Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Grade Poppage Thread (Through-Date Estimation)

1515254565789

Comments

  • Jayman1982Jayman1982 Posts: 467 ✭✭✭

    31 card modern value, received 10/29/20, entered 01/26/21, shipped 10/05/21

  • jeffcbayjeffcbay Posts: 8,949 ✭✭✭✭

    @Jayman1982 said:
    31 card modern value, received 10/29/20, entered 01/26/21, shipped 10/05/21

    My 25-card Value Modern order has almost the exact received and entered dates (10/29/20 and entered 01/25/21), and have been stuck in Grading since June 30th. This gives me hope though! lol

  • Jayman1982Jayman1982 Posts: 467 ✭✭✭

    @jeffcbay said:

    @Jayman1982 said:
    31 card modern value, received 10/29/20, entered 01/26/21, shipped 10/05/21

    My 25-card Value Modern order has almost the exact received and entered dates (10/29/20 and entered 01/25/21), and have been stuck in Grading since June 30th. This gives me hope though! lol

    My ultra modern value entered the day before this one on 01/25/21 is still in grading haha

  • bobbybakerivbobbybakeriv Posts: 2,186 ✭✭✭✭

    @bobbybakeriv said:
    Today I reached QA1. About a week in Assembly. It is a 20 card Modern-Value sub of 76 & 77 Topps AS cards. I am happy finally to be getting closer but I am also wary of getting hammered (again). Maybe, things will be better this time around....

    >

    EDITED TO ADD: Received 10/08/2020 Entered 01/13/2021 (in case it helps anyone who is tracking).

    QA2 today!!!!! :)

  • bobbybakerivbobbybakeriv Posts: 2,186 ✭✭✭✭
    edited October 6, 2021 9:34AM

    Grades Popped today. Not great but better than my last. I am not sure that I will ever earn another 10 on a '70s card. I thought all of these would grade at least 8, most 9, and a few had the ever-fleeting hope for the unicorn 10. I was wrong once again. :( These were submitted prior to my learning about the "stricter/more accurate" grading standards. :) I don't know what the heck happened with those Kingman's; they came straight from vending years ago. EDIT: For those who are interested, these arrived 10/06/2020 and were entered on 01/13/2021. One year exactly from in the door to out! :wink:

  • bobbybakerivbobbybakeriv Posts: 2,186 ✭✭✭✭

    Pretty crazy!

  • rexvosrexvos Posts: 3,304 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Had one of 3 subs that arrived the same day hit Assembly last night

    All arrived and logged 11/20 logged 2/5 (2 Moderns 1 Ultra Modern) The Moderns have been in grading for over two months. The one that hit assembly last night went into grading a day before the other. Not sure what the going rate on assembly time last time I had a sub pop was 7/7/21

    Looking for FB HOF Rookies
  • Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,557 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Ouch Bobby. No love for those all stars. Sorry amigo.

    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • rexvosrexvos Posts: 3,304 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @rexvos said:
    Had one of 3 subs that arrived the same day hit Assembly last night

    All arrived and logged 11/20 logged 2/5 (2 Moderns 1 Ultra Modern) The Moderns have been in grading for over two months. The one that hit assembly last night went into grading a day before the other. Not sure what the going rate on assembly time last time I had a sub pop was 7/7/21

    2nd sub hit assembly today.

    Looking for FB HOF Rookies
  • swish54swish54 Posts: 704 ✭✭✭✭

    @Cakes said:

    @Kepper19 said:

    @swish54 said:
    74 card football special:
    Arrived: 1/5
    Entered: 1/11
    Grading: 6/28
    Assembly: 9/2
    QA 1: 9/9
    QA 2: 9/9
    Shipped: 9/13

    Overall, pretty disappointed. These were sent in right before the big price jumps, so I was fully expecting upcharges on multiple of the big rookies. That never happened. Thought most were 1-2 grades lower than expected. Other than the big rookies, which would've been submitted no matter what, I thought the others would be mostly 9's, with a few shots at 10's, not mostly 8's with a few shots at 9s like what I received. I felt like I over scrutinized them before sending, knowing they had to get 9's to make it worth it. I'm just thinking out loud here, but couldn't help to wonder if it was a new grader and if they weren't sure of a grade, if they then went by my declared value to help speed it up because a lot of them seemed be a grade where the declared value would put it. I tend to go low on my declared values in years past and this was the first time I noticed it. IDK. Like I said, just thinking out loud. I am looking forward to getting them back in-hand to check them over again and see if I missed something, but I don't think so.

