Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

My proof buffalo story

TONEDDOLLARSTONEDDOLLARS Posts: 2,928 ✭✭✭✭
So, several years back I bought a 1937 proof buffalo nickel that was in a ICG 67 holder . This coin was all there,as they say. Great colors and super clean surfaces. I felt it as all of a seven and it was priced right so I bought it. I kept it in the black hole until recently,, and just pulled it out a month ago to send it in to PCGS. I got the coin back about a week ago and they graded it PR-66+. I am happy with this grade as buffalos are really not my series and I was very close with my grading. Splitting hairs on 67 and 66+.

So now I decide to package up 15 coins and send them to CAC. I then take off for a week of golf in Florida. I received an email from CAC and they are mailing my submission back as it is finished. 14/15 beaned, not to bad. Now if you are thinking the proof is the one coin that did not bean, you would be wrong. The proof was beaned, with a GOLD, go figure. Needless to say I am happy, and maybe my buffalo grading was not bad after all .

Comments

  • Options
    mingotmingot Posts: 1,807 ✭✭✭
    I need pictures.
  • Options
    TONEDDOLLARSTONEDDOLLARS Posts: 2,928 ✭✭✭✭
    Not from Florida
  • This content has been removed.
  • Options
    littlebearlittlebear Posts: 1,590 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Congrats!


    Larry L.


    image
    Autism Awareness: There is no limit to the good you can do, if you don't care who gets the credit.
  • Options
    blu62vetteblu62vette Posts: 11,968 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I need pictures. >>



    Here are some pictures in the prior holder when I saw it at the Boston ANA. A real gorgeous piece.

    image
    http://www.bluccphotos.com" target="new">BluCC Photos Shows for onsite imaging: Nov Baltimore, FUN, Long Beach http://www.facebook.com/bluccphotos" target="new">BluCC on Facebook
  • Options
    TONEDDOLLARSTONEDDOLLARS Posts: 2,928 ✭✭✭✭
  • Options
    crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,212 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>I need pictures. >>



    Here are some pictures in the prior holder when I saw it at the Boston ANA. A real gorgeous piece.

    image >>



    Oh baby!! What a BEAUTIFUL Buff!! You did REALLY well it's just GORGEOUS!! Lucky as a hound dog!!...image
    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Options
    dcarrdcarr Posts: 10,047 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice coin.

    That ICG label looks like the older type, which would mean that coin was graded by the folks who are currently at ANACS.
  • Options
    breakdownbreakdown Posts: 2,381 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If grading from images (something that is tricky at best) I have to say that I think ICG had it correct (with no disrespect to our hosts). For comparison purposes, here is mine and I see no obvious reason mine is graded higher than yours, particularly since we use the same photographer.

    image

    Thanks for sharing.image

    "Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.

  • Options
    RedneckHBRedneckHB Posts: 20,155 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 2nd Buffalo has a better strike.
    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • Options
    blu62vetteblu62vette Posts: 11,968 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The 2nd Buffalo has a better strike. >>



    being the photographer of both I think that is more lighting, than strike. Maybe the OP can chime in. On buffs it is easy to loose detail with lighting.
    http://www.bluccphotos.com" target="new">BluCC Photos Shows for onsite imaging: Nov Baltimore, FUN, Long Beach http://www.facebook.com/bluccphotos" target="new">BluCC on Facebook
  • Options
    mkman123mkman123 Posts: 6,849 ✭✭✭✭
    The OPs buff is awesome, Breakdowns buff is awesome too but the strike looks better tho
    Successful Buying and Selling transactions with:

    Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
  • Options
    bestclser1bestclser1 Posts: 5,566 ✭✭✭
    Jack,I have always done well with ICG coins as well.Either they upgraded,or were way undervalued.Congrats pal!Lloydimage
    Great coins are not cheap,and cheap coins are not great!
  • Options
    TONEDDOLLARSTONEDDOLLARS Posts: 2,928 ✭✭✭✭
    Not having the other coin in hand, I can only speak about mine and the strike is very damm good. Todd can speak to both coins. He has had them both in hand. Either way who really cares as this thread was about the different opinions this coin received while being graded.
  • Options
    breakdownbreakdown Posts: 2,381 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Toneddollars,

