Home U.S. Coin Forum

Hansen watch.

1585961636490

Comments

  • ReadyFireAimReadyFireAim Posts: 1,825 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 10, 2020 6:52AM

    @Currin said:
    I don’t know where the upgrading the Saint-Gaudens series falls on Mr. Hansen’s priority list.

    The Fox coins are all sold now & I can't wait to see which ones Hansen bought.
    I hope he cleaned house :p
    Here is his set....
    https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/gold/20-gold-major-sets/st-gaudens-20-gold-major-varieties-1933-patterns-circulation-strikes-1907/publishedset/148197

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,113 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 11, 2020 4:29PM

    @Currin said:
    Provenance: unknown

    It's great that Hansen is adding provenance to these otherwise unattributed coins!

    Peace Dollar Upgrades

    The first coins that Mr. Hansen posted from 2020 FUN US Coins Signature Auction in Orlando were Peace Dollars. It appears from the updates posted in his Peace Dollar sets, he purchase these high end graded specimens last night. Two of the coins went directly into his Top Set, 1921 High Relief and 1922-D Peace Dollars. The third coin, 1923-D Peace Dollar was placed in his second set, Diana's Set of Peace Dollars. With this purchase, he now have two 1923-D MS66+ POP 12/1 specimens. Both 1923-D specimens are CAC approved. These coins are from the Illinois Collection of Peace Dollars. The realized price from the three coins was about $160,000. PCGS values the coins approx. $260,000.

    That's a big difference in PCGS coin value and realized price. I wonder if that will bring the PCGS values down?

    With these upgrades, the Hansen Collection of Peace Dollars moves closer to the retired PCGS Hall of Fame All-Time top set, California 1. The set retired a couple months ago, but I am not sure where these coins are. Will they show in auction soon? Do not know, if anyone can share some light, please do so.

    That's interesting to note. I'd be curious as to what happened to this set as well.

  • PerfectionPerfection Posts: 180 ✭✭✭

    The auction was mostly week except for most of the Cac coins which for the most part did better. It seems that except for certain or special coins prices are off by 20%. This is cac as well.
    Look at the high reliefs, the 1896 67 dcam cac 20, fhe bust halves. All low.

    I do not think Pcgs or cdn will lower prices based on one auction or month.
    However soon or later pcgs will need to list cac prices If they don't it is difficult for many
    regular people to understand prices realized.

    Comments on prices?

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,113 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 12, 2020 2:07PM

    Here are the prices:

    1921 High Relief Peace Dollar - PCGS MS67 - Ex-MBJ Set, Illinois Set

    1922-D Peace Dollar - PCGS MS67 - Ex-Anne Kate, Illinois Set

    1923-D Peace Dollar - PCSG MS66+ CAC - Ex-Illinois Set

  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Hansen-Eliasberg Challenge II – Part III

    This was a good week for Hansen. He won three coins outright and the other two I determined to be a tie. The first coin was a Dahlonega issue three dollar. Hansen has one of the rare mint states in his collection. He has one of, if not the finest set of Three Dollar gold in mint state that has ever been assembled. If you have never seen this set, it is worth taking a look. The set is missing only the unique 1870-S issue that is owned by the Bass Foundation. Hansen Dahlonega specimen is one of two certified by PCGS MS61, with only the Pogue MS62 certified finer. Eliasberg coin was a XF45.

    One of the two proofs in the comparison today, is the 1875 Three Dollar. Both great collectors indicated their specimens to be PCGS certified PR64CAM. This coin ended up as a tie. Hansen has a little better 1879 flowing Hair Stella. Hansen’s coin is a PR67 compared to Eliasberg’s PR66. Hansen’s 1795 Small Half Eagle is a MS62 compared to Eliasberg AU58.

    The last coin compared is a two date comparison. Hansen has a 1798 MS63 Half Eagle, and Eliasberg had a 1799 MS63. The POP on Hansen’s MS63 is 4/4 which is better than Ellsberg’s 10/2. Or is it? I decided to declare a tie on the coins. The total value for Hansen’s five coins is $900,000. The result is another 3-0-2 win by Hansen. This increases Hansen’s overall lead.