    1 1 53250682 EXCELLENT-MINT 6 1986 Topps 374 Steve Young Card
    2 1 53250683 EXCELLENT-MINT 6 1986 Topps 374 Steve Young Card
    3 1 53250684 NEAR MINT 7 1986 Topps 374 Steve Young Card
    4 1 53250685 EXCELLENT-MINT 6 1986 Topps 374 Steve Young Card
    5 1 53250686 EXCELLENT 5 1984 Topps 123 Dan Marino Card
    6 1 53250687 EXCELLENT 5 1984 Topps 123 Dan Marino Card
    7 1 53250688 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1984 Topps 123 Dan Marino Card
    8 1 53250689 NEAR MINT 7 1984 Topps 123 Dan Marino Card
    9 1 53250690 NEAR MINT 7 1984 Topps 123 Dan Marino Card
    10 1 53250691 NEAR MINT 7 1986 Topps 161 Jerry Rice Card
    11 1 53250692 NEAR MINT 7 1986 Topps 161 Jerry Rice Card
    12 1 53250693 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1986 Topps 161 Jerry Rice Card
    13 1 53250694 NEAR MINT 7 1986 Topps 161 Jerry Rice Card
    14 1 53250695 EXCELLENT-MINT 6 1984 Topps 63 John Elway Card
    15 1 53250696 EXCELLENT 5 1984 Topps 63 John Elway Card
    16 1 53250697 EXCELLENT-MINT 6 1984 Topps 63 John Elway Card
    17 1 53250698 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1984 Topps 63 John Elway Card
    18 1 53250699 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1987 Topps 264 Herschel Walker Card
    19 1 53250700 MINT 9 1987 Topps 264 Herschel Walker Card
    20 1 53250701 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1987 Topps 264 Herschel Walker Card
    21 1 53250702 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1987 Topps 264 Herschel Walker Card
    22 1 53250703 MINT 9 1987 Topps 264 Herschel Walker Card
    23 1 53250704 NEAR MINT 7 1988 Topps 352 Vinny Testaverde Card
    24 1 53250705 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1987 Topps 112 Joe Montana Card
    25 1 53250706 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1987 Topps 112 Joe Montana Card
    26 1 53250707 NEAR MINT 7 1985 Topps 157 Joe Montana Card
    27 1 53250708 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1986 Topps 45 Dan Marino Card
    28 1 53250709 MINT 9 1986 Topps 67 Howie Long Card
    29 1 53250710 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1987 Topps 362 Jim Kelly Card
    30 1 53250711 MINT 9 1987 Topps 362 Jim Kelly Card
    31 1 53250712 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1987 Topps 362 Jim Kelly Card
    32 1 53250713 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1988 Topps 327 Bo Jackson Card
    33 1 53250714 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1988 Topps 327 Bo Jackson Card
    34 1 53250715 NEAR MINT 7 1983 Topps 362 Franco Harris Card
    35 1 53250716 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1984 Topps 380 Darrell Green Card
    36 1 53250717 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1986 Topps 255 Boomer Esiason Card
    37 1 53250718 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1986 Topps 255 Boomer Esiason Card
    38 1 53250719 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1986 Topps 255 Boomer Esiason Card
    39 1 53250720 NEAR MINT 7 1986 Topps 255 Boomer Esiason Card
    40 1 53250721 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1986 Topps 112 John Elway Card
    41 1 53250722 VERY GOOD-EXCELLENT 4 1978 Topps 315 Tony Dorsett Card
    42 1 53250723 MINT 9 1984 Topps 280 Eric Dickerson Card
    43 1 53250724 NEAR MINT 7 1985 Topps 24 Richard Dent All Pro Card
    44 1 53250725 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1983 Topps 294 Marcus Allen Card
    45 1 53250726 NEAR MINT 7 1983 Topps 294 Marcus Allen Card
    46 1 53250727 NEAR MINT 7 1982 Topps 434 Lawrence Taylor All-Pro Card
    47 1 53250728 POOR 1 1972 Topps 200 Roger Staubach Card
    48 1 53250729 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1986 Topps 389 Bruce Smith Card
    49 1 53250730 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1986 Topps 389 Bruce Smith Card
    50 1 53250731 NEAR MINT 7 1986 Topps 389 Bruce Smith Card
    51 1 53250732 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1986 Topps 389 Bruce Smith Card
    52 1 53250733 EXCELLENT-MINT 6 1983 Topps 38 Mike Singletary Card
    53 1 53250734 NEAR MINT 7 1983 Topps 38 Mike Singletary Card
    54 1 53250735 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1987 Topps 115 Jerry Rice Card
    55 1 53250736 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1987 Topps 115 Jerry Rice Card
    56 1 53250737 NEAR MINT 7 1986 Topps 388 Andre Reed Card
    57 1 53250738 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1986 Topps 388 Andre Reed Card
    58 1 53250739 NEAR MINT 7 1984 Topps 228 Walter Payton Card
    59 1 53250740 EXCELLENT-MINT 6 1985 Topps 33 Walter Payton All Pro Card
    60 1 53250741 NEAR MINT 7 1985 Topps 33 Walter Payton All Pro Card
    61 1 53250742 MINT 9 1987 Topps 46 Walter Payton Card
    62 1 53250743 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1986 Topps 11 Walter Payton Card
    63 1 53250744 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1983 Topps 36 Walter Payton Card
    64 1 53250745 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1983 Topps 36 Walter Payton Card
    65 1 53250746 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1986 Topps 1000 Yard Club 3 Walter Payton Card
    66 1 53250747 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1986 Topps 1000 Yard Club 3 Walter Payton Card
    67 1 53250748 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1986 Topps 350 Warren Moon Card
    68 1 53250749 NEAR MINT 7 1986 Topps 350 Warren Moon Card
    69 1 53250750 NEAR MINT 7 1986 Topps 350 Warren Moon Card
    70 1 53250751 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1985 Topps 251 Warren Moon Card
    71 1 53250752 NEAR MINT 7 1985 Topps 251 Warren Moon Card
    72 1 53250753 EXCELLENT-MINT 6 1986 Topps 156 Joe Montana Card
    73 1 53250754 NEAR MINT 7 1986 Topps 156 Joe Montana Card
    74 1 53250755 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1986 Topps 156 Joe Montana Card

