PS to my 3b post from yesterday. I thought the EDS (top pic) was a 3a die pair. I wanted to ensure I still had a complete set of the 1869/69 die pairs, so I bought this one yesterday:
It’s already out for designation. I included the descriptive literature from EERC. The tv is way too dark so I didn’t want to post it.
@TomB said:
Somehow, I managed to be on these boards for the last year without ever opening this thread up. I know, I know, how could that happen? Now that I have spent the last hour looking at these incredible IHCs and giving myself carpel tunnel from hitting the "Like" button over and over, I have come to the conclusion that @asheland can either pay for my medical expenses to carpel tunnel surgery or, instead, can simply mail me that incredibly attractive PCGS VF25 1877 that has been posted in this thread.
@TomB said:
I guess I get to put up post numbers 298 and 299 in this thread. This coin is not nearly as rare as myriad others in this thread and is not nearly as high grade as so many others and is definitely not nearly as valuable as coin after coin after coin that has been shared, but I like it. For the IHC series I really like RD coins to be in older holders because I believe they are likely going to be more stable overall, and much less likely to show a fingerprint in the future, than newer holdered coins.
100% agree with RED in the old holders!
A fatty with a gold sticker!? That is remarkable! I would be so proud to own that one!
@TomB said:
I guess I get to put up post numbers 298 and 299 in this thread. This coin is not nearly as rare as myriad others in this thread and is not nearly as high grade as so many others and is definitely not nearly as valuable as coin after coin after coin that has been shared, but I like it. For the IHC series I really like RD coins to be in older holders because I believe they are likely going to be more stable overall, and much less likely to show a fingerprint in the future, than newer holdered coins.
100% agree with RED in the old holders!
A fatty with a gold sticker!? That is remarkable! I would be so proud to own that one!
This is an interesting one....It was originally purchased in an NGC holder as a PF64BN (Bronze).
It was cracked and sent to PCGS, where it graded PF65 (copper Nickel).
Metallurgic analysis says it is bronze, but on a thick planchet. That should make it a J-356a Pattern and should be graded with a color designation. Looks absolutely Cameo in hand too!
@redraider: great coin! Curious about the metallurgical test: did you do that before or after going to PCGS? Are you going to attempt to designate it as a J-356a? Love these coins with distinct obv/rev contrast!
@Copperindian: Metlaergic testing was done in the NGC slab and was not accurate. It was cracked out and tested again and tested as bronze. It then went to PCGS (with the metallurgic testing results) where the testing results were ignored and went into a Copper-Nickel holder.
Here is the testing results. Interesting to see more than trace amount of silver and gold in the result.
The mint did a lot of funky stuff in 1864 in testing new metal compositions, so who knows what this one really is.
@redraider said: @Copperindian: Metlaergic testing was done in the NGC slab and was not accurate. It was cracked out and tested again and tested as bronze. It then went to PCGS (with the metallurgic testing results) where the testing results were ignored and went into a Copper-Nickel holder.
Here is the testing results. Interesting to see more than trace amount of silver and gold in the result.
The mint did a lot of funky stuff in 1864 in testing new metal compositions, so who knows what this one really is.
Comments
@WiscKau: nice! Is this one raw?
“The thrill of the hunt never gets old”
PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
Copperindian
Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
Copperindian
@TomB: glad you caught up with “us”! Nice 1908!
“The thrill of the hunt never gets old”
PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
Copperindian
Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
Copperindian
PS to my 3b post from yesterday. I thought the EDS (top pic) was a 3a die pair. I wanted to ensure I still had a complete set of the 1869/69 die pairs, so I bought this one yesterday:
It’s already out for designation. I included the descriptive literature from EERC. The tv is way too dark so I didn’t want to post it.
“The thrill of the hunt never gets old”
PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
Copperindian
Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
Copperindian
Thanks for the kind words!
NGC PF 64BN
Haha.
I can electronically mail this to you…
My YouTube Channel
100% agree with RED in the old holders!
A fatty with a gold sticker!? That is remarkable! I would be so proud to own that one!
My YouTube Channel
I love that one. I used to own it.
Sunshine Rare Coins
sunshinecoins.com/store/c1/Featured_Products.html
This is an interesting one....It was originally purchased in an NGC holder as a PF64BN (Bronze).
It was cracked and sent to PCGS, where it graded PF65 (copper Nickel).
Metallurgic analysis says it is bronze, but on a thick planchet. That should make it a J-356a Pattern and should be graded with a color designation. Looks absolutely Cameo in hand too!
@redraider: great coin! Curious about the metallurgical test: did you do that before or after going to PCGS? Are you going to attempt to designate it as a J-356a? Love these coins with distinct obv/rev contrast!
“The thrill of the hunt never gets old”
PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
Copperindian
Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
Copperindian
@Copperindian: Metlaergic testing was done in the NGC slab and was not accurate. It was cracked out and tested again and tested as bronze. It then went to PCGS (with the metallurgic testing results) where the testing results were ignored and went into a Copper-Nickel holder.
Here is the testing results. Interesting to see more than trace amount of silver and gold in the result.
The mint did a lot of funky stuff in 1864 in testing new metal compositions, so who knows what this one really is.
That’s very interesting!
My YouTube Channel