    1854-D Three Dollar: The only Dahlonega-issued coin of this type and a hugely popular coin.
    Hansen Coin: 1854-D Three Dollar MS61 PCGS POP 2/1
    Eliasberg Coin: 1854-D Three Dollar est. XF45 POP 21/67
    Hansen Won (1-0)

    1875 Three Dollar: A Proof-only issue with a reported mintage of just 20. This was the first US gold coin to eclipse the $100k price barrier, all the way back in the 1970’s.
    Hansen Coin: 1875 Three Dollar PCGS PR64CAM PCGS POP 6/4
    Eliasberg Coin: 1875 Three Dollar PCGS PR64CAM PCGS POP 6/4
    Tie (1-0-1)

    1879 Flowing Hair Stella: Always in demand as a Trophy coin and an issue with an interesting back story.
    Hansen Coin: 1879 Flowing Hair Stella PCGS PR67 PCGS POP 1/1
    Eliasberg Coin: 1879 Flowing Hair Stella est. PR66 POP 26/3
    Hansen Won (2-0-1)

    1795 Small Eagle Half Eagle: The very first date of this long-lived denomination and an issue which is more available than one might expect.
    Hansen Coin: 1795 Small Eagle Half Eagle PCGS MS63 PCGS POP 28/18
    Eliasberg Coin: 1795 Small Eagle Half Eagle EST. AU58 POP 42/77
    Hansen Won (3-0-1)

    1798 or 1799 Large Eagle Half Eagles: The two most affordable 18th century US gold coins and available in nice AU for a low five-figure cost.
    Hansen Coin: 1798 Large Eagle Half Eagle PCGS MS63 PCGS POP 4/4
    Eliasberg Coin: 1798 Large Eagle Half Eagle EST. AU55 POP 28/50
    Hansen Coin: 1799 Large Eagle Half Eagle PCGS MS62+ PCGS POP 1/12
    Eliasberg Coin: 1799 Large Eagle Half Eagle EST. MS63 POP 10/2
    Hansen Won (3-0-2)

    Eliasberg was shut out this week with no wins. Third stage was good for Hansen as he extends his overall lead to 9-4-2. As stated before, I have not looked ahead and do not know the results. It will be fascinating to watch as we have 35 more gold coins to compare. These will be the five coins that we will look at next week.

    1813-1834 Half Eagle:The Fat Head type half eagle, probably my single favorite US coin design. The Collection with the best Fat Head will win.
    1829 Small Planchet Half Eagle: First year of type and a great rarity in all grades. One of the few coins on this list I’ve never handled.
    1838-C Half Eagle: First-year-of-issue from the brand new Charlotte Mint and a scarce one-year type to boot.
    1838-D Half Eagle: A Wow coin for the exact same reasons as its counterpart the 1838-C half eagle.
    1861-C Half Eagle: The final coin struck at this mint and an issue with plausible Civil War associations.

    Hansen WOW Coins

    1854-D Three Dollar MS61 (Gold Shield)
    PCGS Coin #7970 / PCGS Serial #30132476
    PCGS POP 2/1, PCGS Price Guide Value $150,000

    Ron Guth Comments: This is the only three dollar gold piece struck at the Dahlonega mint. It is undeniably one of the rarest in the series, ranking 12th in rarity according to number of appearances in our 238 catalogue auction survey and 6th according to rarity by average grade. All specimens that I have seen are very poorly struck with very little hair on the headdress detail and weak or missing denticles. The milling is also characteristically weak in places, particularly at twelve o'clock on the obverse. The effect is similar to when a loop has been removed but this weakness is present on every specimen I have encountered. Like the 1854, the 1854-D had small letters in the word DOLLARS. The mintmark is always unusually bold. Specimens of this date are usually grossly overgraded, partly because the date is a very rare one, but also because they are just hard to grade and the tendency with most auctioneers is to be optimistic when there is a doubt. I have seen several AU pieces but never an unequivocally mint state one. Even strictly graded EF specimens are very rare.
    .
    .
    1875 Three Dollar CAM PR64CAM (Gold Shield)
    PCGS Coin #88039/ PCGS Serial #29592906
    PCGS POP 6/4, PCGS Price Guide Value $190,000

    David Akers comments: Next to the legendary 1870-S, the 1875 is the most famous and highly desired three dollar gold piece. It has auction records as high as $150,000 (PCGS CoinFacts editors note: Remember this was written in 1976), although, as the auction records conclusively show, it is not nearly as rare as the 1873 Open 3 and is, in fact, one of the more common dates in proof prior to the 1880's! Certainly, it has been offered for sale many more times than the 1874 or 1878 which have identical reported mintages of 20 pieces. This apparent discrepancy is answered by the fact that the claimed mintage of 20 for the 1875 is not really accurate since more than 20 pieces are known to exist. The term "restrike" has been used when discussing the 1875, but properly used, the term "restrike" denotes a coin that is struck in a year later than its date. Such has not been conclusively proven to be the case with the 1875 three dollar gold piece, and although there are differences between known specimens, it is more likely that they were merely struck at different times during the same year rather than in different years.
    .
    .
    1879 $4 Flowing Hair PR67 (Gold Shield)
    PCGS Coin #8057 / PCGS Serial #81058250
    PCGS POP 1/1, PCGS Price Guide Value $350,000