    It was not my intention to hijack your thread -- sorry if it came off that way. For 37 proofs, the strike tends to be hammered. I think Todd is correct that light and the tilt of the coins causes any differences. My guess is that in person, the strikes are comparable. I suspect Todd tilted yours slightly to pick up the nice peripheral color that is in your coin. Your coin looks every bit a 67 from here.

    "Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.

  • Options
    TONEDDOLLARSTONEDDOLLARS Posts: 2,928 ✭✭✭✭
    Breakdown, no problem at all. My reply was mre geared to who has the biggest, if you know what I mean. Both coins are stunners in hand, and I'm sure you like yours as much as I like mine. You may have something about the tilt of the coin. To tell you the truth, my coin in hand has a lot more color than shows in the picture.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Options
    WindycityWindycity Posts: 3,596 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wonderful coin... a bit soft on strike but absolutely gorgeous!
    <a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.mullencoins.com">Mullen Coins Website - Windycity Coin website
  • Options
    crypto79crypto79 Posts: 8,623
    I dont like/collect copper coins but those are very nice and almost enough to convince me otherwise
  • Options


    << <i>I dont like/collect copper coins but those are very nice and almost enough to convince me otherwise >>

    What copper coins are you referring to ? image
  • Options
    keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,650 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Beautiful coin!
    "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
    Not really looking for much these days but if I were, it might be a toner. :smile:
  • Options
    CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>I dont like/collect copper coins but those are very nice and almost enough to convince me otherwise >>

    What copper coins are you referring to ? image >>


    "Nickels" are 75% copper, 25% nickel.
  • Options
    capecape Posts: 1,621
    Congrats Jack...... I told you it was real toning when you bought it from me and that NGC had their heads up their ---image
    ed rodrigues
  • Options
    lasvegasteddylasvegasteddy Posts: 10,487 ✭✭✭
    sweet write-up
    even sweeter buff
    in the love that buff crowd i'm in...image
    everything in life is but merely on loan to us by our appreciation....lose your appreciation and see


  • Options
    fcloudfcloud Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭
    congrats

    President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay

  • Options
    AuroraBorealisAuroraBorealis Posts: 3,591 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What a beauty TONEDDOLLARS... Congratulations for the new holder, grade and gold bean...

    Now lets here about the golf trip... image

    ABimage
  • Options
    TONEDDOLLARSTONEDDOLLARS Posts: 2,928 ✭✭✭✭
    Thanks all, I think I'll keep it. image
  • Options
    TONEDDOLLARSTONEDDOLLARS Posts: 2,928 ✭✭✭✭
    Wayne,

    Crazy golf trip. 86 & 87 the first two days right off the plane. Next two rounds, 101&102. Round five, 73 after 16 and the skies opened up with a par three and a short par 4 left. It ranied so hard that all the greens were under water and no golf for several hours. shot 102 the next to last day, with the wind blowing 35-40 mph, truley unbeliveable. Finished the trip on Sunday with a 81. Go figure it seemed just as windy that day. Scored all over the place on this trip, no rhime or reason. I had a blast though imageimageimage
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,784 ✭✭✭✭✭
    In its early days ICG made a strong effort to be a top tier grading company. In fact in my view is that ICG made stronger effort than any other “second tier” company to be among the best. Unfortunately they ran into the same consumer resistance that has hit any company that has tried for the top. All the coins that were really nice ended up in the “big two holders” and anything that was slightly off stayed in the ICG holder unless the owner took a down grade. Then ICG lowed their standards, and the rest is history.

