Home World & Ancient Coins Forum

North/South/Central American Coins Thursday, let's see them!

14950515355

Comments

  • pruebaspruebas Posts: 4,529 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JohnnyCache said:

    @pruebas said:
    @JohnnyCache sorry to resurrect your 1.5 year old comment, but it had stuck in my mind and the thought resurfaced in yesterday's EMO Collection sale at Stacks.

    I managed to obtain a common Zacatecas cuartilla (1825) in a very uncommon grade--NGC MS63. I also snagged the silver presentation specimen of the same date--NGC MS61. This is the now earliest-dated silver cuartilla/octavo in my collection.

    The MS63 regular issue sold over $5000, so you can see the rarity/demand/"unusuality" of such a coin.


    I saw those in the Stacks auction. Though I lusted after the silver piece I knew from the onset it was just a pipe dream for me however I actually pursued the 63, though ultimately I had to bow out well shy of the final hammer.

    They are stunning examples, congratulations!

    I thought your comment in the other thread was interesting:

    @pruebas said:
    I don’t believe that piece is a Soho Mint product.

    One of these days I’ll write an article refuting that erroneous conclusion in the book that claimed it is.

    But I bought that lot. Ugh!

    Is it your belief that it is none the less still a pattern piece albeit perhaps not a Soho Mint product or is there something else at work here?

    Having seen and owned many Soho Mint pieces over the years, and having read books and papers on the subject, I have a pretty good feel for what their products look and feel like. I am convinced that these 1838 so-called fantasy patterns (and I'm not sure fantasy is the correct word either) are not Soho.

    The workmanship, the edge, the "fabric", the material. They just don't "feel" like Soho products.

    Stacks got the attribution from a recent book by a Mexican author. Notice NGC did not use that attribution on the slab. I corresponded with the author before he wrote the book, but he was dead set on his theory. He has absolutely no primary sources, did not see any Soho archival material, did not see the actual coins, and has little numismatic experience. He just put out that conjecture, wrote a book, found a publisher, and (most) everyone believed him.

    I think the pieces came from Europe. but not Soho and probably not the UK.

    As to whether they are patterns. Not in the traditional sense. Maybe more like the 1890 Lauer 2c pieces. Like advertising pieces or something like that. But they are very rare (hence why I paid up for that example).

  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,097 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Pictures are not available yet- could be interesting

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • pruebaspruebas Posts: 4,529 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JohnnyCache said:

    @pruebas said:
    @JohnnyCache sorry to resurrect your 1.5 year old comment, but it had stuck in my mind and the thought resurfaced in yesterday's EMO Collection sale at Stacks.

    I managed to obtain a common Zacatecas cuartilla (1825) in a very uncommon grade--NGC MS63. I also snagged the silver presentation specimen of the same date--NGC MS61. This is the now earliest-dated silver cuartilla/octavo in my collection.

    The MS63 regular issue sold over $5000, so you can see the rarity/demand/"unusuality" of such a coin.


    I saw those in the Stacks auction. Though I lusted after the silver piece I knew from the onset it was just a pipe dream for me however I actually pursued the 63, though ultimately I had to bow out well shy of the final hammer.

    They are stunning examples, congratulations!

    Thank you.

    Did you win any of the other mint state cuartillas?

    What did you think of the 1824 Zacatecas?

  • JohnnyCacheJohnnyCache Posts: 1,761 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @pruebas said:
    Did you win any of the other mint state cuartillas?

    What did you think of the 1824 Zacatecas?

    I didn't end up bidding on any other pieces. I tracked and momentarily thought about the 1862 Zacatecas in NGC AU-50, but it's hard to fall in love with the bride ( the 1825 Zacatecas NGC MS-63) and instead come home with a less attractive bridesmaid (1862 Zacatecas NGC AU-50).

  • JohnnyCacheJohnnyCache Posts: 1,761 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Oh my goodness, I hadn't tracked the 1824 Zacatecas, as when I originally looked at the lots I didn't like the look of the crack so I had to look it up now, wow I'm in shock.

    I never would have imagined that hammer price. That said, I have limited numismatic knowledge and I am simply attracted to this design for the beauty of it. Is there something, beyond grade that elevated that piece to that lofty hammer price?