    Some tough sets there, especially the 1986 Topps football, with the green borders and usual tough centering...1984 football also typically bad centered...post a few pics of the ones you felt got lower grades than anticipated once you get them back

    Okay I have decided to step back up onto my soapbox. THE 86 TOPPS FOOTBALL IS UNFAIRLY GRADED! The stigma is unfair and it has just stuck. Getting a PSA 9 with the modern graders is damn near impossible. I am still not sure how you got the MINT 9 1986 Topps 67 Howie Long grade.

    Sorry to see your results, I feel for you. You should stop sending in any 86's for at least 3 to 5 years. Thankfully I gave up on ever getting a Rice to grade high 2 or 3 years ago. I couldn't take the pain any longer.

    After getting them back and being able to look them over again, it seems they were particularly harsh on the centering. Here's a few of the pics I thought were off. I'm all for constructive criticism...I certainly could've missed something and there's always something to learn. Note-if there's a faint vertical line, it's the scanner, not the card.

    Thought this was a 9+

    Thought this was at least a good shot at a 10.

    I thought all these Rice's were at least 1 grade low, if not 2. I've never sent in for a review, but I might on these.

    I would argue the TB centering on this 3rd one kept it at a 7, but it's pert near the same as the 8?

    Thought this was a solid 9 with a pretty good shot at a 10.

    Thought this was a solid 9 with a pretty good shot at a 10 as well.

    Thought this was an 8+

    Thought this was at least a 9, with a good shot at a 10

    9+

  • envoy982envoy982 Posts: 371 ✭✭✭

    @swish54 wish I could help you here. 86 Topps and 89 Score kill me. I consistently am a grade high on them but do pretty well on everything else. I feel like the edges and corners are critiqued much harsher on those sets.

  • CzoneCzone Posts: 17 ✭✭

    @scmavl said:
    Nice hit on the Vandersloots, @Czone I'm sure there are way bigger cards in that sub, but those are the ones that I like best. None of my Sloots are graded.

    Thanks. I was pretty excited to get 10s on those two that I bought raw off of Ebay. I've been a Gonzaga Season Ticket Holder for 15 years now and Courtney is as good of a pure point guard as I have seen. Enjoying watching her and the Sky in the Playoffs.

  • rexvosrexvos Posts: 3,304 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thought this was at least a good shot at a 10.

