Options
PCI grading, never again! PHOTOS W/CRACKOUT TAGS
Hi all.
I've lurked here for a year. My interests are more in currency but I do some type coin collecting and decided to put a Walker short set together. It took about a year of purchasing slabbed coins individually. I've been a machinist-tool and die maker for over 30 years so I think I know what I'm seeing when I look at a piece of metal. Well in my stupid attempt to have the set graded a minimum of ms65 I purchased several ms64 slabs that I am sure were ungraded. Well to save (waste) money I cracked out 10 and sent them to PCI (mistake)
for grading mid June 2007. There back now. Thought there my be some interest here in seeing how the "new" PCI did. Thoughts and comments welcome.
1946 NGCms64 PCI au50 Very nice gold orange blue toning, full thumb and skirt lines, spotless fields
1944D PCGSms64 PCIms63 Rattler slab, nice toning, full thumb and skirt lines, near spotless fields
1944 NGCms63 PCIau55 old "soap dish" slab, nice toning, full thumb and skirt lines, near spotless fields
1945D ANACSms64 PCIau58 there new slab
1942S PCGSms64 PCIms63 Older slab, superior luster, near spotless fields
1945S NGCms64 PCIms63 superior luster, near spotless fields
1943S ANACSms64 PCIms63 old mini slab, PQ
1944 NGCms64 PCIms62 superior luster, near spotless fields
1944S NGCms64 PCIms63 nice toning, full thumb and skirt lines, near spotless fields
1941S NGCau58 PCIms62 looked under graded like the rest








I've lurked here for a year. My interests are more in currency but I do some type coin collecting and decided to put a Walker short set together. It took about a year of purchasing slabbed coins individually. I've been a machinist-tool and die maker for over 30 years so I think I know what I'm seeing when I look at a piece of metal. Well in my stupid attempt to have the set graded a minimum of ms65 I purchased several ms64 slabs that I am sure were ungraded. Well to save (waste) money I cracked out 10 and sent them to PCI (mistake)
for grading mid June 2007. There back now. Thought there my be some interest here in seeing how the "new" PCI did. Thoughts and comments welcome.
1946 NGCms64 PCI au50 Very nice gold orange blue toning, full thumb and skirt lines, spotless fields
1944D PCGSms64 PCIms63 Rattler slab, nice toning, full thumb and skirt lines, near spotless fields
1944 NGCms63 PCIau55 old "soap dish" slab, nice toning, full thumb and skirt lines, near spotless fields
1945D ANACSms64 PCIau58 there new slab
1942S PCGSms64 PCIms63 Older slab, superior luster, near spotless fields
1945S NGCms64 PCIms63 superior luster, near spotless fields
1943S ANACSms64 PCIms63 old mini slab, PQ
1944 NGCms64 PCIms62 superior luster, near spotless fields
1944S NGCms64 PCIms63 nice toning, full thumb and skirt lines, near spotless fields
1941S NGCau58 PCIms62 looked under graded like the rest









This is the last time I will ever do this again
0
Comments
Russ, NCNE
Sorry for your misfortune. Who's grading at PCI.. .I rather like stringent standards.. A couple of yours took a nose dive, though. It makes me wonder who missed what at NGC or if you got prints on your coins after the crack out.
Welcome, too.
Joe
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
<< <i>Who's grading at PCI.. .I rather like stringent standards.. >>
If one is just a collector / casual submitter the results will frequently be similar to what he posted. If one is a high volume submitter, the results are completely different.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>Hi Gi...
Sorry for your misfortune. Who's grading at PCI.. .I rather like stringent standards.. A couple of yours took a nose dive, though. It makes me wonder who missed what at NGC or if you got prints on your coins after the crack out.
Welcome, too.
Joe >>
where do you see mention of finger prints on the coins?
<< <i>
<< <i>Hi Gi...
Sorry for your misfortune. Who's grading at PCI.. .I rather like stringent standards.. A couple of yours took a nose dive, though. It makes me wonder who missed what at NGC or if you got prints on your coins after the crack out.
Welcome, too.
Joe >>
where do you see mention of finger prints on the coins? >>
full thumb
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Hi Gi...
Sorry for your misfortune. Who's grading at PCI.. .I rather like stringent standards.. A couple of yours took a nose dive, though. It makes me wonder who missed what at NGC or if you got prints on your coins after the crack out.
Welcome, too.
Joe >>
where do you see mention of finger prints on the coins? >>
full thumb
on Walkers, i'll take 'full thumb' on all of my coins!
https://www.ebay.com/mys/active
Truer words were never spoken! IMO the way some of these TPG treat the casual submitter vs. their high volume submitters border on the criminal.
Greg Hansen, Melbourne, FL Click here for any current EBAY auctions Multiple "Circle of Trust" transactions over 14 years on forum
<< <i>I've sent to PCI and found them increasingly (overly) strict. I sent a raw VDB, came back, PCI MS63RB. Cracked it out and sent to PCGS, came back, PCGS MS65RB. >>
That's because you're a casual submitter. Take a look at some of the PCI crap sold by high volume dealers.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>If one is just a collector / casual submitter the results will frequently be similar to what he posted. If one is a high volume submitter, the results are completely different. >>
I'm still puzzled by this practice and how it is justified.