    For whatever reason your Proof quarter looks better in PCGS holder than it did in the ICG holder. I see a spot toward the top of the Indian’s hair in the ICG holder which would make known it down to PR-66 from 67, and some cloudiness in the reverse mirror between the buffalo’s legs. In the PCGS holder the obverse spot is gone, and the cloudiness is diminished. Maybe it is the lighting, but if the obverse spot really is there, I would not have given that piece a gold bean in the PR-66+ holder.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    lasvegasteddylasvegasteddy Posts: 10,487 ✭✭✭


    << <i>In its early days ICG made a strong effort to be a top tier grading company. In fact in my view is that ICG made stronger effort than any other “second tier” company to be among the best. Unfortunately they ran into the same consumer resistance that has hit any company that has tried for the top. All the coins that were really nice ended up in the “big two holders” and anything that was slightly off stayed in the ICG holder unless the owner took a down grade. Then ICG lowed their standards, and the rest is history.

    For whatever reason your Proof quarter looks better in PCGS holder than it did in the ICG holder. I see a spot toward the top of the Indian’s hair in the ICG holder which would make known it down to PR-66 from 67, and some cloudiness in the reverse mirror between the buffalo’s legs. In the PCGS holder the obverse spot is gone, and the cloudiness is diminished. Maybe it is the lighting, but if the obverse spot really is there, I would not have given that piece a gold bean in the PR-66+ holder. >>



    looks like the pretty color above the buff's hip is gone too
    everything in life is but merely on loan to us by our appreciation....lose your appreciation and see


  • Options
    guitarwesguitarwes Posts: 9,308 ✭✭✭

    I like it alot. I would love to be able to own a Proof Buffalo Nick one day.

    There are some good coins in ICG holders.
    @ Elite CNC Routing & Woodworks on Facebook. Check out my work.
    Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
  • Options
    lasvegasteddylasvegasteddy Posts: 10,487 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I like it alot. I would love to be able to own a Proof Buffalo Nick one day.

    There are some good coins in ICG holders. >>


    one goal i have this year...one if not 2...gotta have a matty and a shiny one too...image
    everything in life is but merely on loan to us by our appreciation....lose your appreciation and see


  • Options
    SoCalBigMarkSoCalBigMark Posts: 2,845 ✭✭✭✭✭
    ***OLD THREAD ALERT***

    Great thread about Proof Buffalo's and ICG. Do you think they are undervalued?
  • Options
    Type2Type2 Posts: 13,985 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Very nice, it will pull 67 $$'s in auction if you ever sell it with the Gold CC so good for you. image


    Hoard the keys.
  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Beautiful coins..... proof buffalo's are just gorgeous.... Cheers, RickO
  • Options
    joebb21joebb21 Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I had a 1916 buffalo in ngc ms67 cac and a 1937 5c ngc pf67 cac

    Sent them to pcgs to cross- both came back 66+

    Sent them both back to CAC

    both gold stickered.

    I was exceptionally happy image
    may the fonz be with you...always...
  • Options
    koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>In its early days ICG made a strong effort to be a top tier grading company. In fact in my view is that ICG made stronger effort than any other “second tier” company to be among the best. Unfortunately they ran into the same consumer resistance that has hit any company that has tried for the top. All the coins that were really nice ended up in the “big two holders” and anything that was slightly off stayed in the ICG holder unless the owner took a down grade. Then ICG lowed their standards, and the rest is history.

    Another thing that hurt ICG was all the Proof70 grades they gave out not long after they started up. The old printed Teletrade auction booklets had tons of this stuff. That was another reason they lost their credibility way back when.
  • Options
    gyocomgdgyocomgd Posts: 2,582 ✭✭✭
    The second coin is superior. The central obverse is significantly stronger. Compare the hair knots and areas just above them. That isn't a lighting discrepancy; the PCGS is simply hammered better.
    The milk spots (or whatever) in the reverse fields of the former ICG piece also detract slightly to my eye.
    image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file