    Herschel is pretty nice could easily be a 10 from front scan. Back
    May have gotten you

    Looking for FB HOF Rookies
  • Bosox1976Bosox1976 Posts: 8,557 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice Marvel poppage! Congrats

    Mike
    Bosox1976
  • Thanks @Bosox1976 - totally made my day and the best thing was they didnt ding me too bad

  • parthur1607parthur1607 Posts: 202 ✭✭✭

    @jtomm2005 said:
    Thanks @Bosox1976 - totally made my day and the best thing was they didnt ding me too bad

    I hate the fact that they do up charges on a sub that was submitted a year ago! Last year those cards weren’t worth what they are today. When you submitted them you submitted them at the correct service level. You were charged for a service that you didn’t receive. They shouldn’t charge more for a higher priced card anyway because it doesn’t take anymore time or effort to grade. The only reason we should pay more is if we want the cards back sooner and your cards did not come back any sooner. I have a few in the pipeline that I expect to get upcharged on. I have a few Shohei Ohtani cards that MAY have been worth $80 when I submitted them and are now selling closer to $1,000. Had those cards been processed in 2 months, which is about how long bulk subs used to take, they would have been well below the next service level threshold. I know I won’t have an argument with them when/if I do get upcharged, so im venting here.

    Nice cards though! Glad you got the grades you were hoping for! Good luck in the future

  • @parthur1607 said:

    @jtomm2005 said:
    Thanks @Bosox1976 - totally made my day and the best thing was they didnt ding me too bad

    I hate the fact that they do up charges on a sub that was submitted a year ago! Last year those cards weren’t worth what they are today. When you submitted them you submitted them at the correct service level. You were charged for a service that you didn’t receive. They shouldn’t charge more for a higher priced card anyway because it doesn’t take anymore time or effort to grade. The only reason we should pay more is if we want the cards back sooner and your cards did not come back any sooner. I have a few in the pipeline that I expect to get upcharged on. I have a few Shohei Ohtani cards that MAY have been worth $80 when I submitted them and are now selling closer to $1,000. Had those cards been processed in 2 months, which is about how long bulk subs used to take, they would have been well below the next service level threshold. I know I won’t have an argument with them when/if I do get upcharged, so im venting here.

    Nice cards though! Glad you got the grades you were hoping for! Good luck in the future

    Totally agree. There is some kind of double dipping going on here... you're waiting a year for your cards AND paying at today's rates. You're being punished for their inability to grade the cards in any kind of reasonable amount of time.

  • parthur1607parthur1607 Posts: 202 ✭✭✭

    Exactly!

    Here’s an example of one that went the other way.

    In March I pulled a Ronald Acuña Jr from a 2018 Topps Update. It was the short print of him in his batting practice Jersey. At the time that card was selling for ~ $2,000 in PSA 10. Thought for sure this card was a 10 so I sent it in at whatever level was $1,500-$2,499 (don’t remember the level, been too long and too many submissions since). Card comes back graded PSA 9 so that knocked close to $1,000 off the value. Well I didn’t get a refund for submitting it at a higher level than needed, which I am ok with. I understand that’s the service I paid for and the card was back within a month. But as was stated above we can’t be charged today’s prices for last year’s submissions.

  • @parthur1607 said:

    @jtomm2005 said:
    Thanks @Bosox1976 - totally made my day and the best thing was they didnt ding me too bad

    I hate the fact that they do up charges on a sub that was submitted a year ago! Last year those cards weren’t worth what they are today. When you submitted them you submitted them at the correct service level. You were charged for a service that you didn’t receive. They shouldn’t charge more for a higher priced card anyway because it doesn’t take anymore time or effort to grade. The only reason we should pay more is if we want the cards back sooner and your cards did not come back any sooner. I have a few in the pipeline that I expect to get upcharged on. I have a few Shohei Ohtani cards that MAY have been worth $80 when I submitted them and are now selling closer to $1,000. Had those cards been processed in 2 months, which is about how long bulk subs used to take, they would have been well below the next service level threshold. I know I won’t have an argument with them when/if I do get upcharged, so im venting here.

    Nice cards though! Glad you got the grades you were hoping for! Good luck in the future

    @parthur1607 - totally agree with every word you said- Since I joined these forums earlier this year I have seen and heard the same venting - I would normally go toe to toe with them for the exact reason stated but I know it falls on a deaf ear. It aint right but they made the rules and are sticking to it. The up side is that I'm getting those cards back and will enjoy listing them in the very near future. Thanks for the comment! Good luck to you as well

  • @MarshallFaulk28 said:

    @parthur1607 said:

    @jtomm2005 said:
    Thanks @Bosox1976 - totally made my day and the best thing was they didnt ding me too bad

    I hate the fact that they do up charges on a sub that was submitted a year ago! Last year those cards weren’t worth what they are today. When you submitted them you submitted them at the correct service level. You were charged for a service that you didn’t receive. They shouldn’t charge more for a higher priced card anyway because it doesn’t take anymore time or effort to grade. The only reason we should pay more is if we want the cards back sooner and your cards did not come back any sooner. I have a few in the pipeline that I expect to get upcharged on. I have a few Shohei Ohtani cards that MAY have been worth $80 when I submitted them and are now selling closer to $1,000. Had those cards been processed in 2 months, which is about how long bulk subs used to take, they would have been well below the next service level threshold. I know I won’t have an argument with them when/if I do get upcharged, so im venting here.

