Home PSA Set Registry Forum
Options

1972 Topps Baseball - Official PSA Thread!

1212224262760

Comments

  • Options
    ArnyVeeArnyVee Posts: 4,246
    Great job Jason! Hope you score at least a 9 on that thing! Do you have a scan of it?
    * '72 BASEBALL #15 100%
    * C. PASCUAL BASIC #3
    * T. PEREZ BASIC #4 100%
    * L. TIANT BASIC #1
    * DRYSDALE BASIC #4 100%
    * MAGIC MASTER #4/BASIC #3
    * PALMEIRO MASTER/BASIC #1
    * '65 DISNEYLAND #2
    * '78 ELVIS PRESLEY #6
    * '78 THREE'S COMPANY #1

    image

    WaltDisneyBoards
  • Options
    I think your best chance of getting a 9 on the McRae IA would be to legally change your name to "Mr. Discount Sportscards" or "Mr. Four Sharp Corners" before you fill out the PSA Submission form.
  • Options
    gaspipe26gaspipe26 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭
    Joe,
    What no gaspipe?
  • Options


    << <i>I think your best chance of getting a 9 on the McRae IA would be to legally change your name to "Mr. Discount Sportscards" or "Mr. Four Sharp Corners" before you fill out the PSA Submission form. >>



    Or "Gaspipe"

    You probably had about 100 McRae IA's at one point (maybe you still do)... how many were centered well enough to get a 9 NQ? Hell, I'd be happy with a 7 NQ or a qualified 9 at this point.
  • Options
    ArnyVeeArnyVee Posts: 4,246


    << <i>Hell, I'd be happy with a 7 NQ or a qualified 9 at this point. >>



    I know what you mean Joe.
    * '72 BASEBALL #15 100%
    * C. PASCUAL BASIC #3
    * T. PEREZ BASIC #4 100%
    * L. TIANT BASIC #1
    * DRYSDALE BASIC #4 100%
    * MAGIC MASTER #4/BASIC #3
    * PALMEIRO MASTER/BASIC #1
    * '65 DISNEYLAND #2
    * '78 ELVIS PRESLEY #6
    * '78 THREE'S COMPANY #1

    image

    WaltDisneyBoards
  • Options
    gaspipe26gaspipe26 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭
    I wish I had 100 or so, just alot of Blue IA.
  • Options
    lostdart58lostdart58 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭
    Have the 72 collectors gone into hibernation? I suppose it is summer and time to be outdoors, vacation, or what not. I have just returned from vacation myself visiting my sister in upstate NY.


    ......slim pickens on ebay it seems with far too many PSA 7s and others of less quality................OH well........
    Collector of:Baseball
    1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better

    Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
    Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
    Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete


  • Options
    ArnyVeeArnyVee Posts: 4,246
    Not sure if any of you noticed in the new SMR that a lot of the 'low pop' cards have + marks next to them! image

    For example....Willie Mays IA, Vida Blue IA, Norm Cash, Felipe Alou, Hal McRae IA, Hank Aaron IA, Maury Wills IA, Bud Harrelson IA and Expos Team have all gone up in value from PSA 6 to PSA 9! image

    The 'values' still haven't met the 'real' numbers, but at least we are having some of these toughies acknowledged finally.
    * '72 BASEBALL #15 100%
    * C. PASCUAL BASIC #3
    * T. PEREZ BASIC #4 100%
    * L. TIANT BASIC #1
    * DRYSDALE BASIC #4 100%
    * MAGIC MASTER #4/BASIC #3
    * PALMEIRO MASTER/BASIC #1
    * '65 DISNEYLAND #2
    * '78 ELVIS PRESLEY #6
    * '78 THREE'S COMPANY #1

    image

    WaltDisneyBoards
  • Options
    Old timers: help me out of my confusion ?? what am i missing or just plain dumb here? examples:
    card # 14 POP 40-8's 4-9's 0-10's $55.00 card # 336 POP 41-8's 6-9's 1-10's $7.00
    card # 230 POP 29-8's 6-9's 0-10's $131.00 card # 457 POP 29-8's 7-9's 0-10's $11.00
    card # 425 POP 37-8's 12-9's 1-10's $63.00 card # 718 POP 32-8's 9-9's 0-10's $11.00
    card # 496 POP 34-8's 3-9's 0-10's $89.00 card # 113 POP 32-8's 5-9's 0-10's $15.00

