Home U.S. Coin Forum

Saturday morning coffee with coins

1596061626365»

Comments

  • DCWDCW Posts: 7,682 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Great book @lkenefic !
    Love the potty dollar @lermish

    Happy Saturday, all.

    Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
    "Coin collecting for outcasts..."

  • @lermish i almost got serious on bidding for that but didn’t know if anyone would encapsulate it

  • @lermish ” It closed at about half of my max.. thanks for not costing me a couple hundred more dollars 😂”

    In retrospect we have cost each other more than a couple hundred dollars. 😁

  • RobertScotLoverRobertScotLover Posts: 1,059 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lermish said:
    The mailman arrived too late for coffee. Just arrived, a 75-CC with the very tough type 2 reverse (and, for the ultra mega nerds, the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die:

    ....and a totally unremarkable obverse:

    What is "the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die"?

  • lermishlermish Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 15, 2025 11:49PM

    @RobertScotLover said:

    @lermish said:
    The mailman arrived too late for coffee. Just arrived, a 75-CC with the very tough type 2 reverse (and, for the ultra mega nerds, the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die:

    ....and a totally unremarkable obverse:

    What is "the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die"?

    JK=Joe Kirchgessner, the guy who wrote the definitive trade dollar book. There are four type 2 reverse dies that were used for the 75-CC. The die catalogued as Q (JK-Q) is extremely scarce.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • DCWDCW Posts: 7,682 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lermish said:

    @RobertScotLover said:

    @lermish said:
    The mailman arrived too late for coffee. Just arrived, a 75-CC with the very tough type 2 reverse (and, for the ultra mega nerds, the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die:

    ....and a totally unremarkable obverse:

    What is "the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die"?

    JK=Joe Kirchgessner, the guy who wrote the definitive trade dollar book. There are four type 2 reverse dies that were used for the 75-CC. The die catalogued as Q (JK-Q) is extremely scarce.

    So, is it a bad thing someone carved the obverse into a "potty dollar," or does it make it more interesting?
    I guess that is subjective questioning.

    Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
    "Coin collecting for outcasts..."

  • lermishlermish Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DCW said:

    @lermish said:

    @RobertScotLover said:

    @lermish said:
    The mailman arrived too late for coffee. Just arrived, a 75-CC with the very tough type 2 reverse (and, for the ultra mega nerds, the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die:

    ....and a totally unremarkable obverse:

    What is "the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die"?

    JK=Joe Kirchgessner, the guy who wrote the definitive trade dollar book. There are four type 2 reverse dies that were used for the 75-CC. The die catalogued as Q (JK-Q) is extremely scarce.

    So, is it a bad thing someone carved the obverse into a "potty dollar," or does it make it more interesting?
    I guess that is subjective questioning.

    It is a very subjective question.

    For the set I'm putting together, I'm attempting to have each coin be somewhat unique, although a few of the dates will likely be plain jane due to scarcity/expense. Whether that is a neat variety, engraving, or whatever. So, for me, this coin checks all of the boxes and is a perfect fit.

    For a hypothetical collector working on a set of circulated T$ varieties or, an even more hypothetical collector working on T$s by die marriage, it would probably be disappointing to see the engraving.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • JWPJWP Posts: 28,917 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lermish said:

    @DCW said:

    @lermish said:

    @RobertScotLover said:

    @lermish said:
    The mailman arrived too late for coffee. Just arrived, a 75-CC with the very tough type 2 reverse (and, for the ultra mega nerds, the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die:

    ....and a totally unremarkable obverse:

    What is "the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die"?

    JK=Joe Kirchgessner, the guy who wrote the definitive trade dollar book. There are four type 2 reverse dies that were used for the 75-CC. The die catalogued as Q (JK-Q) is extremely scarce.

    So, is it a bad thing someone carved the obverse into a "potty dollar," or does it make it more interesting?
    I guess that is subjective questioning.

    It is a very subjective question.

    For the set I'm putting together, I'm attempting to have each coin be somewhat unique, although a few of the dates will likely be plain jane due to scarcity/expense. Whether that is a neat variety, engraving, or whatever. So, for me, this coin checks all of the boxes and is a perfect fit.

    For a hypothetical collector working on a set of circulated T$ varieties or, an even more hypothetical collector working on T$s by die marriage, it would probably be disappointing to see the engraving.

    I would not like the Obverse otr the reverse. Looks like an off-color copper/silver round. I would not want it at any price.

    USN & USAF retired 1971-1993
    Successful Transactions with more than 100 Members

  • lermishlermish Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JWP said:

    @lermish said:

    @DCW said:

    @lermish said:

    @RobertScotLover said:

    @lermish said:
    The mailman arrived too late for coffee. Just arrived, a 75-CC with the very tough type 2 reverse (and, for the ultra mega nerds, the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die:

    ....and a totally unremarkable obverse:

    What is "the even more scarce JK-Q Reverse Die"?

    JK=Joe Kirchgessner, the guy who wrote the definitive trade dollar book. There are four type 2 reverse dies that were used for the 75-CC. The die catalogued as Q (JK-Q) is extremely scarce.

    So, is it a bad thing someone carved the obverse into a "potty dollar," or does it make it more interesting?
    I guess that is subjective questioning.

    It is a very subjective question.

    For the set I'm putting together, I'm attempting to have each coin be somewhat unique, although a few of the dates will likely be plain jane due to scarcity/expense. Whether that is a neat variety, engraving, or whatever. So, for me, this coin checks all of the boxes and is a perfect fit.

    For a hypothetical collector working on a set of circulated T$ varieties or, an even more hypothetical collector working on T$s by die marriage, it would probably be disappointing to see the engraving.

    I would not like the Obverse otr the reverse. Looks like an off-color copper/silver round. I would not want it at any price.

    Thanks for that comment. I feel the exact same way about Jefferson nickels.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file