    David Akers Comments: Two designs were produced in 1879, one by Charles E. Barber, the other by George T. Morgan. Barber's flowing hair design was virtually an exact copy of a pattern half eagle (J-1574) designed by his father, William Barber, the preceding year. Fifteen pieces were struck in 1879 (the so-called "originals") and early in 1880, an additional 400 were struck at the request of the Coinage Committee. Since no hubs were available to duplicate the dies, the old dies with the 1879 date were used. These 400 pieces are the so-called "restrikes." They were officially offered to members of Congress and personal or political friends at the production cost ($6.50). Quite a furor was raised by coin collectors and dealers when they learned of this and considerable letter writting and publicity ensued. S.K. Harzfeld, a dealer, also learned in an interview with Superintendent A.L. Snowden, that 150 or the 415 pieces struck were still in the vaults of the Mint as late as October, 1880. As was the case in 1868 and 1874, the idea on an international gold coin was rejected by Congress and was not proposed again.

    The 1879 flowing hair stella is the second most common of all U.S. gold patterns and it has appeared for sale many more times than any of the other stellas. Obviously, it is impossible to state exactly how many of the original 415 still exist, but for what one guess is worth, I would estimate that at least 300 to 350 are still around, although certainly many of them are impaired to some degree. Contrary to popular belief, the retrikes do not always weigh 103.2 grains and therefore, many are offered as one of the 15 "originals", often at an inflated price, when in reality they are one of the more common 400 restrikes. The restrikes are usually identifiable by light adjustment marks or striations on the head of Liberty.
    .
    .
    1795 $5 Small Eagle MS62 (Gold Shield)
    PCGS Coin #8066 / PCGS Serial #36068839
    PCGS 28/18, PCGS Price Guide Value $145,000

    David Akers comments: Although not particularly scarce by Half Eagle standards, the 1795 Small Eagle is nevertheless a relatively high priced coin due to its status as the first U.S. gold coin and its popularity as a type coin. It is much more common than the other dates of this type and is fairly obtainable in AU-Unc. condition. Gems, that is MS-65 or better coins, are rare but still occasionally available. Proof-like surfaces are the norm rather than the exception but no true proofs exist. There are, however, several first strike specimens that have the characteristics of "presentation" pieces.
    One interesting variety exists with the second S in STATES over the letter D. This variety, although more rare than the varieteies with the plain S, does not generally command a premium.
    .
    .
    1798 $5 BD-4 Large 8, 13 St Rev. MS63 (Gold Shield)
    PCGS Coin #507324 / PCGS Serial #32231606
    PCGS POP 1/0, Estimate price $65,000

    Ron Guth Comments: BD-4 is one of the Heraldic Eagle, Large 8 varieties with 13 stars on the reverse. Dannreuther called it "the most available of 1798 Large Eagle coins" but it is still a very scarce variety. Later states of the reverse die show rim cuds at ES of STATES and the O of OF. The strike quality of this variety is usually soft, particularly in the centers. We have yet to see a fully struck example, but there are a few that show most of the shield lines. Adjustment marks are rarely seen, but a PCGS MS63 example exists with rather extensive pre-strike filing on the reverse. High quality 1798 $5 BD-4's are very rare. The PCGS CoinFacts Condition Census of the top ten examples includes seven Mint State pieces, most of which are low-end Uncs. The star of this variety is an NGC MS64 example that sold in 2011 for a record $155,250. Another top example is in the Core Collection at the Harry W. Bass, Jr. Foundation Collection at the American Numismatic Association.

    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,113 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 12, 2020 11:41PM

    I just noticed that the Ex-Kate Anne / Illinois Set 1922-D Peace Dollar in PCGS MS67 had an interesting description. I guess they can't say that anymore!

    Discussions concerning this issue's collectibility often cease at the MS66+ level, since acquiring a PCGS-graded Superb Gem is usually an unrealistic endeavor. Indeed, a glance at the current highest-rated Peace dollar sets in the PCGS Registry reveals many MS66+ coins, but not a single MS67. Even the current highest-ranked Registry Set -- the D.L. Hansen Collection -- settles for an MS66+. The reason is simply because this date in MS67 PCGS can be considered a Holy Grail of sorts for the Peace dollar series -- highly desired, but seen so infrequently at auction as to make one wonder if such coins actually exist.

  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,105 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like the 54-D but can't say that I like the early gold. Clearly they have been lightened, especially the 1795. Is the 1798 the coin noted with the pre-strike filing? There is only one P63 in the current pop reports for the variety but who is to say the pop reports have the 63 noted in the correct variety attribution.

  • jerseycat101jerseycat101 Posts: 1,348 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That 22-D Peace Dollar is sensational. Much like most Peace Dollars, that's under-graded by a full point compared to the grading standards of Morgan Dollars.

  • kauwisckauwisc Posts: 80 ✭✭✭

    Love this thread!