    Just curious why certain Low POPS go so high while other Low POPs sell for book or a little higher?

    image
  • Options
    lostdart58lostdart58 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Old timers: help me out of my confusion ?? what am i missing or just plain dumb here? examples:
    card # 14 POP 40-8's 4-9's 0-10's $55.00 card # 336 POP 41-8's 6-9's 1-10's $7.00
    card # 230 POP 29-8's 6-9's 0-10's $131.00 card # 457 POP 29-8's 7-9's 0-10's $11.00
    card # 425 POP 37-8's 12-9's 1-10's $63.00 card # 718 POP 32-8's 9-9's 0-10's $11.00
    card # 496 POP 34-8's 3-9's 0-10's $89.00 card # 113 POP 32-8's 5-9's 0-10's $15.00

    Just curious why certain Low POPS go so high while other Low POPs sell for book or a little higher?

    image >>



    Well.....the cards you have on your left side list all have had recent sales on EBAY

    The cards on your right side list have not had any recent EBAY sales.
    Collector of:Baseball
    1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better

    Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
    Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
    Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete


  • Options
    The cards are only worth what someone is willing to pay regardless of the pop, commons prices are usually dictated by who needs what.
    Some guys who pay big for certain cards will "run up" subsequent copies so the underbidder in the previous auction doesn't get the card for a fraction of what they paid....a "patience tax" if you will or maybe just spite.

    Whoever said we wash away with the rain ?
  • Options
    I also think that some people still associate "Low Pop" with cards that are no longer low pops. The Phillies Rookies is one that comes to mind. A few years ago, it was one of the low pops, but it really isn't anymore. I think some people see it now and still remember it being tough and thus they overpay for it.
  • Options


    << <i>I also think that some people still associate "Low Pop" with cards that are no longer low pops. The Phillies Rookies is one that comes to mind. A few years ago, it was one of the low pops, but it really isn't anymore. I think some people see it now and still remember it being tough and thus they overpay for it. >>



    I think some cards are still "sleeepers" in terms of difficulty.

    Notable tough card #150 N.Cash pop 43 in 8 or better vs. :

    #14 Phils Rooks pop in 8 or better=44
    #138 Kekich pop in 8 or better=44
    #218 Kasko pop in 8 or better= 42

    Notable tough card # 385 M.Stanley pop in 43 in or better vs. :

    #113 Moret pop in 8 or better= 37
    #102 Allen pop in 8 or better= 41
    #366 Rosario pop in 8 or better= 44

    Here's another interesting comparison,


    #708 Foli ia pop 27 in 8 or better

    #377 Harmon pop 27 in 8 or better

    The last 2 Harmons went for 61.00 & 47.00 while the Foli's are going for almost 4x that....go figure.
    Whoever said we wash away with the rain ?
  • Options
    ArnyVeeArnyVee Posts: 4,246
    The Foli IAs have both the "Mets & Hi # Factor" involved, which I assume contributes to the price difference. There are collectors specifically looking for Mets cards, specifically looking for '72 IA cards & specifically for Hi # cards. That, coupled with those folks attempting to complete the set makes for a higher price on that card. Believe me, I can't wait until that card comes back down to earth with the pricing image
    * '72 BASEBALL #15 100%
    * C. PASCUAL BASIC #3
    * T. PEREZ BASIC #4 100%
    * L. TIANT BASIC #1
    * DRYSDALE BASIC #4 100%
    * MAGIC MASTER #4/BASIC #3
    * PALMEIRO MASTER/BASIC #1
    * '65 DISNEYLAND #2
    * '78 ELVIS PRESLEY #6
    * '78 THREE'S COMPANY #1

    image

    WaltDisneyBoards
  • Options
    RipkenRipken Posts: 559 ✭✭✭
    I just got a nice group of PSA 8 and 9 '72s back including a Baker in 8. The 9's include: #161 275 314 385 413 428 455 481 516 545 742.
    They'll be up on eBay later tonight, joining a large group of other vintage cards already up.
  • Options
    ArnyVeeArnyVee Posts: 4,246
    Speaking of the Foli card....last night's went for over $220 to Bill....sheesh...can't a brotha get a shot at this card?!

