<< <i>Drug money from what I have seen discovered on the News, has been buried underground in tunnels on skids. They sure will not be returned until found. $$$ taken from here by travelers probably will be kept foreign for exchanges of other currencies....To me it seems kind of fruitless, but maybe you never know maybe they will find some leads. I can see how a new money system could be of benefit to National Security and our money supply as a whole. >>
Cashless. Coming to a theater near you.. >>
Not likely either in mine or your lifetime. I've heard that now for over 30 years, and I agree that payments via a written check are a thing of the past. On the other hand, electronic, debit or credit card transactions are up considerably, but nothing will ever remove the good old $ from circulation.
Check-less society coming to a theater near you >>
Oh, I know, the normalcy bias will tell you that it isn't going to happen, but I would not hold my breath. 30 years ago they didn't have the system set up for it. Now, they do. That is why the social engineers are shaping the culture to make it hip and cool to pay with your phone, direct deposit intead of physical payment, etc.. It's just a matter of time. It's coming, and sooner than you may want to believe.
Half the posters on this forum would have been against "fire", the "wheel" or the "light bulb" when they were invented.
Mark
Walker Proof Digital Album Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i>Drug money from what I have seen discovered on the News, has been buried underground in tunnels on skids. They sure will not be returned until found. $$$ taken from here by travelers probably will be kept foreign for exchanges of other currencies....To me it seems kind of fruitless, but maybe you never know maybe they will find some leads. I can see how a new money system could be of benefit to National Security and our money supply as a whole. >>
Cashless. Coming to a theater near you.. >>
Not likely either in mine or your lifetime. I've heard that now for over 30 years, and I agree that payments via a written check are a thing of the past. On the other hand, electronic, debit or credit card transactions are up considerably, but nothing will ever remove the good old $ from circulation.
Check-less society coming to a theater near you >>
One more thing, how can you say nothing will ever remove the $ from circulation when all they have to do is tell the banks to send it all back to them so it can be destroyed? If that doesn't work, they can deem it worthless so those holding it won't have anything of value. It's not going to be nearly as difficult to do away with it as you may think. "He who makes the rules is king".
SDR may be a term more and more will become familiar with in the not so distant future..
<< <i> One more thing, how can you say nothing will ever remove the $ from circulation when all they have to do is tell the banks to send it all back to them so it can be destroyed? If that doesn't work, they can deem it worthless so those holding it won't have anything of value. It's not going to be nearly as difficult to do away with it as you may think. "He who makes the rules is king".
SDR may be a term more and more will become familiar with in the not so distant future.. >>
Anything is possible. Even more probable than your scenario is that "they" make owning "precious metals" illegal. >>
A paperless system is an easier way to control the majority of people around the world. Metals are a whole lot harder to control or round up. History has shown us that. That may happen too, but I highly doubt it's as high of a priority as a cashless society would be, that could dictate most everything commerce wise by a key stroke.
<< <i>Priorities change at a given time depending on the objectives that those in charge are trying to accomplish. If metals ever really matter again, then they'll make it worth their while to "round up" or put in place such punitive repercussions that using them in any way becomes virtually impossible. >>
The number of people owning metals are relatively small in the bigger picture if they want to control what the masses buy and sell. It's much more effective to go cashless first, and no doubt they are already aware of that.
<< <i>Half the posters on this forum would have been against "fire", the "wheel" or the "light bulb" when they were invented.
Mark >>
Or how the social engineers created the bikini....oh the chaos that has ensued. >>
I was against the top half of the bikini
Mark
Walker Proof Digital Album Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i>Priorities change at a given time depending on the objectives that those in charge are trying to accomplish. If metals ever really matter again, then they'll make it worth their while to "round up" or put in place such punitive repercussions that using them in any way becomes virtually impossible. >>
The number of people owning metals are relatively small in the bigger picture if they want to control what the masses buy and sell. It's much more effective to go cashless first, and no doubt they are already aware of that. >>
No doubt according to who? Just who are these so called social engineers calling for a cashless society? Don't get me wrong, I personally think it will happen one day as it is rather an obvious thing to do IMO if and when truly feasible on a wide scale. We've started down the road but I'm not sure why you feel the need to turn it into yet another conspiracy theory. But then again, we're talking about you. >>
Something is not a conspiracy theory when the globalists who run the world are clearly calling for their one world system and a cashless society. If some can't see the writing on the wall with the paying with your phone, asset forfeiture laws pertaining to $, etc.. then they are in for a great reality check in the future.
With the $ illegally in foreign hands, they can enter on a VISA into Our Country disappear and live freely for years without ever being discovered, until they do something that they came here for, to Destroy our American Way of Life. And all done on our money! 2001 really took the cake.
<< <i>Priorities change at a given time depending on the objectives that those in charge are trying to accomplish. If metals ever really matter again, then they'll make it worth their while to "round up" or put in place such punitive repercussions that using them in any way becomes virtually impossible. >>
The number of people owning metals are relatively small in the bigger picture if they want to control what the masses buy and sell. It's much more effective to go cashless first, and no doubt they are already aware of that. >>
No doubt according to who? Just who are these so called social engineers calling for a cashless society? Don't get me wrong, I personally think it will happen one day as it is rather an obvious thing to do IMO if and when truly feasible on a wide scale. We've started down the road but I'm not sure why you feel the need to turn it into yet another conspiracy theory. But then again, we're talking about you. >>
Something is not a conspiracy theory when the globalists who run the world are clearly calling for their one world system and a cashless society. If some can't see the writing on the wall with the paying with your phone, asset forfeiture laws pertaining to $, etc.. then they are in for a great reality check in the future. >>
Snicker. I love how you connect the imaginary dots. Mark
Walker Proof Digital Album Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
I've seen a lot of paranoid people die in my 60 years. Half of them from worry. Maybe I'll see even more go sooner than I expected. Who knows ? They make pills for that now.
Only thing I worry about is my 87 year old mother, which I have to protect...other than that what happens is what happens. I will do the best I can, and that is all I can do.
Good discussion from honest people is not a bad thing, it is a good thing. Especially on message boards. We are in a warped time, we know there are consequences that are out of our control. The only thing we as Americans can do is not be surprised and stand behind our Country, Party does not matter...We are ALL AMERICANS who will be fighting for the same thing...OUR WAY OF LIFE.
It would be quite boring round here if we all thought they were out to get us, wouldn't it. Imagine if we were all afraid to write or speak about anything. Oh, the joy of silence. Lol
<< <i>I've seen a lot of paranoid people die in my 60 years. Half of them from worry. Maybe I'll see even more go sooner than I expected. Who knows ? They make pills for that now. >>
I want to die peacefully in my sleep, like my grandfather. Not screaming and yelling like the passengers in his car.
"Bongo drive 1984 Lincoln that looks like old coin dug from ground."