  • AngryTurtleAngryTurtle Posts: 1,565 ✭✭✭
    edited January 13, 2020 2:50PM

    @Boosibri said:
    I like the 54-D but can't say that I like the early gold. Clearly they have been lightened, especially the 1795. Is the 1798 the coin noted with the pre-strike filing? There is only one P63 in the current pop reports for the variety but who is to say the pop reports have the 63 noted in the correct variety attribution.

    I agree with you, but to me the 1798 looks a little more funky than the '95. My CAC submissions prove that I need to work on my Golden eye, so I may be wrong.

  • GazesGazes Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭✭✭

    One comment not directed towards anyone. When looking at any of Hansen's coins one has to keep in mind that he is collecting one of everything! Since he needs everything, it is impossible for every coin to be "all there." It is amazing how many actually are---top pops, famous coins, CAC, etc. The greatest compliment i can give Hansen is that when i take almost any series, his set exceeds or at least competes with top sets that specialize in that series.

  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    And that my friend is why Mr. Hanson will always be able to pursue and enjoy his collection as there will always be a hole that can be made better!

    @Gazes said:
    One comment not directed towards anyone. When looking at any of Hansen's coins one has to keep in mind that he is collecting one of everything! Since he needs everything, it is impossible for every coin to be "all there." It is amazing how many actually are---top pops, famous coins, CAC, etc. The greatest compliment i can give Hansen is that when i take almost any series, his set exceeds or at least competes with top sets that specialize in that series.

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,113 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 13, 2020 11:00PM

    @Gazes said:
    One comment not directed towards anyone. When looking at any of Hansen's coins one has to keep in mind that he is collecting one of everything! Since he needs everything, it is impossible for every coin to be "all there." It is amazing how many actually are---top pops, famous coins, CAC, etc. The greatest compliment i can give Hansen is that when i take almost any series, his set exceeds or at least competes with top sets that specialize in that series.

    His goal is amazing. It can be easy to nit about a coin here and a coin there, but looking through so many coins would be such an amazing treat.

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,113 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree that it's difficult to compare 1980s estimated grades with certified grades 30+ years later. Is it easy enough to find Eliasberg coins with generation slabs or TrueViews?

  • edwardjulioedwardjulio Posts: 1,090 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Currin
    Do you have the contact information for the Investigator Numismatic Detective Agency? I am trying to ascertain provenance on some of my coins and could use some assistance. B)

    End Systemic Elitism - It Takes All Of Us

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,113 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 14, 2020 6:30PM

    @Currin said:
    Nice Quarter Eagle upgrade from FUN

    [...]

    1839-D Classic Head $2-1/2

    The coin was purchase in The 2020 FUN US Coins Signature Auction in Orlando. The finest specimen of three 1839-D quarter eagles auctioned.

    [...]

    This coin appeared in auction once before in Heritage August 2019 ANA World's Fair of Money US Coins Signature Auction in Chicago. The coin was in a MS62 NGC holder and realized $31,200. That is a nice little bump up in just less than six months. I obtained this connection with the help of the Investigator Numismatic Detective Agency. They were not able to determine any additional pedigree prior to the 2019 Heritage sale. I hope you to find this coin as a nice little upgrade.

    Provenance: Unknown

    [...]

    1839-D Classic Head Quarter Eagle, MS62+ (Gold Shield)
    PCGS Coin #7700 / PCGS Serial #38391879 / POP 1/4
    One-Year Dahlonega Type Coin, Branch Mint Condition Rarity
    PCGS Price Guide Value: $57,500

    How amazing is it that this coin can’t be traced further back than 2019? Glad it has a notable provenance now!

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,113 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 15, 2020 2:57PM

    Given the notable diagnostic over F in OF on the reverse, I wonder how easy it would be to find checking for other grades?

  • OriginalDanOriginalDan Posts: 3,747 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Zoins said:
    Given the notable mark over F in OF on the reverse, I wonder how easy it would be to find checking for other grades?

    Newman Numismatic Portal has been very helpful in reconnecting coins with their past owners, in my experience. It’s a little clunky to use, at first, but after some practice it’s a great resource.

  • SrotagSrotag Posts: 23 ✭✭

    I much preferred the OGH-55CAC to the 62+ at FUN (that's why I bought it :blush: ), especially at 40% of the price. The 55 may someday be a 58, but never an MS coin. I think the same could be said of the 62+ :wink:
    BTW, the HA auction record of the 62+ indicates "This Owner is proactively entertaining offers". Why is Hanson offering the coin for sale thru HA immediately after winning it at auction? Usually that is an indication that the HA wholesale dept bought the coin. Are we sure Hanson bought it?

