Grade opinions please 81 CC
Gothat3rs
Posts: 238 ✭✭✭
Just curious about grade opinions on this 81 cc. 
Successful Transactions dantheman984,jimtyler,perryhall,doubleeagle07,onlyroosies,bigjpst,olahinmah,jwp,Cfioretti,surfinxhi,commoncents05,jclovescoins,LeeBone,WQoarterFreddie
3
Comments
Luster of a 64. Reverse marks on eagle and obv. neck. My guess 63.
Looks great, nice and frosty.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Looks like a nice 63, and it seems to have a shot at 4 I think
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
63+
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Ms 63, nice coin 🪙
63+ is my grade, likely a 64 at PCGS.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
Attractive look. I think 64 would be reasonable and I would be disappointed with 63. 63+ is definitely in play- good luck with the outcome
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Very nice MS64
USAF (Ret.) 1985 - 2005. E-4B Aircraft Maint. Crew Chief and Contracting Officer.
✓ Everyman Mint State Carson City Morgan Dollars (1878 – 1893)
✓ Morgan Dollar GSA Hoard (1878 – 1891)
✓ Everyman Mint State Lincoln Cents (1909 – 1958)
✓ Matte Proof Toned Lincoln Cents (1909 – 1916)
63
63
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
NGC is slightly lenient on GSA submissions, I would say MS-64.
"But seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness and all these things shall be added unto you" Matthew 6:33. Young fellow suffering from Bust Half fever.
BHNC #AN-10
JRCS #1606
Agree with Mark's 63+. Great luster, a few too many marks to 64. JMO
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
Ya certainly a luster bomb I'd give it a 64
Nice looking 64.
63
Looks 63.....
63
63
63
Dave
+1
The OP's beautiful, frosty coin looks every bit, if not better than this 1884 that CACG put a 64+ on the label a few months back...
.
64
I think 63+ is right on the money, but the luster looks like it could push it into 64 on a good day in the grading room. Very little difference in value between 3 and 4 on this one, fortunately for the OP. Very nice coin!
MS-63. The marks on the cheek are too numerous to grade any higher.
Hard to tell from those pictures. If luster is strong, probably 64.
MS-64
After taking a second look, I am slightly more bullish in terms of the grade being a 64 with even a slight shot at 64+. Let me explain… take a real good look at the fields on both sides. The fields are very clean. The frost merely magnifies the contact contrast from other coins while in the bag. The contact does not seem to be deep. In my slightly revised view, I think a 63+ would even be a disappointment.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
63 plus could be shot at 64
64
63+
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
63
Tough to grade from the photos, MS63
“Land of the free because of the brave”
“Saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone”
In Deo solo confidimus
Member since 2026
Successful BST transactions with: Ted 1, JWP, bigjpst, Vetter, nickelsciolist,
The PCGS price guide has the 63 at $860 and the 64 at $900, a negligible spread so it doesn’t matter without a + or a bean.
Is your interest category buy, sell, or hold ?
I like it as a 64
Collector, occasional seller
Thank you for everones opinion always appreciate this forum and our members
Successful Transactions dantheman984,jimtyler,perryhall,doubleeagle07,onlyroosies,bigjpst,olahinmah,jwp,Cfioretti,surfinxhi,commoncents05,jclovescoins,LeeBone,WQoarterFreddie
64 RGDS!
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
Retiring at 55, what day is today?
MS-64+
WRONG!
I see pieces with barely a mark on them which are graded MS-64. There are obvious marks on the cheek on this piece.
If that piece were in an NGC or PCGS MS-64 holder, it would not get a CAC sticker.
Another data point, I suppose. Mine were graded by NGC many years ago; probably soon after released by the GSA. Grading standards apparently do change.
"Mine" you wrote under my posted pic...
Thank you for your purchase, if that's what you're getting at?
I had the coin above graded last August and sold it in Sept, if memory serves.
If not your '84 coin above, sorry for my confusion!
Yes, grading standards do change, as do grade opinions based on photos...
Buy as a 62 sell as a 63
Micah Langford - https://www.oldglorycoinsandcurrency.com/
I'd like to see those MS-64 pieces with barely a mark on them, thanks!
In the meantime, I've got a couple of PCGS graded GSA's that might grab your attention ⇊ right-click/new-tab for zoom...
One is a 64, and the other two are 65's. I snapped them with my cheap phone.
I think it's time for some to take a step back, and realize that the OP has a nicer coin than one might think?
Some might also perhaps reconsider this notion that a 64 will "barely" have a mark on it, lol.
Or perhaps, this notion that a reflective/contrasting frost-rub equates to a bag-mark/hit. It doesn't imo, and maybe I'm wrong...
.
I think the services are more liberal on the more common CC issues. I’ll guess they would call it a 64. I’d like it better as a 63.
You lost the thread, apparently. But it doesn't matter....