Home U.S. Coin Forum

Hansen watch.

1272830323390

Comments

  • StoogeStooge Posts: 4,665 ✭✭✭✭✭

    C'mon guys, lets all take a breath, it's Christmas.


    Later, Paul.
  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Currin said: "In week number three update, we are comparing four small cents. I hope this to be a fun game. In my first week posting, I described this challenge as “an interesting experiment”. Insider2 reminded us that it is hard to compare collections a half century apart. He described as a “fanciful exercise”. I agree, but I hope everyone have fun watching the progression of this game."

    It's a shame when we compare two coins from any different collections that we don't know the month and year when each coin was graded. It might be like Hanson 1909-S VDB MS-67 Red(2014)/Eliasberg 1909-S VDB MS-66 RB (1998). That's because the grading standards have changed over the years.

    Here is a story you all can laugh at. The Hanson 1909-S VDB would be a perfect example of the AU-58 grade in the 1970's at the first TPGS at INSAB. Back then we sent a full red 55 DDO 1c out as an AU-58. We also sent a letter back with the coin saying that we had to grade the coin AU because of the trace of wear on the head. Then we advised him that his coin was the best example we had ever seen, that whatever he paid it was worth the price; that the dealer did nothing wrong calling the coin a Choice Unc (65); and that he should not bother to try and find a better example. :) I've told my students that if the coin remained in the same condition today it would probably grade MS-67 or MS-68. It turns out I've been pretty close with my long-held prediction.

    True technical grading during the period of "no trace of wear" was pretty tough; yet that coin would never be graded MS one time and AU the next due to the loss of luster (for whatever the reason) on the ear, cheekbone, and beard. That's what made that grading system so precise and why grades did not change over time or due to the condition of the coin business.

  • GazesGazes Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭✭✭

    again...wow

  • specialistspecialist Posts: 956 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Even I have to be nice to Delloy, he called me and wished me a Merry Xmas. He and I and like oil and water-and he knows it. I guess opposites do attract...

  • yosclimberyosclimber Posts: 4,747 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 28, 2018 6:03PM

    That's a very nice 1802, tied for 5th on Breen's roster.
    Below 9th the quality drops very fast, so this is one that could have taken awhile.
    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/937249/1802-half-dime-provenance-top-9-specimens

    The 1796 LM-1 MS-67+ is a dazzler, as are some of the other pop 1/0 bust half dimes from that top registry set.

  • JBatDavidLawrenceJBatDavidLawrence Posts: 504 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Currin said:
    It appear DLH purchased one of JRCSLM32 half dime sets, Flowing Hair and Draped Bust Half Dimes Major Variety Set, Circulation Strikes (1792-1805). This is a 15 coin set, and from the purchased, Hansen replaced 11 coins in his set. Of the 11 replaced, five were PCGS POP 1/0. The big news is that with the set, he purchased a 1802 half dime. This is a count down coin. The 1802 coin is ex. Simpson. I will post a count down update on Monday. It appears DLH/JB is finishing the year strong.

    https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/half-dimes/early-half-dimes-major-sets/flowing-hair-draped-bust-half-dimes-major-variety-set-circulation-strikes-1792-1805/alltimeset/171441

    Good work! It just got posted this afternoon...yes, we purchased 12 of the coins from the set and they are quite amazing. We started working on this collection in July, but we finally got it done in December! We're excited to add the 1802 and the rest of the coins are marvelous as well. Each piece has a PCGS TrueView as well, so you can see the quality!

    John Brush
    President of David Lawrence Rare Coins www.davidlawrence.com
    email: John@davidlawrence.com
    2022 ANA Dealer of the Year, Past Chair of NCBA (formerly ICTA), PNG Treasurer, Instructor at Witter Coin University, former Instructor/YN Chaperone ANA Summer Seminar, Coin World Most Influential, Curator of the D.L. Hansen Collection
  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @yosclimber said:
    The 1796 LM-1 MS-67+ is a dazzler, as are some of the other pop 1/0 bust half dimes from that top registry set.