  • pruebaspruebas Posts: 4,529 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JohnnyCache said:

    @pruebas said:
    Did you win any of the other mint state cuartillas?

    What did you think of the 1824 Zacatecas?

    I didn't end up bidding on any other pieces. I tracked and momentarily thought about the 1862 Zacatecas in NGC AU-50, but it's hard to fall in love with the bride ( the 1825 Zacatecas NGC MS-63) and instead come home with a less attractive bridesmaid (1862 Zacatecas NGC AU-50).

    @bidask knows all about marrying the bridesmaid instead of the bride!

    And I get it. I feel the same way.

    Better to pay up on the coin that tugs your heart, else you’ll be thinking about it every time you view the substitute.

  • AbueloAbuelo Posts: 1,820 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TwoKopeiki impressive

  • SimonWSimonW Posts: 895 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 22, 2024 6:40PM

    @Plus00Vltra

    So you're the one...😁

    Nice pull

    I'm BACK!!! Used to be Billet7 on the old forum.

  • TwoKopeikiTwoKopeiki Posts: 9,693 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 22, 2024 10:08PM

    Great find @Plus00Vltra <3 My kind of coin!

  • Plus00VltraPlus00Vltra Posts: 33 ✭✭✭

    @SimonW said:
    @Plus00Vltra

    So you're the one...😁

    Nice pull

    Thanks @SimonW for falling on your sword and letting this one go! I am pleased as punch to have it in my collection.

  • bidaskbidask Posts: 14,017 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Boosibri said:
    New an improved images of this 66+ peso.

    I like it

    The date as well .

    I manage money. I earn money. I save money .
    I give away money. I collect money.
    I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.




  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,108 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bidask said:

    @Boosibri said:
    New an improved images of this 66+ peso.

    I like it

    The date as well .

    1885/4, not the common dated 1884 thankfully

  • pruebaspruebas Posts: 4,529 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Abuelo said:

    I am a bit surprised on how few coins I have bought this year...

    There certainly has been no shortage of things to buy this year. But the prices…. :#

  • AbueloAbuelo Posts: 1,820 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @pruebas yes, not in the mood to buy a coin for the price of my house.

  • ELuisELuis Posts: 1,065 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Abuelo Nice F25 25C
    I saw this, but raw;

  • pruebaspruebas Posts: 4,529 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Abuelo said:
    @pruebas yes, not in the mood to buy a coin for the price of my house.

    @Abuelo I don't think they will be coming down much or at all. The increase is mostly due to the devaluation of the USD (aka inflation). And as you know from the grocery store, once things inflate, they don't deflate.

    So if you want to continue collecting (Mexican) coins, you will need to adjust to the new reality at some point.

  • AbueloAbuelo Posts: 1,820 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • AbueloAbuelo Posts: 1,820 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ELuis and the amazing thing is how inexpensive it is. Thanks

  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,097 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @7Jaguars

    Without doing any research, I will take a stab at your question- the 1983 1/4 balboa likely was likely clad- even ones in the sets. So I question why the LEY 0.500 would be present on a smaller denomination coin- that’s all I got.

    Nice coins.

    The British Honduras penny looks quite attractive-congrats.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Indeed, the 1983 Panama 1/4 Balboa is a pattern with the major difference the “Ley 0.500” designation.
    Note that the more famous “Ley” varieties are the 1982 1 and 5 Balboa types. This would exceed their rarity by a bit.

    No FM 1/4 Balboas were ever struck in silver. May have been a pattern for a putative 80th Anniversary of independence that never materialized.

    The BH 1913 cent was quite a coup and glad to have it, a Central American rarity in top condition.

    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • AbueloAbuelo Posts: 1,820 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Impressive @TwoKopeiki

  • TwoKopeikiTwoKopeiki Posts: 9,693 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Abuelo said:
    Impressive @TwoKopeiki

    Thanks! Fun with varieties never stops :)

  • CRHer700CRHer700 Posts: 1,919 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I recently found this in circulation in Florida. It is my oldest silver coin ever recovered.