    1972 Tim Foli IA PSA 8 Card
    * '72 BASEBALL #15 100%
    * C. PASCUAL BASIC #3
    * T. PEREZ BASIC #4 100%
    * L. TIANT BASIC #1
    * DRYSDALE BASIC #4 100%
    * MAGIC MASTER #4/BASIC #3
    * PALMEIRO MASTER/BASIC #1
    * '65 DISNEYLAND #2
    * '78 ELVIS PRESLEY #6
    * '78 THREE'S COMPANY #1

    image

    WaltDisneyBoards
  • Options


    << <i>Speaking of the Foli card....last night's went for over $220 to Bill....sheesh...can't a brotha get a shot at this card?!

    Dear brotha, got a Foli IA NICE CARD Centering 98-2 T/B 1-99 L/R PSA gradable if you like 1 or 2 "s
    also have Mcrae IA centered 50/50 only problem dog chewed on maybe a PSA 3 or 4 cards are free
    S/H & I is 20.00. heck I'd like a shot at Jim Northup. pls adv image
  • Options


    << <i>Speaking of the Foli card....last night's went for over $220 to Bill....sheesh...can't a brotha get a shot at this card?!

    1972 Tim Foli IA PSA 8 Card >>



    After being outbid at over 700.00 for the lot of 31 8's that included a Dietz IA and a Mcrae IA (the only 2 cards I needed) I didn't even bother raising the bar on the Foli IA.
    I bet if I bid 400.00 it would have fell short, in the end he may not have the best set but it will certainly be the most expensive one.

    I see that Chris Rountree put his set up on ebay, he worked on that one for a long time. It will be interesting to see where that one ends...my guess is around 10k.
    Whoever said we wash away with the rain ?
  • Options
    beach64beach64 Posts: 218 ✭✭
    Just think it it was 1/1
    Killebrew now at 1902 for PSA 10
    Link

  • Options
    lostdart58lostdart58 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭
    I was checking out Chris' set up for sale on EBAY. he says you will get some of the variation cards with the set......Too bad the two "Cubs green variation" cards he shows are actually mislabeled and not variations at all.

    image

    Anyway I wish him luck in selling it.....image
    Collector of:Baseball
    1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better

    Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
    Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
    Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete


  • Options


    << <i>Just think it it was 1/1
    Killebrew now at 1902 for PSA 10
    Link >>




    expensive! isn't it!
    live each day like it's your last but don't count on it!
  • Options
    lostdart58lostdart58 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Just think it it was 1/1
    Killebrew now at 1902 for PSA 10
    Link >>




    expensive! isn't it! >>



    Its the old case of two guys who MUST HAVE the card......................the next one goes for half that price.
    Collector of:Baseball
    1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better

    Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
    Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
    Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete


  • Options
    lostdart58lostdart58 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭
    image


    As good as any Playboy centerfold I have seen!!!
    Collector of:Baseball
    1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better

    Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
    Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
    Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete


  • Options
    ArnyVeeArnyVee Posts: 4,246
    <enter drool here>

    I love box
    * '72 BASEBALL #15 100%
    * C. PASCUAL BASIC #3
    * T. PEREZ BASIC #4 100%
    * L. TIANT BASIC #1
    * DRYSDALE BASIC #4 100%
    * MAGIC MASTER #4/BASIC #3
    * PALMEIRO MASTER/BASIC #1
    * '65 DISNEYLAND #2
    * '78 ELVIS PRESLEY #6
    * '78 THREE'S COMPANY #1

    image

    WaltDisneyBoards
  • Options


    << <i><enter drool here>

    I love box >>



    Box is great, but usually not worth the expense that goes with it...image
    Whoever said we wash away with the rain ?
  • Options
    lostdart58lostdart58 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i><enter drool here>