    Nice cards though! Glad you got the grades you were hoping for! Good luck in the future

    Totally agree. There is some kind of double dipping going on here... you're waiting a year for your cards AND paying at today's rates. You're being punished for their inability to grade the cards in any kind of reasonable amount of time.

    Definitely is not a fair way to go about it for certain, if anything I would have loved to have had these cards back in the earlier months of the year but cant change that.

  • shawthershawther Posts: 284 ✭✭✭

    No updates? I have a couple of subs that have been in grading for a few months that were entered in mid February.

  • nam812nam812 Posts: 10,583 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @shawther said:
    No updates? I have a couple of subs that have been in grading for a few months that were entered in mid February.

    I have 2 subs like that myself that were entered on 2/17/21 (Value Ultra-Modern) and 2/25/21 (Value Modern). I'm hopeful that we're only 4 - 6 weeks away from the finish line.

  • NorcalNorcal Posts: 278 ✭✭✭

    Some movement on my Value Modern 21 card Sub. Shipped Nov. 2020
    TOTAL ITEMS 21 DATE RECEIVED 2/3/2021
    Have been in Assembly for 5 days

    `

  • mrburns443mrburns443 Posts: 203 ✭✭✭✭

    Quarterly special just popped that arrived 9/29/20

    1 1 53048985 GOOD 2 1958 Topps 5 Willie Mays Card
    2 1 53048986 VERY GOOD-EXCELLENT 4 1959 Topps 464 Mays' Catch Makes Series History Card
    3 1 53048987 VERY GOOD-EXCELLENT 4 1961 Topps 150 Willie Mays Card
    4 1 53048988 VERY GOOD 3 1961 Topps 579 Willie Mays All Star Card
    5 1 53048989 VERY GOOD-EXCELLENT 4 1962 Topps 395 Willie Mays All Star Card
    6 1 53048990 EXCELLENT 5 1963 Topps 300 Willie Mays Card
    7 1 53048991 VERY GOOD 3 1967 Topps 423 Fence Busters Willie Mays/Willie McCovey Card
    8 1 53048992 VERY GOOD-EXCELLENT 4 1959 Topps 564 Mickey Mantle All Star Card
    9 1 53048993 FAIR 1.5 1968 Topps Game 2 Mickey Mantle Card
    10 1 53048994 POOR 1 1951 Bowman 2 Yogi Berra Card
    11 1 53048995 POOR 1 1952 Bowman 1 Yogi Berra Card
    12 1 53048996 POOR 1 1950 Bowman 77 Duke Snider Card
    13 1 53048997 POOR 1 MC 1950 Bowman 98 Ted Williams Card
    14 1 53048998 VERY GOOD 3 1950 Bowman 112 Gil Hodges Card
    15 1 53048999 VERY GOOD+ 3.5 1960 Topps 250 Stan Musial Card
    16 1 53049000 VERY GOOD 3 1959 Topps 435 Frank Robinson Card
    17 1 53049001 VERY GOOD-EXCELLENT+ 4.5 1960 Topps 1 Early Wynn Card
    18 1 53049002 VERY GOOD-EXCELLENT 4 1961 Topps 344 Sandy Koufax Card
    19 1 53049003 VERY GOOD-EXCELLENT 4 1967 Topps 400 Bob Clemente Card
    20 1 53049004 NEAR MINT 7 1969 Topps 630 Bobby Bonds All-Star Rookie Card
    21 1 53049005 EXCELLENT 5 1959 Topps 467 Aaron Clubs World Series Homer Card
    22 1 53049006 VERY GOOD-EXCELLENT 4 1960 Topps 300 Hank Aaron Card
    23 1 53049007 VERY GOOD 3 1964 Topps 300 Hank Aaron Card

  • nam812nam812 Posts: 10,583 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mrburns443 said:
    Quarterly special just popped that arrived 9/29/20.....

    Arrived is irrelevant, when was it received?