Many eyes are going to be opened in the future. Then, them "conspiracy theories" won't seem so funny or so far from reality. Until then, snicker, snicker..
<< <i>It would be quite boring round here if we all thought they were out to get us, wouldn't it. Imagine if we were all afraid to write or speak about anything. Oh, the joy of silence. Lol >>
Law of Logical Argument - Anything is possible if you don't know what you're talking about.
"Bongo drive 1984 Lincoln that looks like old coin dug from ground."
<< <i>Only thing I worry about is my 87 year old mother, which I have to protect...other than that what happens is what happens. I will do the best I can, and that is all I can do. >>
Just who and or what are you protecting her from ?... I suggest she hire a 3rd party to keep an eye on you...
<< <i>Many eyes are going to be opened in the future. Then, them "conspiracy theories" won't seem so funny or so far from reality. Until then, snicker, snicker.. >>
How many have closed (permanently) waiting for them to get us?
<< <i>Many eyes are going to be opened in the future. Then, them "conspiracy theories" won't seem so funny or so far from reality. Until then, snicker, snicker.. >>
How many have closed (permanently) waiting for them to get us? >>
<< <i>Many eyes are going to be opened in the future. Then, them "conspiracy theories" won't seem so funny or so far from reality. Until then, snicker, snicker.. >>
How many have closed (permanently) waiting for them to get us? >>
<< <i>Many eyes are going to be opened in the future. Then, them "conspiracy theories" won't seem so funny or so far from reality. Until then, snicker, snicker.. >>
How many have closed (permanently) waiting for them to get us? >>
Something is not a conspiracy theory when the globalists who run the world are clearly calling for their one world system and a cashless society. If some can't see the writing on the wall with the paying with your phone, asset forfeiture laws pertaining to $, etc.. then they are in for a great reality check in the future. >>
Once again, who are these "globalists" calling for a "cashless society"? Paying with one's phone seems like an invention borne of convenience. >>
Once again, who are these "globalists" calling for a "cashless society"?
I would say that any elected representative who voted for the new "anti-terrorism" banking regs that require banks to report "suspicious" transactions involving cash is a social engineer who is calling for a cashless society.
Whoever votes to subsidize the UN, the World Bank or the IMF is a globalist. Whoever supports the UN small arms treaty in direct conflict with the US Constitution is a globalist. All of these UN entities rhapsodize over social engineering under the primary assumption that people aren't smart enough to know what's good for themselves.
It's always telling when the elite bankers and politicians seem to have never actually "worked" for a living and yet they can afford lifestyles that will never even be visible to you or I. Harry Reid was a prosecutor until he made it into Congress, and now he lives in a Suite at the Washington DC Ritz Carlton at our expense. Something like $23,000 a month.
Which doesn't even compare to one of Obama's "nights out" or vacation junkets - but he would be a prime example of your social engineering globalist who never held a real job and somehow dictates policies to millions of people who do work. Strange world, eh?
Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally
<< <i>It sounds to me like you guys are trying to find causation where there isn't one. I can make any connection between any random two events if I want to badly enough. Being a cashless society does not at all have to mean that it is done because those in power want it that way. There are a bevy of reasons why a cashless society makes sense. Life today is already traceable in an endless number of ways including virtually any and all things financial, so being cashless only scrapes up the last 1-2% (if that) that becomes untraceable.
Mankind, for the past many decades and really centuries, has constantly succeeded in making as many aspects of life as automated as possible. One can argue whether that is good or bad but it is efficient and a "cashless society" is just another manifestation of that overarching trend. Call me crazy, but I actually believe that these things happen because financial processors and banks make more money automating all of these elements rather than having a gazillion branches with a gazillion tellers they need to pay to process all that cash, which they aren't even very fast or accurate at to begin with. >>
Yep, people like you are proof that their agenda will more than likely become reality as many will buy in to it. All in the name of "progress", "keeping you safe", or whatever other deceptive technique they want to use to sell it to the masses..
And don't worry, they are already coming out with robotic tellers. The wave of the future is robots that will replace humans. This is what the globalists are wanting if you read any of their white papers, books, or listen to their own words in interviews they have done.
Yep, people like you are proof that their agenda will more than likely become reality as many will buy in to it. All in the name of "progress", "keeping you safe", or whatever other deceptive technique they want to use to sell it to the masses.. >>
There is no "buying into it" involved. It's called technological progress. Maybe you're a 100 years old and yearn for days of the Great Depression when most things were entirely "off the grid". Those days ended LONG ago. WELL before recently. You think the government is that hard up to keep tabs on the few morsels of cash and PMs that folks like you own. Once again, everything they want to know, they know today. It's the prices that comes with living in a digital world where it's so easy to track anything and everything. >>
Yes, like I said, it's all going to be sold in the name of "progress" or whatever other deceptive technique they want to use to sell it to the masses. You have already swallowed the hook based on your replies. And no, I am not trying to be mean by saying that. I am just discussing this with you. Everything is not at all what it seems.
<< <i>And don't worry, they are already coming out with robotic tellers. The wave of the future is robots that will replace humans. This is what the globalists are wanting if you read any of their white papers, books, or listen to their own words in interviews they have done. >>
One thing I can always count on with you is your endless contradictions. You're so sure that "globalists" are forcing us to a "cashless society" yet all these same "globalists" are going to force "robotic tellers" down our throats. I guess being cashless isn't as convenient as I would have thought. >>
Well, they have to slowly phase the cash out as they are currently doing. It's not like it's going to disappear overnight. No contradiction. You just don't see the bigger picture.
<< <i>And don't worry, they are already coming out with robotic tellers. The wave of the future is robots that will replace humans. This is what the globalists are wanting if you read any of their white papers, books, or listen to their own words in interviews they have done. >>
One thing I can always count on with you is your endless contradictions. You're so sure that "globalists" are forcing us to a "cashless society" yet all these same "globalists" are going to force "robotic tellers" down our throats. I guess being cashless isn't as convenient as I would have thought. >>
Well, they have to slowly phase the cash out as they are currently doing. It's not like it's going to disappear overnight. No contradiction. You just don't see the bigger picture. >>
Well, it seems like you don't see the bigger picture, or the smaller picture or any picture at all. It's like the blind leading the blind without any clue whatsoever. A good chunk of society, especially the younger generation almost never uses cash. The funny thing about your "robotic teller", is that they've been out for DECADES. Maybe you've never seen an ATM before. Oh well. >>
Before you start it again, please do some more research. I am not talking about ATMs.
Yes, the article fluff pieces the reasons why things are headed this way, but they always use deception to sell their agenda to the masses as something to 'help them'.
