GTG! Newly graded SLQ! GRADE REVEALED!!

Options
2windy2fish
2windy2fish Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited August 16, 2022 4:27PM in U.S. Coin Forum


Fresh from our host… I cracked it out of a SEGS 65 holder…

«1

Comments

  • FlyingAl
    FlyingAl Posts: 4,470 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS66. I think it got a luster bump.

  • privatecoin
    privatecoin Posts: 3,853 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Ms65

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • TPRC
    TPRC Posts: 3,819 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    65

    Tom

  • Walkerfan
    Walkerfan Posts: 10,391 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    64

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • d9lowe
    d9lowe Posts: 312 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    63

  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,132 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @d9lowe said:
    63

    Why so low?

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Pickwickjr
    Pickwickjr Posts: 559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Great looking quarter. I’ll say MS65 👍🏻

  • gumby1234
    gumby1234 Posts: 5,901 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I'll guess 66. Nice looking.

    Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM

  • erwindoc
    erwindoc Posts: 5,447 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS65, no FH

  • Walkerguy21D
    Walkerguy21D Posts: 12,164 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @erwindoc said:
    MS65, no FH

    Same, still a very nice coin.

    Successful BST transactions with 177 members. breakdown, scotty1419, mattniss, bigjpst, onlyroosies, Manorcourtman, guitarwes, Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • ricko
    ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    That looks like a 66 to me.... Nice coin, good luster... Cheers, RickO

  • shish
    shish Posts: 1,224 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Nice luster, MS-66

    Liberty Seated and Trade Dollar Specialist
  • rip_f
    rip_f Posts: 368 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Easily a 66. Beautiful coin.

  • rokky
    rokky Posts: 308 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS64

  • marcmoish
    marcmoish Posts: 6,936 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Nice n clean - 66 in my mind here.

  • Soldi
    Soldi Posts: 2,177 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    65 non FH. Nice coin!

  • logger7
    logger7 Posts: 9,858 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Is there a grade limitation on these if they are not FH? Also you have to ask why the Segs graders did not grade it higher?

  • dunkleosteus430
    dunkleosteus430 Posts: 595 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I think SEGS was right. 65.

    I collect world proof sets, coins featuring composers, mid-20th century U.S. proof coins, U.S. type coins, and whatever else I want.

  • Cougar1978
    Cougar1978 Posts: 10,067 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    64

    Investor
  • clarkbar04
    clarkbar04 Posts: 5,027 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    65

    MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.
  • coinbuf
    coinbuf Posts: 12,567 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    66+

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • Coinscratch
    Coinscratch Posts: 11,086 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I grade it beautiful - 66+

  • manlye1
    manlye1 Posts: 251 ✭✭✭
    Options

    64+

  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,132 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @logger7 said:
    Is there a grade limitation on these if they are not FH? Also you have to ask why the Segs graders did not grade it higher?

    There's no grade limitation for non-FH examples, just as there aren't for coins with other designations, such as FB, FBL, etc.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Lostintranslation
    Options

    I say 66 because of that terrific luster.

  • Allentram
    Allentram Posts: 119 ✭✭✭
    Options

    I'm in the MS66 crowd. Looks great for the few SLQ's I've seen in person.

  • ElKevvo
    ElKevvo Posts: 4,199 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    65 No FH (can't see the ear hole in the photo) Really nice looking coin...thanks for posting!

    K

    ANA LM
  • Paradisefound
    Paradisefound Posts: 8,623 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    66 ☺️ Beautiful coin w/o FH

  • WilliamF
    WilliamF Posts: 866 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    66, no full head, outstanding luster and surfaces :)

    ."It's a dangerous business... going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to" -JRR Tolkien_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Outstanding BST transactions as a seller, buyer and trader with: ----- mustanggt, Kliao, claudewill87, MWallace, paesan, mpbuck82, moursund, basetsb, lordmarcovan, JWP, Coin hunter 4, COINS MAKE CENTS, PerryHall, Aspie_Rocco, Braddick, DBSTrader2, SanctionII, Histman, The_Dinosaur_Man, jesbroken, CentSearcher ------ANA Member #3214817

  • DennisH
    DennisH Posts: 14,041 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    65, not FH

    When in doubt, don't.
  • AstroJoe
    AstroJoe Posts: 310 ✭✭✭
    Options

    64

    Joe

    Everything is all right!
  • ChrisH821
    ChrisH821 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I'll stick with 65

    Collector, occasional seller

  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,132 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    It would be interesting to see how the grade guesses would have differed, had the coin's prior grading history not been disclosed.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • FlyingAl
    FlyingAl Posts: 4,470 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @MFeld said:
    It would be interesting to see how the grade guesses would have differed, had the coin's prior grading history not been disclosed.