    I agree, the 1796 LIKERTY is a big catch of the group. According to the PCGS Price Guide, it is twice the value of the 1802. First glance I place the value on the 1802. The price guide list the total value of the 11 upgrades and the new 1802 at $1,673,500. According to JB, the negotiations last six months. Very nice outcome.

    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • specialistspecialist Posts: 956 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I am not happy when sets I build get broken up....Delloy did again to me....grrrr...

  • DMWJRDMWJR Posts: 5,994 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 29, 2018 12:41PM

    "Focus relative to wealth" is what every collector should strive for. With each purchase, Delloy makes me reevaluate my own collecting strategy. I'm a collector only, and not a dealer. This is a side benefit of his impact to the hobby that most people are not considering. He's a game changer. (I don't collect at his level but it is all relative)

    On the morning after the battle of the Monitor and the Merrimack, when there was an argument that there was no clear victor between the two, the verdict was that all other navies were rendered useless. I see Hansen v. Eliasberg the same way.

    Doug
  • STEWARTBLAYNUMISSTEWARTBLAYNUMIS Posts: 2,697 ✭✭✭✭

    Currin - When you post Gazes small Cent challenge comparing Hansen’s small cent challenge
    to Eliasberg’s small cents, it’s comparing apples to pineapples.
    IMO if you want to compare coins which both collectors collected primarily and almost totally
    In the 19th century. Compare:
    Barber dimes,quarters and half dollars both mint state and proof
    Seated dimes, quarters and half dollars both proof and mint state
    Half Cents
    Large Cents
    Two Cents
    Three Cent Silvers
    Gold coins
    Liberty Eagles
    Liberty Double Eagles

    Most seasoned collectors consider the Eliasberg Coin collection the greatest collection ever assembled. The breadth of the Hanson collection is by far greater than the Eliasberg collection.
    I hope you agree with me in comparing apples to apples

  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Gazes Challenge –Part 4

    In week number four update, we are starting our silver series. I hope you have enjoyed this challenge so far. This is intended to be fun, so I hope to keep it that way. The rule of the game is to compare grades for a predetermined group of coins in Hansen’s Registry set with the Eliasberg’s. I understand this may not be complete and comprehensive comparison, but it is simple. If I find any additional information that could change the results, I may at times break the rule, as I did on this update.

    The two coins being compared this week is the 1792 and 1802 Half Dimes. Hansen has the better 1792 Half Diime by two grade points. Hansen did an upgrade this week and added the 1802. He got the new coin just under the wire. Before this update, it appeared Eliasberg would get at least one point by default. Eliasberg will still get a point for the 1802.

    I am going to break my rule of the 1802. By registry grading, Hansen has the better coin, PCGS VF45 vs. Eliasberg estimated grade VF40. I asked for a second opinion from someone that has study these coins. Breen graded both of them VF-EF. I'd say they are roughly equal. The Eliasberg specimen has been certified AU53 by PCGS. The coin was sold in 2017 in a Heritage auction. Being I have knowledge of this info, I will break the rule and declare Eliasberg winner of the 1802.

    This week ended in tie 1/1. Next week could be interesting with 4 coins in the challenge.

    Half Dimes

    1792 Half Disme: First regular issue U.S. coin; association with George Washington.
    Hansen Coin: 1792 Half Dimse MS66 (PCGS POP 3/2, overall: 3/3)
    Eliasberg Coin: 1792 Half Dimse MS64 (PCGS POP 8/5, overall: 8/6)

    Winning Coin:

    Hansen 1792 Half Disme - PCGS MS66

    1802 Half Dime: Rarest half dime; important U.S. rarity. (Note: considered collectable)
    Hansen Coin: 1802 Half Dime PCGS XF45 (PCGS POP 1/3, overall 1/4)
    Eliasberg Coin: 1802 Half Dime – Estimated XF40 (currently PCGS AU 53 PCGS POP 1/2)

    Winning Coin:
    Eliasberg 1802 Half Dime PCGS AU53

    Gaze Challenge
    Half Dimes - Tie (1-1-0)
    Overall - Hansen (6-3-1)

    Next week: Dimes
    1796 Dime: First year of issue.
    1838-O Dime: First mintmarked issue of this denomination.
    1916-D Mercury Dime: Rarest and best known coin of this design.
    1942/1-P Dimes: Only recognized overdates in the Mercury Dime series.
    1942/1-D Dimes: Only recognized overdates in the Mercury Dime series
    Note: Winner of the 1942/1 will be best of the 4 

    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @specialist said:
    Even I have to be nice to Delloy, he called me and wished me a Merry Xmas. He and I and like oil and water-and he knows it. I guess opposites do attract...

