Home U.S. Coin Forum

Hansen watch.

1505153555690

Comments

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Zoins said:
    Pretty exciting now that it’s down to 6 coins remaining!

    To do what?

  • dbldie55dbldie55 Posts: 7,731 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Complete a PCGS defined set that I am sure many never thought we would see even close to being completed.

    Collector and Researcher of Liberty Head Nickels. ANA LM-6053
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @dbldie55 said:
    Complete a PCGS defined set that I am sure many never thought we would see even close to being completed.

    Agree. But not accomplish the stated goal of besting eliasberg

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,113 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 24, 2019 9:58AM

    But it’s still a great accomplishment! The 6 coins was mentioned just a few posts above so it should have be easy to understand the context.

    If one is training to qualify for the Boston Marathon, do we discount previous marathon finishes leading up to that?

    Or if one is training for an Olympic gold medal, do we ignore silver Olympic and gold World Championships beforehand?

    Generally they are not ignored but celebrated as well. Why should this be any different?

    Imagine saying to an Olympic athlete, your silver medal doesn't matter because your stated goal was gold.

  • yosclimberyosclimber Posts: 4,785 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 29, 2019 4:47PM

    I like the marathon analogy, but the PCGS registry completion is more like a waypoint than a medal.
    A non-gold medal says you finished well but did not win.

    I'd say this is more like the 20 mile point in the (26.2 mile) marathon.
    Based on distance, you are getting close.
    But it's often said that the true marathon begins at mile 20 when some of your controlling muscles are not functioning,
    you going slow, and it is taking a lot of effort for each stride!

    Of course all the cool upgrades don't fit the marathon analogy. :)

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,113 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 24, 2019 3:19PM

    The question is whether we can celebrate other accomplishments or not. I think it will be great accomplishment too, like how he has many #1 sets already. This is a journey to enjoy, and I'm hoping he'll continue to improve the set even if he does attain every coin that Eliasberg had.

  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @tradedollarnut said:

    @dbldie55 said:
    Complete a PCGS defined set that I am sure many never thought we would see even close to being completed.

    Agree. But not accomplish the stated goal of besting eliasberg

    I agree Bruce. Although, JB stated the “set (as defined by PCGS) has been a focus since early on”. I believe there is a difference of an end result goal and what is being presently focused on. I think the “goal of besting Eliasberg (in completeness)” is a longer term challenge than what they are working on presently. As you know, even completing the registry set will require the purchase of the Pogue coins. Will and can that happen, I don’t know. Also, Mr. Hansen has stated several times that he do not think he can obtain all the coins due to availability. A prime example is the 1870-s Three Dollar Gold.

    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • blitzdudeblitzdude Posts: 5,886 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Coins with details (outside of a quick dip to remove the nasty from a silver) should NEVER EVER straight grade period.

  • PerfectionPerfection Posts: 180 ✭✭✭

    Forgetting. the completion issue, it should be noted that Jb and dlh are continually buying
    MANY great coins as upgrades to the collection. Many are even CAC.
    The buying is constant. The blog shows some of them. I think we would all be interested in
    seeing or reading about more of the purchases. It has only been three years. If they keep buying there is no telling what the set could look like years from now.
    Forget the Indian. He bought it because it was available. If a non derails one appears I assume they will buy that as well.

  • jerseycat101jerseycat101 Posts: 1,348 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 25, 2019 4:54AM

    .

  • PhilLynottPhilLynott Posts: 890 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Absolutely love both of those, honestly two of my favorites in this entire thread all things considered.

  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Some powerful additions!

  • GoBustGoBust Posts: 595 ✭✭✭✭✭

    These 1829 Half eagles are exquisite and represent the direction of this collection headed up into the stratosphere!

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,113 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 25, 2019 4:44PM

    @Currin said:
    1829 “Large Size” Half Eagle PR64
    PCGS Coin #8149 / PCGS Serial #20962900 / POP 1/0
    Ex: Mickley – Garrett
    PCGS Value $1,825,000

    Great coin and great post @Currin

    Of note, the proof is also CAC (green).

  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,105 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Zoins said:

    @Currin said:
    1829 “Large Size” Half Eagle PR64
    PCGS Coin #8149 / PCGS Serial #20962900 / POP 1/0
    Ex: Mickley – Garrett
    PCGS Value $1,825,000

    Great coin and great post @Currin

    Of note, the proof is also CAC (green).

    Pop 1, only full proof known. Put whatever stickers you want on that coin it’s sweet regardless

  • goldengolden Posts: 9,589 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Holy crap!

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,113 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 25, 2019 5:15PM

    @Boosibri said:

    @Zoins said:

    @Currin said:
    1829 “Large Size” Half Eagle PR64
    PCGS Coin #8149 / PCGS Serial #20962900 / POP 1/0
    Ex: Mickley – Garrett
    PCGS Value $1,825,000

    Great coin and great post @Currin

    Of note, the proof is also CAC (green).

    Pop 1, only full proof known. Put whatever stickers you want on that coin it’s sweet regardless

    Unique or not, it's still good to know it hasn't been messed with :)

  • logger7logger7 Posts: 8,513 ✭✭✭✭✭

    CNN covered the Hansen purchase of the 94-s dime, bought by Hansen: https://www.cnn.com/style/article/rare-dime-auction-trnd/index.html

  • goldengolden Posts: 9,589 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Super!

