The books on this series hammer in the the importance of the head needing to be full on collectors of such. I was just glancing at photos on a old hard drive and saw a 1926-S with a 85% virtual full head I sold as it wasn't really full. Now kicking myself as in the decade or more that has passed I never found a better example.
To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
@DeplorableDan said:
I’m unaware of the grades but I would much rather have the top coin. That toning is spectacular.
A decade ago that type of toning on a SLQ would have been considered questionable at both top grading services. Many of the Boys Town and Eliasberg collection SLQ's had envelope toning like this and at times needed to be resubmitted more than once or bounced between grading services to straight grade.
To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
For some folks money isn’t an obstacle and how they spend it will never make sense to the others where it is.
The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
It all depends upon your wallet. If my wallet could easily afford both I would always get the bottom one as it is technically a better coin. If I couldn’t afford both easily then it’s moot and I would either go with the top or neither.
I haven’t researched the series or the date but I suppose the price differential has always been there and is exaggerated by registry competition.
@TurtleCat said:
It all depends upon your wallet. If my wallet could easily afford both I would always get the bottom one as it is technically a better coin. If I couldn’t afford both easily then it’s moot and I would either go with the top or neither.
I haven’t researched the series or the date but I suppose the price differential has always been there and is exaggerated by registry competition.
Last scenario unrealistic since if you could afford 250K, I’m confident you could afford an additional 20K.
Seated Half Society member #38 "Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
@TurtleCat said:
It all depends upon your wallet. If my wallet could easily afford both I would always get the bottom one as it is technically a better coin. If I couldn’t afford both easily then it’s moot and I would either go with the top or neither.
I haven’t researched the series or the date but I suppose the price differential has always been there and is exaggerated by registry competition.
Last scenario unrealistic since if you could afford 250K, I’m confident you could afford an additional 20K.
Maybe he means if his wallet could afford the storage space for both coins. He is probably thinking of carrying them to feed parking meters...
100th pint of blood donated 7/19/2022 . Transactions with WilliamF, Relaxn, LukeMarshal, jclovescoins, braddick, JWP, Weather11am, Fairlaneman, Dscoins, lordmarcovan, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, JimW. God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, that who so believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder with the bigger wallet. I think the top coin is the better of the two, and it appears the second coin has a scratch on the eagle's wing that would knock its grade down by a full point. Commercialization and matching the sale to the right buyer plays a role in extreme prices too.
Custom album maker and numismatic photographer.
Need a personalized album made? Design it on the website below and I'll build it for you. https://www.donahuenumismatics.com/.
The only thing surprising here is who asked the question.
You can choose to not care at all about "Full Head" or "Full steps" or even "Red" vs. "Red Brown" vs. "Brown". You'll save a fortune if you don't care about such things. On the other hand, people do.
Buy everything in AU 55 or AU 58 and you'll really save money by avoiding the MS grades. But there is a quality difference.
The bottom coin is totally hammered! Notice the date, rivets, and head of course on the obverse; the reverse strike is superb and shows in the lettering. Hmmm but a difference factor of 12.5 is tremendous.
A simple "full strike" designation makes more sense to me than only paying attention to one small design detail.
Unfortunately true full strikes just don't exist for many US coins.
@Liquidated said:
Slightly OT but SLQ’s were always my favorite. Always wanted to see an absolute full strike with perfect details on the head, shield, and drapery above knee. Never seen an absolute perfectly struck SLQ
The best struck of the series is the 1917 P Type I. If you can afford an MS 65 FH, the coin should be fully struck.
"Vou invadir o Nordeste, "Seu cabra da peste, "Sou Mangueira......."
When looking at strike detail, number two for the obverse and one for the reverse...Price differential is a mystery without further information. Cheers, RickO
@TurtleCat said:
It all depends upon your wallet. If my wallet could easily afford both I would always get the bottom one as it is technically a better coin. If I couldn’t afford both easily then it’s moot and I would either go with the top or neither.
I haven’t researched the series or the date but I suppose the price differential has always been there and is exaggerated by registry competition.
Last scenario unrealistic since if you could afford 250K, I’m confident you could afford an additional 20K.
Show us the labels and the registry points difference .....