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,461 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Srotag said:
    I much preferred the OGH-55CAC to the 62+ at FUN (that's why I bought it :blush: ), especially at 40% of the price. The 55 may someday be a 58, but never an MS coin. I think the same could be said of the 62+ :wink:
    BTW, the HA auction record of the 62+ indicates "This Owner is proactively entertaining offers". Why is Hanson offering the coin for sale thru HA immediately after winning it at auction? Usually that is an indication that the HA wholesale dept bought the coin. Are we sure Hanson bought it?

    Many winning bidders - some knowingly and others, unknowingly - have their account settings set to entertaining offers.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Unless Mr. Hanson has opted out, HA automatically shows the owner is actively seeking offers on any coins purchased(even years ago!).

    @Srotag said:
    I much preferred the OGH-55CAC to the 62+ at FUN (that's why I bought it :blush: ), especially at 40% of the price. The 55 may someday be a 58, but never an MS coin. I think the same could be said of the 62+ :wink:
    BTW, the HA auction record of the 62+ indicates "This Owner is proactively entertaining offers". Why is Hanson offering the coin for sale thru HA immediately after winning it at auction? Usually that is an indication that the HA wholesale dept bought the coin. Are we sure Hanson bought it?

  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,105 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 15, 2020 3:33PM

    @Srotag said:
    I much preferred the OGH-55CAC to the 62+ at FUN (that's why I bought it :blush: ), especially at 40% of the price. The 55 may someday be a 58, but never an MS coin. I think the same could be said of the 62+ :wink:
    BTW, the HA auction record of the 62+ indicates "This Owner is proactively entertaining offers". Why is Hanson offering the coin for sale thru HA immediately after winning it at auction? Usually that is an indication that the HA wholesale dept bought the coin. Are we sure Hanson bought it?

    I doubt Hansen bid with his own account. I’d expect that DLRC won it on theirs.

  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Srotag said:
    I much preferred the OGH-55CAC to the 62+ at FUN (that's why I bought it :blush: ), especially at 40% of the price. The 55 may someday be a 58, but never an MS coin. I think the same could be said of the 62+ :wink:
    BTW, the HA auction record of the 62+ indicates "This Owner is proactively entertaining offers". Why is Hanson offering the coin for sale thru HA immediately after winning it at auction? Usually that is an indication that the HA wholesale dept bought the coin. Are we sure Hanson bought it?

    Yes, I can confirm he purchased the coin. If it is offered for sale, it because the coin realized less than he thought it would. He has multiple coins and maybe more that one duplicate. If coin is immediately being offered, tells me that Hansen does not have an emotional attachment to coin. Same as the 1856-S Half Eagle that he purchased and sold it the next morning for a profit.

    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,461 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Currin said:

    @Srotag said:
    I much preferred the OGH-55CAC to the 62+ at FUN (that's why I bought it :blush: ), especially at 40% of the price. The 55 may someday be a 58, but never an MS coin. I think the same could be said of the 62+ :wink:
    BTW, the HA auction record of the 62+ indicates "This Owner is proactively entertaining offers". Why is Hanson offering the coin for sale thru HA immediately after winning it at auction? Usually that is an indication that the HA wholesale dept bought the coin. Are we sure Hanson bought it?

    Yes, I can confirm he purchased the coin. If it is offered for sale, it because the coin realized less than he thought it would. He has multiple coins and maybe more that one duplicate. If coin is immediately being offered, tells me that Hansen does not have an emotional attachment to coin. Same as the 1856-S Half Eagle that he purchased and sold it the next morning for a profit.

    As has been posted to this thread, already, just because a coin shows as “This Owner is proactively entertaining offers” doesn’t necessarily mean the owner knowingly chose to show the coin as being available for sale.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • jerseycat101jerseycat101 Posts: 1,348 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @Currin said:

    @Srotag said:
    I much preferred the OGH-55CAC to the 62+ at FUN (that's why I bought it :blush: ), especially at 40% of the price. The 55 may someday be a 58, but never an MS coin. I think the same could be said of the 62+ :wink:
    BTW, the HA auction record of the 62+ indicates "This Owner is proactively entertaining offers". Why is Hanson offering the coin for sale thru HA immediately after winning it at auction? Usually that is an indication that the HA wholesale dept bought the coin. Are we sure Hanson bought it?

    Yes, I can confirm he purchased the coin. If it is offered for sale, it because the coin realized less than he thought it would. He has multiple coins and maybe more that one duplicate. If coin is immediately being offered, tells me that Hansen does not have an emotional attachment to coin. Same as the 1856-S Half Eagle that he purchased and sold it the next morning for a profit.

    As has been posted to this thread, already, just because a coin shows as “This Owner is proactively entertaining offers” doesn’t necessarily mean the owner knowingly chose to show the coin as being available for sale.

    This is a common source of confusion on Heritage. The text is quite misleading. The owner of a coin should need to enable this option on a coin-by-coin basis. It should be disabled by default.

