Here's your chance to show everyone that you're a grading genius - which is the AU58 and which is th

One of the two 1850 Liberty Double Eagles below has been graded AU58 by a major grading company. The other has been graded MS61 by the same company.
Which is which and please let us know what you base your conclusions on? No one should feel ANY pressure, since this should be a slam dunk exercise.


Which is which and please let us know what you base your conclusions on? No one should feel ANY pressure, since this should be a slam dunk exercise.



0
Comments
Bottom AU-58.
Cameron Kiefer
Bottom AU58
Michael
Cameron Kiefer
Bottom AU58
You can kinda see in the scans the almost lack of luster in the bottom one, though it has much less dings in the fields than the MS-61. If it had that full luster, I would guess it would grade MS-63, but I'm not a grading genius, just learning to be one =D
42/92
<< <i>The grading genius already got it >>
You didn't notice my winky? And by the way, Mr. Grading Genius, are you signed up for the "World Series of Grading?"
Michael
<< <i>...and please let us know what you base your conclusions on? >>
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
Cheek hit on the bottom one qualifies it for a 61, but takes it out of the running for a 58.
That is the opinion of a certified grading genius. A man so respected for his ability to separate the gems from the POS' that David Hall himself once said "Yeah... Clankeye... I guess."
Clankeye
<< <i>I hope that the rest of the respondents do better at following the proper procedures : >>
I just cheated off the grading genius's response!
Michael
P.S. I responded before I read or even looked at the other replies.
09/07/2006
Bottm MS61
Glen
Bottom MS-61
Reason - bottom coin looks too baggy to be anything better than MS-61....top coins looks better than a 61, so it must be the AU-58 with some rub. And of course I know nothing about grading gold.
Bottom AU-58
BUT I would not grade either one Unc. There is too much going on in the fields of both pieces.
The top gets the MS-61 because it shows about 90% of its mint luster. The lower piece is duller.
To me a low grade Unc. in the ideal world has full luster, but lots of marks. Given that as I collector I'd sooner own one of these coins than a banged up MS-60.
K S
the top coin is AU58-the luster is impaired. The bottom coin is the MS61, baggy but appears to have full, unimpaired luster.
Check out some of my 1794 Large Cents on www.coingallery.org
First of all, I am not familiar with the series. But, the bottom one is the AU because I detect wear on both of the eagle's wingtips (reverse), and notice slight wear on Miss Liberty's hair on the AU coin.
I would like to add that I do not like either coin due to the numerous contact marks.
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."
Bot 58
1850 $20 is tough because of the typical mushy strike. BTW, I would be very hesitant to buy one right now. Who knows how many AU and MS examples were on the SS Republic?
<< <i>I would like to add that I do not like either coin due to the numerous contact marks. >>
Both coins are well above average when it comes to contact marks for these early $20 gold pieces. These coins were large, soft and heavy, (They weigh more than a silver dollar) and they seldom put away by 19th century collectors because of the high face value. It is for those reasons that these pieces had been so hard to find in Choice to Gem Mint State until the shipwreck coins got into numismatic circulation. These coins were stored and transported in bags, and since they were not stored in government vaults for 100 years like the Morgan dollars, they got lots of bag marks.
Looking for PCGS AU58 Washington's, 32-63.
<< <i>and please let us know what you base your conclusions on >>
Why? at the services you don't explain why you grade. You punch in the grade and that's it.
Cameron Kiefer
<< <i>Why? at the services you don't explain why you grade. You punch in the grade and that's it. >>
Cameron - because the author of this thread requested it.
<< <i>DorkCarl, if you can't give either of those coins an AU-58, I'd say you are one tough customer. You should see some of the stuff that the services tried to pass as MS-61 or AU-58 years ago. They looked like they had been used a surface for a track meet. >>
hey billjones, here's my take on it. the WORST grading ever done by pcgs/ngc is in early copper. they are far too often off by 15, 20, yes i said TWENTY points in grade. and that's commmercial grade, not eac! but the second worst grading these "services" do is in high-grade gold, & you know it. if i ever were to bid on high-grade gold sight-unseen, i would take FIVE POINTS off every grade across the board. that's how far off i think they OFTEN are. so imo, i'd bid on those two coins as au-53 & au-55.
but to coinguy1's point, most likely, the baggy coin is the ms-61 (slab grade) & the less baggy 1 is the au-58.
another absurdity of plastic grades. again, NEITHER coin should commercial grade above au-55.
K S
The bottom coin is Marty's
My posts viewed
since 8/1/6
Bottom MS61
To my eye, the top coin shows much more of what I would call 'circulation strikes', i.e. small superficial scratches in the field typical of circulation wear and tear. The bottom coin, although showing bigger hits, appear more bag like rather than from circulation. Also, I think I can see the hint of 'cartwheel luster' on the bottom coin, whereas the top coin is more of a 'flat' reflection indicating to me that the flow lines have been interfered with by circulation. Thats my two cents worth.
Edited to add: Looking at the third surface (rims) there appear to be small dings to the top coin...i.e. slide marks or hits, again common for circulation type hits. The rims of the bottom coin look unassaulted to me. With this observation I am now about 98% sure of my ranking and fully open to ridicule and derision!
Greg Hansen, Melbourne, FL Click here for any current EBAY auctions Multiple "Circle of Trust" transactions over 14 years on forum
My #1 Low Ball Peace Dollar Set
When we are planning for posterity, we ought to remember that virtue is not hereditary.
Thomas Paine
Bottom AU58 - Luster missing in places and the marks are fewer (if the coin was MS it may be a 62)
Bottom AU58 Very light rub (less bag marks but rub makes it AU).
Crap, I had label spelled right the first time.
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
Bottom 58
Look for the wear on the high points on Liberty's head thing and on the thing around the lower part of the eagle on both sides (articulate about this, ain't I?)
CG
09/07/2006
09/07/2006
Whichever is which I would take the AU58 all day long.
Tyler
NEVER LET HIPPO MOUTH OVERLOAD HUMMINGBIRD BUTT!!!
WORK HARDER!!!!
Millions on WELFARE depend on you!
Top coin: luster more even but not great. Cheeks not bad but fields very baggy. But don't see any wear despite the poor strike. 1850's despite the first year of issue for circulation were not great struck coins. I would have graded this more of a MS-60.
So the top has to be the MS coin and the bottom, an AU coin.
Bottom MS61
With all the AU58s I have racked up, I should know. I just picked the coin I thought looked the best and it MUST be the AU58!