  • blurryfaceblurryface Posts: 5,136 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 12, 2021 11:40AM

    @nam812 said:

    @mrburns443 said:
    Quarterly special just popped that arrived 9/29/20.....

    Arrived is irrelevant, when was it received?

    while weve been groomed to accept this is the truth, i think its time the collecting group as a whole snaps back to reality. enough deflection & shade. lets get back to the real world.

    eta: and when it was a few days or a week, that is tolerable. when we are talking an entire fiscal quarter or longer…enough is enough.

  • mrburns443mrburns443 Posts: 203 ✭✭✭✭

    @nam812 said:

    @mrburns443 said:
    Quarterly special just popped that arrived 9/29/20.....

    Arrived is irrelevant, when was it received?

    January 7

  • shawthershawther Posts: 284 ✭✭✭

    @nam812 That is kind of what I was expecting too. I have 8 more value submissions that were entered throughout the month of April that I do not expect movement for a while.

  • RoflesRofles Posts: 753 ✭✭✭✭✭

    2 card express, mailed today! 😎

  • rexvosrexvos Posts: 3,304 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @rexvos said:

    @rexvos said:
    Had one of 3 subs that arrived the same day hit Assembly last night

    All arrived and logged 11/20 logged 2/5 (2 Moderns 1 Ultra Modern) The Moderns have been in grading for over two months. The one that hit assembly last night went into grading a day before the other. Not sure what the going rate on assembly time last time I had a sub pop was 7/7/21

    2nd sub hit assembly today.

    Ands the one that hit Assembly 2nd popped today. While the other that originally hit assembly still sits. I am not thrilled with the results but not terrible. I hoped for better on a few or just 1 really nice hit out of the 70s. It kind of stinks that the only 10 I got was a card I alreasy owned in a 10.

    Line # Item # Cert # Grade Description Type
    1 1 54694987 NEAR MINT 7 1972 Topps 37 Carl Yastrzemski Card
    2 1 54694988 EXCELLENT-MINT 6 1977 Topps 1 Batting Leaders G.Brett/B.Madlock Card
    3 1 54694989 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1977 Topps 60 Jim Rice Card
    4 1 54694990 MINT 9 1977 Topps 140 Mike Schmidt Card
    5 1 54694991 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1977 Topps 234 Nolan Ryan Card
    6 1 54694992 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1977 Topps 231 George Brett Card
    7 1 54694993 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1977 Topps 285 Brooks Robinson Card
    8 1 54694994 NEAR MINT 7 1977 Topps 295 Gary Carter Card
    9 1 54694995 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1977 Topps 390 Dave Winfield Card
    10 1 54694996 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1977 Topps 430 Fergie Jenkins Card
    11 1 54694997 NEAR MINT 7 1977 Topps 473 Rookie Outfielders Card
    12 1 54694998 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1977 Topps 480 Carl Yastrzemski Card
    13 1 54694999 NEAR MINT 7 1977 Topps 547 Willie McCovey Card
    14 1 54695000 MINT 9 1977 Topps 525 Dennis Eckersley Card
    15 1 54695001 NEAR MINT 7 1977 Topps 580 George Brett Card
    16 1 54695002 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1977 Topps 650 Nolan Ryan Card
    17 1 54695003 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1978 Topps 36 Eddie Murray Card
    18 1 54695004 MINT 9 1978 Topps 704 Rookie 2nd Basemen Card
    19 1 54695005 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1978 Topps 707 Rookie Shortstops Card
    20 1 54695006 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1978 Topps 708 Rookie Catchers Card
    21 1 54695007 MINT 9 1978 Topps 708 Rookie Catchers Card
    22 1 54695008 NEAR MINT 7 1981 Topps 816 Tim Raines Traded Card
    23 1 54695009 MINT 9 1982 Topps Traded 103T Steve Sax Card
    24 1 54695010 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1983 Topps 482 Tony Gwynn Card
    25 1 54695011 NEAR MINT 7 1983 Topps Traded 108T Darryl Strawberry Card
    26 1 54695012 NEAR MINT 7 1982 Donruss 405 Cal Ripken Jr. Card
    27 1 54695013 MINT 9 1981 Fleer 28 George Brett Batting Card
    28 1 54695014 GEM MINT 10 1984 Fleer 599 Darryl Strawberry Card

    Looking for FB HOF Rookies
  • bobbybakerivbobbybakeriv Posts: 2,186 ✭✭✭✭

    @rexvos said:

    @rexvos said:

    @rexvos said:
    Had one of 3 subs that arrived the same day hit Assembly last night

    All arrived and logged 11/20 logged 2/5 (2 Moderns 1 Ultra Modern) The Moderns have been in grading for over two months. The one that hit assembly last night went into grading a day before the other. Not sure what the going rate on assembly time last time I had a sub pop was 7/7/21

    2nd sub hit assembly today.