  • SrotagSrotag Posts: 23 ✭✭

    Thank-you for your comments and clarification. I have never used the function and did not understand how it worked.

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,113 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Currin said:

    @edwardjulio said:
    @Currin
    Do you have the contact information for the Investigator Numismatic Detective Agency? I am trying to ascertain provenance on some of my coins and could use some assistance. B)

    Several of you have asked about the Investigator Numismatic Detective Agency by Ron Guth.

    I love the name of this. He should have a detective badge :)

  • yosclimberyosclimber Posts: 4,785 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Great work, Ron!
    Thanks for sharing.

  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 17, 2020 5:25PM

    Hansen-Eliasberg Challenge II – Update

    Great detective work Ron. I cannot imagine the size of your database. You do amazing work. Thanks for performing this exercise at my request. When I did a similar challenge last year at this time, I received similar comments and created the same controversy. This is my comment last year:

    I hope this to be a fun game that we are playing. In my first week posting, I described this challenge as “an interesting experiment”. It is hard to compare collections a half century apart. Insider2 described as a “fanciful exercise”. I agree.

    So, I hope everyone understands this is just for fun and a way to show great coins is a competitive way. The original concept was just to compare the coins as the appeared in the two registry sets. After a couple weeks, I broke my rules and wrote this:

    The rule of the game is to compare grades for a predetermined group of coins in Hansen’s Registry set with the Eliasberg’s. I understand this may not be complete and comprehensive comparison, but it is simple. If I find any additional information that could change the results, I may at times break the rule, as I did on this update.

    With Ron Guth’s help, we broke the rule to see what happens. This new info changes the results a little, but did not flip the results. So let me provide an update. The new result is 2-1-2 Hansen revised from 3-0-2 Hansen. This changes the overall to 8-5-2 Hansen.

    Again, thanks Ron for your contribution. You are the best at what you do. Let’s have fun, I am planning to do something a little different with this weekend posting. If you look at coin #16, you may be able to understand why.

    By the way, if you was not riding along for last year's challenge, it is worth you time to go back and take a look. As with this year, there were some great coins in that challenge from both collection.

    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • wondercoinwondercoin Posts: 16,907 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Dear Mr. Hansen...

    Can you please remove #35356018 from your Registry Set (sold more than 1 week ago in the Heritage sale) so that I can register my coin. My first of 2 Official set removal requests that I filed about a week ago still did not get the coin # freed up from your set.

    Thank you.

    Wondercoin

    Please visit my website at www.wondercoins.com and my ebay auctions under my user name www.wondercoin.com.
  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Type II Gold Dollar upgrade for FUN

    One of the perks with hosting this forum, I can show the coin of my choosing. Mr. Hansen gets to choose what he wants to buy, but I get to display what I want to show. As many of you know, I do have a minor personal relationship with Mr. Hansen and Mr. Brush. A few days ago, John sent me a short list of purchases from the Heritage FUN show that he thought to be “highlights”. This coin was not on that list, but one of my favorites. This mere mid five figure coin may not be in the Top 10 for expensive coins purchased. I saw this coin last weekend and my desire to show it has stuck.

    Expert Ron Guth describes the Type 2, Indian Princess, Small Head this way: The revision of the $1 gold piece in 1854 coincided with the issuance of the $3 gold piece, both of which were designed by James Barton Longacre (more widely known for his Indian Cent design). The obverse design shows a figure of Liberty, whose head is actually smaller than on the Type One Gold Dollars, but the effect is the same because of the addition of the Indian headdress. The reverse is a nearly exact copy of the Flying Eagle Cent, and was used also on the $3 gold piece. Overall, the diameter of the Type Two Gold Dollar is larger than the Type One, but because the weight remained the same, the thickness was necessarily reduced. In Mint State, the Type Two Gold Dollar is scarce to rare; in Gem condition, it is highly desirable. As of this writing, PCGS has certified only six examples at the MS-67 level, with none finer. Proof examples are known of the 1854 and 1955 dates; all are exceedingly rare.

    1854 G$1 Type 2, Indian Princess, Small Head MS66 Dollar

    The coin may not be an Hansen highlight for the fact it is not be considered as a condition rarity due to a population of 12, but there are only 4 certified by PCGS as finer. There are two MS66+ and two MS67. Expert David Akers describes the coins as: It is interesting to note that the auction survey indicates that the 1854 Type II and 1855 are virtually of identical rarity, both from the standpoint of number of appearances (222 and 223 respectively) as well as from the standpoint of average grade. The data also indicates that the 1854 Type II is the third most common of all gold dollars, and so the relatively high price it brings is due solely to its being a definite type coin. High grade examples, that is AU or Unc. pieces, are readily available, and even gem specimens are encountered with regularity. Many specimens show numerous clash marks on both obverse and reverse as well as a weakness in the LL of DOLLAR and the 85 of the date. Full date specimens, however, are definitely more common than they are for 1855.

