I already posted what I thought might be a realistic price to expect for a set like that. But 7K? Already? I absolutely do not understand that auction.
Or, I might be completely missing something that is obvious to everybody else...
Looks to me like Brian and Bill both have a case of the WANTS
Brian, spikemax used to be in to the 78's and then got out. Sold mostly everything as far as I know. I am suprised to see him bidding . Guess he missed the beautiful 78's! Anyway, he has been a strong bidder in the past with this issue and had the 3rd All Time Finest set when he broke it up. Good luck ...
<< <i>But 7K? Already? I absolutely do not understand that auction. >>
Suppose the set sells for $7-8K. What would it cost to build the same set from scratch? The toughies will be extremely hard to find graded, if at all, and if you bust unopened looking for them how much money will be flushed down the toilet in the process?
Maybe $7-8K isn't so far out there afterall....................
I'm not really going after Musky's set with any aggression. I did value it at $9200 with SMR close to $14,500. Musky's set has a few hard to find 10's that I need but overall his 10's are of higher pop. and shouldn't bring much value if the set is split up. When my sub. gets back I should only need about 85 to finish so for me to go after that set doesn't make a lot of sense other than to have the #1 set on the registry.
Isn't it at least a little bit strange that Musky's set is not on the registry? I know he was buying 78's WELL before I ever started.
Anyway, if Brian grabs that sweet loot of cards there will be more than a few of us looking UP at him I think the chase for a complete set of 10's is just ADMIRABLE! What a quest, and what a GREAT set to try it .....
I knew those Forsters were due to come out of the woodwork! Someone just pulled a 9 on one. Not sure who it was though. I hope the 29 other cards I need to upgrade from PSA 8 come out of the woodwork too. I am not going to get into bidding wars to complete the set in minimum PSA 9. So, the more the merrier
Yeah I can't believe the reserve hasn't been met either on Musky's set. And reading his description he won't disclose his reserve price. Reading the description it looks like he has the third Forster card too.
That 3rd Forster card just popped up I think. hmmmmm
4 hours left on that set. I am wondering if he really wants to sell it. Seems like musky is getting the ol toes wet and will let it go only if someone gets a case of the "lust" and busts the reserve.
Guys, considering ole musky has at minimum 10k in the set, i think his reserve is fair. No need to lose money because the market has been flooded with 78's. Its still a lot of time and effort to put this beast together, so 10k in one fell swoop seems fair. jmho of course.
Guy....... If Musky continues to wait (like the rest of us) and sells his set later I would bet he will continue to lose money given all the unopened boxes/cases. Just because someone puts "X" amount into a set doesn't mean you will always get it back out. There's alot of collectors that think this way but with a year that has so much material still unopened it just won't hold its value as well.
For my situation, if I didn't spend so much time collecting/grading PSA 10's and bought what was available I probably would have had this set together in a couple of months. Maybe not all 9's or higher but one of the finer sets on the registry. I'm certainly not expecting to get out what I put into it. I'm not sure someone would consider buying my set (when completed) for the what I have into it.
Brian, i understand your point completely. What i had a problem with was people determining what a seller should let his property sell for without understanding all the factors involved. I love my 78's and they cost me a ton to put together, do i resent the fact that i'll probably never get out of it what i put into it, heck ya, no one likes to lose money, but on the other hand, it is something i love so that tempers the material side of it. The reserve comments just irk me sometimes. Who knows what goes through a sellers mind when setting prices, just look at some of the prices in card dealers ebay stores and websites. guy
Guy, sorry the "reserve" comments irk you. BUT, I can give a rats a$$ how much money some poor sap puts into his set. For crying out loud, I have put alot of money into my set. However, I am not naive enough to think that just because I overspent on my cards that someone else should too. Unless the seller is not really interested in off loading it.. SO, whith that said, there are guys who set reserves so high just to see what action might come, to test the waters.
I will NEVER resent that I might not get out of this as what I put in. Not for one miniscule second.
I don't see any derogatory comments about musky's reserve so I don't really understand what is irking you.
This thread seems to be getting a little stale. Does anyone have any goals for their set? Anyone have submissions their waiting on for 78's? I have one that's almost a month old now. I feel like a kid at Christmas time keep checking status and can't wait.
Looks like Mike is making a push on his set... way to go Mike!
An advantage to not sniping: I saw that you were an active bidder on that Ontiveros, Brian...so I stayed out of it. Glad to see you got him. I did win the Krukow, though!
