Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

First Strikes... Will this matter in the future?

anyone think this will effect the value of the coin in the future. Do you believe a high grade with the first strike sticker attached will be more appealing than the same coin with a higher grade?
---
If it ain't about the money lord knows i've gone insane

Comments

  • Options
    Not to me....

    And it doesn't now.
  • Options
    BBQnBLUESBBQnBLUES Posts: 1,803
    Only to the TV Coin Shops promoting as "RARE" BS

    The gulliable public will continue to get taken by these Vultures <sigh>
  • Options
    JoeLewisJoeLewis Posts: 1,913 ✭✭✭✭
    I kind of like them because all the suckers buy up the first strike coins at a premium and then I can buy up all the non-first strike coins for less!


    Just kidding, I have no interest in this stuff at all! I also think the "First Strike" thing is demeaning to the hobby.
  • Options
    NeoStarNeoStar Posts: 1,123 ✭✭✭
    I hope not. After all, "First Strike" is just a pretty label that has been over hyped by dealers. Neither PCGS nor the Mint have ever issue a statement that may indicate that the label should carry a premium. It is the people selling them as "WOW WOW LOOKY LOOKY First Strike WOW WOW" that have driven the prices up...
  • Options
    what a touchy subject, best not to openly discuss it image
  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,171 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It means nothing to me, but I am so far out of the numismatic mainstream my opinions probably don't matter.
    It is a marketing device. If the collecting public likes it it will be successful and will bring premiums, especially from people who buy from TV coin sellers.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    carlcarl Posts: 2,054
    If some coins are first strike coins, then many others must be second, third, fourth, etc strike coins. I've heard and seen numerous coins labled as first stike coins but never one labled as LAST STIKE. IF people are impressed with first strike coins, I wonder just how expensive the last strike coins would be? Since there can only be one last stike coin, that one would really be valuable. Then again a middle strike coin cold also be of interest. Now if a quarter has 17,004,001 minted, 1945S, the quarter that was the 8,502,000.5 coin minted would also be worth a lot, NO?
    Carl
  • Options
    itsnotjustmeitsnotjustme Posts: 8,787 ✭✭✭
    I hope not.

    The fact is it does make a difference in sale price today. Whether it SHOULD is greatly debated---whether it DOES is clear.
    Give Blood (Red Bags) & Platelets (Yellow Bags)!
  • Options
    NeoStarNeoStar Posts: 1,123 ✭✭✭
    As brought up by IGWT, in a previous post jamakin stated the following:

    I don't see a problem. PCGS states first strikes are coins sold in the first month of release. Big deal
    Collectors that want that label should already be aware that it means only that.
    Delusional people might think the are buying the first coins off the presses But like the saying goes" there is one born every minute. "
    The Government should cash in on the craze and offer a first strike of the die coins or first 100 coins coin or number the coins by the batch.Then they could jack up the premium and offer the chance to buy them by lottery drawing. Now that would be a gas:


    And I really agree with what he said!
  • Options
    OPAOPA Posts: 17,161 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>anyone think this will effect the value of the coin in the future. Do you believe a high grade with the first strike sticker attached will be more appealing than the same coin with a higher grade? >>



    Whether you like it or not, “first strike” designations demand a premium over non first strike and have for years. Therefore, if you plan to hold on to your coin until death, it doesn’t make any difference, but if you plan to sell it at one point in the future, it does make a financial difference. I’m in for the “buck” & if I have a choice, I’ll take the “First Strike” over the non first strike any day. The coin is only worth what some one else is willing to pay for it & if “First Strike” is a selling tool .. why look a gift horse in the mouth?

    "Bongo drive 1984 Lincoln that looks like old coin dug from ground."
  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Only for newbies that do not know any better... they will waste their money on the worthless label. Cheers, RickO
  • Options
    BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭
    The label will mean something. It adds an attractive appearance to the front of the slab. Some people do buy the slab and not the coin or at least make that as part of their decision.