    The coin was purchased in the Heritage 2020 FUN US Coins Signature Auction in Orlando a week ago. The coin is from The HFW² Collection. I could not find much information on this collection. Approx. 50 coins were offered from the collection with large diverse grouping including a (1616) 6PENCE Sommer Islands Sixpence. There were early high grade proofs, lots of nice gold, and even a set of Panama-Pacific Commemoratives including both Fifties.

    Heritage described this coin as: Both the 1854 and 1855 Type Two gold dollar issues are prone to strike weakness as a result of the high-relief design, frequently accompanied by the clash marks that are prevalent on representatives of the type. Q. David Bowers writes in his series Guide Book, expounding on a theme with variations that will be familiar to readers of his work: "The very occasional specimen seen on the market is sharply struck and from perfect dies. Because certification service holders do not mention sharpness or weakness of strike or eye appeal, sometimes it is possible to acquire an attractive and sharp coin for only a small additional amount of money. All things considered, many if not most sophisticated buyers would rather have a sharply struck MS-64 than a lightly struck MS-65 or MS-66. As to buyers who are not sophisticated--and these are the majority--a number such as MS-66 is a siren call that is far more alluring than a technical mention of a sharp strike on an MS-64. More than for either of the other two designs, cherrypicking for a really choice, well-struck Type II can be a worthwhile pursuit." With this piece, no cherrypicking is necessary. The strike is strong throughout. We are tempted to say full, but close examination shows just a bit of softness on the top-right of the 8 in the date. Additionally, there are no clash marks present in the fields, as usually seen. The mint luster is softly frosted and each side displays original reddish-gold color. An exceptional Type Two gold dollar.

    I find the realized price for the coin to be interesting. Mr. Hansen purchased the coin for $36,000. PCGS valued the coin at $55,000. That is down from a value of $60,000 on Dec 1, 2019 and high of $65,000 in 2015. Did Mr. Hansen catch a filling star? Heritage has not auctioned a MS66 specimen since 2011, where the coin realized $44,562.50. Also, Heritage list three unconfirmed sales for MS66s since 2015 that realized $70,500, $64,625 and $76,375. So, how was Mr. Hansen able to pick it up for $36,000? If you like to share any thoughts or comments please do so. According to PCGS price guide, the price the coin realized is between a MS65 and MS65+ price. The coin is not CAC approved, so maybe that is a factor.

    Provenance: Other than from the The HFW² Collection, I am not able to find out any additional pedigree information.

    In comparison, Mr. Eliasberg had a monster 1954 Type II. Estimated grade MS67 purchased at the Bowers & Ruddy Oct '82 Eliasberg sale by Harry Bass for $30,800. Pedigree: Louis E. Eliasberg, Sr. Collection - Bowers & Merena 10/1982:25, $30,800 - Bowers & Merena 7/2002:669, $126,500

    1854 Type Two Gold Dollar, MS66
    PCGS Coin #7531 / PCGS Serial #25532707 / POP 12/4
    Sharply Struck, No Die Clashing
    Rarely Encountered So Fine


    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @wondercoin said:
    Dear Mr. Hansen...

    Can you please remove #35356018 from your Registry Set (sold more than 1 week ago in the Heritage sale) so that I can register my coin. My first of 2 Official set removal requests that I filed about a week ago still did not get the coin # freed up from your set.

    Thank you.

    Wondercoin

    Mitch, I’m pretty sure you can go through PCGS to get that done.

    True, but it's a bit of a hassle. Since Hansen is selling a tremendous number of duplicates these days, someone managing those sales should probably be more diligent in making sure coins get removed from his inventory when they are sold.

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,167 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not being a jerk, but how did it end up in a 66 holder?

  • ReadyFireAimReadyFireAim Posts: 1,825 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 19, 2020 4:17AM

    @MFeld said:
    Mitch, I’m pretty sure you can go through PCGS to get that done.

    I snap a pic of the slab beside my driver's license and email it to David Talk who is the set registry manager.
    Same day service in the past

    Or you can PM him here...
    https://forums.collectors.com/profile/SetRegistryManager

  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Liberty Double Eagle Upgrades

    The D. L. Hansen Collection of Liberty Double Eagles can be described as incredible. The collection has PCGS All-Time Finest Set for Liberty Head $20 Gold Basic Set, Circulation Strikes (1850-1907). There is no other real competition in this series. At least, no other collection has registered a competitive set. You hear rumors and claims, but as of today, there is no competition. Mr. Hansen replaced two coins purchased in the Heritage 2020 FUN US Coins Signature Auction in Orlando.