    I called you on Christmas and they put me on hold. Then hung up. LOL. Only kidding!

    HAPPY NEW YEAR to everyone. Hope to see some of you at FUN.

  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Count Down 24 – Last update for 2018

    It is fitting for the last update of the year to be a countdown coin. We have seen some really great additions to the collection, and this one should be near the top. Only 24 coins to go before DLH can accomplish his quest. According to my observation, he started 2018 needing about 80 coins to complete the Eliasberg Classic set. He will start 2019 needing only 24. I will not make any New Year predictions, but getting the number down to 10-12 by the end of 2019 would be a significant accomplishment. It is great to see him finishing the year strong. With the upcoming FUN auctions in January, he will have the opportunity to start 2019 just as strong.

    In considering collectable coins, this is the last silver coin that Hansen required. It does complete PCGS U.S. Coins Complete Basic Set, Circulation Strikes for non-gold. Hansen still has a few more gold coins to go. There are still several more silver coins needed to complete the Eliasberg Quest. You may review the list below to see those coins. PCGS do not include many of them in their complete registry sets due to I believe collectability. For simplicity, I wish PCGS would be more consistent and include all coins.

    Historically, the last silver coin that Hansen needed to complete the U.S. Coins Complete Basic Set, Circulation Strikes set was the 1802 Half Dime. This is not an easy coin to obtain is quality condition. It is said that all known samples have problems, some less than others. Ron Guth wrote this on the 1802 Half Dimes: The 1802 Half Dime is one of the classic rarities in United States coins thanks to a small mintage and a low survival rate. Breen (1988) claims the date was first "recorded" in 1863, when three examples were known, but according to David Davis, the first auction appearance of an 1802 Half Dime was in Edward Cogan's December 1859 sale. In 1883, Harold P. Newlin enumerated 16 examples, but according to Logan & McCloskey (1998, p. 9), he overlooked at least a few auction appearances. In 1935, James MacAllister claimed to know of 35 examples (Breen, p. 279). The definitive listing of 1802 Half Dimes appears in Logan & McCloskey (pp. 9-38), where David J. Davis chronicled 167 sales and appearances over a 140 year time period. By combining duplicate appearances and matching against Newlin's and Breen's lists, Davis confirmed a population of 35 examples. The majority of the known examples are in low grade. The finest example known is the About Uncirculated Garrett example, though there are some close competitors. No true Uncirculated examples are known.

    As stated, Breen did research on the 1802 Half Dime. There are about nine specimens that are in really good collectable condition. I would say that Hansen’s coin falls in the middle of the list. There were three specimens that ranks as EF/VF+, the Hansen Specimen, the Pittman Specimen, and the Eliasberg Specimen. He ranked the Garrett as finest, Valentine (Pogue) as second, and Atwater as third.

    1802 Half Dime XF45 Cert 29582773 PCGS POP 1/4

    As stated, there are may be three of four other specimens that in better condition than the Hansen Specimen. His Coin is the Ex: Simpson Specimen. This coin has not sold in auction in some time. The coin appeared in Pre-ANA Vintage Sale in 1989, but it did not sale. The last auction where it was sold was the New England Rare Coin Auction in 1978 where the coin realized $16,500. The latest documented owners are Larry Hanks, Jay Parrino, Bob Simpson, and now the Hansen Collection. Some other famous owners in the pedigree are Dr. Angus Black and Reed Hawn.