    Don't you like the cool flag?
  • Options
    I don;t think it should matter.
  • Options
    RedTigerRedTiger Posts: 5,608
    Yes, it matters now, and it will matter more as time goes on. Why? Because first strike means almost certainly graded once. Which would most collectors prefer a coin that makes the grade on the first try, or one that makes the grade on the fifth resubmit? I know which I want, and am willing to pay more for that.

    It is not just moderns. If there were something similar for classics, odds approach certainty that the coins with the "graded once" label would trade for significant premiums over the other coins.

    If offered two coins for the same price, I'll pick First Strike every time, unless the coin is clearly inferior, and that is rarely the case with moderns.

  • Options
    BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Yes, it matters now, and it will matter more as time goes on. Why? Because first strike means almost certainly graded once. Which would most collectors prefer a coin that makes the grade on the first try, or one that makes the grade on the fifth resubmit? I know which I want, and am willing to pay more for that.

    It is not just moderns. If there were something similar for classics, odds approach certainty that the coins with the "graded once" label would trade for significant premiums over the other coins.

    If offered two coins for the same price, I'll pick First Strike every time, unless the coin is clearly inferior, and that is rarely the case with moderns. >>



    Just because it is first strike does not mean it was only graded once. You can send it in for re-grade and keep the first strike label.
  • Options
    Aegis3Aegis3 Posts: 2,936 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Yes, it matters now, and it will matter more as time goes on. Why? Because first strike means almost certainly graded once. Which would most collectors prefer a coin that makes the grade on the first try, or one that makes the grade on the fifth resubmit? I know which I want, and am willing to pay more for that.

    It is not just moderns. If there were something similar for classics, odds approach certainty that the coins with the "graded once" label would trade for significant premiums over the other coins.

    If offered two coins for the same price, I'll pick First Strike every time, unless the coin is clearly inferior, and that is rarely the case with moderns. >>



    This sounds an awful lot like the gambler's fallacy. The probability that a coin c will receive grade g on submission n should be independent of any previous grades.
    --

    Ed. S.

    (EJS)
  • Options
    TheRavenTheRaven Posts: 4,167 ✭✭✭✭
    I would not pay extra for such a coin.....
    Collection under construction: VG Barber Quarters & Halves
  • Options
    ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Yes, it matters now, and it will matter more as time goes on. Why? Because first strike means almost certainly graded once. Which would most collectors prefer a coin that makes the grade on the first try, or one that makes the grade on the fifth resubmit? I know which I want, and am willing to pay more for that.

    It is not just moderns. If there were something similar for classics, odds approach certainty that the coins with the "graded once" label would trade for significant premiums over the other coins.

    If offered two coins for the same price, I'll pick First Strike every time, unless the coin is clearly inferior, and that is rarely the case with moderns. >>



    I'm sorry, but I think this has absolutely no merit whatsoever.
  • Options
    First strike is a guarantee that a coin has not been submitted multiple times for an upgrade, The grade is what was assigned at that particular time. We all know that gradeflation is a real. So I believe that there will be real value associated with the first strke labels in the future. Given the higher value that the ebay public gives first strikes now, we can safely say that the ebay public assesses a higher value now as well. For all the naysayers out there. "GET OVER IT" and "GET WITH THE PROGRAM" image
    Luck happens when preparation meets opportunity.
  • Options
    i didn't mean to upset anyone but I did enjoy it
    ---
    If it ain't about the money lord knows i've gone insane
  • Options
    bumanchubumanchu Posts: 1,383 ✭✭✭
    The future begins after I post this.

    Short term, yes to some.

    Long term, to fewer.

    Longer term, who knows? Crazier things happen all the time and also repeat themselves.
    And I ain't lying this time.
  • Options


    << <i>i didn't mean to upset anyone but I did enjoy it >>

    If all first strike buyers read what the mint said about the so called first strikes, no one would buy them and they would be much more upset
  • Options
    veryfineveryfine Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭
    I don't think it should matter, but if it probably will.
    Actually, I am just as concerned about the microscopic differences between ms-69 and ms-70 bullion coins. As far as I'm concerned, an ms-65 bullion coin (if one were to exist in such a lowly state of preservation!) would be perfectly acceptable.
  • Options
    CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,432 ✭✭✭✭✭
    First Strikes image

    As people finally figure out that these were nothing more than marketing hype, I think it will matter less and less and less and less and less and less - ad infinitum.

