An Interesting NGC Slab (First I've Seen)
braddick
Posts: 24,341 ✭✭✭✭✭
I thought this was interesting enough to pick it up.
(Should be here in about a week.)
In the meantime, was NGC simply being neglectful?
peacockcoins
4
Comments
Huh? Interesting
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
What do they mean, Details?
Cleaned?
The coin looks amazing to me?
"Jesus died for you and for me, Thank you,Jesus"!!!
--- If it should happen I die and leave this world and you want to remember me. Please only remember my opening Sig Line.I would imagine that they mean that the coin is a proof (what grade I don't know) and that it has either been cleaned or has had the surfaces artificially altered.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
It is a proof coin so why the "Proof Detail" label?
Wayne
Kennedys are my quest...
By looking at the reverse I would say they determined "Environmental Damage".
Perhaps.
Does NGC charge extra to place that determination on the insert?! /s
peacockcoins
Normally NGC will put why it's a details coin. The "Proof Details" is a common term they use.
https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2334524.m570.l1313&_nkw=proof+details+ngc&_sacat=0&LH_TitleDesc=0&_odkw=proof+details&_osacat=0
Wow... that's new. To my eye, my first impression was AT... gassed... Taco Bell wrapper... whatever....
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
Looks like there’s some nice color on it.
Is there a PhotoVision for it?
they got it for artificial toning according to cert lookup
https://ngccoin.com/certlookup/2108736-050/NGCDetails/
I'm thinking maybe artificial toning.
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
That's good news.
I know NGC will hit up modern silver commemoratives along with silver eagles with an AT designation many times when the toning is just fine.
It'll be fun to see what this one looks like in hand.
peacockcoins
From the photo the coin looks to have been cooked, I think NGC is correct, but you may have different results at another TPG.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
Thinking maybe AT
I am surprised it did not give further information on the label... Though it is clear when looking it up. The right determination though... Cheers, RickO
Artificial toning on a modern commemorative... ?just wonderful...
Hard pass!!
Weird designation. I may be in the minority, but it looks ok to me. I can see 35 years in an album getting to where it is with pleasant color on one side and being a little cloudy on the other.
https://www.ebay.com/mys/active