    This Condition Census coin is a great addition to the set. Being the coin has appeared in limited public sales and auctions, there are not many profession descriptions for this coin. The coin is very appealing and has nice original toning. I did find a description of the coin’s marking from YOSCLIMBER’s Stanford Educational Website:
    1. horizontal scratch midway between date and neck curl
    2. diagonal scratch from neck curl to base of chin
    3. small nick in center of shield (4th stripe)
    4. scratches or adjustment marks between ES and stars
    5. nose, under chin, right stars machine doubled, same as Valentine & Atwater
    6. pale golden (or gun metal / rose) luster

    The coin was purchase in a 12 coin group from the collection of JRCSLM32 set: Flowing Hair and Draped Bust Half Dimes Major Variety Set, Circulation Strikes (1792-1805). This is a 15 coin set, and from the purchased, Hansen replaced 11 coins in his set. Of the 11 replaced, five were PCGS POP 1/0. The 1802 was included in the set purchased. We do not know the price paid for the grouping, but according to JB, the negotiations lasted six months. The PCGS price guide list the total value of the 11 upgrades and the new 1802 at $1,673,500.

    According to PCGS graders, The Eliasberg Specimen is a better condition coin than Hansen’s. By registry grading, Hansen’s coin is PCGS VF45 vs. Eliasberg PCGS AU53. Breen considered them to be about equal.

    1802 Draped Bust Half Dime XF45 (PCGS Gold Shield)
    PCGS Coin #4268 / PCGS Serial #29582773 / POP 1/4

    Ex: George Hale, 1945 - Dr. Angus Black, 1970 - Reed Hawn, 1973 - Newport Collection, 1975 - Bibler - private collection - Norman Pullen - Larry Hanks - East Coast Collection - Vintage Auctions 8/1989:103 - Bob R. Simpson Collection

    There are 24 remaining coins in the Eliasberg Quest. The 14 coins that are not listed in “complete registry set” are Bold below. Note: DLH was a partner in the purchase of the 1854-S Half Eagle being that he's a partner with DLRC, but after purchasing the coin, DLHC reported the specimen was sold to an undisclosed client.

    Top 10
    1870-S Half Dime (Unique Coin in Tom Bender PCGS Registry Collection)
    1873-CC "No Arrows" Dime (Unique Coin in an anonymous collection)
    1870-S Three Dollar Only (Unique Coin owned by the Bass Foundation displayed at the ANA)
    1866 "No Motto" Dollar Proof Only (2 Minted, Unique Private Coin in Simpson Collection)
    1822 Half Eagle (Survival 3, Unique Private Owned Coin in the Pogue Collection)
    1933 Double Eagle (Known Survival 16, Unique Legally Owned Coin - anonymous collection)
    1854-S Half Eagle (Survival 4, Two known in private: 1-Pogue AU58+; 2- XF45 sold July 2018)
    1798 "Small Eagle" Half Eagle (Survival 7, Only 2 maybe 3 examples could be privately purchased)
    1913 Liberty Head Nickel Proof Only (5 Minted, 3 private owned)
    1885 Trade Dollar Proof Only (Minted known 5)

    Next 10
    1838-0 Half Dollar BM Only (Survival 9, six known for private purchase)
    1880 Four Dollar Gold "Stella’s" (Coiled Hair) Proof Only (Survival 8)
    1827 "Original" Quarter Dollar Proof Only (Survival 9)
    1894-S Barber Dime BM Proof Only (Survival 13)
    1841 Quarter Eagle (Survival for regular strikes 12, proofs 4)
    1797 "Large Eagle” Half Eagle (Survival 20)
    1819 Half Eagle (Survival for “No Variety” 7, for “5D/50” 17)
    1880 Four Dollar Gold "Stella’s" (Flowing Hair) Proof Only (Survival 24)
    1933 Ten Dollar (Survival 40, rarest issue in series)
    1796 “Stars" Quarter Eagle (Survival 40)

    Last 4
    1839 Gobrecht Dollar Proof Only (Survival 60-75)
    1840-D Quarter Eagle (Survival 65)
    1854-D Quarter Eagle (Survival 75)
    1798 Quarter Eagle (Survival 80)

    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • yosclimberyosclimber Posts: 4,747 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2, 2019 5:46PM


    Wow, that 1796 LM-1 MS-67+ : the colors give the devices such great contrast.


