The first coin looks DCAM. If both photos were taken under the same conditions I would (and did) vote #1. If it is the same coin, if neither or both are DCAM the poll is flawed...
Has your camera or photographing technique changed in the past few years? If no, and if #2 is DCAM while #1 isn't, I'd say Hall's attempt to prove standards are the same is flawed.
Both were imaged recently. The first three months ago, the second yesterday. Same lampshade, same lighting. There really is no attempt to make one look better than the other.
Frankies were one of the first. And it was before Y2K. I think I recall green label DCAM Frankies so that would put it before 1996. Anyway it isn't an issue here.
The second coin is the one designated DCAM. It's graded PR66DCAM, cert # 2875857. It's a seven digit blue label with the bar code on the back. That puts the grading period at four plus years ago, maybe a bit earlier. Just one of many, many coins I've seen and handled from that era that would not regrade the same if submitted today. I don't trust coins from this era unless I can buy them sight-seen in-hand.
The first coin was graded PR69CAM cert #21904640 in March of this year.
<< <i>Cha Ching! Russ, did you retrieve this from one of the many proof sets you're notorious for acquiring? >>
It was one of three PCGS PR66CAMs that I picked off on Teletrade. Somebody had submitted them with crappy flips, so they hazed over and got graded low. I cracked them out, dipped them and resubmitted them. The others went 68CAM and 66CAM.
You're having delusions of grandeur again. - Susan Ivanova Well, if you're gonna have delusions, may as well go for the really satisfying ones. - Marcus Cole
I called them some months ago with this very question. The Customer Service Rep., after checking, told me he thought it was 1991 for Cameo and about a year later for Deep Cameo.
Comments
Duh.
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
<< <i>neither. >>
<< <i>One of these coins is graded DCAM, the other Cameo. >>
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
<< <i>neither. >>
<< <i>One of these coins is graded DCAM, the other Cameo. >>
Russ, NCNE >>
coin #3.
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>Juiced equally. The first one really does blow away the second one.
Russ, NCNE >>
Then I'll vote #1 which is obviously wrong.
Lucy, NCNE
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
<< <i>This poll is rigged.
Lucy, NCNE >>
Indeed.
Rick
Always Looking for Raw Proof Lincoln Cents !!
<< <i>If it is the same coin, if neither or both are DCAM the poll is flawed... >>
It is not the same coin, and one is graded DCAM. As I noted, they were graded at least three years apart.
Russ, NCNE
Edit: 4 years ago?
TorinoCobra71
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
<< <i>If it is the same coin, if neither or both are DCAM the poll is flawed... >>
It is not the same coin, and one is graded DCAM. As I noted, they were graded at least three years apart.
Russ, NCNE >>
Does it bother you that nobody trusts you?
I voted the obvious. If either of them is DCAM, it's #1. But I have a feeling there's more to the story........
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Frankies were one of the first. And it was before Y2K. I think I recall green label DCAM Frankies so that would put it before 1996. Anyway it isn't an issue here.
<< <i>I'll guess #2 was graded DCAM 3 years ago and #1 got CAMed recently. >>
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
Tom
The first coin was graded PR69CAM cert #21904640 in March of this year.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
The second coin was graded PR69CAM cert #21904640 in March of this year.
Russ, NCNE >>
You mean the first coin.... correct?
Cha Ching! Russ, did you retrieve this from one of the many proof sets you're notorious for acquiring? Just curious!
Tom
<< <i>Cha Ching! Russ, did you retrieve this from one of the many proof sets you're notorious for acquiring? >>
It was one of three PCGS PR66CAMs that I picked off on Teletrade. Somebody had submitted them with crappy flips, so they hazed over and got graded low. I cracked them out, dipped them and resubmitted them. The others went 68CAM and 66CAM.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>what flips do you use Russ >>
ET Kointainer SAFLIPS™. Accept no substitutes.
Russ, NCNE
Russ;
Where could one obtain such flips? Thanks in advance.
Tom
http://www.brent-krueger.com/flips.html
Product #ETK-SF25-100.
Russ, NCNE
I guess this is one case where dipping helped. It sure helped the value of that coin.
<< <i>It sure looks like it is harder to get a DCAM now, or was easier then. >>
Harder now ... found that out with a few PL & DMPL Morgans I submitted recently.
Steve
Happy Rock Wrens
You're having delusions of grandeur again. - Susan Ivanova
Well, if you're gonna have delusions, may as well go for the really satisfying ones. - Marcus Cole
<< <i>When did PCGS start designating DCAM? >>
I called them some months ago with this very question. The Customer Service Rep., after checking, told me he thought it was 1991 for Cameo and about a year later for Deep Cameo.
Chance favors the prepared mind.