I have to say, a BUNCH of the 78 PSA 10's that have sold and are still up on e-bay I wouldn't touch with a 3 mile long pole. So many of my 9's centering slap around these 10's like rag dolls. YUCK
I think I should crack and re-submit a bunch of my 9's. What the heck right? Have you guys done this lately with sweet 78 9's?
I'm relatively new to graded cards. I have approximately four sets worth of mint 78's that I've owned since they came out of wax packs. I've recently picked-up some graded 78's off Ebay but wanted to get a first hand testimonial on sending cards off to be graded. Pro's/Con's whatever.
Much Appreciated.
There are two types of people in this world; those who like Neil Diamond, and those who don't. My ex-wife loves him!!
I agree. The musky e-bay fling suprised me more than anything. I certainly was not irritated at all. That is laughable really. None of this was a question until Guy posted his comments that he was "irked" for some strange reason that any of us would talk about the reserve put on that set. Even though it was just talk and nothing derogatory. I wouldn't ever gang up on somebody and bid in spite, and I would bet Nick's toungue was firmly planted in the side of his cheek
Everyone will have very expensive sets (more than necessary) if bids get driven up for spite, especially for the guys that have their sets open on the registry.
Hey, it's only money. :-)
SinibobCards@aol.com
Working on 56T BB and 80T BB Looking to trade blocks of BB graded commons for other blocks of BB commons
With the ongoing and accelerating grade inflation when it comes to 1970’s cards, I would encourage you to crack and resubmit any nice examples that you have. I’m considering doing the same to my collection of permanent keepers for any card that is centered better than 44/56. Over the last year I have broken out some cards that I submitted during 2000-2002 and have been pleased with the results. Here are some examples:
Invoice 584017 – Zip Code 98008: At the end of the invoice you will notice a bunch of 1970’s Kellogg’s Cards. I went back through my sets and broke out 6-9’s and 6-8’s that I submitted years ago. The new results were 10-10’s and 2-9’s. You NEVER would have seen results like this on K-Cards just a couple of years ago! Anyone else think it’s more than just coincidence that there is now complete 1970 Kellogg’s PSA 10 set and that when the set was hotter than a firecracker and everyone was submitting cards that no one could even come close?
Invoice 588767 – Zip Code 98008: The first 22 cards are some 1975’s that I submitted in 2001 that came back as 8’s. I broke them out and received 9-10’s and 13-9’s. Quite an improvement!
Invoice 588437 – Zip Code 98008: I broke out 17 PSA 9's from 1978 that I thought were 10’s and sprinkled them in with some new cards that I submitted for the first time. The results were 14-10’s and 3-9’s. In addition, the Bob Watson PSA 9 that is in my set was a PSA 8 that I cracked out and resubmitted on this invoice.
I have found results like this to be typical of the cards I re-submitted. Although you have to look at the card, if you have a nice high-end example, it is well worth it. It’s just a bummer that the rules of the game have changed so much that people have to pay twice to get today’s grades.
Frank
Looking for 1975, 1978, and 1979 Topps Baseball in high end PSA 9 and PSA 10. ______________________________________ The best presents in life are the ones you give yourself!
Could not agree more with your statement about the rules changing. I am a newbie to the boards, but have already to come to despise the resubmission game. Is it just a revenue generator for CU, or is the grading truly that inconsistent.
I am about 10 cards away from a 1970 Kellogg's set in PSA 8. Do you think it is worthwhile to resubmit the whole set and see how it comes back. Or should I just be happy with cards as cards?
I think the rules have just tightened up again and I see others posts having the same comments. I sent in 100 cards.... 90 of them had true potential at being a 10..... only 13 received a 10. My eyes haven't changed since I cracked my case, in which I received 333 10's out of approx. 650 submitted.
I recently purchased some PSA 9's from different sellers on Ebay were I can't find anything wrong with them, centering is dead on, corners are sharp, no chipping, no tiling. I think it's a crap shoot on either who you get grading or how many 10's a grader will give on anyone submission.
My recent sub.: sub# 591454, zip 92602.
I will probably review all cards again and re-crack and play the game..... what a shame to have to do.
Your comments seem to me to confirm my suspicion that CU is generating revenue by undergrading knowing that the resubmit game is growing so prevalent. I hope that isn't the case. I think we need to demand consistent grading up front, not submit multiple times till the desired grade is received. I was really fired up about a PSA registry set, but I am getting a bit discouraged due to this resubmit B.S.