Did you just come upon the the concept of humanoid robots and man's quest for artificial intelligence? The 1980s just called for you Stan, they want their ideas back. >>
Did you just come upon the the concept of humanoid robots and man's quest for artificial intelligence? The 1980s just called for you Stan, they want their ideas back. >>
Oh, you know everything. By all means.. >>
These aren't exactly brilliant original ideas I'm throwing out there. It's rather COMMON knowledge among these creatures we call human beings. This is the problem with these conspiracy theories you throw out there, which for all I know may even be accurate. However, you cite no good reasoning or support, yet alone logic, for why you're saying what you're saying other than to cite blogs by lunatic fringe individuals or your own paranoid thoughts. Once again, what motivation is there for "globalists" to go to a cashless society for the sake of tracking us when they already have those powers today? I'm not saying they don't want it for reasons that most people probably want it. Convenience! But trying to make allusions that this is somehow another violation of individual rights doesn't make much sense. >>
Oh, of course, lunatic fringe to link to people like Bill Gates calling for a cashless society. LOL!
Oh, of course, lunatic fringe to link to people like Bill Gates calling for a cashless society. LOL! >>
And you can add me and millions of others to that list. But that still doesn't address why you think it is motivated by "globalists" who seek to control our actions? Most people ALREADY behave in a cashless manner. Cash is a waste of time, space, money and resources. It doesn't need to exist in paper form. But you ascribing some suspicious motivation behind the scenes for a cashless society makes no sense. At least until you can provide some reasoning. >>
There is no reasoning with you. I just showed you Bill Gates calling for it and you still make excuses. Oh well..
<< <i>Half the posters on this forum would have been against "fire", the "wheel" or the "light bulb" when they were invented.
Mark >>
Mark, that was pretty funny, LOL..
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
<< <i> There is no reasoning with you. I just showed you Bill Gates calling for it and you still make excuses. Oh well.. >>
Excuses about what? Your supposition here ISN'T that you're calling for a "cashless society". In fact, you seem to be railing against it. Your position is that "globalists" are jiggering for a cashless society to gain control over us but don't have anything to say about why you feel that way. I don't at all see how you think Bill Gates supporting such a world supports anything that you've said here. If Bill Gates said "Globalists are gearing for a cashless society to gain more control over mankind" or anything to that effect, than I would agree with you. Is that, or something to that effect, what he is stating? I really don't know so please enlighten me. >>
If you would do your research and listen to what globalists like Gates are calling for, you wouldn't need for me to enlighten you on the matter. I'm serious, and not trying to be smarty pants with that comment. It's not that hard to research these issues and see what they are calling for. It doesn't take a genius to see what is going on if one just breaks from the conditioning the social engineers have placed on society.
The use of the word snicker above recalls this passage from one of the greatest poems ever written, which actually seems quite fitting in the ominous context of this discussion, too, lol..
I am no prophet—and here’s no great matter; I have seen the moment of my greatness flicker, And I have seen the eternal Footman hold my coat, and snicker, And in short, I was afraid.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
If you would do your research and listen to what globalists like Gates are calling for, you wouldn't need for me to enlighten you on the matter. I'm serious, and not trying to be smarty pants with that comment. It's not that hard to research these issues and see what they are calling for. It doesn't take a genius to see what is going on if one just breaks from the conditioning the social engineers have placed on society. >>
Well if you've supposedly done the "research", then you should have no problems citing some of that "research" which supposedly supports your supposition. I'm serious, and not trying to be smarty pants with that comment. It's not that hard to cite your research and supposedly support your claims. >>
Why do you think they bringing down regulations to imply it's criminal to own $$, while they use asset forfeiture tactics to take everything from law abiding citizens who may make random legit deposits from their businesses? Why now, when law abiding citizens have deposited money like this for years with no issues? Is this really to "keep you safe", while the drug money is allowed to be laundered through the mega banks?
Why do you think they bringing down regulations to imply it's criminal to own $$, while they use asset forfeiture tactics to take everything from law abiding citizens who may make random legit deposits from their businesses? Why now, when law abiding citizens have deposited money like this for years with no issues? Is this really to "keep you safe", while the drug money is allowed to be laundered through the mega banks? >>
Where is this regulation you speak of? If one has support for their cash transactions, and it's all legitimate, there should be no reasons to be concerned or paranoid. Sound like you might be into some shady stuff. >>
You are ridiculous. I wasn't talking about me as I don't own a business. Another thing, the "if you have nothing to hide" is a propaganda technique that only works on the ones who drink the kool aid.
Do you live in a bubble and don't know what has been going on for LAW ABIDING CITIZENS?
Here, this is just a sample of what I am talking about that is being done to good citizens:
<<Federal prosecutors have dropped their civil forfeiture case against Carole Hinders, a restaurant owner who was targeted by the IRS last year for making cash deposits that the agency considered suspicious.
Hinders, who has owned and operated Mrs. Lady’s for 38 years, had her bank account seized by the IRS simply because of her deposit amounts. Hinders, whose restaurant did not accept credit cards, frequently made cash deposits at her bank that amounted to just under $10,000. Federal law requires banks to report deposits over that amount, and Hinders was suspected of illegal activity because her deposit amounts were close to that $10,000 threshold. Hinders had been using the same bank for 30 years and said she had never been informed that “I was making my deposits wrong.”
Hinders had never actually been criminally charged with conducting any illegal activity, yet her money was taken because civil forfeiture explicitly allows the seizure of assets based solely on suspicion with no requirement of criminal charges. Civil forfeiture, while legal, places extraordinary burdens on businesses and individuals who have had their property or assets seized by the government to claim their innocence.
The Institute for Justice, an organization focused on challenging civil forfeiture, reported that the government will return the $33,000 that was taken from Hinders. “I actually wanted a trial, which would have cleared my name and helped to protect others, but it is good to get the money back. My fight is far from over, though. I am willing to tell my story to Congress to help change forfeiture laws so that no one else has to go through what I suffered,” said Hinders. The Institute for Justice has been helping Hinders fight to get her money back from the IRS.
Despite prosecutors dropping her case, Hinders still faces the possibility of the IRS reopening her case. According to the Institute for Justice, the IRS claimed that their case was “justified” and requested the right to be able to refile the case at another point in time. IJ attorney Wesley Hottot criticized this move, saying “Instead of simply returning the money with interest and an apology to Carole for the nightmare they put her through, the IRS is shamefully attempting to mask their retreat by insisting on the right to refile the case in the future.”
The Institute for Justice plans to ask the court to deny the request from the IRS and allow Hinders to receive interest on the money that was seized.>>
<< <i>You're even more ridiculous. You ramble on about some case that only would have been helped by a "cashless society". You should be supporting such a world if you are going to cite such an example. But your lack of simple understanding and your endless contradictory nature doesn't see the obvious. >>
I am ridiculous when you don't even have enough time to read and research what I post before your fingers are a flying and beating the keyboard in an eager attempt to insult me and the info I am sharing? Ok, whatever..
