Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Topps VS OPC baseball observations...

11112131416

Comments

  • CardGeekCardGeek Posts: 690 ✭✭✭

    I'm sure it's not. I sent in an OPC card with a similar surface and I think it came back a 2.

  • tsalems1tsalems1 Posts: 3,537 ✭✭✭✭✭

    opcbaseball.com
  • n49thn49th Posts: 32 ✭✭✭

    I recently picked up a nice starter set of 200+ 1971 OPC low numbers on FB (mostly VG+ or better with a sharp Garvey and Foster RC, along with 9 HOFers).

    A couple days later, I walked into a local antique mall to see if I could find any others. Lo and behold, there was a stack of 7 HOFers tucked in the corner of a showcase. 6 were low numbers and all 6 were priced too high for raw (even considering how tough any 71s are).

    The fellow would not haggle, but the 7th card you may ask? Well...

    Granted, there is a light crease in the upper left corner. PSA 3-4 tops, I'm sure.

    No need to haggle on this one though, I think you'll agree.
    *Roughly $18.50 for my American friends

    All in all, a fun find of 71s.

  • smallstockssmallstocks Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Holy crap! $18.50!


    Late 60's and early to mid 70's non-sports
  • olb31olb31 Posts: 4,043 ✭✭✭✭✭

    appears that a 1974 O-Pee-Chee Nolan Ryan psa 8 just sold for $2,500. Topps sell for around $400 - $450. Huge sell.

    Work hard and you will succeed!!
  • olb31olb31 Posts: 4,043 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @tsalems1 said:

    sweet. I picked the 19756 rose opc 8 pop 3 a few months ago. Both are extremely tough cards.

    Work hard and you will succeed!!
  • NJ80sBBCNJ80sBBC Posts: 814 ✭✭✭✭

    Even common80s boxes are hitting all time highs. Blows my mind that an 83 is 1000$ and 84 500$

    Wild.

    John

    Conundrum - Loving my unopened baseball card collection....but really like ripping too
  • smallstockssmallstocks Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I just sold two vintage OPC's in the last couple of days at roughly 3x what I paid for them last summer.


    Late 60's and early to mid 70's non-sports
  • olb31olb31 Posts: 4,043 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1966 mantle psa 5 opc sold for $1,050. Topps are going for around $500.

    Work hard and you will succeed!!
  • The question is is this something you should jump at now. Like unopened became massively expensive over a little period. Speaking of that the unopened niche hasn't caught up yet at all. OPC's are still running about half the price of regular Topps wax even though their pop numbers are much lower. Just going by numbers alone shows a sleeping giant

  • 1982FBWaxMemories1982FBWaxMemories Posts: 2,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 19, 2026 2:50PM

    Is the 1973 OPC Willie Mays still trailing the 1973 Topps even though the OPC numbers are so very very tiny?

    Same with the 1978 Reggie Jackson...

    It's the singer not the song - Peter Townshend (1972)
    Not even a minute do I buy the whole buh buh buh I'm a man-child japery - Me (2025)

  • jackstrawjackstraw Posts: 3,851 ✭✭✭✭

    @1982FBWaxMemories said:
    Is the 1973 OPC Willie Mays still trailing the 1973 Topps even though the OPC numbers are so very very tiny?

    Same with the 1978 Reggie Jackson...

    I bet the 78 Topps Ryan laps the OPC version a few times too.

    Collector Focus

    ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
  • 1982FBWaxMemories1982FBWaxMemories Posts: 2,374 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jackstraw said:

    @1982FBWaxMemories said:
    Is the 1973 OPC Willie Mays still trailing the 1973 Topps even though the OPC numbers are so very very tiny?

    Same with the 1978 Reggie Jackson...

    I bet the 78 Topps Ryan laps the OPC version a few times too.

    Then it's any OPC I have is lapped by the Topps and any that I want the opposite. frickin' amazing.

