Home U.S. Coin Forum

Saturday morning coffee with coins

1596061626365»

Comments

  • DCWDCW Posts: 7,689 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Great book @lkenefic !
    Love the potty dollar @lermish

    Happy Saturday, all.

    Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
    "Coin collecting for outcasts..."

  • @lermish i almost got serious on bidding for that but didn’t know if anyone would encapsulate it

  • @lermish ” It closed at about half of my max.. thanks for not costing me a couple hundred more dollars 😂”

    In retrospect we have cost each other more than a couple hundred dollars. 😁

  • RobertScotLoverRobertScotLover Posts: 1,065 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lermish said:
    The mailman arrived too late for coffee. Just arrived, a 75-CC with the very tough type 2 reverse (and, for the ultra mega nerds, the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die:

    ....and a totally unremarkable obverse:

    What is "the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die"?

  • lermishlermish Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 15, 2025 11:49PM

    @RobertScotLover said:

    @lermish said:
    The mailman arrived too late for coffee. Just arrived, a 75-CC with the very tough type 2 reverse (and, for the ultra mega nerds, the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die:

    ....and a totally unremarkable obverse:

    What is "the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die"?

    JK=Joe Kirchgessner, the guy who wrote the definitive trade dollar book. There are four type 2 reverse dies that were used for the 75-CC. The die catalogued as Q (JK-Q) is extremely scarce.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • DCWDCW Posts: 7,689 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lermish said:

    @RobertScotLover said:

    @lermish said:
    The mailman arrived too late for coffee. Just arrived, a 75-CC with the very tough type 2 reverse (and, for the ultra mega nerds, the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die:

    ....and a totally unremarkable obverse:

    What is "the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die"?

    JK=Joe Kirchgessner, the guy who wrote the definitive trade dollar book. There are four type 2 reverse dies that were used for the 75-CC. The die catalogued as Q (JK-Q) is extremely scarce.

    So, is it a bad thing someone carved the obverse into a "potty dollar," or does it make it more interesting?
    I guess that is subjective questioning.

    Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
    "Coin collecting for outcasts..."

  • lermishlermish Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DCW said:

    @lermish said:

    @RobertScotLover said:

    @lermish said:
    The mailman arrived too late for coffee. Just arrived, a 75-CC with the very tough type 2 reverse (and, for the ultra mega nerds, the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die:

    ....and a totally unremarkable obverse:

    What is "the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die"?

    JK=Joe Kirchgessner, the guy who wrote the definitive trade dollar book. There are four type 2 reverse dies that were used for the 75-CC. The die catalogued as Q (JK-Q) is extremely scarce.

    So, is it a bad thing someone carved the obverse into a "potty dollar," or does it make it more interesting?
    I guess that is subjective questioning.

    It is a very subjective question.

    For the set I'm putting together, I'm attempting to have each coin be somewhat unique, although a few of the dates will likely be plain jane due to scarcity/expense. Whether that is a neat variety, engraving, or whatever. So, for me, this coin checks all of the boxes and is a perfect fit.

    For a hypothetical collector working on a set of circulated T$ varieties or, an even more hypothetical collector working on T$s by die marriage, it would probably be disappointing to see the engraving.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • JWPJWP Posts: 29,062 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lermish said:

    @DCW said:

    @lermish said:

    @RobertScotLover said:

    @lermish said:
    The mailman arrived too late for coffee. Just arrived, a 75-CC with the very tough type 2 reverse (and, for the ultra mega nerds, the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die:

    ....and a totally unremarkable obverse:

    What is "the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die"?

    JK=Joe Kirchgessner, the guy who wrote the definitive trade dollar book. There are four type 2 reverse dies that were used for the 75-CC. The die catalogued as Q (JK-Q) is extremely scarce.

    So, is it a bad thing someone carved the obverse into a "potty dollar," or does it make it more interesting?
    I guess that is subjective questioning.

    It is a very subjective question.

    For the set I'm putting together, I'm attempting to have each coin be somewhat unique, although a few of the dates will likely be plain jane due to scarcity/expense. Whether that is a neat variety, engraving, or whatever. So, for me, this coin checks all of the boxes and is a perfect fit.

    For a hypothetical collector working on a set of circulated T$ varieties or, an even more hypothetical collector working on T$s by die marriage, it would probably be disappointing to see the engraving.

    I would not like the Obverse otr the reverse. Looks like an off-color copper/silver round. I would not want it at any price.

    USN & USAF retired 1971-1993
    Successful Transactions with more than 100 Members

  • lermishlermish Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JWP said:

    @lermish said:

    @DCW said:

    @lermish said:

    @RobertScotLover said:

    @lermish said:
    The mailman arrived too late for coffee. Just arrived, a 75-CC with the very tough type 2 reverse (and, for the ultra mega nerds, the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die:

    ....and a totally unremarkable obverse:

    What is "the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die"?

    JK=Joe Kirchgessner, the guy who wrote the definitive trade dollar book. There are four type 2 reverse dies that were used for the 75-CC. The die catalogued as Q (JK-Q) is extremely scarce.

    So, is it a bad thing someone carved the obverse into a "potty dollar," or does it make it more interesting?
    I guess that is subjective questioning.

    It is a very subjective question.

    For the set I'm putting together, I'm attempting to have each coin be somewhat unique, although a few of the dates will likely be plain jane due to scarcity/expense. Whether that is a neat variety, engraving, or whatever. So, for me, this coin checks all of the boxes and is a perfect fit.

    For a hypothetical collector working on a set of circulated T$ varieties or, an even more hypothetical collector working on T$s by die marriage, it would probably be disappointing to see the engraving.

    I would not like the Obverse otr the reverse. Looks like an off-color copper/silver round. I would not want it at any price.

    Thanks for that comment. I feel the exact same way about Jefferson nickels.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • CregCreg Posts: 1,038 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I tried Irish Cream to help me to understand that S mint mark thread—it might take some Bloody Marys too.

  • Inspired70Inspired70 Posts: 650 ✭✭✭✭✭
    • @DCW great post and congratulations on getting clarity.
  • ashelandasheland Posts: 24,053 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Copperindian said:
    Happy Saturday! Todays Red Eye: Intenso with a Diavolito espresso shot:

    This coin happens to be my first (& likely last) one with provenance from the great Louis Eliasberg:




    I don’t collect Seated Dimes, but this pop 1/0 was irresistible! Great story, too, as depicted by the description included with the coin pics.
    Note the initial sale from SF dealer Adolph Reimers to J.M. Clapp barely preceded the 1906 SF earthquake. Eliasberg acquired it from the Clapp estate in 1942. This one goes way back & remains in remarkable condition today.

    Man! That is absolutely stunning! Congratulations!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file