"My friends who see my collection sometimes ask what something costs. I tell them and they are in awe at my stupidity." (Baccaruda, 12/03).I find it hard to believe that he (Trump) rushed to some hotel to meet girls of loose morals, although ours are undoubtedly the best in the world. (Putin 1/17) Gone but not forgotten. IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Broadstruck, Ricko, Big Moose, Cardinal.
I think this is what comes of having a “mature” market. There’s a lot of money out there but most US coin series are quite common even at the top end. So if you want the best, semi arbitrary sub- designations are needed.
I would certainly be content with the 1st coin at that kind of discount. The difference is just too subtle to justify that big of a premium. But, hey people do what they want with their money
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."
The price discrepancy is simply that two people with significant budgets want top pop with full heads.
PCGS lists the pops as:
Non-FH MS67: POP 1083/1/0
FH MS67: POP 123/2/0
While Non-FH and FH have different pops in the PCGS POP report, I tend to merge them and would consider them as:
Non-FH MS67: POP 1206/1/2
FH MS76: POP 1207/2/0
I can understand it at some level. I want to pick up a particular Civil War Token where the nose is not well struck on many pieces. I refuse to buy one where the nose is not well struck, even if it's otherwise a high grade. The coin just isn't enjoyable that way to me.
10x price is a lot, but everyone's financial condition is different.
It is more of an indictment as to how silly the FH designation is for this series... it takes up such a small portion of the design and yet coins are valued to ridiculous levels for a striking characteristic that is less important than the Shield.
A Full Shield designation would be far more appropriate as a standard and even a measurement as the strike and even preservation concerns.
But changing a grading standard to make it more responsive to describing the actual preservation of the coin is not likely going to happen anytime soon.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Comments
Deleted
I’m unaware of the grades but I would much rather have the top coin. That toning is spectacular.
Founder- Peak Rarities
Website
Instagram
Facebook
FH vs Non FH
I'll take the what appears to be the not quite FH but more attractive (IMO) SLQ for a savings of $230,000. please
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
The books on this series hammer in the the importance of the head needing to be full on collectors of such. I was just glancing at photos on a old hard drive and saw a 1926-S with a 85% virtual full head I sold as it wasn't really full. Now kicking myself as in the decade or more that has passed I never found a better example.
The shield on the bottom one is more detailed as well.
Successful BST with drddm, BustDMs, Pnies20, lkeigwin, pursuitofliberty, Bullsitter, felinfoel, SPalladino
$5 Type Set https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/u-s-coins/type-sets/half-eagle-type-set-circulation-strikes-1795-1929/album/344192
CBH Set https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/everyman-collections/everyman-half-dollars/everyman-capped-bust-half-dollars-1807-1839/album/345572
FWIW they could have done Trade Dollars with FH designations too.
If the prices had been flipped around, I wouldn't have batted an eye.
peacockcoins
No comparison in eye appeal obviously. Pricing difference is a symptom of registry competition obsession.
"Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
Someone with unlimited funds probably wanted the nicest coin of the date.
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."
A decade ago that type of toning on a SLQ would have been considered questionable at both top grading services. Many of the Boys Town and Eliasberg collection SLQ's had envelope toning like this and at times needed to be resubmitted more than once or bounced between grading services to straight grade.
Deleted
For some folks money isn’t an obstacle and how they spend it will never make sense to the others where it is.
It all depends upon your wallet. If my wallet could easily afford both I would always get the bottom one as it is technically a better coin. If I couldn’t afford both easily then it’s moot and I would either go with the top or neither.
I haven’t researched the series or the date but I suppose the price differential has always been there and is exaggerated by registry competition.
Last scenario unrealistic since if you could afford 250K, I’m confident you could afford an additional 20K.
"Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
230 K for a little extra metal flow. If you have that kind of cash it can be spent on worse things I suppose.
Uh, you don't see that the cheaper one has a better strike? That's why it's cheaper for sure.
bob
Maybe it is just the pics, but the top coin seems to have a stronger reverse strike. Will agree the head looks struck better on the bottom coin.
Successful BST Transactions: erwindoc, VTchaser, moursund, robkool, RelicKING, Herb_T, Meltdown, ElmerFusterpuck, airplanenut
Maybe he means if his wallet could afford the storage space for both coins. He is probably thinking of carrying them to feed parking meters...