    I love box >>



    Box is great, but usually not worth the expense that goes with it...image >>




    I never took home the Playboy centerfold either! image
    Collector of:Baseball
    1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better

    Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
    Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
    Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete


  • Options


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i><enter drool here>

    I love box >>



    Box is great, but usually not worth the expense that goes with it...image >>




    I never took home the Playboy centerfold either! image >>



    I took home the Playboy centerfold, Had to get some shots right afterwords
  • Options
    FBFB Posts: 1,684 ✭✭
    Playboy Centerfold probably not worth the expense either!
    Frank Bakka
    Sets - 1970, 1971 and 1972
    Always looking for 1972 O-PEE-CHEE Baseball in PSA 9 or 10!

    lynnfrank@earthlink.net
    outerbankyank on eBay!
  • Options
    ArnyVeeArnyVee Posts: 4,246
    But I would have fun rippin' open either one! image

    Sorry, had to say it. image
    * '72 BASEBALL #15 100%
    * C. PASCUAL BASIC #3
    * T. PEREZ BASIC #4 100%
    * L. TIANT BASIC #1
    * DRYSDALE BASIC #4 100%
    * MAGIC MASTER #4/BASIC #3
    * PALMEIRO MASTER/BASIC #1
    * '65 DISNEYLAND #2
    * '78 ELVIS PRESLEY #6
    * '78 THREE'S COMPANY #1

    image

    WaltDisneyBoards
  • Options
    Survey: If you had your choice of opening a box of 1972 Topps. Which series would you pick 1,2,3,4,5, or 6?

    My pick would be 5th series .(Williams, Rose, Ryan, Sutton,Robinson Marichal), So let's here some others picks
  • Options
    ArnyVeeArnyVee Posts: 4,246
    5th or 6th would be my choices for star cards or hard to find cards. But, I think that if it was just for the fun of it, I'd go 5th for sure.
    * '72 BASEBALL #15 100%
    * C. PASCUAL BASIC #3
    * T. PEREZ BASIC #4 100%
    * L. TIANT BASIC #1
    * DRYSDALE BASIC #4 100%
    * MAGIC MASTER #4/BASIC #3
    * PALMEIRO MASTER/BASIC #1
    * '65 DISNEYLAND #2
    * '78 ELVIS PRESLEY #6
    * '78 THREE'S COMPANY #1

    image

    WaltDisneyBoards
  • Options
    lostdart58lostdart58 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭
    Send BBCE $3600 plus shipping and YOU can open a 5th series box just like the one I have pictured.
    Collector of:Baseball
    1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better

    Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
    Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
    Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete


  • Options
    I'd go for series 3, not too much star power but the thrill of possibly pulling a Mcrae IA, Dietz IA or an Aaron IA in PSA 9 would be awesome .

    Series 4 would be my second choice, in series 4 you have what I call the "gold coast" from 433-449 you have 2 Bench , 2 Reggie, 2 Seaver, 2 Williams, 2 Munson, 2 Stargell, Bob Lemon , the Wills IA and the Henderson. Other cards in series 4 are the Reds Rooks and the Garrett. The Hodges along with the Abernathy are both very tough 9's.

    After adding my morning receipts I am at 50% of the set with a GPA of 8.15, my goal is to be at 75 % or better by the end of the year .
    Whoever said we wash away with the rain ?
  • Options
    lostdart58lostdart58 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭
    After losing out on two on ebay over the weekend.............Bill Novick was kind enough to contact me and sell me a Clay Carroll IA PSA 8 at a bargain price..................

    hense i still need:

    182 - Kranepool IA
    230 - World Series
    518 - Wayne garrett
    582 - Expos Team card

    and I need an upgrade the Dietz IA which i currently have in a PSA 7

    I will be sending in among other low pops ( through Lowstartmick) a 230, two 518, and a Dietz IA during the next special. (some may not grade out though)
    Collector of:Baseball
    1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better

    Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
    Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
    Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete


  • Options
    I have the following 72's for sale - make offer to dwedge@clevelandnet.com