    Here's the 1800 LM-1 MS-68 ex-Norweb for reference. (PCGS CoinFacts photo)
    https://auctions.stacksbowers.com/lots/view/1-1DMVA

    Hansen's 1800 LM-3 MS-66 is really nice, too.

  • OldIndianNutKaseOldIndianNutKase Posts: 2,700 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Certainly these very rare coins were produced with much pride by the mint employees that produced them. Given that only 50% of those minted are known, one has to wonder how many are still existent as family artifacts, or in cornerstones in buildings.

    OINK

  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Gazes Challenge –Part 5

    In this week’s update, we are comparing 5 dimes that range from 1796 to 1942. Again, I hope you have enjoyed this challenge so far.

    The first comparison is the 1796. Both specimens are presently in PCGS holders which makes the decision easy. Eliasberg has the better coin by one grade point. The 1838-O “No Stars” dime was a dead tie with each collection having a PCGS certified MS65 specimen. The mercury dimes are where Hansen made a comeback.

    Hansen’s 1916-D dime certified PCGS MS67FB with POP 8/0 is finer that Eliasberg’s specimen that is estimated MS65FB. I cannot find any record that his coin has been certified or auctioned since the Bowers & Merena May '96 sale. In the overdated 1942/1 Mercury Dime comparison, Eliasberg only obtained the 1942/1-P in estimated XF45 condition. Hansen easily have the better coins with finest being 1942/1-D Mercury Dime PCGS MS67FB (PCGS POP 1/0). This was a comparison of all 4 dimes with overall best coin receiving one point.

    This week ended with Hansen winning the dime challenge 2-1-1. Presently, Hansen has extended his lead by 4 coins. Next week challenge with be 5 quarters. I am a little disappointed that “The Barber Quarter” is not on the list, even though it could become controversial.

    Dime Challenge

    1796 Dime: First year of issue.
    Hansen Coin: 1796 Draped Bust Dime PCGS MS65 (PCGS POP 7/10)
    Eliasberg Coin: 1796 Draped Bust Dime PCGS MS66 (PCGS POP 7/3)

    1838-O Dime: First mint marked issue of this denomination.
    Hansen Coin: 1838-O Liberty Seated Dime PCGS MS65 (PCGS POP 4/1)
    Eliasberg Coin: 1838-O Liberty Seated Dime PCGS MS65 (PCGS POP 4/1)

    1916-D Mercury Dime: Rarest and best known coin of this design.
    Hansen Coin: 1916-D Mercury Dime PCGS MS67FB (PCGS POP 8/0)
    Eliasberg Coin: 1916-D Mercury Dime EST. MS65FB (POP 34/35)

    1942/1-P Dimes: Only recognized overdates in the Mercury Dime series.
    Hansen Coin: 1942/1-P Mercury Dime PCGS MS66FB (PCGS POP 10/0)
    Eliasberg Coin: 1942/1-P Mercury Dime EST. XF45 (PCGS POP 346/863)

    1942/1-D Dimes: Only recognized overdates in the Mercury Dime series
    Hansen Coin: 1942/1-D Mercury Dime PCGS MS67FB (PCGS POP 1/0)
    Eliasberg Coin: 1942/1-D Mercury Dime (Eliasberg did not have an specimen)

    Gaze Challenge
    Dimes - Hansen (2-1-1)
    Overall - Hansen (8-4-2)

    Winning Coins:

    Eliasberg’s 1796 Draped Bust Dime PCGS MS66 (PCGS POP 7/3)

    TIE--Hansen’s 1838-O Liberty Seated Dime PCGS MS65 (PCGS POP 4/1)

    TIE--Eliasberg’s 1838-O Liberty Seated Dime PCGS MS65 (PCGS POP 4/1)
    No picture available

    Hansen’s 1916-D Mercury Dime PCGS MS67FB (PCGS POP 8/0)

    Hansen’s 1942/1-D Mercury Dime PCGS MS67FB (PCGS POP 1/0)
    No picture available

    Next Week Quarters:
    1796 Quarter: First U.S. quarter dollar; one year type.
    1870-CC Quarter: First Carson City quarter; earliest issue from this mint.
    1916 Standing Liberty Quarter: Popular first year of issue; famous bare breast design.
    1918/7-S Quarter: Rarest issue of this design; only overdated issue.
    1932-D Quarter: Key issue in the newly-popular Washington Quarter series.

