Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

What grade do you think PCGS . . . UPDATED

ajaanajaan Posts: 17,213 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited May 28, 2023 6:36AM in U.S. Coin Forum

would give this coin if submitted now?


The very light scratch isn't noticeable with the naked eye.

I bought the coin because of the toning. I find it quite attractive.


DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


Don

Comments

  • Options
    ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,408 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I am not sure, 63-64ish? I am distracted be the jaw scuff

    Collector, occasional seller

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like a 64.... The scratch will bring it down.... IMO.... Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    lermishlermish Posts: 2,313 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ajaan said:
    would give this coin if submitted now?

    The very light scratch isn't noticeable with the naked eye.

    I think the key word is NOW. Anecdotally, PCGS has really tightened up their grading standards this year. Given that you say the scratch isn't viewable without magnification I would have said 64, now I'm in the 63 camp but wouldn't be shocked to see a 62+

    Chopmarked Trade Dollar Registry Set --- US & World Gold Showcase --- World Chopmark Showcase

  • Options
    privatecoinprivatecoin Posts: 3,248 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • Options
    SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,358 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1. 64 without the scratch.
  • Options
    mikee999mikee999 Posts: 619 ✭✭✭✭✭

    au58

  • Options
    pursuitoflibertypursuitofliberty Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think the cheek scruffs, if on the coin and not the holder, drop in back. She has that 64 (or a little better) luster, so she probably goes at 63, shot 64


    “We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”

    Todd - BHNC #242
  • Options
    TomBTomB Posts: 20,957 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The coin feels like an AU58, but I could see any TPG putting it into an MS62 holder. If pressed for a single grade, I would state AU58.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • Options
    RLSnapperRLSnapper Posts: 544 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Pretty coin with some flaws...MS62.

  • Options
    shishshish Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The obverse appears to be a AU-58, the reverse looks to be MS-63 or 64. I could see any TPG putting it into an MS62 holder.

    Liberty Seated and Trade Dollar Specialist
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,663 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I don't think that there is any way you are going buy that coin in an AU-58 holder. I'd go MS-62.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    Dave99BDave99B Posts: 8,430 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice color. I’d guess MS62 at best.

    Dave

    Always looking for original, better date VF20-VF35 Barber quarters and halves, and a quality beer.
  • Options
    Jzyskowski1Jzyskowski1 Posts: 6,650 ✭✭✭✭✭

    60 or 61. Lots of distractions and maybe a 58 as mentioned. There’s something about the obverse that is wrong. I’m practicing grading so I’m working on the multiple questions every coin presents. Thanks 🙏
    Not an expert by any means.

    🎶 shout shout, let it all out 🎶

  • Options
    kirkminkkirkmink Posts: 172 ✭✭✭✭

    I am torn. The scuffing on the jawline makes me want to say AU-58. But if that isn't dinged, I could see this going MS-63 based on luster and overall eye appeal.

    "Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?"- Calvin and Hobbes

  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,050 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That scratch looks anything but light, and I really want to call it Details.

    However, based on your comment I'll give it a 63. That scratch really does have to be almost nonexistent though.

    Coin Photographer.

  • Options
    HillbillyCollectorHillbillyCollector Posts: 557 ✭✭✭✭✭

    62-63 assuming that jaw isn’t bad.

  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 45,695 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I tend to be conservative when grading from pics since there can be issues with a coin that don't show up in the pics but that can be visible when examined in hand under a lamp. That said, I'll guess MS62.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    Voltaire: Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero.

  • Options
    ajaanajaan Posts: 17,213 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll post the ANACS grade tonight.


    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • Options
    Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,261 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @kirkmink said:
    I am torn. The scuffing on the jawline makes me want to say AU-58. But if that isn't dinged, I could see this going MS-63 based on luster and overall eye appeal.

    Same thoughts here.

    Successful BST transactions with 170 members. Recent: Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • Options
    ashelandasheland Posts: 22,917 ✭✭✭✭✭

    62 here as well.

    My YouTube Channel

  • Options
    marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,241 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS62 for me.

  • Options
    U1chicagoU1chicago Posts: 5,776 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS 62 market grade

  • Options
    erwindocerwindoc Posts: 4,965 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Torn between 62 and 63. Ill go 63.

  • Options
    rainbowroosierainbowroosie Posts: 4,874 ✭✭✭✭

    61

    "You keep your 1804 dollar and 1822 half eagle -- give me rainbow roosies in MS68."
    rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
  • Options
    SoldiSoldi Posts: 2,097 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63

  • Options
    ajaanajaan Posts: 17,213 ✭✭✭✭✭


    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • Options
    LeeBoneLeeBone Posts: 4,356 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63... possibly even a 64

  • Options
    JJMJJM Posts: 8,014 ✭✭✭✭✭

    62

    👍BST's erickso1,cone10,MICHAELDIXON,TennesseeDave,p8nt,jmdm1194,RWW,robkool,Ahrensdad,Timbuk3,Downtown1974,bigjpst,mustanggt,Yorkshireman,idratherbgardening,SurfinxHI,derryb,masscrew,Walkerguy21D,MJ1927,sniocsu,Coll3tor,doubleeagle07,luciobar1980,PerryHall,SNMAM,mbcoin,liefgold,keyman64,maprince230,TorinoCobra71,RB1026,Weiss,LukeMarshall,Wingsrule,Silveryfire, pointfivezero,IKE1964,AL410, Tdec1000, AnkurJ,guitarwes,Type2,Bp777,jfoot113,JWP,mattniss,dantheman984,jclovescoins,Collectorcoins,Weather11am,Namvet69,kansasman,Bruce7789,ADG,Larrob37
  • Options
    kirkminkkirkmink Posts: 172 ✭✭✭✭

    I would expect an MS-60 to be much more baggy than that. Beautiful coin, and undergraded.

    "Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?"- Calvin and Hobbes

  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,050 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think it's more than possible they net graded it for the chin scratch.

    Coin Photographer.

  • Options
    Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 7,826 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 28, 2023 7:06PM

    I consider it MS60. Chin scratch. If u start it at 10 pct behind MS60 CPG on eBay will it sell? Will it even get bids? If not run it thru an auc cycle then drop the price, rinse / repeat. Blow it out and get a nice PCGS coin MS64 or higher.

    So Cali Area - Coins & Currency
  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 12,577 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The coin looks pretty nice in the first set of images. But in the pictures showing it in the ANACS holder, its surfaces appear to have been altered. Hopefully, it’s just the imaging.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    ajaanajaan Posts: 17,213 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    The coin looks pretty nice in the first set of images. But in the pictures showing it in the ANACS holder, its surfaces appear to have been altered. Hopefully, it’s just the imaging.

    It is. Quickly taken with cell phone.


    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • Options
    marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,241 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If you plan on cracking it - it would be cool to see the grade when you get it back.

  • Options
    ajaanajaan Posts: 17,213 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @marcmoish said:
    If you plan on cracking it - it would be cool to see the grade when you get it back.

    Not sure if I'm willing to spend $50 to find out.


    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • Options
    cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,096 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I could see it in a 62 holder with a CAC sticker.

  • Options
    WalkerloverWalkerlover Posts: 824 ✭✭✭✭

    It seems to me that the big scratch is part of a bunch of hairline scratches indicating either a light cleaning or slight cabinet friction or slight wear

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...