    Ands the one that hit Assembly 2nd popped today. While the other that originally hit assembly still sits. I am not thrilled with the results but not terrible. I hoped for better on a few or just 1 really nice hit out of the 70s. It kind of stinks that the only 10 I got was a card I alreasy owned in a 10.

    I feel your pain. I have recently subbed a lot of 75-77 Topps cards and haven't faired well. They are very tough on them these days (as I am sure you are well-aware). Good luck in the future.

  • ejguruejguru Posts: 618 ✭✭✭

    Some movement to report...
    37 card value vintage arrived 11/24/20, received 2/9/21, grading mid-August, moved into Assembly today 10/14.
    44 card value moderns with same exact dates through the system, synchronized up.

    "...life is but a dream."

    Used to working on HOF SS Baseballs--Now just '67 Sox Stickers and anything Boston related.
  • jeffcbayjeffcbay Posts: 8,949 ✭✭✭✭

    Value Modern (25 Cards)
    Arrived = 10/29/20
    Logged = 01/25/21
    Grading = 06/30/21
    Assembly = not yet... :(

  • thehallmarkthehallmark Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭

    @blurryface said:
    1 card, reholder.

    recvd: 1/27/21
    logged: 3/25/21
    poppage: 10/14/21

    notes: 10 months to reholder a single card. they best get it together in this ever changing environment. gradings one thing. this long of a turnaround for a card thats already in the system is absurd.

    I pray that this is an agenda item for their re-org: Reholder orders get sent somewhere else, nowhere near the mountain of cards to be graded, and also are beholden to a different timeline to completion. Such a different animal - it shouldn't even be on the same list of services.

  • Jayman1982Jayman1982 Posts: 467 ✭✭✭

    @jeffcbay said:
    Value Modern (25 Cards)
    Arrived = 10/29/20
    Logged = 01/25/21
    Grading = 06/30/21
    Assembly = not yet... :(

    I feel your pain, our subs are brothers:

    Arrived: 10/29/20
    Logged: 01/25/21
    Grading: 06/30/21
    No Assembly yet....

  • jayhawkejayhawke Posts: 1,313 ✭✭✭

    1977 is a rough year for centered cards. The Schmidt must look sweet.

    Nice hit on the 1990 French UD Jagr.

  • rexvosrexvos Posts: 3,304 ✭✭✭✭✭

    had 4 subs hit grading today all were received 2/9 logged 3/26

    Looking for FB HOF Rookies
  • scmavlscmavl Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭

    Express sub, been there a little over two weeks, but has been sitting in QA2 for a few days now. Not expecting an upcharge, so I don't know what the holdup is. QA2 is usually the quickest step, in my experience.

    2.5 is pretty much my speed.
  • envoy982envoy982 Posts: 371 ✭✭✭

    This thread has been quiet. In looking at the CTE we , there has been no movement since 10/6. > @rexvos said:

    had 4 subs hit grading today all were received 2/9 logged 3/26

    You are giving me hope! My 4 subs arrived 2/24 and entered 4/7. What are we setting the over/under at..3 months, 6 months? I'm hoping the really big avalanche was stuff arrived on or after mid-March so maybe we will beat that and get stuff a bit sooner.

  • envoy982envoy982 Posts: 371 ✭✭✭

    @scmavl said:
    Express sub, been there a little over two weeks, but has been sitting in QA2 for a few days now. Not expecting an upcharge, so I don't know what the holdup is. QA2 is usually the quickest step, in my experience.

    My buddy had an express sit in qa2 for two days and got the upcharge email on day 2 after losing hope. :)

  • rexvosrexvos Posts: 3,304 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @rexvos said:

    @rexvos said:

    @rexvos said:
    Had one of 3 subs that arrived the same day hit Assembly last night

    All arrived and logged 11/20 logged 2/5 (2 Moderns 1 Ultra Modern) The Moderns have been in grading for over two months. The one that hit assembly last night went into grading a day before the other. Not sure what the going rate on assembly time last time I had a sub pop was 7/7/21

    2nd sub hit assembly today.

