    4th and 3
    4th and 6
    4th and 10

    and

    3rd and 20 with :37 left to set up the winning touchdown

    Cal's offseason to-do list:

    1) recruit a living, breathing human being who can make a play on defense

    you'll never be able to outrun a bad diet

  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 30,638 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @galaxy27 said:
    Cal was up 35-10 with 8:06 left in the 3rd. from that point on, the Canes scored 4 touchdowns. along the way they converted:

    4th and 3
    4th and 6
    4th and 10

    and

    3rd and 20 with :37 left to set up the winning touchdown

    Cal's offseason to-do list:

    1) recruit a living, breathing human being who can make a play on defense

    That is a sound plan! 😂😂😂

  • burghmanburghman Posts: 957 ✭✭✭✭

    Didn’t watch Cal Miami, but it looked like a textbook targeting call wasn’t called against Miami, that apparently would have essentially iced the game. Between that and the Hail Mary overturn, the Canes are getting some big time help to remain undefeated.

    Jim

  • coolstanleycoolstanley Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭✭✭

    In this weeks coaches poll, only 34 points separate Texas and Ohio State from the #1 spot. But whomever wins the Oregon vs Ohio State game should move up to #1. The B1G Ten now has 3 in the top 5 in both polls.

    The SEC bias is real. 2 AP voters have Alabama still #3 in their rankings. https://collegepolltracker.com/football/team/alabama-crimson-tide/2024

    They don't matter but they kind of do.

    They perpetuate the continued narrative about the SEC being the best.

    They aren't, but these people that vote in this continue to just push and push and push it.

    Terry Bradshaw was AMAZING!!

    Ignore list -Basebal21

  • coolstanleycoolstanley Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @burghman said:
    Didn’t watch Cal Miami, but it looked like a textbook targeting call wasn’t called against Miami, that apparently would have essentially iced the game. Between that and the Hail Mary overturn, the Canes are getting some big time help to remain undefeated.

    That's 2 weeks in a row the ACC Refs bailed Miami out.

    Terry Bradshaw was AMAZING!!

    Ignore list -Basebal21

  • coolstanleycoolstanley Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 6, 2024 3:56PM

    @Bullsitter said:
    My TOP 12 this week are,
    .
    1. Texas
    2. OSU
    3. Oregon
    4. Penn State
    5. Indiana
    6. BYU
    7. Iowa State
    8. Miami
    9. Georgia
    10. Clemson
    11. Ole Miss
    12. A&M

    I dont have Miami in my top 10 because they probably should have 2 losses after the blown calls by the refs.
    Boise State is an interesting team. They went toe to toe with Oregon on the road. They give up a lot of points on defense but have one of the best offenses in the country.

    Terry Bradshaw was AMAZING!!

    Ignore list -Basebal21

  • bgrbgr Posts: 1,715 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coolstanley said:
    In this weeks coaches poll, only 34 points separate Texas and Ohio State from the #1 spot. But whomever wins the Oregon vs Ohio State game should move up to #1. The B1G Ten now has 3 in the top 5 in both polls.

    The SEC bias is real. 2 AP voters have Alabama still #3 in their rankings. https://collegepolltracker.com/football/team/alabama-crimson-tide/2024

    They don't matter but they kind of do.

    They perpetuate the continued narrative about the SEC being the best.

    They aren't, but these people that vote in this continue to just push and push and push it.

    Bama is still ranked 3rd in FPI which is what most of the polls use. It’s just a bad metric.

    The rankings do matter because it is I’ll affect the selections and ordering and who plays at who. So if you’re not in those first 4 spots you really care about the rankings.

  • coolstanleycoolstanley Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bgr said:

    @coolstanley said:
    In this weeks coaches poll, only 34 points separate Texas and Ohio State from the #1 spot. But whomever wins the Oregon vs Ohio State game should move up to #1. The B1G Ten now has 3 in the top 5 in both polls.