<< <i>You're even more ridiculous. You ramble on about some case that only would have been helped by a "cashless society". You should be supporting such a world if you are going to cite such an example. But your lack of simple understanding and your endless contradictory nature doesn't see the obvious. >>
I am ridiculous when you don't even have enough time to read and research what I post before your fingers are a flying and beating the keyboard in an eager attempt to insult me and the info I am sharing? Ok, whatever.. >>
Just telling it like it is. No eagerness involve. >>
You're not telling it like it is. I posted how law abiding citizens are being railroaded, and all you can do is ignore reality, make excuses, while tossing out your catty replies.
You're not telling it like it is. I posted how law abiding citizens are being railroaded, and all you can do is ignore reality, make excuses, while tossing out your catty replies. >>
I properly interpreted your post and the article and I stand by my conclusion. If you feel so bad for the owner, you should realize that her persecution could not have occurred in a cashless society. I still don't think you get that VERY simple concept. >>
I don't think you get the fact that it should not have happened to a law abiding citizen in the first place. I don't think you get the fact that a cashless society is only being pushed as a more powerful control system. The only way they gradually get there is to imply citizens are 'suspicious' or 'potential criminals' for possessing cash. Over time, the populace buys in to the social engineering/brainwashing of cash being bad, then a cashless society is accepted and becomes reality. Once in place, you are at the mercy of your controllers. Nope, no reason for concern there. It's going to be fantastic.
You're not telling it like it is. I posted how law abiding citizens are being railroaded, and all you can do is ignore reality, make excuses, while tossing out your catty replies. >>
I properly interpreted your post and the article and I stand by my conclusion. If you feel so bad for the owner, you should realize that her persecution could not have occurred in a cashless society. I still don't think you get that VERY simple concept. >>
I don't think you get the fact that it should not have happened to a law abiding citizen in the first place. I don't think you get the fact that a cashless society is only being pushed as a more powerful control system. The only way they gradually get there is to imply citizens are 'suspicious' or 'potential criminals' for possessing cash. Over time, the populace buys in to the social engineering/brainwashing of cash being bad, then a cashless society is accepted and becomes reality. Once in place, you are at the mercy of your controllers. Nope, no reason for concern there. It's going to be fantastic. >>
Yes, I knew you were going to play that angle from the get go. That those actions were the result of subtle machinations to guide us toward a cashless society. Which gets us back to your original point. But once again, toward what end? The vast majority of financial transactions are already cashless. The vast majority of cash is accounted for or traceable if "they" or anyone wants to investigate the matter. So what is it that a cashless society gets "them" in terms of "control" that they don't already have? >>
I wonder if you don't vote or think a certain way if your 'digital' account could get turned off? What could happen if you tick off the wrong person who is connected? If you offend someone? What about that candy bar you bought at Walmart with your digital account? How about that stop at your favorite steakhouse? McDonald's? Taco Bell? Do they raise your insurance rates as they can say you are not eating healthy? How bout that ski trip that they can claim raises your rates because you are high risk due to your personal activities? How about if you fill up your vehicle 3-4 times a week because your job requires travel? Will their be an additional tax on your digital account because they can claim you are 'harming the earth' by using so much fuel? It's a slippery slope just ripe with potential pitfalls that the controllers can use against you. Oh, but I'm sure they would never do anything like that.
<< <i> I wonder if you don't vote or think a certain way if your 'digital' account could get turned off? What could happen if you tick off the wrong person who is connected? If you offend someone? What about that candy bar you bought at Walmart with your digital account? How about that stop at your favorite steakhouse? McDonald's? Taco Bell? Do they raise your insurance rates as they can say you are not eating healthy? How bout that ski trip that they can claim raises your rates because you are high risk due to your personal activities? How about if you fill up your vehicle 3-4 times a week because your job requires travel? Will their be an additional tax on your digital account because they can claim you are 'harming the earth' by using so much fuel? It's a slippery slope just ripe with potential pitfalls that the controllers can use against you. Oh, but I'm sure they would never do anything like that. >>
Wow! If you have that much time to be paranoid about all the pitfalls of living this thing we call "life", then you're clearly wasting yours. >>
That is the response I would expect from someone who doesn't want to face the reality of what can happen when all of your freedom is surrendered and you are at the mercy of someone who can and will call all of the shots.
<< <i> That is the response I would expect from someone who doesn't want to face the reality of what can happen when all of your freedom is surrendered and you are at the mercy of someone who can and will call all of the shots. >>
"Paranoia will destroy ya" >>
Typical reply when you have no defense. It doesn't work anymore.
<< <i> That is the response I would expect from someone who doesn't want to face the reality of what can happen when all of your freedom is surrendered and you are at the mercy of someone who can and will call all of the shots. >>
"Paranoia will destroy ya" >>
Typical reply when you have no defense. It doesn't work anymore. >>
S(a)TAN...there is no defense against ignorance, paranoia, or simple mindedness. You make these crazy rationalizations based on contorted suppositions. I guess thats to be expected from someone who holds in high reverence mythical stories about humans' future. Incredible is the disdain you have for conspiracy and manipulation while your own (after)life depends so heavily upon it. I find your psychosis to be incredibly fascinating. Thank you for the continual case study.
Regarding the OP. There is no law, or supposed law, that says you cant store cash in your SDB. The bank is merely stating that should something happen to that box it will not be held responsible for losses. Hey!! big evil bankster new world order guy---I have cash in my SDB!!!! What you gonna do about it? Should I be scared now?
<< <i> That is the response I would expect from someone who doesn't want to face the reality of what can happen when all of your freedom is surrendered and you are at the mercy of someone who can and will call all of the shots. >>
"Paranoia will destroy ya" >>
Typical reply when you have no defense. It doesn't work anymore. >>
S(a)TAN...there is no defense against ignorance, paranoia, or simple mindedness. You make these crazy rationalizations based on contorted suppositions. I guess thats to be expected from someone who holds in high reverence mythical stories about humans' future. Incredible is the disdain you have for conspiracy and manipulation while your own (after)life depends so heavily upon it. I find your psychosis to be incredibly fascinating. Thank you for the continual case study.
Regarding the OP. There is no law, or supposed law, that says you cant store cash in your SDB. The bank is merely stating that should something happen to that box it will not be held responsible for losses. Hey!! big evil bankster new world order guy---I have cash in my SDB!!!! What you gonna do about it? Should I be scared now?
BOO!! >>
I'm not too worried what a bitter person like yourself thinks of me. But I am sorry that your wife left you and you have your personal life issues that resulted in your being this bitter man towards God, but let's not hash that situation out on this forum. I thought we already put that to rest via PM? Either way, enjoy the path you choose. You have to answer for it, not me.