    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • GazesGazes Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Currin

    what do you read into it?

  • specialistspecialist Posts: 956 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Hey gazes, you want to make a challenge on the 10C 1796? I bought the MS67 for Simpson which some people think is a specimen. And it is CAC too.

    These threads disturb me to no end. While Delloy is sucking all coins (good and bad), it should be noted there are others out there w/better coins-and bigger collections.

    Do not think every coin bought is so cool. In many areas it was not hard to top Elasiberg

  • GazesGazes Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @specialist said:
    Hey gazes, you want to make a challenge on the 10C 1796? I bought the MS67 for Simpson which some people think is a specimen. And it is CAC too.

    These threads disturb me to no end. While Delloy is sucking all coins (good and bad), it should be noted there are others out there w/better coins-and bigger collections.

    Do not think every coin bought is so cool. In many areas it was not hard to top Elasiberg

    I am not foolish enough to challenge you ! I trust your opinion about the 10C 1796. One reason I love this thread is I enjoy reading about collectors building their collections. If there was a thread similar to this one about the Simpson collection I would read it religiously as well.

  • specialistspecialist Posts: 956 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Myself and Mr Simpson had a different style. We did not want any old thing offered to us-it was the very best or no. That is why we never looked to one up Eliasberg.

    I am just tired of people thinking this set is the greatest ever-it is not. To me, this thread has been somewhat misleading

    However, let me make this clear: Delloy IS one if the greatest collectors ever. ONE of the-NOT THE!

  • GazesGazes Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @specialist said:
    Myself and Mr Simpson had a different style. We did not want any old thing offered to us-it was the very best or no. That is why we never looked to one up Eliasberg.

    I am just tired of people thinking this set is the greatest ever-it is not. To me, this thread has been somewhat misleading

    However, let me make this clear: Delloy IS one if the greatest collectors ever. ONE of the-NOT THE!

    How does Mr. Simpson decide which coins to buy? I know he has patterns and proof gold---but does he collect series? does collect any coin that is special regardless of series? just curious what, if any, parameters he has?

  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    FUN TOP 5

    We are down to the final day before the FUN starts. These are the top 5 coins that from my observation would make significant improvement to Hansen’s HOF collection. I have no idea that he will bid on any of them. The first two are coins neeeded for the Hansen Quest. It will be interesting to see if he goes for either one.

    The next two coins would be needed for the Major Variety set. As discussed before, Hansen neeeds about 60 coins. These two specimens would fit very nicely in his cabinet. The last one is a very rare proof. This coin is not needed in any PCGS sets, but if Hansen wants one of everything, he must have this coin. There is no other 1818 proof quarter available.

    If you have a different opinion, please share. This is my list of TOP 5. You may have a different list.

    Atwater-Eliasberg-Morelan 85

    What else need to be said? This coin is countdown coin for the Eliasberg Quest, number #10 on my list. There are only 5 known. This is Eliasberg’s specimen and the finest known. Does not appear to be going cheap. Be interesting to see if Hansen really wants it. Enough said...


    1827 Brilliant proof, exceedingly rare - one bought at one of the sales $225, and not so fine a proof as this. (Edward Cogan, 4/1867)

    A very similar thought to the first coin. It is not as rare as the 1885 T-Dollar. It is a countdown coin, number #13 on the list. It is not the finest, but a very nice condition census specimen. A strong pedigree dating back to 1867. Very nice toning. What else could you ask for?


    Ted Naftzger Chain AMERI. Cent

    This Chain variety would be need if Hansen plans to complete the Major Varieties category. Why not get a really nice one. The coin has cross the $1M bid threshold. PCGS values the coin at $1,350,000. We don’t how what Hansen values it at. What the buyer thinks is only thing that matters.


    Caldwell-Weinberg 1795 S-80, B-11 Jefferson Head Cent

    This is another old variety that Hansen will need at some point. This is the finest 1795 Jefferson Head cent in collectors' hands. One slightly finer is in the ANS. Will this be the week that he fills that hole? We will see.