    Charlie Fox - #129 - PSA 8 - 90571821
    Scipio Spinks - #202 - PSA 8 - 12440606
    Tommy Helms - #204 - PSA 8 - 90572003
    Tom Egan - #207 - PSA 8 - 31195842
    Milt Pappas - #208 - PSA 8 - 12067491
    Joe Rudi - #209 - PSA 8 - 30968911
    Denny McLain - #210 - PSA 8 - 30968913
    Gary Sutherland - #211 - PSA 8 - 31195849
    Grant Jackson - #212 - PSA 8 - 90043152
    Mike McQueen - #214 - PSA 8 - 90597821
    Alex Johnson - #215 - PSA 9 - 11747712
    Checklist 264-394 - #251 - PSA 8 - 31325387
    Ken Reynolds - #252 - PSA 9 - 90597620
    Jim Lonborg - #255 - PSA 9 - 90349657
    Maury Wills - #437 - PSA 8 - 31358220
    Willie Stargell - #447 - PSA 7 - 31367105
    Tommy Harfper - #455 - PSA 8 - 60044252

    Thanks,

    Dale

    1st Finest Set - 1981 Baseball Fleer Basic - Retired
    1st Finest Set - 1981 Baseball Fleer Master - Retired
    1st Finest Set - 1955 Baseball Golden Stamps - Cleveland Indians - Retired
    1st Finest Set - Mel Harder Baseball Master - Active
    Mel Harder Showcase Set - Active
    #15 on Current Set Registry - 1972 Topps Baseball - Retired
    #23 on All Time Set Registry - 1972 Topps Baseball - Retired
  • Options
    GDM67GDM67 Posts: 2,523 ✭✭✭✭
    What's the general grade level you guys who are working to complete the set are aiming for? Some of you look to be cool with 8's and others seem intent on 9.
  • Options
    lostdart58lostdart58 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭


    << <i>What's the general grade level you guys who are working to complete the set are aiming for? Some of you look to be cool with 8's and others seem intent on 9. >>



    Most will be content to finish there sets in PSA 8.....Two collectors in the registry are working on all PSA 9. A handful of cards in the set only have one or two examples in PSA 9.

    I am working on an all PSA 8 set...........but will end up at close to 8.5 when all is said and done...........always looking for bargain PSA 9s
    Collector of:Baseball
    1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better

    Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
    Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
    Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete


  • Options
    packCollectorpackCollector Posts: 2,786 ✭✭✭
    was pulled into this thread because I put up a cardenal traded psa 8 and was surprised by some of the early bidding. I wasn't even going to list the card , I usually don't submit anything to get 8's but threw this one in to fill a sub.

    I opened a few 3rd series packs last week , no luck on stars but 4-5 psa 9/10 candidates. pulled a mcrae IA but way oc as usual.

    if I was going to open a full box , it would be a 5th/6th box. the best of both worlds. you get the high numbers plus the shot at the rose's and ryan. there were a rew of these boxes around a few years ago, and there were some cool packs that were triple wrapped that were 5th/6th. I opened a few packs with some pretty good success but if you are looking to save money it is tough, do it for the fun!!

    I have opened at least a box worth of 72's from all series over the last few years and would say I am close to breakeven but that is only because i graded out some 9's early and a couple 10's. now there only seem to be a few 9's that could bail out a box where there were many back then. happy hunting
  • Options
    ArnyVeeArnyVee Posts: 4,246


    << <i>was pulled into this thread because I put up a cardenal traded psa 8 and was surprised by some of the early bidding. >>



    That Cardenal Traded card in PSA 8 generally gets anywhere from $60 to $100 (I think that I got mine for $70 or so).
    * '72 BASEBALL #15 100%
    * C. PASCUAL BASIC #3
    * T. PEREZ BASIC #4 100%
    * L. TIANT BASIC #1
    * DRYSDALE BASIC #4 100%
    * MAGIC MASTER #4/BASIC #3
    * PALMEIRO MASTER/BASIC #1
    * '65 DISNEYLAND #2
    * '78 ELVIS PRESLEY #6
    * '78 THREE'S COMPANY #1

    image

    WaltDisneyBoards
  • Options


    << <i>What's the general grade level you guys who are working to complete the set are aiming for? Some of you look to be cool with 8's and others seem intent on 9. >>