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,113 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Beautiful looking Ikes! Great seeing so many top pops in the series.

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,167 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Given all of the top pop moderns he has been buying in recent months, I wonder if Hansen's secondary goal is to complete as many #1 PCGS registry sets as possible.

  • JustacommemanJustacommeman Posts: 22,847 ✭✭✭✭✭

    He’s going to need a bigger vault

    m

    Walker Proof Digital Album
    Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
  • neildrobertsonneildrobertson Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @cameonut2011 said:
    Given all of the top pop moderns he has been buying in recent months, I wonder if Hansen's secondary goal is to complete as many #1 PCGS registry sets as possible.

    I think that follows from having the best overall set. You could conceivably have the best complete US set without having the best set in many of the subsections. It seems clear that he also values having his coins be some of the best examples available in each of the respective subsets. I think the spending on moderns reflects that he truly values everything, which is a little different from the bias for the classics that many high end collectors have.

    IG: DeCourcyCoinsEbay: neilrobertson
    "Numismatic categorizations, if left unconstrained, will increase spontaneously over time." -me

  • 3keepSECRETif2rDEAD3keepSECRETif2rDEAD Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Go baby, go baby, go!!!! ;)

  • CatbertCatbert Posts: 7,123 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Geez, look at that strike on the 1974 Ike!

    Seated Half Society member #38
    "Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
  • GoBustGoBust Posts: 595 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I was very happy and excited to see that John and Del picked up the classic key 1817/4 for his Lettered Edge Capped Bust Half Dollar set. It shows they valued what might have been the last key coin Eliasberg added to the set when he bought a 1817/4 from Al Overton. Congratulations gentleman!

  • goldengolden Posts: 9,589 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Another wow!

  • This content has been removed.
  • SmEagle1795SmEagle1795 Posts: 2,166 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Beautiful, beautiful coin.

    Learn about our world's shared history told through the first millennium of coinage: Colosseo Collection
  • OldIndianNutKaseOldIndianNutKase Posts: 2,700 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What is not to LOVE about that 1795 Eagle........

  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,105 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Glad to see he bought the 1841 $2.5

  • lavalava Posts: 3,286 ✭✭✭

    Currin, thank you for your latest post. I think that goes a long way in clearing the air on the 33. The coin is in a genuine holder. No one is being misled. It’s not for everyone, but it is a heck of a gap filler. Good luck with the future newps.

    I brake for ear bars.
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 30, 2019 12:03PM

    @golden said:
    Mr. Hansen has now reached 60% of the 100 Greatest U.S. Coins! Eliasberg had 59%.

    At least 9 coins that Eliasberg owned aren’t entered into his set. I see another 3 or 4 that I don’t know if he owned or not but are possibilities.

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 30, 2019 12:52PM

    @golden said:
    Mr. Hansen has now reached 60% of the 100 Greatest U.S. Coins! Eliasberg had 59%.

    Is that book an opinion of the authors or are the coins picked absolutely the 100 greatest coins as acknowledged by the vast majority of successful professional numismatists, researchers, etc?

    It seems to me that eventually, anyone with enough money, time, and the ability to accumulate enough coins now privately held after some folks die before he does, Mr. Hansen or his family should eventually reach the goal he has set. I hope he is around to see it done. :)

  • CurrinCurrin Posts: 1,520 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 30, 2019 6:23PM

    @tradedollarnut said:

    @golden said:
    Mr. Hansen has now reached 60% of the 100 Greatest U.S. Coins! Eliasberg had 59%.

    At least 9 coins that Eliasberg owned aren’t entered into his set. I see another 3 or 4 that I don’t know if he owned or not but are possibilities.

    I agree with you Bruce. I wish PCGS Registry would fix the Eliasberg sets. Several sets are missing coins. As for the 100 Greatest U.S. Coins, getting 60 is a great feat and should be celebrated. Although, if you look at the top 25, Eliasberg had 17 coins and presently Hansen has 12. I think Hansen will get there, but will take time for coins to come available. When he hits 18 of the top 25, now that will be something special.

    And complete the Famous 10.

    My 20th Century Type Set, With Type Variations---started : 9/22/1997 ---- completed : 1/7/2004

    My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That will indeed be an accomplishment as I see only 17 that are likely to be available

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,167 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 31, 2019 9:39AM

    @tradedollarnut said:

    @golden said:
    Mr. Hansen has now reached 60% of the 100 Greatest U.S. Coins! Eliasberg had 59%.

    At least 9 coins that Eliasberg owned aren’t entered into his set. I see another 3 or 4 that I don’t know if he owned or not but are possibilities.

    A lot of the grades listed in Eliasberg's set are also outdated so those comparing the two sets are tilting at wind mills if relying only on the registry. It possible to "beat" Eliasberg's set by rebuilding it completely as many of the coins are now in higher graded plastic.

  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Can't say that now with all the modern collectors.

    @tradedollarnut said:
    Peace dollars were moderns to Eliasberg. And nobody gave a crap about needing gems then...

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file