GTG on this PCGS graded 1916 walker which is stickered by Green CAC. Answer MS-66.
oreville
Posts: 11,970 ✭✭✭✭✭
The coin looks much MUCH nicer in person. A solid MS-66. The luster is awesome.
A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
1
Comments
That picture isn't of very high resolution, but MS63?
God bless all who believe in him. Do unto others what you expect to be done to you. Dubbed a "Committee Secret Agent" by @mr1931S on 7/23/24. Founding member of CU Anti-Troll League since 9/24/24.
I know its mint state, but the toning is fugly
MS60 - unattractive toning. Needs conservation.
64
Mr_Spud
Details environmental damage / mold
it's gotta be something nuts like a 67
UNC Details - Damaged. It's a magician's coin, split in half, and only has an obverse.
Chopmarked Trade Dollar Registry Set --- US & World Gold Showcase --- World Chopmark Showcase
We only get to see the obverse? Based on the single photo provided, I'll guess MS-66.
Though it's not my favorite look for a walker, I don't really see any contact marks, and the luster under the crust looks radiant. It looks like a shot at 67 If it were white.
Founder- Peak Rarities
Website
Instagram
Facebook
65/66, nice thumb. I'm guessing the toning looks better in hand.
I know you and I know what you like. Given that, and given my interpretation of the HA image that looks like it's circa 2010, I will go with MS66. However, that guess is predicated on the coin having terrific luster underneath the toning and having no hidden marks that I can't see in those images. I also assume the reverse looks essentially like the obverse and that both sides are well struck, since it appears the obverse is well struck.
If you had been an anonymous poster with that image, and I did not know the image was from HA so as to guess a timeframe, I would not have guessed so high and would likely have assumed it was an MS64.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
MS62
MS65 - crusty! Assume rev has a similar look.
“The thrill of the hunt never gets old”
PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
Copperindian
Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
Copperindian
Based on a very difficult Obverse only image ... maybe 5 shot 6 ... and probably attractive with thick luster ... but that's a really tough image
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
66
MS64+
Why post a GTG without an image of the reverse?
Sorry, I can't make an educated guess from just the obverse image.
I can. I grade the coin 6 (half of the grade for half of the coin) 😉
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Impossible to grade from that photo.
MS66 - toned; but, strong hand, clean body, and fields
Same thoughts as well.
And as @TomB mentioned, I know the OP has some amazing walkers, so assuming he owns the coin, I wouldn’t guess it’s a low MS coin.
I know that one of the P67 examples for the date is toned in a similar fashion.
Showing great luster (remembering the more matte finish of the first year fields).
Great strike.
I'll go for a 67 GTG.
My grade would be "pass." The toning is ugly and terminal in the darkest sections. If you dipped this, you might get an unpleasant surprise with dull spots in those areas. This is an example of where blindly following the CAC sticker would be a mistake. This coin would not be an easy resale to a discriminating buyer.
It's hard to tell if the frost has been broken on the toned high points from that photo. If it has not, then the technical grade is MS-63. If the mint frost is broken, it's an AU-58.
High resolution photos of both sides
Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled
I suspect the coin looks much nicer in hand and also the HA slab shot.
I’m guessing it’s a 66 and it’s not my cup of tea if the coin looks like the picture in hand.
I don’t care if it has a CAC sticker, as I strongly dislike the toning.
I’ll guess 65.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
That’s one without knowing their decision would say no sticker.
I used to own a similar-looking example and I think a forum member might still have it. It was hard to catch the luster in a photo, it didn't help that I used an old cell phone. Super nice in hand though.
Coins like that I start at 64 (65-1) and then go up or down based on luster which I can’t really tell from the photo. For radiant Pearlessence glow like many early walkers it could go up to 67
11.5$ Southern Dollars, The little “Big Easy” set
65
Looks like a 66FH with a nice strike.
Not a fan of the toning at all but it's not my coin so it doesn't matter.
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan
I almost like that one. It would not be my first choice, but it is a nicely preserved piece with old time envelope toning.
When a piece has a lot of coal black toning, it's a pass for me.
64
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
If I were a grading com, which I am not, Would subtract for toning like this
The “FH” designation is reserved for Standing Liberty quarters.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Thanks for the reverse image, just a guess, MS-65 or 66 depending on the luster.
The photos can be enlarged, both on the Heritage site and here, for me.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I now know not to forget to show the reverse of the coin as i posted this thread too late at night.
I find the coin to be pretty fantastic although apparently not as well struck as many 1916s. So my guess is MS-64. If it were possible for me to create a matched set with that toning, I would do it.
On the web: http://www.earlyus.com
Yes, it can be enlarged as all photos can. What I meant was it isn't high resolution, so it only gets less defined as you zoom in.
Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled
I just went to this auction lot on HA and used the HA enlargement only (nothing from my laptop features or on the screen shot I took). This is the screen shot on my laptop of the max enlargement. Seems okay to me but I don't know photography.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=_KWVk0XeB9o - Ruby Starr (from 'Go Jim Dandy') Piece Of My Heart
.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=D0FPxuQv2ns - Ruby Starr (from 'Go Jim Dandy') Maybe I'm Amazed
RLJ 1958 - 2023
Thanks for telling me about that, I had just copied the lot thumbnails because they looked large enough to me. Edited my first comment to include the better quality images.
Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled
It might be PCGS 66 and CAC but it is too crusty for me. It would be a pass for me.
A little variety is cool.
I do like crusty coins dated before 1917 but also love white coins dated after 1916.
@oreville: love the originality & the excellent detail! Great piece!
“The thrill of the hunt never gets old”
PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
Copperindian
Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
Copperindian