    The SEC bias is real. 2 AP voters have Alabama still #3 in their rankings. https://collegepolltracker.com/football/team/alabama-crimson-tide/2024

    They don't matter but they kind of do.

    They perpetuate the continued narrative about the SEC being the best.

    They aren't, but these people that vote in this continue to just push and push and push it.

    Bama is still ranked 3rd in FPI which is what most of the polls use. It’s just a bad metric.

    The rankings do matter because it is I’ll affect the selections and ordering and who plays at who. So if you’re not in those first 4 spots you really care about the rankings.

    All good points agreed.

    Terry Bradshaw was AMAZING!!

    Ignore list -Basebal21

  • Steven59Steven59 Posts: 8,683 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Texas, which had an open date, received 52 out of 61 first-place votes and became the first team in two years to bounce in and out of the top spot in a span of three polls. The Longhorns also were just the third team since 2008 to be voted No. 1 after not playing the day before.

    "When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"

  • GroceryRackPackGroceryRackPack Posts: 3,203 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 7, 2024 2:55PM

    Gotta Re-do this one... Wrong Topic...
    🤣🙃🤣🙃

  • Basebal21Basebal21 Posts: 3,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Bullsitter said:
    I was just curious.

    Speaking of being tough on Bama, nobody is tougher on Bama than Bama fans. I'm a member of BAMA ON3 and it's in meltdown mode. They're griping because DeBoer wore a t-shirt. They want the DC gone. They want one player to be held out in next weeks game. The younger Bama fans that grew up under Saban are having the toughest time.... B)

    DeBoer knows the honeymoon is over.

    You never want to be the guy after the GOAT and the offense is more creative, but that defense has really lost some toughness and some discipline. Anything less than one national title in the next 3 or 4 years and he will either get fired or they will make something up to fire him like Auburn did to their coach.

    He really needs to bench Moore for at least a half if not the game. Its a little risky but the just absolutely unacceptable after the play garbage. The kicking the football after the ref just spotted it might be the dumbest thing Ive ever seen on a football field. He might have had to find his own ride home if he did that with Saban there

    Wisconsin 2-6 against the SEC since 2007

  • coolstanleycoolstanley Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Steven59 said:
    Texas, which had an open date, received 52 out of 61 first-place votes and became the first team in two years to bounce in and out of the top spot in a span of three polls. The Longhorns also were just the third team since 2008 to be voted No. 1 after not playing the day before.

    LOL unreal. I'm surprised those morons didn't put Vanderbilt at #2.

    Terry Bradshaw was AMAZING!!

    Ignore list -Basebal21

  • TabeTabe Posts: 6,061 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @burghman said:
    Didn’t watch Cal Miami, but it looked like a textbook targeting call wasn’t called against Miami, that apparently would have essentially iced the game. Between that and the Hail Mary overturn, the Canes are getting some big time help to remain undefeated.

    100% correct. Yes, Cal blew the lead so it's mostly on them but if that targeting is called, the game is basically over.

  • Basebal21Basebal21 Posts: 3,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Tabe said:

    @burghman said:
    Didn’t watch Cal Miami, but it looked like a textbook targeting call wasn’t called against Miami, that apparently would have essentially iced the game. Between that and the Hail Mary overturn, the Canes are getting some big time help to remain undefeated.

    100% correct. Yes, Cal blew the lead so it's mostly on them but if that targeting is called, the game is basically over.

    Certainly seen less get called many times, but Cal should have never let it get to that point. You deserve to lose if you get outscored 29-3 in the last 18 minutes to lose by 1

    Wisconsin 2-6 against the SEC since 2007

  • coolstanleycoolstanley Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Paul Finebaum: “Inexcusable, This will go down as the worst loss in NCAA History. They should’ve fired him before getting on the team bus back home. This loss would’ve never happened with Nick Saban.”
    Vanderbilt was 0-60 all time versus AP top-five teams before Saturday, the longest such streak in the poll era (since 1936). The Commodores hadn't beaten the Crimson Tide in 40 years, but they snapped a 23-game skid.
    Marking the biggest Upset in NCAA History over Appalachian State’s 34-32 Upset Win Over #5 Michigan, According to Paul Finebaum.