Comments
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Drug money from what I have seen discovered on the News, has been buried underground in tunnels on skids. They sure will not be returned until found. $$$ taken from here by travelers probably will be kept foreign for exchanges of other currencies....To me it seems kind of fruitless, but maybe you never know maybe they will find some leads. I can see how a new money system could be of benefit to National Security and our money supply as a whole. >>
Cashless. Coming to a theater near you..
Not likely either in mine or your lifetime. I've heard that now for over 30 years, and I agree that payments via a written check are a thing of the past. On the other hand, electronic, debit or credit card transactions are up considerably, but nothing will ever remove the good old $ from circulation.
Check-less society coming to a theater near you
Oh, I know, the normalcy bias will tell you that it isn't going to happen, but I would not hold my breath. 30 years ago they didn't have the system set up for it. Now, they do. That is why the social engineers are shaping the culture to make it hip and cool to pay with your phone, direct deposit intead of physical payment, etc.. It's just a matter of time. It's coming, and sooner than you may want to believe.
Mark
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Drug money from what I have seen discovered on the News, has been buried underground in tunnels on skids. They sure will not be returned until found. $$$ taken from here by travelers probably will be kept foreign for exchanges of other currencies....To me it seems kind of fruitless, but maybe you never know maybe they will find some leads. I can see how a new money system could be of benefit to National Security and our money supply as a whole. >>
Cashless. Coming to a theater near you..
Not likely either in mine or your lifetime. I've heard that now for over 30 years, and I agree that payments via a written check are a thing of the past. On the other hand, electronic, debit or credit card transactions are up considerably, but nothing will ever remove the good old $ from circulation.
Check-less society coming to a theater near you
One more thing, how can you say nothing will ever remove the $ from circulation when all they have to do is tell the banks to send it all back to them so it can be destroyed? If that doesn't work, they can deem it worthless so those holding it won't have anything of value. It's not going to be nearly as difficult to do away with it as you may think. "He who makes the rules is king".
SDR may be a term more and more will become familiar with in the not so distant future..
<< <i>Half the posters on this forum would have been against "fire", the "wheel" or the "light bulb" when they were invented.
Mark >>
Social engineering is very effective. Not all change is a good thing, so don't be deceived.
<< <i>
<< <i>
One more thing, how can you say nothing will ever remove the $ from circulation when all they have to do is tell the banks to send it all back to them so it can be destroyed? If that doesn't work, they can deem it worthless so those holding it won't have anything of value. It's not going to be nearly as difficult to do away with it as you may think. "He who makes the rules is king".
SDR may be a term more and more will become familiar with in the not so distant future.. >>
Anything is possible. Even more probable than your scenario is that "they" make owning "precious metals" illegal. >>
A paperless system is an easier way to control the majority of people around the world. Metals are a whole lot harder to control or round up. History has shown us that. That may happen too, but I highly doubt it's as high of a priority as a cashless society would be, that could dictate most everything commerce wise by a key stroke.
<< <i>Half the posters on this forum would have been against "fire", the "wheel" or the "light bulb" when they were invented.
Mark >>
Or how the social engineers created the bikini....oh the chaos that has ensued.
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
<< <i>Priorities change at a given time depending on the objectives that those in charge are trying to accomplish. If metals ever really matter again, then they'll make it worth their while to "round up" or put in place such punitive repercussions that using them in any way becomes virtually impossible. >>
The number of people owning metals are relatively small in the bigger picture if they want to control what the masses buy and sell. It's much more effective to go cashless first, and no doubt they are already aware of that.
<< <i>
<< <i>Half the posters on this forum would have been against "fire", the "wheel" or the "light bulb" when they were invented.
Mark >>
Or how the social engineers created the bikini....oh the chaos that has ensued. >>
I was against the top half of the bikini
Mark
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Half the posters on this forum would have been against "fire", the "wheel" or the "light bulb" when they were invented.
Mark >>
Or how the social engineers created the bikini....oh the chaos that has ensued. >>
I was against the top half of the bikini
Mark >>
Yup. Easiest way to control man is via a scantily clad woman. All part of the new world order as described in the "book".
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Priorities change at a given time depending on the objectives that those in charge are trying to accomplish. If metals ever really matter again, then they'll make it worth their while to "round up" or put in place such punitive repercussions that using them in any way becomes virtually impossible. >>
The number of people owning metals are relatively small in the bigger picture if they want to control what the masses buy and sell. It's much more effective to go cashless first, and no doubt they are already aware of that. >>
No doubt according to who? Just who are these so called social engineers calling for a cashless society? Don't get me wrong, I personally think it will happen one day as it is rather an obvious thing to do IMO if and when truly feasible on a wide scale. We've started down the road but I'm not sure why you feel the need to turn it into yet another conspiracy theory. But then again, we're talking about you. >>
Something is not a conspiracy theory when the globalists who run the world are clearly calling for their one world system and a cashless society. If some can't see the writing on the wall with the paying with your phone, asset forfeiture laws pertaining to $, etc.. then they are in for a great reality check in the future.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Priorities change at a given time depending on the objectives that those in charge are trying to accomplish. If metals ever really matter again, then they'll make it worth their while to "round up" or put in place such punitive repercussions that using them in any way becomes virtually impossible. >>
The number of people owning metals are relatively small in the bigger picture if they want to control what the masses buy and sell. It's much more effective to go cashless first, and no doubt they are already aware of that. >>
No doubt according to who? Just who are these so called social engineers calling for a cashless society? Don't get me wrong, I personally think it will happen one day as it is rather an obvious thing to do IMO if and when truly feasible on a wide scale. We've started down the road but I'm not sure why you feel the need to turn it into yet another conspiracy theory. But then again, we're talking about you. >>
Something is not a conspiracy theory when the globalists who run the world are clearly calling for their one world system and a cashless society. If some can't see the writing on the wall with the paying with your phone, asset forfeiture laws pertaining to $, etc.. then they are in for a great reality check in the future. >>
Snicker. I love how you connect the imaginary dots. Mark
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
We are in a warped time, we know there are consequences that are out of our control. The only thing we as Americans can do is not be surprised and stand behind our Country, Party does not matter...We are ALL AMERICANS who will be fighting for the same thing...OUR WAY OF LIFE.
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
<< <i>I've seen a lot of paranoid people die in my 60 years. Half of them from worry. Maybe I'll see even more go sooner than I expected. Who knows ? They make pills for that now. >>
I want to die peacefully in my sleep, like my grandfather. Not screaming and yelling like the passengers in his car.
<< <i>It would be quite boring round here if we all thought they were out to get us, wouldn't it. Imagine if we were all afraid to write or speak about anything. Oh, the joy of silence. Lol >>
Law of Logical Argument - Anything is possible if you don't know what you're talking about.