    I'd be happy to finish mine in any grade. I started looking for all 8's and ended up getting some 9's when the prices dropped dramatically (and there weren't any more 8's that I needed).
  • Options
    ArnyVeeArnyVee Posts: 4,246


    << <i>What's the general grade level you guys who are working to complete the set are aiming for? Some of you look to be cool with 8's and others seem intent on 9. >>



    I'm cool with all 8s. For a bit, I started bidding and winning a few 9s, but I went back to my all 8s philosophy and have been downgrading and selling those 9s in my eBay store.
    * '72 BASEBALL #15 100%
    * C. PASCUAL BASIC #3
    * T. PEREZ BASIC #4 100%
    * L. TIANT BASIC #1
    * DRYSDALE BASIC #4 100%
    * MAGIC MASTER #4/BASIC #3
    * PALMEIRO MASTER/BASIC #1
    * '65 DISNEYLAND #2
    * '78 ELVIS PRESLEY #6
    * '78 THREE'S COMPANY #1

    image

    WaltDisneyBoards
  • Options
    In my previous effort I was looking to do mostly 9's but this time around I don't plan to get too caught with GPA so 8's suit me fine...they're cheap too.
    Whoever said we wash away with the rain ?
  • Options
    I bid $201 on the Reed and POOF! one of you snagged it!

    image
    live each day like it's your last but don't count on it!
  • Options


    << <i>I bid $201 on the Reed and POOF! one of you snagged it!

    image >>



    Bill can be tough to bid against, I used to think if I really wanted a 72 PSA 8 or 9 it could be won, not so anymore.

    I win as much as I lose lately.
    Whoever said we wash away with the rain ?
  • Options
    ArnyVeeArnyVee Posts: 4,246
    What Bill wants, he gets! image
    * '72 BASEBALL #15 100%
    * C. PASCUAL BASIC #3
    * T. PEREZ BASIC #4 100%
    * L. TIANT BASIC #1
    * DRYSDALE BASIC #4 100%
    * MAGIC MASTER #4/BASIC #3
    * PALMEIRO MASTER/BASIC #1
    * '65 DISNEYLAND #2
    * '78 ELVIS PRESLEY #6
    * '78 THREE'S COMPANY #1

    image

    WaltDisneyBoards
  • Options
    gemintgemint Posts: 6,075 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What do y'all think about the set that went for about $9k with the juice in the recent Mastro auction? Sure it had a PSA 10 Garvey but that is a real strong price for a 1972 set.
  • Options
    lostdart58lostdart58 Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭


    << <i>What do y'all think about the set that went for about $9k with the juice in the recent Mastro auction? Sure it had a PSA 10 Garvey but that is a real strong price for a 1972 set. >>



    You have a link?? Was it a complete graded set??

    I am curious....................if that was a completely graded set the price was not good.

    If it was a mostly raw set then...they price was indeed over the top.
    Collector of:Baseball
    1955 Bowman Raw complete with 90% Ex-NR or better

    Now seeking 1949 Eureka Sportstamps...NM condition
    Working on '78 Autographed set now 99.9% complete -
    Working on '89 Topps autoed set now complete


  • Options
    I can't link the auction but it was not a fully graded set it had Garvey and Tommy John in psa 10, with a few other commons graded 10 . It had about 50 psa 9's including Carew, Ryan, Hunter,Fingers and Wilhelm The 8's included Bench, Clemente, Carlton Mays and Fisk. All in all about 70 cards were graded. The rest of the set was described as nm to nm-mt with centering problems on about 15% of the set . As usual with Mastro someone over paid.....or was bidding against the house.

    They had a ton of vending and wax boxes that all went for a fortune, $40,000.00 for 13 vending boxes, the 5 wax boxes went for 16 k ...not including the juice. A series one wax box seemed to be a bargain at 2100.

    Lots of unopened still around.
    Whoever said we wash away with the rain ?
  • Options
    Arny - new picture... nice.
  • Options
    Anyone have thoughts on the sale of Chris' 72 set ?
    Whoever said we wash away with the rain ?
Sign In or Register to comment.