    Ands the one that hit Assembly 2nd popped today. While the other that originally hit assembly still sits. I am not thrilled with the results but not terrible. I hoped for better on a few or just 1 really nice hit out of the 70s. It kind of stinks that the only 10 I got was a card I alreasy owned in a 10.

    Line # Item # Cert # Grade Description Type
    1 1 54694987 NEAR MINT 7 1972 Topps 37 Carl Yastrzemski Card
    2 1 54694988 EXCELLENT-MINT 6 1977 Topps 1 Batting Leaders G.Brett/B.Madlock Card
    3 1 54694989 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1977 Topps 60 Jim Rice Card
    4 1 54694990 MINT 9 1977 Topps 140 Mike Schmidt Card
    5 1 54694991 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1977 Topps 234 Nolan Ryan Card
    6 1 54694992 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1977 Topps 231 George Brett Card
    7 1 54694993 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1977 Topps 285 Brooks Robinson Card
    8 1 54694994 NEAR MINT 7 1977 Topps 295 Gary Carter Card
    9 1 54694995 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1977 Topps 390 Dave Winfield Card
    10 1 54694996 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1977 Topps 430 Fergie Jenkins Card
    11 1 54694997 NEAR MINT 7 1977 Topps 473 Rookie Outfielders Card
    12 1 54694998 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1977 Topps 480 Carl Yastrzemski Card
    13 1 54694999 NEAR MINT 7 1977 Topps 547 Willie McCovey Card
    14 1 54695000 MINT 9 1977 Topps 525 Dennis Eckersley Card
    15 1 54695001 NEAR MINT 7 1977 Topps 580 George Brett Card
    16 1 54695002 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1977 Topps 650 Nolan Ryan Card
    17 1 54695003 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1978 Topps 36 Eddie Murray Card
    18 1 54695004 MINT 9 1978 Topps 704 Rookie 2nd Basemen Card
    19 1 54695005 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1978 Topps 707 Rookie Shortstops Card
    20 1 54695006 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1978 Topps 708 Rookie Catchers Card
    21 1 54695007 MINT 9 1978 Topps 708 Rookie Catchers Card
    22 1 54695008 NEAR MINT 7 1981 Topps 816 Tim Raines Traded Card
    23 1 54695009 MINT 9 1982 Topps Traded 103T Steve Sax Card
    24 1 54695010 NEAR MINT-MINT 8 1983 Topps 482 Tony Gwynn Card
    25 1 54695011 NEAR MINT 7 1983 Topps Traded 108T Darryl Strawberry Card
    26 1 54695012 NEAR MINT 7 1982 Donruss 405 Cal Ripken Jr. Card
    27 1 54695013 MINT 9 1981 Fleer 28 George Brett Batting Card
    28 1 54695014 GEM MINT 10 1984 Fleer 599 Darryl Strawberry Card

    These are out for delivery today. The other order that went into Assembly 2 days prior to this one is still in assembly today. I should be able to post the scans on the board today to help gauge accuracy of the grading.

    Looking for FB HOF Rookies
  • NorcalNorcal Posts: 278 ✭✭✭

    Have had a submission in QA check 2 for 5 days…. Things that make you go mmmmm.

  • parthur1607parthur1607 Posts: 202 ✭✭✭

    @Norcal said:
    Have had a submission in QA check 2 for 5 days…. Things that make you go mmmmm.

    Had one this past week in QA2 for 4 days. Grades finally popped Friday. You’ll have grades by Monday. 👌

  • FluxFlux Posts: 149 ✭✭

    @Norcal said:
    Have had a submission in QA check 2 for 5 days…. Things that make you go mmmmm.

    I have a vintage value sub thats been in QA2 for a solid week+. Does this mean a likely Upcharge?

  • NorcalNorcal Posts: 278 ✭✭✭

    @Flux said:

    @Norcal said:
    Have had a submission in QA check 2 for 5 days…. Things that make you go mmmmm.

    I have a vintage value sub thats been in QA2 for a solid week+. Does this mean a likely Upcharge?

    I wouldn’t count on it so if there is an up charge, you can be pleasantly surprised. :)

  • demondeacsdemondeacs Posts: 117 ✭✭✭

    @Flux said:

    @Norcal said:
    Have had a submission in QA check 2 for 5 days…. Things that make you go mmmmm.

    I have a vintage value sub thats been in QA2 for a solid week+. Does this mean a likely Upcharge?

    They graded about 50-60k less cards last week than they had in previous weeks according to sites that track their pop reports, so my guess would be there are a lot of people with orders that are close to being finalized.

Sign In or Register to comment.