I'm not complaining about the grades I have received from my subs. Hell, I think out of over 700 78's submitted I have pulled maybe a half dozen 8's. Its just that i have many PSA 9's that are dead centered, razor sharp cornered, suberbly focused BEASTS that make alot of the present and recent e-bay 10's look silly. So what I am thinking is why should I bid on them when they are probably in my set already
As far as PSA generating revenue with resubmissions, whose to say they (PSA) knows that the resubmitted card they are looking at and grading is a resubmission. They would only know this if the case was not cracked for resubmission. Still new to the game, so this is just my 2 cents.
Obviously you are correct, CU has no idea if it is regrading a previously graded psa card. I guess my point is that you see throughout the message board discussions about resubmitting cards till people get the desired grade. Whether it is intentional revenue generation or inconsistent grading I have no idea. I just find the whole resubmission game rather disconcerting.
I am also a newbie to the boards, so take my thoughts with a grain of salt.
I saw the Lyle and looks so much better than my 9. I could not resist that one. And I have been doing ALOT of resisting lately due to the fact that I just got married on May 6th!
The Rob Belloir gets rid of another pesky PSA 8. At this point it takes a minor miracle to nab one I need for a low price.
Comments
Thanks! I do have a dozen or so slider nines in the set. The Murray was a card I thought might pull a 10 when I submitted it.
Dan
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
I already posted what I thought might be a realistic price to expect for a set like that. But 7K? Already? I absolutely do not understand that auction.
Or, I might be completely missing something that is obvious to everybody else...
Brian, spikemax used to be in to the 78's and then got out. Sold mostly everything as far as I know. I am suprised to see him bidding . Guess he missed the beautiful 78's! Anyway, he has been a strong bidder in the past with this issue and had the 3rd All Time Finest set when he broke it up. Good luck ...
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
<< <i>But 7K? Already? I absolutely do not understand that auction. >>
Suppose the set sells for $7-8K. What would it cost to build the same set from scratch? The toughies will be extremely hard to find graded, if at all, and if you bust unopened looking for them how much money will be flushed down the toilet in the process?
Maybe $7-8K isn't so far out there afterall....................
And when you complete the set in 10...or, at least in all possible 10's...I am counting on driving the 45 miles down the 405 for a private viewing!
Nick
Anyway, if Brian grabs that sweet loot of cards there will be more than a few of us looking UP at him
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
Not to mention 1,035 hits ...
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
Yeah I can't believe the reserve hasn't been met either on Musky's set. And reading his description he won't disclose his reserve price. Reading the description it looks like he has the third Forster card too.
That 3rd Forster card just popped up I think. hmmmmm
4 hours left on that set. I am wondering if he really wants to sell it. Seems like musky is getting the ol toes wet and will let it go only if someone gets a case of the "lust" and busts the reserve.
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
jmho of course.
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
For my situation, if I didn't spend so much time collecting/grading PSA 10's and bought what was available I probably would have had this set together in a couple of months. Maybe not all 9's or higher but one of the finer sets on the registry. I'm certainly not expecting to get out what I put into it. I'm not sure someone would consider buying my set (when completed) for the what I have into it.
Brian
guy
I will NEVER resent that I might not get out of this as what I put in. Not for one miniscule second.
I don't see any derogatory comments about musky's reserve so I don't really understand what is irking you.
Dan
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
Looks like Mike is making a push on his set... way to go Mike!
I still need to nab a few 9s.
Good luck on your submission.
Working on 56T BB and 80T BB
Looking to trade blocks of BB graded commons for other blocks of BB commons
https://www.psacard.com/psasetregistry/sinibobcards/othersets/3205
https://www.ebay.com/sch/sinibobsystems/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_ipg=&_from=
Nick
I think I should crack and re-submit a bunch of my 9's. What the heck right?
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
Much Appreciated.
muskycaptain
Shall we gang up on him? We could easily push that card to about $275...just testing the market, of course. As he tested it last week.
$74.99!!!
Hold me back!
He's not the first one to test the waters with a PSA-graded 78 set.