Companies are of course free to adopt whatever business practices they like, and it's common for "high volume" customers to receive preferential treatment.
Usually, however, they receive price breaks based on volume and preferred (superior) customer service. Not what essentially winds up being a different service with different standards.
If in fact this practice does take place (and I have no doubt that it does), it sort of negates the entire "level playing field" concept that standardized, impartial third-party grading was supposed to impart to the hobby and business of numismatics.
Which is why I guess a lot of folks don't play the plastic game.
60 years into this hobby and I'm still working on my Lincoln set!
Is it possible a first time poster gets a thread to 100 ?
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
<< <i>I've sent to PCI and found them increasingly (overly) strict. I sent a raw VDB, came back, PCI MS63RB. Cracked it out and sent to PCGS, came back, PCGS MS65RB. Go figure. Mike >>
I bought a 15-P Lincoln graded 63RB by PCI (it was a few years back so not part of any recent standards tightening effort). It's a 64RD any day of the week, better than some graded as such by the "market leaders." So go figure indeed.
60 years into this hobby and I'm still working on my Lincoln set!
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
Sorry for your loss.
bob
<< <i>
<< <i>I've sent to PCI and found them increasingly (overly) strict. I sent a raw VDB, came back, PCI MS63RB. Cracked it out and sent to PCGS, came back, PCGS MS65RB. >>
That's because you're a casual submitter. Take a look at some of the PCI crap sold by high volume dealers.
Russ, NCNE >>
Oh?
<< <i>I cannot fathom why anyone would crack any coin out of an NGC or PCGS holder and send it to PCI. >>
Especially if you've been lurking here for a year. You should have known better!
I have no clue what the coin would grade at if submitted to a leading TPG. One day I will find out.
This is the problem with slabbing...TPGs should authenticate, and let dealers and collectors agree or disagree on grades...but it will never happen!....OK....I will come down off of the soap box!
Shawn
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
<< <i>Can't think of anything to say.
Hoard the keys.
<< <i>So wait a minute...most of the time PCI is criticized on the forums for being overgraded a point or 2.....and the market reflects this by dealers saying things like..."PCI 65 would be NGC 64 and PCGS 63"....and.....now they are being criticized for being to strict?
This is the problem with slabbing...TPGs should authenticate, and let dealers and collectors agree or disagree on grades...but it will never happen!....OK....I will come down off of the soap box!
Shawn >>
Shawn,
that is the argument for the ages........maybe the higher end TPGs should issue a "range". Maybe PCGS and NGC can grade a coin as 'authentic' and issue a grade range of 'no less than MS63, but no higher than 65'. Let the buyer/seller argue over the "correct" grade. a two grade range is a good one, as you don't often hear the lament " that darn PCGS/NGC gave me a MS63. my coin is a clear MS66!"
then, we can take the execs from 'Big Oil' out and flog them, buy the world a Coke, and teach them how to sing in harmony!
I'm not running for President, but feel free to write me in!
Doug
<< <i>Where do I find some newly graded PCI coins? >>
my thoughts exactly
(unless he's pulling our legs)
let's see the coins
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
Then I'll see for myself if they are being too strict. If they are, I'll start gobbling them up.
For a large selection of U.S. Coins & Currency, visit The Reeded Edge's online webstore at the link below.
The Reeded Edge
<< <i>Take a look at some of the PCI crap sold by high volume dealers. >>
I recently picked up a couple of 67RD PCI Lincolns off the 'bay, mostly out of curiosity to see what they actually were. Spotty 65s, not even worth a crackout. Didn't pay much for them at least, maybe $10 each.
60 years into this hobby and I'm still working on my Lincoln set!
<< <i>I've never seen a thread that bashes pci for being too strict!
Will wonders never cease?
Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1
<< <i>I cannot fathom why anyone would crack any coin out of an NGC or PCGS holder and send it to PCI. >>
Agree. Makes no sense whatsoever. Paying to move a coin from a top tier slab to a third tier slab is just plain dumb.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Edit:
<< I cannot fathom why anyone would crack any coin out of an NGC or PCGS holder and send it to PCI. >>
Especially if you've been lurking here for a year. You should have known better!
I think someone is tugging some chains.
This IS a Joke, right.
Herb
<< <i>Favoritism toward big dealers as to grades given is only a step worst than a fee structure which allows me to buy graded NGC Early Release '07-W Eagles for less than the grading and shipping fees would be if I sent in 5 coins, let alone a number smaller than that. Are TPGs set up to help the hobby or dealers? >>
TPG's are in this to make money period. Enough said.
<< <i>It looks like it is time to start looking at PCI again. >>
The problem is that there are too many PCI slabs with overgraded coins already out there. If they want to tighten their grading so collectors will take them seriously, they will have to redesign their insert to differentiate the new stricter slabs from the older looser slabs.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
I think they did, Doesn't JT Stanton sign the insert?
Steve