Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Raw card Saturday......................post your scans for Saturday, 10/1/2011!

1252628303148

Comments

  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭


    << <i>They have letters that repeat in there last name. ie. two 'I's" two "T's" etc. >>



    Nope. Szotkiewicz defeats that theory.

    Edited to say: To clarify, I thought you meant they all have two sets of repeating letters. Sorry for any confusion.
    Brett
  • CARDSANDCOINSCARDSANDCOINS Posts: 340 ✭✭✭
    They all have 10 letters in their last name
  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭


    << <i>They all have 10 letters in their last name >>



    Close enough. Some have more than 10, but they all have at least 10. Good job.
    Brett
  • swartz1swartz1 Posts: 4,911 ✭✭✭
    to go in the next group sub...

    image


    Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
    - uncut


    Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
  • Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,557 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Here's a litle something outside of my usual 62's. Nice 73-74 Topps Hockey set I just picked up...


    image

    image
    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭
    Brett
  • Brett--The only thing I can say is nice cards, because I'm stumped on the cards. I was thinking along the All Star angle but I can't figure it out. Good question. Doug
  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭
    Doug,
    Thanks for the reply. The answer has nothing to do with on-field accomplishments; it's strictly baseball card related. Keep trying.
    Brett
  • Here's some '57s that I've had for a long time. I have always asked myself why I never upgraded the Clemente, Brooks Robby or Mays. No creased is a plus--- but in the end I'm just happy I have them in the set. Anyone out there know if the two Burgess cards are variations? The lettering seems different with more shadowing on one card compared to the other. I went a little nuts with the scans today because we have a new and improved scanner, now you can really see how crappy my cards look. Take care everyone. Doug

    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
  • cincyredlegscincyredlegs Posts: 2,032 ✭✭✭
    Here are a few 53's I picked up a few weeks ago. Centering is a bit off but I love this set.

    Mark

    image
    image
    image
    image
    Project:

    T206 Set - 300/524
  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭
    Doug and Mark,

    You have some really beautiful cards. I don't have any '50's cards, but I sure love 'em.
    Brett
  • Mark, nice '53s. I agree, very nice set. A few more stabs at the question. They had more than one year of "IN-ACTION" cards or something to do with the '82 set.
  • daddymcdaddymc Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Mark, nice '53s. I agree, very nice set. A few more stabs at the question. They had more than one year of "IN-ACTION" cards or something to do with the '82 set. >>



    I think you are really close. I'm guessing that they had In-Action cards in BOTH 1972 and 10 years later in 1982.
    Currently working on: Kurt Warner PSA 9 or 10

  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭
    Brett
  • daddymcdaddymc Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭
    BoSox, I'm not much for Hockey cards, but those are some sharp looking cards.
    Currently working on: Kurt Warner PSA 9 or 10

  • Brett- Beautiful '72s, and for that matter the '82's. I'm more of a fan of the 72's and those are sharp! I always like that Seaver IA, you know exactly what he was thinking in that shot. "Where was that pitch?"
  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭
    Brett
  • Has to do with the stadium they are in. Shea?
  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭
    Doug,
    I thought this was an easy one, but I didn't expect to get the answer so quickly. Well done...and thanks for ruining my fun! image
    Brett


  • << <i>Doug,
    I thought this was an easy one, but I didn't expect to get the answer so quickly. Well done...and thanks for ruining my fun! image >>



    Sorry Brett, I was thinking that too, with all the work you put into this. No outfield seats gave it away.
  • fattymacsfattymacs Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭
    A few I picked up at a card shop.

    image
  • Some random cards I was going through today. My fear is the '71 Mays is trimmed because it's short, but we won't worry about that now.

    image
  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭
    Rob and Doug,

    Those are some super-looking cards.
    Brett


  • << <i>Rob and Doug,

    Those are some super-looking cards. It's amazing how comprehensive your collections are. >>



    Thanks Brett---It's called being old (speaking for myself) and having a love for the hobby that has lasted since being a kid.
  • fattymacsfattymacs Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭
    Thanks Brett, my collection is dysfunctional and I'm a horribly impulsive buyer. The only good thing is, I'm never lacking something to purchase (if only my card budget were bigger).
  • initialDinitialD Posts: 1,624 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Thanks Brett, my collection is dysfunctional and I'm a horribly impulsive buyer. The only good thing is, I'm never lacking something to purchase (if only my card budget were bigger). >>



    Quote of the year image

  • nightcrawlernightcrawler Posts: 5,110 ✭✭
    image
  • initialDinitialD Posts: 1,624 ✭✭✭


    << <i>image >>



    VEry Nice C56's image I love these hockey cards

  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭
    Brett
  • purduepetepurduepete Posts: 791 ✭✭✭
    Superb cards from last weekend everybody!