    God bless all who believe in him. Do unto others what you expect to be done to you. Dubbed a "Committee Secret Agent" by @mr1931S on 7/23/24. Founding member of CU Anti-Troll League since 9/24/24.

  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,108 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @7Jaguars said:
    That is an honest and "real" coin there Sir!

    Well, not the coin, but is a die for the obverse of a 1/4 Balboa:

    That did likely struck some dubious mint “errors” in its time

  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not guilty here! I actually have the reverse die also & some show what appear to be gold residual that I would like to test one day - maybe XRF but none around here....

    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • pruebaspruebas Posts: 4,529 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @7Jaguars said:
    That is an honest and "real" coin there Sir!

    Well, not the coin, but is a die for the obverse of a 1/4 Balboa:

    Franklin Mint die?

  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No, US Mint die that I believe was used to strike many of the 1982 "error" coins that were over struck on US coins and many other variants.

    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • bidaskbidask Posts: 14,017 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TwoKopeiki said:

    @Abuelo said:
    Impressive @TwoKopeiki

    Thanks! Fun with varieties never stops :)

    Speaking of varieties what is your thought of this 1858zs mo 8 r possibly being a overdate? ( 8/7 )

    I manage money. I earn money. I save money .
    I give away money. I collect money.
    I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.




  • TwoKopeikiTwoKopeiki Posts: 9,693 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 7, 2024 7:11PM

    @bidask said:

    @TwoKopeiki said:

    @Abuelo said:
    Impressive @TwoKopeiki

    Thanks! Fun with varieties never stops :)

    Speaking of varieties what is your thought of this 1858zs mo 8 r possibly being a overdate? ( 8/7 )

    Hey Dan. I'm not seeing the 7. All 3 reverse 8's look the same to me and no out of place artifacts.

  • TwoKopeikiTwoKopeiki Posts: 9,693 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 30, 2024 10:59AM

    A couple of additional purchases from Phil Rutherford's collection being auctioned by Stacks:

    1777/6 in PCGS AU Details plastic. Tough (R2) variety and surprisingly not attributed by either PCGS or correctly noted in the lot description by Stacks. A nice addition to the chopped VF details example of this die pairing already in the collection previously courtesy of Kent at World Numismatics.

    And a nice original PCGS AU53 example of an 1809-TH 8 Reales with the second, less common, bust shape of Ferdinand VII.

  • TwoKopeikiTwoKopeiki Posts: 9,693 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 11, 2024 11:26AM

    To illustrate the different bust shapes before someone asks:

    Type A (mostly used in 1808)

    Type B (mostly used in 1808 and some in 1809)

    Type C (most common type, used in 1809 and later)

  • AbueloAbuelo Posts: 1,820 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TwoKopeiki and the 7/6 is quite clear!

  • TwoKopeikiTwoKopeiki Posts: 9,693 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Abuelo said:
    @TwoKopeiki and the 7/6 is quite clear!

    Indeed!

  • scubafuelscubafuel Posts: 1,850 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @pruebas Nice addition. I was watching those go by yesterday and thought of your earlier post.

  • AbueloAbuelo Posts: 1,820 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Again, great coins @TwoKopeiki

    @pruebas never disappoints

  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1984 Barbados 10 Dollars - Beautiful Simplicity:

    1905 Panama 50 Centisimos - IMHO undergraded & original:


    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,468 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 13, 2024 1:17AM

    @7Jaguars said:
    This is an extreme rarity, and is a pattern for the proof 1983 (FM) 1/4 Balboa. This was unknown and unrecorded, when all of the sudden it popped up on ebay some 8 or so years ago. Can you spot what makes it special?


    @pruebas said:

    @7Jaguars said:
    That is an honest and "real" coin there Sir!

    Well, not the coin, but is a die for the obverse of a 1/4 Balboa:

    Franklin Mint die?

    @7Jaguars said:
    No, US Mint die that I believe was used to strike many of the 1982 "error" coins that were over struck on US coins and many other variants.

    .

    That pattern coin is Franklin Mint product. It has the Flying-F ("FM") mint mark just above the "1983" date.

    The die might be a US Mint die, but I would need to see a side view of it.

    .

Sign In or Register to comment.