    It's the singer not the song - Peter Townshend (1972)
    Not even a minute do I buy the whole buh buh buh I'm a man-child japery - Me (2025)

  • miwlvrnmiwlvrn Posts: 4,305 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @71waxforever said:
    The question is is this something you should jump at now. Like unopened became massively expensive over a little period. Speaking of that the unopened niche hasn't caught up yet at all. OPC's are still running about half the price of regular Topps wax even though their pop numbers are much lower. Just going by numbers alone shows a sleeping giant

    Not the only reason, but one factor for that is that the notoriously higher sugar content of the vintage OPC gum relative to the Topps gum means that if you were purchasing wax with intent to rip and look for gradable cards, your chances are significantly higher with a vintage OPC box that far more cards inside the packs have been destroyed over time due to the aging gum seepage.

  • tsalems1tsalems1 Posts: 3,537 ✭✭✭✭✭

    opcbaseball.com
  • waxman2745waxman2745 Posts: 871 ✭✭✭

    @miwlvrn said:

    @71waxforever said:
    The question is is this something you should jump at now. Like unopened became massively expensive over a little period. Speaking of that the unopened niche hasn't caught up yet at all. OPC's are still running about half the price of regular Topps wax even though their pop numbers are much lower. Just going by numbers alone shows a sleeping giant

    Not the only reason, but one factor for that is that the notoriously higher sugar content of the vintage OPC gum relative to the Topps gum means that if you were purchasing wax with intent to rip and look for gradable cards, your chances are significantly higher with a vintage OPC box that far more cards inside the packs have been destroyed over time due to the aging gum seepage.

    1972 and 1980 OPC are very challenging sets because of this.

    Adam
    buying O-Pee-Chee (OPC) baseball cards
    also collecting US & Canadian silver coins
  • balco758balco758 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Stretch OPC style.

  • tsalems1tsalems1 Posts: 3,537 ✭✭✭✭✭

    opcbaseball.com
  • tsalems1tsalems1 Posts: 3,537 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @balco758 said:
    Tom,
    I call your Yaz and I raise you a Rice.

    ![]

    And I’ll match the PSA 9 with a 9 of my own 😊

    opcbaseball.com
  • ElMagoStrikeZoneElMagoStrikeZone Posts: 1,539 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Please continue flexing gentlemen. I'm vicariously thrilled.

  • jackstrawjackstraw Posts: 3,851 ✭✭✭✭

    Here is a nice 9

    Collector Focus

    ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
  • balco758balco758 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Kryptonite, eh?!!

  • craig44craig44 Posts: 12,552 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Mikeygiggs_336699 said:
    Haven’t posted in awhile, I just wanted to share my latest pickup 72 OPC JR Richard PSA 9 pop 4 none higher! If he doesn’t suffer that major stroke what kind of numbers does he end up with?

    I have to think he would have been at least Doc Gooden good, or maybe better. I have a feeling Houston would have pitched him a million innings and used up his arm though.

    George Brett, Roger Clemens and Tommy Brady.

  • ElMagoStrikeZoneElMagoStrikeZone Posts: 1,539 ✭✭✭✭✭

    '74 OPC Johnny B is chef's kiss

  • brad31brad31 Posts: 3,001 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Can’t believe the Reggie’s and that ‘71 leader and Perez. Awesome stuff!

  • balco758balco758 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Lefty.

  • jackstrawjackstraw Posts: 3,851 ✭✭✭✭

    Collector Focus

    ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
  • tsalems1tsalems1 Posts: 3,537 ✭✭✭✭✭

    opcbaseball.com
  • 1982FBWaxMemories1982FBWaxMemories Posts: 2,374 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It's the singer not the song - Peter Townshend (1972)
    Not even a minute do I buy the whole buh buh buh I'm a man-child japery - Me (2025)

  • 1982FBWaxMemories1982FBWaxMemories Posts: 2,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 21, 2026 6:27PM

    Bellinger like, actually slightly better, 1970 numbers - wonder how much Roy woudl make in today's game?

    It's the singer not the song - Peter Townshend (1972)
    Not even a minute do I buy the whole buh buh buh I'm a man-child japery - Me (2025)

  • jackstrawjackstraw Posts: 3,851 ✭✭✭✭

    Collector Focus

    ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
  • tsalems1tsalems1 Posts: 3,537 ✭✭✭✭✭

    opcbaseball.com
  • jackstrawjackstraw Posts: 3,851 ✭✭✭✭

    Collector Focus

    ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
Sign In or Register to comment.