<< <i>Only thing I worry about is my 87 year old mother, which I have to protect...other than that what happens is what happens. I will do the best I can, and that is all I can do. >>
Just who and or what are you protecting her from ?...
I suggest she hire a 3rd party to keep an eye on you...
<< <i>Many eyes are going to be opened in the future. Then, them "conspiracy theories" won't seem so funny or so far from reality. Until then, snicker, snicker..
How many have closed (permanently) waiting for them to get us?
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
<< <i>
<< <i>Many eyes are going to be opened in the future. Then, them "conspiracy theories" won't seem so funny or so far from reality. Until then, snicker, snicker..
How many have closed (permanently) waiting for them to get us? >>
"You were warned...."
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Many eyes are going to be opened in the future. Then, them "conspiracy theories" won't seem so funny or so far from reality. Until then, snicker, snicker..
How many have closed (permanently) waiting for them to get us? >>
"You were warned...." >>
Great little saying, ain't it.
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Many eyes are going to be opened in the future. Then, them "conspiracy theories" won't seem so funny or so far from reality. Until then, snicker, snicker..
How many have closed (permanently) waiting for them to get us? >>
"You were warned...." >>
Great little saying, ain't it.
<< <i>
<< <i>
Something is not a conspiracy theory when the globalists who run the world are clearly calling for their one world system and a cashless society. If some can't see the writing on the wall with the paying with your phone, asset forfeiture laws pertaining to $, etc.. then they are in for a great reality check in the future. >>
Once again, who are these "globalists" calling for a "cashless society"? Paying with one's phone seems like an invention borne of convenience. >>
Here is an interesting read
I would say that any elected representative who voted for the new "anti-terrorism" banking regs that require banks to report "suspicious" transactions involving cash is a social engineer who is calling for a cashless society.
Whoever votes to subsidize the UN, the World Bank or the IMF is a globalist. Whoever supports the UN small arms treaty in direct conflict with the US Constitution is a globalist. All of these UN entities rhapsodize over social engineering under the primary assumption that people aren't smart enough to know what's good for themselves.
It's always telling when the elite bankers and politicians seem to have never actually "worked" for a living and yet they can afford lifestyles that will never even be visible to you or I. Harry Reid was a prosecutor until he made it into Congress, and now he lives in a Suite at the Washington DC Ritz Carlton at our expense. Something like $23,000 a month.
Which doesn't even compare to one of Obama's "nights out" or vacation junkets - but he would be a prime example of your social engineering globalist who never held a real job and somehow dictates policies to millions of people who do work. Strange world, eh?
I knew it would happen.
<< <i>It sounds to me like you guys are trying to find causation where there isn't one. I can make any connection between any random two events if I want to badly enough. Being a cashless society does not at all have to mean that it is done because those in power want it that way. There are a bevy of reasons why a cashless society makes sense. Life today is already traceable in an endless number of ways including virtually any and all things financial, so being cashless only scrapes up the last 1-2% (if that) that becomes untraceable.
Mankind, for the past many decades and really centuries, has constantly succeeded in making as many aspects of life as automated as possible. One can argue whether that is good or bad but it is efficient and a "cashless society" is just another manifestation of that overarching trend. Call me crazy, but I actually believe that these things happen because financial processors and banks make more money automating all of these elements rather than having a gazillion branches with a gazillion tellers they need to pay to process all that cash, which they aren't even very fast or accurate at to begin with. >>
Yep, people like you are proof that their agenda will more than likely become reality as many will buy in to it. All in the name of "progress", "keeping you safe", or whatever other deceptive technique they want to use to sell it to the masses..
<< <i>
<< <i>
Yep, people like you are proof that their agenda will more than likely become reality as many will buy in to it. All in the name of "progress", "keeping you safe", or whatever other deceptive technique they want to use to sell it to the masses.. >>
There is no "buying into it" involved. It's called technological progress. Maybe you're a 100 years old and yearn for days of the Great Depression when most things were entirely "off the grid". Those days ended LONG ago. WELL before recently. You think the government is that hard up to keep tabs on the few morsels of cash and PMs that folks like you own. Once again, everything they want to know, they know today. It's the prices that comes with living in a digital world where it's so easy to track anything and everything. >>
Yes, like I said, it's all going to be sold in the name of "progress" or whatever other deceptive technique they want to use to sell it to the masses. You have already swallowed the hook based on your replies. And no, I am not trying to be mean by saying that. I am just discussing this with you. Everything is not at all what it seems.
Stan!
<< <i>
<< <i>And don't worry, they are already coming out with robotic tellers. The wave of the future is robots that will replace humans. This is what the globalists are wanting if you read any of their white papers, books, or listen to their own words in interviews they have done. >>
One thing I can always count on with you is your endless contradictions. You're so sure that "globalists" are forcing us to a "cashless society" yet all these same "globalists" are going to force "robotic tellers" down our throats. I guess being cashless isn't as convenient as I would have thought. >>
Well, they have to slowly phase the cash out as they are currently doing. It's not like it's going to disappear overnight. No contradiction. You just don't see the bigger picture.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>And don't worry, they are already coming out with robotic tellers. The wave of the future is robots that will replace humans. This is what the globalists are wanting if you read any of their white papers, books, or listen to their own words in interviews they have done. >>
One thing I can always count on with you is your endless contradictions. You're so sure that "globalists" are forcing us to a "cashless society" yet all these same "globalists" are going to force "robotic tellers" down our throats. I guess being cashless isn't as convenient as I would have thought. >>
Well, they have to slowly phase the cash out as they are currently doing. It's not like it's going to disappear overnight. No contradiction. You just don't see the bigger picture. >>
Well, it seems like you don't see the bigger picture, or the smaller picture or any picture at all. It's like the blind leading the blind without any clue whatsoever. A good chunk of society, especially the younger generation almost never uses cash. The funny thing about your "robotic teller", is that they've been out for DECADES. Maybe you've never seen an ATM before. Oh well. >>
Before you start it again, please do some more research. I am not talking about ATMs.
More on robotic tellers
Yes, the article fluff pieces the reasons why things are headed this way, but they always use deception to sell their agenda to the masses as something to 'help them'.
<< <i>
<< <i>Before you start it again, please do some more research. I am not talking about ATMs.
More on robotic tellers >>
Did you just come upon the the concept of humanoid robots and man's quest for artificial intelligence? The 1980s just called for you Stan, they want their ideas back. >>
Oh, you know everything. By all means..
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Before you start it again, please do some more research. I am not talking about ATMs.