    I never have and never will pay a premium for a First Strike coin holder. In fact, I only have one for my holder collection and I paid market for it.

    Note how quiet PCGS has been on the topic - that speaks volumes.

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • Options
    BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭
    I think it does not matter now for many coins. Look at the 2005/2006 Silver Eagles. Both FS and non FS PCGS are selling for about the same price in the low $30 range.

    Also look at the FS Buffalo Gold in MS. These are going for about the same in FS and non FS.

    Although with a much lower population the FS Buffalo Gold in Proof is selling at a substation premium especially in PR70.

    The equality is getting much closer.
  • Options
    JoeLewisJoeLewis Posts: 1,913 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Yes, it matters now, and it will matter more as time goes on. Why? Because first strike means almost certainly graded once. Which would most collectors prefer a coin that makes the grade on the first try, or one that makes the grade on the fifth resubmit? I know which I want, and am willing to pay more for that.

    It is not just moderns. If there were something similar for classics, odds approach certainty that the coins with the "graded once" label would trade for significant premiums over the other coins.

    If offered two coins for the same price, I'll pick First Strike every time, unless the coin is clearly inferior, and that is rarely the case with moderns. >>



    BUT, can't you tell a low-end coin from a high-end coin? Why do you need the label to tell you that? If you can't tell the difference between a low-end coin and a high-end coin then maybe you shouldn't be concerned about it in the first place.
  • Options
    leothelyonleothelyon Posts: 8,542 ✭✭✭✭✭
    First Strikes... Will this matter in the future?

    It will only matter to those who are ignorant of the true meaning in why they were labeled as such. Word spreads fast and a public dealer would lose face very fast selling them otherwise. Sellers on the internet may take longer to realize this. In the end, the last cat holding the bag will be the source from whence they were manufactured. image

    Leo

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • Options
    morgansforevermorgansforever Posts: 8,501 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Makes no difference to me.
    World coins FSHO Hundreds of successful BST transactions U.S. coins FSHO
  • Options
    FatManFatMan Posts: 8,977
    As long as the TPGs have First Strike Registries it will matter for those who are competing with sets. It is a shame because the First Strike™ label weighs in at zero numismatic value, but does hold a value to those who collect plastic. The TPGs should be ashamed of themselves.
  • Options
    19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,503 ✭✭✭✭
    Of course it will but only to the First Strike slab collectors!

    Especially for those graded 69 that have not milk spotted and its only a question of time before PCGS includes all the other First Strike coins in the registry set instead of just the 2005 and 2006.

    Collecting First Strike labels has nothing to do with coin collecting but eveything to do with collecting the slab. Plain and simple.
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • Options
    ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭
    The coin is already worth the same; the plastic is worth more. Whether or not the market remains silly enough to continue to give it a premium remains to be seen.
  • Options
    garsmithgarsmith Posts: 5,894 ✭✭
    <<First Strikes... Will this matter in the future?>>

    Not to me, meaning I would like to have a few first strike slabs, but I would not pay a premium for them!
  • Options
    The only "First Strike" that I want is a;

    2006-W 20th Anniversary Gold Eagle PR70DCAM $50 from the 20th Anniversary Set

    The "First Strike" label is worth thousands over the non-First Strike

    I kick myself in the A$$ daily for not getting one when the price was right.
  • Options
    MyqqyMyqqy Posts: 9,777
    It is a shame because the First Strike™ label weighs in at zero numismatic value, but does hold a value to those who collect plastic. The TPGs should be ashamed of themselves.

    Well spoken! I know that I hope for a future numismatic community that doesn't put value into gimmicky marketing, but I also don't put much faith in that ever happening..
    My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable !

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file