    1818 Close date. Proof. Sharp, beautiful impression. Extremely rare thus. Plate VI.(Chapman 12/1890)

    This last example is a very interesting coin. I am not sure if PCGS would recognize the coin as a proof, although, it has been recognized as a proof for about 125 years. This is the earliest proof quarter. One other is known, but is in the National Numismatic Collection at the Smithsonian Institution. That one is a much lower grade. This is just one of 25-30 early proof dimes and quarters that is in the FUN sale. It will be interesting to see Hansen’s desire for these early coins. They may not be on his priority list at this time. By the way, this 1818 proof is a PF67!


    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • specialistspecialist Posts: 956 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I saw NO WAY on the 1885 TD. I Know 3 -yes 3 real players. Delloy would be happier I believe w/a lesser quality one to fill the hole ( I am NOT trashing that). But please......

    And the jeff head-LOL.... he has ZERO shot. I know who the buyer will be. Bring it on (this buyer has never lost when he wants something).

    Currin, you are making me light headed!

  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 9, 2019 7:48PM

    In case you missed it...
    Paul Nugget is a new member of the DLRC team. I think this is good news for advice and assistance in the Hansen Collection.

    https://coinweek.com/dealers-companies/david-lawrence-dealers/gold-coin-expert-paul-nugget-joins-david-lawrence-rare-coins/

    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @GoBust said:

    Thankfully, I was able to land the 1818 PR67 CAC unique proof quarter that is not part of any PCGS sets at present. I agreed with your assessment that its a fantastically important and historic coin. As a completist collector trying to master early American silver, it was a must have for my early quarter proof set.

    Congratulation on the 1818 proof quarter dollar which I think is a “Mr. Big” too. It is a very intriguing coin. I would love to see your MI set someday. It appears to be coming along nicely. Are you planning to cross the ‘18 over to PCGS? I think the significance of the coin would increase greatly if you can get PCGS to recognize it as the only private owned pre-1820 proof quarter dollar. I personally think it should be included in the early proof quarter PCGS registry set. It would put the coin squarely on the map, and also, you would be only one that can have a complete registry set! Which now you deserve.

    Thanks for sharing your experience with DLH. I have never met him, and doubtful I ever will. I base my understanding on what I read and what others say. Sometimes, I get the feeling that he is not a completest. Did you get feeling he didn’t want the 1818, or did he want it, but you won the battle? If so, big victory! In reading his published comments, he has never claimed be a completest, although he was willing to pay a big price to complete the TD Proofs. Sometimes I see he is not interested in coins that he may never have another opportunity to purchase, i.e. your 1818 and the 1854-S. At times, he don’t seem (to me) to “need the must have” that you described in your personal pursuit. I find this very interesting and intriguing to watch. I know... I break my own rule: The thread is about the collection/coins and not the man.

    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • PhilLynottPhilLynott Posts: 887 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 11, 2019 6:02PM

    @specialist said:
    I saw NO WAY on the 1885 TD. I Know 3 -yes 3 real players. Delloy would be happier I believe w/a lesser quality one to fill the hole ( I am NOT trashing that). But please......

    And the jeff head-LOL.... he has ZERO shot. I know who the buyer will be. Bring it on (this buyer has never lost when he wants something).

    Currin, you are making me light headed!

    I wonder if DLH read this post and took it as a challenge

  • GoBustGoBust Posts: 591 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 11, 2019 9:19PM

    Hi Currin, I think Mr. Hansen is in fact a completist as regards to the Eliasberg quest. His chief adviser, John B., is clearly helping to execute that plan. His enthusiasm for US coins is affecting collectors in every single series and I believe this is very, very positive for the hobby. He had only been at this for a relatively short period and despite not starting with an extensive major inter-generational set like Eliasberg, he has made amazing progress towards his goal. It's a reflection of the modern era of information flow and deep resources that allows such an attempt. I think some series will take more time to evolve than others. Of course the Hansen collection will have decades of more coins than Eliasberg as well. Some of the early specialist sets are of course difficult to build in shorter periods because of the 10 to 15 to 20 year cycle of availability of key coins, as is the case with proof bust quarters. Eliasberg only had about 40% of the proof quarters dates in his set and Pittman only 50% for example. I'm a more focused specialist and i'm going to try to complete this set. The progress yesterday was getting the two unique proofs, 1818 and 1823/2 under one roof and away we go! I think the very informative blogging and curating that are you doing as his set builds is awesome and enjoyable for the entire group of PCGS collectors. All of who are watching the Hansen collection building around us. Keep up the great effort.