    Terry Bradshaw was AMAZING!!

    Ignore list -Basebal21

  • BullsitterBullsitter Posts: 5,649 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 8, 2024 9:04AM

    I'm a huge Finebaum fan, been listening to him for about 30 years. He has a 4 hour show daily from 2-6 CST on SEC NATION.
    His show yesterday was spot on, it was inexcusable. It'll be a good show today. You guys here ought to tune in. We have 3 callers that are OSU fans. The callers make the show, always have. Listen for 2 weeks and you'll be hooked.

    Jeff is a huge OSU fan and one of my favorite callers....

    ROLL TIDE ROLL

  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,098 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Red Sanders was the Vanderbilt coach for 4 seasons. He lead Vandy to one of its greatest football seasons in 1947 which included an upset of Alabama. Sanders went on to do great things as the Head Coach at UCLA starting in 1949 until his sad and premature death in the late 1950s. The 1954 UCLA team was among the best of the decade. The PAC 8 had a no repeat rule in place which prevented the Uclans from meeting Ohio State in the 1955 Rose Bowl. Now that would be been a legendary match up.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 7,839 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 8, 2024 10:36AM

    has anyone seen this kid play

    and keep in mind these stats are through 5 games

    can't wait to see how this translates at the next level

    Kiper has him ranked high

    you'll never be able to outrun a bad diet

  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,098 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No… not sure anyone has ever cracked 1000 rushing yards at this point in the season….impressive that their schedule included some decent teams, including Oregon

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • bgrbgr Posts: 1,715 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I don't know if Barry Sanders did in 88 but he must have been close.

  • Steven59Steven59 Posts: 8,683 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Doesn't look like he'll be playing anymore this year.............

    "Georgia Bulldogs wide receiver Colbie Young was arrested on charges of battery and assault of an unborn child early Tuesday (October 8) morning, according to Athens-Clarke County Jail records."

    "When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"

  • TabeTabe Posts: 6,061 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bgr said:
    I don't know if Barry Sanders did in 88 but he must have been close.

    Barry had 1002 yards through 5 games. 154 in game 6 and then 1472 in his last 6.

  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 30,638 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @galaxy27 said:
    has anyone seen this kid play

    and keep in mind these stats are through 5 games

    can't wait to see how this translates at the next level

    Kiper has him ranked high

    Outstanding numbers, hopefully the kid keeps it going, another 1500+ yards for the record I think

  • bgrbgr Posts: 1,715 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Tabe said:

    @bgr said:
    I don't know if Barry Sanders did in 88 but he must have been close.

    Barry had 1002 yards through 5 games. 154 in game 6 and then 1472 in his last 6.

    I remember when Melvin Gordon was chasing his record in 2014. No 300 yard games like Barry, but that 400+ against Nebraska was pretty crazy.

  • Basebal21Basebal21 Posts: 3,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @perkdog said:

    @galaxy27 said:
    has anyone seen this kid play

    and keep in mind these stats are through 5 games

    can't wait to see how this translates at the next level

    Kiper has him ranked high

    Outstanding numbers, hopefully the kid keeps it going, another 1500+ yards for the record I think

    2628 for Sanders. Gordon had 2587.

    Realistically though Theres be an asterisks of sorts though if he gets it since its not a power conference.

    Probably no one can name the 3rd rusher on the list for the record. Most would probably guess a Marcus Allen whose 4th, but the 3rd is Kevin Smith from UCF who was only 20 yards behind Gordon. But he did it at UCF before they joined the Big 12

    Wisconsin 2-6 against the SEC since 2007

  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 30,638 ✭✭✭✭✭

  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 30,638 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm shocked that Charles White and Anthony Davis from USC isn't on that top 25 list or Archie Griffin

Sign In or Register to comment.