Home U.S. Coin Forum

The Unwanted Grade: Show your MS62 PCGS coins

13

Comments

  • bud221bud221 Posts: 10 ✭✭✭

    I signed up for membership at CAC back when they were limiting them and never heard back. I haven't checked with them for a long time, and I would have a hard time trusting others to send in coins for me..

  • lermishlermish Posts: 3,995 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bud221 said:
    I signed up for membership at CAC back when they were limiting them and never heard back. I haven't checked with them for a long time, and I would have a hard time trusting others to send in coins for me..

    Total understood but mostly ribbing you. That coin looks amazing for a 62.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • kirkminkkirkmink Posts: 188 ✭✭✭✭

    "Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?"- Calvin and Hobbes

    USN Retired 87-07

  • A better date that I thought would get a 63. Maybe the spot on the reverse held it back?

  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 14,115 ✭✭✭✭✭

    PCGS MS62 - CAC


    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb, Ricko

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • GoldFinger1969GoldFinger1969 Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 14, 2023 8:13PM

    I'll sometimes use MS-62 Saints and Morgans as bullion substitues. Sometimes even higher grades, too.

  • olympicsosolympicsos Posts: 912 ✭✭✭✭

    @jwitten said:
    Here are a few of my favorites

    Hard to find coins in this series 1 or 2 points higher. MS62 is almost the most common uncirculated grade for the series.

  • johnny010johnny010 Posts: 1,855 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bud221 said:
    I signed up for membership at CAC back when they were limiting them and never heard back. I haven't checked with them for a long time, and I would have a hard time trusting others to send in coins for me..

    I tried to sign up last night thinking even though I can’t submit I could still sign up…no dice. Appears their focus is to serve their current 3k members first when the new product hits and we can sign up later maybe still in Q1 if not Q2.

  • CocoinutCocoinut Posts: 2,515 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like this MS 62. It has a good strike and luster without any of the distracting long scratches or gouges that most 62's have.

    Countdown to completion of my Mercury Set: 1 coin. My growing Lincoln Set: Finally completed!
  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 4,699 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BillJones said:

    Great coin, Bill! I would love to find one like that or a nice 58, those are tough to find nice these days. How long have you owned that one?

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • TrampTramp Posts: 782 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Others have said this coin looks better than MS63's and some MS64's Morgan's they've looked at in other dates.

    USAF (Ret.) 1985 - 2005. E-4B Aircraft Maintenance Crew Chief and Contracting Officer.
    My current Registry sets:
    ✓ Everyman Mint State Carson City Morgan Dollars (1878 – 1893)
    ✓ Everyman Mint State Lincoln Cents (1909 – 1958)
    ✓ Morgan Dollar GSA Hoard (1878 – 1891)

  • Glen2022Glen2022 Posts: 959 ✭✭✭✭
    edited February 16, 2023 8:06AM

    Wrong forum, sorry

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,005 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DeplorableDan said:

    @BillJones said:

    Great coin, Bill! I would love to find one like that or a nice 58, those are tough to find nice these days. How long have you owned that one?

    Since 2009. I bought it just before I retired from coin dealing.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • TwobitcollectorTwobitcollector Posts: 4,083 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Positive BST Transactions with:
    INYNWHWeTrust-TexasNationals,ajaan,blu62vette
    coinJP, Outhaul ,illini420,MICHAELDIXON, Fade to Black,epcjimi1,19Lyds,SNMAN,JerseyJoe, bigjpst, DMWJR , lordmarcovan, Weiss,Mfriday4962,UtahCoin,Downtown1974,pitboss,RichieURich,Bullsitter,JDsCoins,toyz4geo,jshaulis, mustanggt, SNMAN, MWallace, ms71, lordmarcovan
  • TwobitcollectorTwobitcollector Posts: 4,083 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Positive BST Transactions with:
    INYNWHWeTrust-TexasNationals,ajaan,blu62vette
    coinJP, Outhaul ,illini420,MICHAELDIXON, Fade to Black,epcjimi1,19Lyds,SNMAN,JerseyJoe, bigjpst, DMWJR , lordmarcovan, Weiss,Mfriday4962,UtahCoin,Downtown1974,pitboss,RichieURich,Bullsitter,JDsCoins,toyz4geo,jshaulis, mustanggt, SNMAN, MWallace, ms71, lordmarcovan
  • coastaljerseyguycoastaljerseyguy Posts: 1,727 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Tramp said:
    Others have said this coin looks better than MS63's and some MS64's Morgan's they've looked at in other dates.