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Who got the Jefferson cent? Was Laura correct?

  • specialistspecialist Posts: 956 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I bought the Jeff head.

    I would have blown old Delloy of of the water on the 1885 if I had been on the phone w/my other customer (he had no gudiance). He did buy the 1884.

    I am disgusted the 2 coins were not kept together. I consider it a lack of respect. I am angry that after all the work I put in, the pony I picked came up short and bought ZERO trade Dollars. BTW, Legend had 3 real bidders. I knew the first person to 3.3 would win it. Not a good start to a year.

  • ilikemonstersilikemonsters Posts: 767 ✭✭✭✭

    JB, that’s an incredible 1863 eagle. > @specialist said:

    I bought the Jeff head.

    I would have blown old Delloy of of the water on the 1885 if I had been on the phone w/my other customer (he had no gudiance). He did buy the 1884.

    I am disgusted the 2 coins were not kept together. I consider it a lack of respect. I am angry that after all the work I put in, the pony I picked came up short and bought ZERO trade Dollars. BTW, Legend had 3 real bidders. I knew the first person to 3.3 would win it. Not a good start to a year.

    Too bad you didn’t pick up the phone and call your client.

    You are either blaming Dell for not buying the 1884. Or you’re blaming your client for not having the correct “guidance” on the 1885.

  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Heads Up

    I am dedicating this week to Hansen Collection of Proof Trade Dollars. Tomorrow, we will start the discussion with the big FUN purchase. Later in the week, more discussions on the Proof Trade Dollar sets. Should be some good information. I am looking forward to learning more about these coins. I hope you enjoy as well. Any particulars you want to see in the discussions, just let me know.

    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • GoBustGoBust Posts: 591 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 14, 2019 5:39PM

    There was a strong push to keep the two trade dollars together during the bidding for what it's worth. Someone told me at the show that the two weren't always together. Perhaps someone knows more history there and it can added to the Hansen trade dollar set review.

  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 15, 2019 5:44AM

    Anyone know where Mr. Chain ended up? If it has been said, sorry but I missed it.

    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • specialistspecialist Posts: 956 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I could not call my other customer. I had committed to someone else who bid $3.2 on the 1885. Believe me, I had a ton of wasted time and energy and was with the wrong pony.

    Wonder if Delloy even knows its Trade Dollar....And FYI-there is a better on out there. I SAW IT.

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 15, 2019 11:40AM

    @GoBust said:
    There was a strong push to keep the two trade dollars together during the bidding for what it's worth. Someone told me at the show that the two weren't always together. Perhaps someone knows more history there and it can added to the Hansen trade dollar set review.

    The coins separated at the Eliasberg sale. I bought the 1885 in 1999. I bought the 1884 several years later to reunite them. I sold them as a pair to the consignor via JA and Heritage. So they’ve been together their entire life except about four years until now

  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,198 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @specialist said:
    I could not call my other customer. I had committed to someone else who bid $3.2 on the 1885. Believe me, I had a ton of wasted time and energy and was with the wrong pony.

    Wonder if Delloy even knows its Trade Dollar....And FYI-there is a better on out there. I SAW IT.

    How many 1884’s have you seen that are better than the Eliasberg coin? I already know you’re not a fan of the Starr coin as a 67, but where do you rank it?

    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It’s the best I’ve held in hand out of four

  • specialistspecialist Posts: 956 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I HATE the PR67. Its UGLY......Just like I hated the MS68 78S.......

    I liked the 84 in 66. Hansen can have his 5 min of fame on the 1885.. There is a better one

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Shhhhhhhhhh

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file