    The Hansen specimens being replaced are not bad coins. One coin that moves to Mr. Hansen’s #2 set is a MS63+ PCGS POP 1/1. The coin is being replaced by a POP 1/0. The other is a MS63+ PCGS POP 4/3 that is replaced with a POP 2/1. I have stated this once before, I believe the Liberty Double Eagles appear to be a set that Mr. Hansen really appreciates. I say this based by coins that he upgrades. This is a set that really don’t need upgrading, except for Mr. Hansen’s desire to make something great, better.

    1878-S Liberty Double Eagle MS64

    Expert David Akers described this Double Eagle as: The 1878-S is most definitely not a common date. It is not particularly scarce in circulated grades but in strictly uncirculated condition it is very difficult to find. Overall, the 1878-S is more rare than the 1875-S and 1877-S and on a par with the 1874-S. It is far rarer than the common 1876-S. This date is most often available in EF or lower grades although AU's are also seen fairly often. In average uncirculated condition, the 1878-S is very scarce and in choice or gem mint state it is decidedly rare. In my opinion, this issue, as well as the 1879-S, 1880-S, 1881-S, and 1882-S, are all very underrated in uncirculated condition. Expert Ron Guth added: The Saddle Ridge Hoard of gold coins, discovered in northern California in 2013, contained thirty-four 1878-S $20s, of which twenty-seven were gradeable, four were Mint State, and one was tied for Finest Known.

    1878-S Double Eagle, MS64
    Sole Finest at PCGS, POP 1/0
    Certification #84079673, PCGS #8987
    PCGS Price Guide: $45,000 / Heritage 2020 FUN: $43,200
    Provenance: Unknown

    Heritage Description: The 2013 Saddle Ridge Hoard included 34 1878-S double eagles, including a Select Uncirculated representative that was then-tied for finest known. Today, this near-Gem representative, whose origin is unknown, reigns alone atop the PCGS Population Report. Its honey-gold surfaces radiate swirling mint frost, and the raised devices on each side are fully struck. Post-mint imperfections are microscopic. There is a small speck of struck-in grease above the 7 and a couple of raised die lumps on Liberty's cheek. The single-finest example we have ever handled, and the same goes for PCGS.

    1882-S Liberty Double Eagle MS64

    Expert David Akers wrote: The 1882-S is not a particularly scarce date but it is certainly harder to find in choice condition than most people realize. Overall, the 1882-S is similar in rarity to the 1879-S, 1885-S, 1888-S, 1892-S, 1893-S, 1901-S and 1905-S but it is much more rare in Unc. than any of those dates except the 1879-S. When available, which is fairly regularly, the 1882-S is typically only VF or EF. Choice and gem quality uncs do exist but they are surprisingly rare. Expert Ron Guth added: The Saddle Ridge Hoard of gold coins, discovered in northern California in 2013, contained seventy 1882-S $20s, including two ungradeable coins, fifteen Mint State examples, and one new Second Finest Known (a single PCGS MS64+).

    1882-S Twenty Dollar, Vibrant MS64
    High Condition Census Coin, POP 2/1
    Certification #25696057, PCGS #8998
    PCGS Price Guide: $35,000 / Heritage 2020 FUN: $24,000
    Provenance: The "So Cal" Collection

    Heritage Description: In our estimation this near-Gem coin is certainly one of the finest 1882-S twenties known, and it is a candidate for an even finer grade. Vibrant rose-gold surfaces emit bright and flashy cartwheel luster, while the strike is extra-sharp for an 1882-S. Every minute detail is crisply defined, including an unlisted S/S mintmark, with the faint curve of an initial S well below the primary mintmark. We wonder if this coin came out of the Saddle Ridge Hoard, which contained 65 examples, but just one piece graded MS64+ that ranks as the current-finest known at either PCGS or NGC. Regardless of its origins, the finely frosted surfaces are virtually unimprovable for an issue that has yet to yield a fully Gem certification at PCGS or NGC despite a large mintage of 1,125,000 pieces. This is also the first MS64 we have offered in the past 20+ years of our auction archives.

    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,113 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ReadyFireAim said:

    @MFeld said:
    Mitch, I’m pretty sure you can go through PCGS to get that done.

    I snap a pic of the slab beside my driver's license and email it to David Talk who is the set registry manager.
    Same day service in the past

    Or you can PM him here...
    https://forums.collectors.com/profile/SetRegistryManager

    Awesome. Thanks for the info!

  • HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow!!

  • GoBustGoBust Posts: 595 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 23, 2020 6:35PM

    Dell Loy seems to be rocking in gold. Perhaps we need to track how his gold collection matches up with the Bass collection, since he it's really beginning to exceed Eliasberg in gold from 1795 on.

  • AotearoaAotearoa Posts: 1,472 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 23, 2020 8:03PM

    Awesome colour on that 1910-D.

    Smitten with DBLCs.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file