    Guess they get much, much stricter as the value goes up. Awesome coin, I was ecstatic buying a nice under-graded NGC VF 25. Agree better then a lot of 63's.

    Jim

  • OAKSTAROAKSTAR Posts: 8,542 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )

  • 1888 $10 MS-62.

  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,839 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 13, 2023 8:18AM

    Bought this 1920-S WLH in 2005 for $1000 off eBay. I recall the Sellers images were very small and out of focus, but nonetheless; I could see a very distinct split thumb, so I knew to purchase it. Never felt the need to upgrade, as I love the strike. I need better images than this crude digital camera image that I took 18 years ago, though. Also, might send her in for reconsideration, someday.


    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • braddickbraddick Posts: 25,000 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Rob41281 said:

    I am grateful your Washington quarter was a "GTG" as I'd be about four or five points off!
    :/

    peacockcoins

  • Rob41281Rob41281 Posts: 2,406 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @braddick said:

    @Rob41281 said:

    I am grateful your Washington quarter was a "GTG" as I'd be about four or five points off!
    :/

    So were many others!

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1055691/results-are-in-gtg-giveaway-toned-1941-washington-quarter/p1

  • braddickbraddick Posts: 25,000 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I did participate in that thread, and I was five points off!

    :'(

    peacockcoins

  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 14,115 ✭✭✭✭✭


    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb, Ricko

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • bramn8rbramn8r Posts: 942 ✭✭✭✭✭

  • bramn8rbramn8r Posts: 942 ✭✭✭✭✭

    unwanted grade, key date Peru Dinero

  • dsessomdsessom Posts: 2,437 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have never been able to figure out why this was graded as a 62, but it was.

    On the other hand, I totally understand why this is a 62. Poor thing is busted as hell.

    Best regards,
    Dwayne F. Sessom
    Ebay ID: V-Nickel-Coins
  • psuman08psuman08 Posts: 406 ✭✭✭✭


  • santinidollarsantinidollar Posts: 1,056 ✭✭✭✭✭



  • dsessomdsessom Posts: 2,437 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @psuman08 said:

    That '28 Peace looks WAY better than a 62, just judging from the photos.

    Best regards,
    Dwayne F. Sessom
    Ebay ID: V-Nickel-Coins
  • SwampboySwampboy Posts: 13,154 ✭✭✭✭✭

    "Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working" Pablo Picasso

  • mattnissmattniss Posts: 780 ✭✭✭✭✭

  • BloodManBloodMan Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This MS62 CAC example looks better than most 63s I've seen.

  • HillbillyCollectorHillbillyCollector Posts: 711 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BloodMan said:
    This MS62 CAC example looks better than most 63s I've seen.

    Very impressive 1889 Type 3. Most ( and my 62 included) show a lot of abrasions, especially on the cheek. This is a great looking coin!
    Congrats!

  • silviosisilviosi Posts: 458 ✭✭✭
    edited April 14, 2023 3:19PM

    What I see on this post questioned me about the relative accuracy of grading. I have DCAM come MS. Human errors are compressible. But I question if the standard change. New graders yes, they are, but what about the type of the coins, period, the way to manufacture, this change also?

    Maybe some internal thoughts on this will be welcome. Sometimes I am afraid to send because of the result.

    Example: I send variety which ANACS, NGC, ICG recognize with the certificate from VVS and PGCS do not??!!. A generation and visions transition?

    I will like to know about.

    PS: I do not blame them for this. Any company has generations transitions with good and bad parts. Is work like this. Absorb blames and loose to become more stronger.

    NEVER ARGUE WITH AN IDIOT.FIRST THEY WILL DRAG YOU DOWN TO THEIR LEVEL.THEN, THEY WILL BEAT YOU WITH EXPERIENCE. MARK TWAIN

  • CocoinutCocoinut Posts: 2,515 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This has enough marks that I sometimes think 62 is a generous grade.

    Countdown to completion of my Mercury Set: 1 coin. My growing Lincoln Set: Finally completed!
  • jt88jt88 Posts: 3,299 ✭✭✭✭✭

  • NeophyteNumismatistNeophyteNumismatist Posts: 1,117 ✭✭✭✭✭


    I am a newer collector (started April 2020), and I primarily focus on U.S. Half Cents and Type Coins. Early copper is my favorite.

  • ldhairldhair Posts: 7,365 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Larry

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file