    I picked up a few more cards at the monthly Cincy show last weekend.

    Here's a couple more 68 Game cards...

    image


    and a HOFer and high numbers for my 61 set...

    image
    image
    Tom

    Collecting: Topps 1952-79, Bowman 1952-55, OPC 1965-71, and Pre-War White Sox cards
  • purduepetepurduepete Posts: 791 ✭✭✭
    I also decided to start collecting different types of pre-war cards after picking up these at the same show.
    Tom

    Collecting: Topps 1952-79, Bowman 1952-55, OPC 1965-71, and Pre-War White Sox cards
  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭
    Tom, BEAUTIFUL!
    Brett
  • julen23julen23 Posts: 4,558 ✭✭
    shaka!

    swank cardboard galore.

    best thread on cu.

    image
    RIP GURU
  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭
    Brett
  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭
    Brett
  • mrpeanut39mrpeanut39 Posts: 841 ✭✭✭


    << <i>1974 mystery theme. Which player does not belong and why?

    image
    image
    image
    image >>



    Hmm. Good one. Not totally sure about this one (don't know about Monteagudo and Adams), but I'll say that Grieve is the only one not to have a Father play in the Majors.
    "I think the guy must be practicing voodoo or something. Check out his eyes. Rico's crazier than a peach orchard sow." -- Whitey Herzog, Spring Training 1973
  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭
    mrpeanut,

    You are 100% correct. All but Grieve had MLB dads. Grieve was chosen as the odd man out because his son, Ben, was a big leaguer. But you weren't fooled!
    Brett
  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭
    Brett
  • bobbybakerivbobbybakeriv Posts: 2,186 ✭✭✭✭
    That is a fantastic Wilt! You guys have some beautiful cards.

    Brett, I doubt this is what you are looking for, but Fingers (only HOF)?
  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭


    << <i>That is a fantastic Wilt! You guys have some beautiful cards.

    Brett, I doubt this is what you are looking for, but Fingers (only HOF)? >>



    Bobby,

    I can kick myself for overlooking that. I tried to include only players who would keep the question unambiguous, but I blew it. Although that isn't the answer I was looking for, Fingers is the correct player. He is the only one among the group to have started a game in the big leagues. The 11 others were purely relievers, spending their entire careers in the bullpen.

    You get full credit.
    Brett
  • bobbybakerivbobbybakeriv Posts: 2,186 ✭✭✭✭
    Outstanding! I like these kind of tests. image
  • Beautiful cards today guys. Brett your quiz cards are always top notch. I just got back from the Seattle card show, very busy with some really nice cards. I realized I need more money as I was walking around. Here's some '58s . Take care. Doug

    image
    image
    image
  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭
    Doug, those cards are awesome. I need to start going to card shows. I've been to one just once in my entire life.
    Brett
  • julen23julen23 Posts: 4,558 ✭✭
    are any of those cards crackouts brett?

    i have been known to crackout a card every now & then myself...

    j
    image
    RIP GURU
  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭
    j,

    None of the 1970 manager's were crackouts, but likely 1/2 of the '74's were. I can't remember which ones, though. The only ones I can recall cracking out were Steve Foucault, Jerry Hairston, and Rollie Fingers; but I've cracked out so many hundreds of cards that I just can't keep track of them all.
    Brett
  • purduepetepurduepete Posts: 791 ✭✭✭
    Doug, those are some great 58's! I would be happy to find cards like that to add to my set.

    Brett, what do you do with all of the flips from the cracked out cards? Do you have to turn them back in to PSA so that they can update their population reports?

    Tom

    Collecting: Topps 1952-79, Bowman 1952-55, OPC 1965-71, and Pre-War White Sox cards
  • SidePocketSidePocket Posts: 2,901 ✭✭✭
    All I can say is those 58's are gorgeous. Gilliam looks like a 9

    "Molon Labe"

  • ymareaymarea Posts: 1,576 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Doug, those are some great 58's! I would be happy to find cards like that to add to my set.

    Brett, what do you do with all of the flips from the cracked out cards? Do you have to turn them back in to PSA so that they can update their population reports? >>



    Tom,

    I have a bunch of flips waiting to go back. I tossed a whole bunch of them in the past before I knew that returning them to PSA was an option.
    Brett
  • purduepetepurduepete Posts: 791 ✭✭✭
    1400!! image
    Tom

    Collecting: Topps 1952-79, Bowman 1952-55, OPC 1965-71, and Pre-War White Sox cards
Sign In or Register to comment.