Isn't that a pretty big ding center of the forward wing on the lower coin? For that reason alone I'd rather have the coin up top.
--Severian the Lame
Top coin much better. Overall strike better ( except head slightly weaker) Reverse MUCH better.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder with the bigger wallet. I think the top coin is the better of the two, and it appears the second coin has a scratch on the eagle's wing that would knock its grade down by a full point. Commercialization and matching the sale to the right buyer plays a role in extreme prices too.
Custom album maker and numismatic photographer.
Need a personalized album made? Design it on the website below and I'll build it for you.
https://www.donahuenumismatics.com/.
Agree! Buy the cheaper coin and use the difference to buy a very nice 1792 Half Disme.
The only thing surprising here is who asked the question.
You can choose to not care at all about "Full Head" or "Full steps" or even "Red" vs. "Red Brown" vs. "Brown". You'll save a fortune if you don't care about such things. On the other hand, people do.
Buy everything in AU 55 or AU 58 and you'll really save money by avoiding the MS grades. But there is a quality difference.
That’s a real Head scratcher.
Buy both of them if you haven’t already and have them encapsulated together.
From the pictures, what I think you are referring to seems to be a die line.
Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled
The head looks much better on the bottom coin. Difference between a fully struck piece and not.
I don't like strike designations and therefore decided 15 years ago to collect Walkers and Buffalos but not SLQs or Mercury Dimes.
"Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.
The bottom coin is totally hammered! Notice the date, rivets, and head of course on the obverse; the reverse strike is superb and shows in the lettering. Hmmm but a difference factor of 12.5 is tremendous.
A simple "full strike" designation makes more sense to me than only paying attention to one small design detail.
Unfortunately true full strikes just don't exist for many US coins.
Imagine collecting by full hand examples. Population would be zero for full hand 40-S & 44-S.
Aside from the head #1 is much better struck and doesn't have the hits on the reverse, most notably on the eagle's wing on #2. I'd rather have #1.
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
The best struck of the series is the 1917 P Type I. If you can afford an MS 65 FH, the coin should be fully struck.
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."
The registry is a powerful drug.
"I spent 50% of my money on alcohol, women, and gambling. The other half I wasted.
When looking at strike detail, number two for the obverse and one for the reverse...Price differential is a mystery without further information. Cheers, RickO
More of “if I could only have one” scenario.
Deleted
I only know a couple things about these two pieces; Both are beautiful. Both are outta my price range.
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
I'll take door #1.
Agree. For buffalos, they could have full braid for the obverse or full hide for the reverse. No thanks.
"Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.
Splitting hairs for that designation... i'll take the top one and a $50 pan-pac over the bottom.
Check out my iPhone app SlabReader!
Show us the labels and the registry points difference .....
Both are MS67….one is FH
I think this is what comes of having a “mature” market. There’s a lot of money out there but most US coin series are quite common even at the top end. So if you want the best, semi arbitrary sub- designations are needed.
I like the face on the top coin better.
On saints, I go for the nicer looking face also even though the coin might have a lower grade.
My Saint Set
Bottom one has more detail. $230,000 worth of detail? They are both nice regardless.
"A dog breaks your heart only one time and that is when they pass on". Unknown
I would certainly be content with the 1st coin at that kind of discount. The difference is just too subtle to justify that big of a premium. But, hey people do what they want with their money
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."
The price discrepancy is simply that two people with significant budgets want top pop with full heads.
PCGS lists the pops as:
While Non-FH and FH have different pops in the PCGS POP report, I tend to merge them and would consider them as:
I can understand it at some level. I want to pick up a particular Civil War Token where the nose is not well struck on many pieces. I refuse to buy one where the nose is not well struck, even if it's otherwise a high grade. The coin just isn't enjoyable that way to me.
10x price is a lot, but everyone's financial condition is different.
Both drop dead gorgeous coins.
Both of which are out of my league.
Wayne
Kennedys are my quest...
It is more of an indictment as to how silly the FH designation is for this series... it takes up such a small portion of the design and yet coins are valued to ridiculous levels for a striking characteristic that is less important than the Shield.
A Full Shield designation would be far more appropriate as a standard and even a measurement as the strike and even preservation concerns.
But changing a grading standard to make it more responsive to describing the actual preservation of the coin is not likely going to happen anytime soon.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.