    In theory, it would not matter. I know that I for one would call that coin a 66 based off of the images no matter what holder it was previously in, and I try to keep this objectivity to my grading. Of course, we all know that opinions would be influenced by the previous history no matter what.

  • 2windy2fish
    2windy2fish Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @MFeld , yes after i started reading comments i had the same thought…i’ll let it percolate for a few more hours then reveal…
    Curious what you think it graded tho?

  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,132 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @2windy2fish said:
    @MFeld , yes after i started reading comments i had the same thought…i’ll let it percolate for a few more hours then reveal…
    Curious what you think it graded tho?

    Based on what I can see and trying to be objective, I'll go with 66+.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • scotty4449
    scotty4449 Posts: 718 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Very nice, I like it a lot! I guess 66

  • jughead1893
    jughead1893 Posts: 2,196 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    66

  • steelielee
    steelielee Posts: 1,177 ✭✭✭
    Options

    Nice, 65

    ************************************

    Many successful BST transactions with dozens of board members, references on request.
  • asheland
    asheland Posts: 24,545 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    65 here, nice one!

  • MrBluster
    MrBluster Posts: 380 ✭✭✭
    Options

    65+ I like it.

  • 2windy2fish
    2windy2fish Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options


    MS63….Gotta say i am baffled…I have taken to heart the phrase “Be curious not furious “
    Is it possible whoever ever typed the grade into the label made a mistake?
    Next question, course of action?
    Crack out and resubmit?
    Regrade?
    CAC and maybe a Gold bean?
    Advice please!

  • scotty4449
    scotty4449 Posts: 718 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Whoa! There has to be something we just can't see in the true view.

  • logger7
    logger7 Posts: 9,858 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    See what cac says. There is something that has been missed.

  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,132 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @2windy2fish said:

    MS63….Gotta say i am baffled…I have taken to heart the phrase “Be curious not furious “
    Is it possible whoever ever typed the grade into the label made a mistake?
    Next question, course of action?
    Crack out and resubmit?
    Regrade?
    CAC and maybe a Gold bean?
    Advice please!

    Pardon me, as I don’t know the degree of your grading expertise - but if it’s not substantial, I suggest getting an in-hand assessment from an expert, if possible.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • 2windy2fish
    2windy2fish Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @MFeld I have been a PCGS member since 2011 set up and sell at 6-8 shows in the PNW every year…set up a the ANA show in Colorado Springs this year…currently waiting on roughly 100 coins at PCGS…
    Consider myself fairly savvy…..the true view is accurate…i graded the coin raw as a 65….

  • marcmoish
    marcmoish Posts: 6,936 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @d9lowe said:
    63

    Good example of why it's best not to rush to judge before you the grade is announced
    It's called Guess The Grade for a reason.
    This lone guess was correct, there must be something here we don't see.

    I agree with the CAC angle, that would be cool if you got a gold bean.
    I'd leave it as is, if that was the case.

  • coinkat
    coinkat Posts: 24,542 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I did not offer an opinion as to the grade. I like the coin based on the images. And I will take a moment to complement the PCGS photo team that creates such great images. Seems the complement has greater meaning and sincerity when it is NOT my coin. I will take this moment to suggest that a full shield designation would have a far more significant impact that a full head. I see the end grade result which I thinks others have also expressed suggest it was worthy of a higher grade. So we sort of go full circle back to the strike and the shield and that is the best answer I can offer as to the grade...

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,132 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @2windy2fish said:
    @MFeld I have been a PCGS member since 2011 set up and sell at 6-8 shows in the PNW every year…set up a the ANA show in Colorado Springs this year…currently waiting on roughly 100 coins at PCGS…
    Consider myself fairly savvy…..the true view is accurate…i graded the coin raw as a 65….

    Thank you and best of luck with it.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,132 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @marcmoish said:

    @d9lowe said:
    63

    Good example of why it's best not to rush to judge before you the grade is announced
    It's called Guess The Grade for a reason.
    This lone guess was correct, there must be something here we don't see.

    I agree with the CAC angle, that would be cool if you got a gold bean.
    I'd leave it as is, if that was the case.

    Well, it seems that it’s a lot more fair to rush to judgment before the grade is revealed, rather than afterwards.😉
    The lone 63 grade matched the assigned grade, but based on the images provided, I believe that it was incorrect.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file