Working on 56T BB and 80T BB
Looking to trade blocks of BB graded commons for other blocks of BB commons
https://www.psacard.com/psasetregistry/sinibobcards/othersets/3205
https://www.ebay.com/sch/sinibobsystems/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_ipg=&_from=
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
Hey, it's only money. :-)
Working on 56T BB and 80T BB
Looking to trade blocks of BB graded commons for other blocks of BB commons
https://www.psacard.com/psasetregistry/sinibobcards/othersets/3205
https://www.ebay.com/sch/sinibobsystems/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_ipg=&_from=
With the ongoing and accelerating grade inflation when it comes to 1970’s cards, I would encourage you to crack and resubmit any nice examples that you have. I’m considering doing the same to my collection of permanent keepers for any card that is centered better than 44/56. Over the last year I have broken out some cards that I submitted during 2000-2002 and have been pleased with the results. Here are some examples:
Invoice 584017 – Zip Code 98008: At the end of the invoice you will notice a bunch of 1970’s Kellogg’s Cards. I went back through my sets and broke out 6-9’s and 6-8’s that I submitted years ago. The new results were 10-10’s and 2-9’s. You NEVER would have seen results like this on K-Cards just a couple of years ago! Anyone else think it’s more than just coincidence that there is now complete 1970 Kellogg’s PSA 10 set and that when the set was hotter than a firecracker and everyone was submitting cards that no one could even come close?
Invoice 588767 – Zip Code 98008: The first 22 cards are some 1975’s that I submitted in 2001 that came back as 8’s. I broke them out and received 9-10’s and 13-9’s. Quite an improvement!
Invoice 588437 – Zip Code 98008: I broke out 17 PSA 9's from 1978 that I thought were 10’s and sprinkled them in with some new cards that I submitted for the first time. The results were 14-10’s and 3-9’s. In addition, the Bob Watson PSA 9 that is in my set was a PSA 8 that I cracked out and resubmitted on this invoice.
I have found results like this to be typical of the cards I re-submitted. Although you have to look at the card, if you have a nice high-end example, it is well worth it. It’s just a bummer that the rules of the game have changed so much that people have to pay twice to get today’s grades.
Frank
______________________________________
The best presents in life are the ones you give yourself!
I hope that the regulars who read my posts can tell when I am serious as opposed to just screwing around.
Could not agree more with your statement about the rules changing. I am a newbie to the boards, but have already to come to despise the resubmission game. Is it just a revenue generator for CU, or is the grading truly that inconsistent.
Thanks in advance,
Doug
45% complete.
I recently purchased some PSA 9's from different sellers on Ebay were I can't find anything wrong with them, centering is dead on, corners are sharp, no chipping, no tiling. I think it's a crap shoot on either who you get grading or how many 10's a grader will give on anyone submission.
My recent sub.: sub# 591454, zip 92602.
I will probably review all cards again and re-crack and play the game..... what a shame to have to do.
Brian
Your comments seem to me to confirm my suspicion that CU is generating revenue by undergrading knowing that the resubmit game is growing so prevalent. I hope that isn't the case. I think we need to demand consistent grading up front, not submit multiple times till the desired grade is received. I was really fired up about a PSA registry set, but I am getting a bit discouraged due to this resubmit B.S.
@.
Doug
45% complete.
I'm not complaining about the grades I have received from my subs. Hell, I think out of over 700 78's submitted I have pulled maybe a half dozen 8's. Its just that i have many PSA 9's that are dead centered, razor sharp cornered, suberbly focused BEASTS that make alot of the present and recent e-bay 10's look silly. So what I am thinking is why should I bid on them when they are probably in my set already
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
fellow '78ers?
PSA 9 Denny Doyle card
wpkoughan@yahoo.com
Collecting 1970-1979 PSA 9 & 10 Baseball Cards
PM sent.
-Mike
Working on 56T BB and 80T BB
Looking to trade blocks of BB graded commons for other blocks of BB commons
https://www.psacard.com/psasetregistry/sinibobcards/othersets/3205
https://www.ebay.com/sch/sinibobsystems/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_ipg=&_from=
Thanks!
Nick
Obviously you are correct, CU has no idea if it is regrading a previously graded psa card. I guess my point is that you see throughout the message board discussions about resubmitting cards till people get the desired grade. Whether it is intentional revenue generation or inconsistent grading I have no idea. I just find the whole resubmission game rather disconcerting.
I am also a newbie to the boards, so take my thoughts with a grain of salt.
Peace
45% complete.
Looks like you sold your set? What happened?
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
Guy.... Did you sell your set, breaking it up? If your breaking it up please contact me.
I saw the Lyle and looks so much better than my 9. I could not resist that one. And I have been doing ALOT of resisting lately due to the fact that I just got married on May 6th!
The Rob Belloir gets rid of another pesky PSA 8. At this point it takes a minor miracle to nab one I need for a low price.
Dan
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
A list price of $7,200 on the Baseball Card Exchange. NOBODY you can trust more than Steve Hart.
I sure as hell won't hit it. Lets hear some feedback!
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240