More on robotic tellers >>
Did you just come upon the the concept of humanoid robots and man's quest for artificial intelligence? The 1980s just called for you Stan, they want their ideas back. >>
Oh, you know everything. By all means.. >>
These aren't exactly brilliant original ideas I'm throwing out there. It's rather COMMON knowledge among these creatures we call human beings. This is the problem with these conspiracy theories you throw out there, which for all I know may even be accurate. However, you cite no good reasoning or support, yet alone logic, for why you're saying what you're saying other than to cite blogs by lunatic fringe individuals or your own paranoid thoughts. Once again, what motivation is there for "globalists" to go to a cashless society for the sake of tracking us when they already have those powers today? I'm not saying they don't want it for reasons that most people probably want it. Convenience! But trying to make allusions that this is somehow another violation of individual rights doesn't make much sense. >>
Oh, of course, lunatic fringe to link to people like Bill Gates calling for a cashless society. LOL!
<< <i>
<< <i>
Oh, of course, lunatic fringe to link to people like Bill Gates calling for a cashless society. LOL! >>
And you can add me and millions of others to that list. But that still doesn't address why you think it is motivated by "globalists" who seek to control our actions? Most people ALREADY behave in a cashless manner. Cash is a waste of time, space, money and resources. It doesn't need to exist in paper form. But you ascribing some suspicious motivation behind the scenes for a cashless society makes no sense. At least until you can provide some reasoning. >>
There is no reasoning with you. I just showed you Bill Gates calling for it and you still make excuses. Oh well..
One world system
Robots
Them
Control
Deception
Fear
Are you breaking your pills in half?
Ed for spelling.
<< <i>Half the posters on this forum would have been against "fire", the "wheel" or the "light bulb" when they were invented.
Mark >>
Mark, that was pretty funny, LOL..
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
<< <i>
<< <i>
There is no reasoning with you. I just showed you Bill Gates calling for it and you still make excuses. Oh well.. >>
Excuses about what? Your supposition here ISN'T that you're calling for a "cashless society". In fact, you seem to be railing against it. Your position is that "globalists" are jiggering for a cashless society to gain control over us but don't have anything to say about why you feel that way. I don't at all see how you think Bill Gates supporting such a world supports anything that you've said here. If Bill Gates said "Globalists are gearing for a cashless society to gain more control over mankind" or anything to that effect, than I would agree with you. Is that, or something to that effect, what he is stating? I really don't know so please enlighten me. >>
If you would do your research and listen to what globalists like Gates are calling for, you wouldn't need for me to enlighten you on the matter. I'm serious, and not trying to be smarty pants with that comment. It's not that hard to research these issues and see what they are calling for. It doesn't take a genius to see what is going on if one just breaks from the conditioning the social engineers have placed on society.
I am no prophet—and here’s no great matter;
I have seen the moment of my greatness flicker,
And I have seen the eternal Footman hold my coat, and snicker,
And in short, I was afraid.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
<< <i>
<< <i>
If you would do your research and listen to what globalists like Gates are calling for, you wouldn't need for me to enlighten you on the matter. I'm serious, and not trying to be smarty pants with that comment. It's not that hard to research these issues and see what they are calling for. It doesn't take a genius to see what is going on if one just breaks from the conditioning the social engineers have placed on society. >>
Well if you've supposedly done the "research", then you should have no problems citing some of that "research" which supposedly supports your supposition. I'm serious, and not trying to be smarty pants with that comment. It's not that hard to cite your research and supposedly support your claims. >>
Why do you think they bringing down regulations to imply it's criminal to own $$, while they use asset forfeiture tactics to take everything from law abiding citizens who may make random legit deposits from their businesses? Why now, when law abiding citizens have deposited money like this for years with no issues? Is this really to "keep you safe", while the drug money is allowed to be laundered through the mega banks?
<< <i>
<< <i>
Why do you think they bringing down regulations to imply it's criminal to own $$, while they use asset forfeiture tactics to take everything from law abiding citizens who may make random legit deposits from their businesses? Why now, when law abiding citizens have deposited money like this for years with no issues? Is this really to "keep you safe", while the drug money is allowed to be laundered through the mega banks? >>
Where is this regulation you speak of? If one has support for their cash transactions, and it's all legitimate, there should be no reasons to be concerned or paranoid. Sound like you might be into some shady stuff. >>
You are ridiculous. I wasn't talking about me as I don't own a business. Another thing, the "if you have nothing to hide" is a propaganda technique that only works on the ones who drink the kool aid.
Do you live in a bubble and don't know what has been going on for LAW ABIDING CITIZENS?
Here, this is just a sample of what I am talking about that is being done to good citizens:
<<Federal prosecutors have dropped their civil forfeiture case against Carole Hinders, a restaurant owner who was targeted by the IRS last year for making cash deposits that the agency considered suspicious.
Hinders, who has owned and operated Mrs. Lady’s for 38 years, had her bank account seized by the IRS simply because of her deposit amounts. Hinders, whose restaurant did not accept credit cards, frequently made cash deposits at her bank that amounted to just under $10,000. Federal law requires banks to report deposits over that amount, and Hinders was suspected of illegal activity because her deposit amounts were close to that $10,000 threshold. Hinders had been using the same bank for 30 years and said she had never been informed that “I was making my deposits wrong.”
Hinders had never actually been criminally charged with conducting any illegal activity, yet her money was taken because civil forfeiture explicitly allows the seizure of assets based solely on suspicion with no requirement of criminal charges. Civil forfeiture, while legal, places extraordinary burdens on businesses and individuals who have had their property or assets seized by the government to claim their innocence.
The Institute for Justice, an organization focused on challenging civil forfeiture, reported that the government will return the $33,000 that was taken from Hinders. “I actually wanted a trial, which would have cleared my name and helped to protect others, but it is good to get the money back. My fight is far from over, though. I am willing to tell my story to Congress to help change forfeiture laws so that no one else has to go through what I suffered,” said Hinders. The Institute for Justice has been helping Hinders fight to get her money back from the IRS.
Despite prosecutors dropping her case, Hinders still faces the possibility of the IRS reopening her case. According to the Institute for Justice, the IRS claimed that their case was “justified” and requested the right to be able to refile the case at another point in time. IJ attorney Wesley Hottot criticized this move, saying “Instead of simply returning the money with interest and an apology to Carole for the nightmare they put her through, the IRS is shamefully attempting to mask their retreat by insisting on the right to refile the case in the future.”
The Institute for Justice plans to ask the court to deny the request from the IRS and allow Hinders to receive interest on the money that was seized.>>
Is this America?
How many people have to go through heck like this, while the mega banks are allowed to launder the drug money?
<< <i>You're even more ridiculous. You ramble on about some case that only would have been helped by a "cashless society". You should be supporting such a world if you are going to cite such an example. But your lack of simple understanding and your endless contradictory nature doesn't see the obvious. >>
I am ridiculous when you don't even have enough time to read and research what I post before your fingers are a flying and beating the keyboard in an eager attempt to insult me and the info I am sharing? Ok, whatever..
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>You're even more ridiculous. You ramble on about some case that only would have been helped by a "cashless society". You should be supporting such a world if you are going to cite such an example. But your lack of simple understanding and your endless contradictory nature doesn't see the obvious. >>
I am ridiculous when you don't even have enough time to read and research what I post before your fingers are a flying and beating the keyboard in an eager attempt to insult me and the info I am sharing? Ok, whatever.. >>
Just telling it like it is. No eagerness involve. >>
You're not telling it like it is. I posted how law abiding citizens are being railroaded, and all you can do is ignore reality, make excuses, while tossing out your catty replies.
<< <i>
<< <i>
You're not telling it like it is. I posted how law abiding citizens are being railroaded, and all you can do is ignore reality, make excuses, while tossing out your catty replies. >>
I properly interpreted your post and the article and I stand by my conclusion. If you feel so bad for the owner, you should realize that her persecution could not have occurred in a cashless society. I still don't think you get that VERY simple concept. >>
I don't think you get the fact that it should not have happened to a law abiding citizen in the first place. I don't think you get the fact that a cashless society is only being pushed as a more powerful control system. The only way they gradually get there is to imply citizens are 'suspicious' or 'potential criminals' for possessing cash. Over time, the populace buys in to the social engineering/brainwashing of cash being bad, then a cashless society is accepted and becomes reality. Once in place, you are at the mercy of your controllers. Nope, no reason for concern there. It's going to be fantastic.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
You're not telling it like it is. I posted how law abiding citizens are being railroaded, and all you can do is ignore reality, make excuses, while tossing out your catty replies. >>
I properly interpreted your post and the article and I stand by my conclusion. If you feel so bad for the owner, you should realize that her persecution could not have occurred in a cashless society. I still don't think you get that VERY simple concept. >>
I don't think you get the fact that it should not have happened to a law abiding citizen in the first place. I don't think you get the fact that a cashless society is only being pushed as a more powerful control system. The only way they gradually get there is to imply citizens are 'suspicious' or 'potential criminals' for possessing cash. Over time, the populace buys in to the social engineering/brainwashing of cash being bad, then a cashless society is accepted and becomes reality. Once in place, you are at the mercy of your controllers. Nope, no reason for concern there. It's going to be fantastic. >>
Yes, I knew you were going to play that angle from the get go. That those actions were the result of subtle machinations to guide us toward a cashless society. Which gets us back to your original point. But once again, toward what end? The vast majority of financial transactions are already cashless. The vast majority of cash is accounted for or traceable if "they" or anyone wants to investigate the matter. So what is it that a cashless society gets "them" in terms of "control" that they don't already have? >>
I wonder if you don't vote or think a certain way if your 'digital' account could get turned off? What could happen if you tick off the wrong person who is connected? If you offend someone? What about that candy bar you bought at Walmart with your digital account? How about that stop at your favorite steakhouse? McDonald's? Taco Bell? Do they raise your insurance rates as they can say you are not eating healthy? How bout that ski trip that they can claim raises your rates because you are high risk due to your personal activities? How about if you fill up your vehicle 3-4 times a week because your job requires travel? Will their be an additional tax on your digital account because they can claim you are 'harming the earth' by using so much fuel? It's a slippery slope just ripe with potential pitfalls that the controllers can use against you. Oh, but I'm sure they would never do anything like that.
<< <i>
<< <i>
I wonder if you don't vote or think a certain way if your 'digital' account could get turned off? What could happen if you tick off the wrong person who is connected? If you offend someone? What about that candy bar you bought at Walmart with your digital account? How about that stop at your favorite steakhouse? McDonald's? Taco Bell? Do they raise your insurance rates as they can say you are not eating healthy? How bout that ski trip that they can claim raises your rates because you are high risk due to your personal activities? How about if you fill up your vehicle 3-4 times a week because your job requires travel? Will their be an additional tax on your digital account because they can claim you are 'harming the earth' by using so much fuel? It's a slippery slope just ripe with potential pitfalls that the controllers can use against you. Oh, but I'm sure they would never do anything like that. >>
Wow! If you have that much time to be paranoid about all the pitfalls of living this thing we call "life", then you're clearly wasting yours. >>
That is the response I would expect from someone who doesn't want to face the reality of what can happen when all of your freedom is surrendered and you are at the mercy of someone who can and will call all of the shots.
<< <i>
<< <i>
That is the response I would expect from someone who doesn't want to face the reality of what can happen when all of your freedom is surrendered and you are at the mercy of someone who can and will call all of the shots. >>
"Paranoia will destroy ya" >>
Typical reply when you have no defense. It doesn't work anymore.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
That is the response I would expect from someone who doesn't want to face the reality of what can happen when all of your freedom is surrendered and you are at the mercy of someone who can and will call all of the shots. >>
"Paranoia will destroy ya" >>
Typical reply when you have no defense. It doesn't work anymore. >>
S(a)TAN...there is no defense against ignorance, paranoia, or simple mindedness. You make these crazy rationalizations based on contorted suppositions. I guess thats to be expected from someone who holds in high reverence mythical stories about humans' future. Incredible is the disdain you have for conspiracy and manipulation while your own (after)life depends so heavily upon it. I find your psychosis to be incredibly fascinating. Thank you for the continual case study.
Regarding the OP. There is no law, or supposed law, that says you cant store cash in your SDB. The bank is merely stating that should something happen to that box it will not be held responsible for losses. Hey!! big evil bankster new world order guy---I have cash in my SDB!!!! What you gonna do about it? Should I be scared now?
BOO!!
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
That is the response I would expect from someone who doesn't want to face the reality of what can happen when all of your freedom is surrendered and you are at the mercy of someone who can and will call all of the shots. >>
"Paranoia will destroy ya" >>
Typical reply when you have no defense. It doesn't work anymore. >>
S(a)TAN...there is no defense against ignorance, paranoia, or simple mindedness. You make these crazy rationalizations based on contorted suppositions. I guess thats to be expected from someone who holds in high reverence mythical stories about humans' future. Incredible is the disdain you have for conspiracy and manipulation while your own (after)life depends so heavily upon it. I find your psychosis to be incredibly fascinating. Thank you for the continual case study.
Regarding the OP. There is no law, or supposed law, that says you cant store cash in your SDB. The bank is merely stating that should something happen to that box it will not be held responsible for losses. Hey!! big evil bankster new world order guy---I have cash in my SDB!!!! What you gonna do about it? Should I be scared now?
BOO!! >>
I'm not too worried what a bitter person like yourself thinks of me. But I am sorry that your wife left you and you have your personal life issues that resulted in your being this bitter man towards God, but let's not hash that situation out on this forum. I thought we already put that to rest via PM? Either way, enjoy the path you choose. You have to answer for it, not me.
"You were warned...."
You and your suppositions.
Bitter towards God? You got some serious issues dude.
Knowledge is the enemy of fear