GTG! Newly graded SLQ! GRADE REVEALED!!
2windy2fish
Posts: 835 ✭✭✭✭✭
Fresh from our host… I cracked it out of a SEGS 65 holder…
6
2windy2fish
Posts: 835 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
MS66. I think it got a luster bump.
Coin Photographer.
Ms65
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
65
Tom
64
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
63
Why so low?
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Great looking quarter. I’ll say MS65 👍🏻
I'll guess 66. Nice looking.
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
MS65, no FH
Same, still a very nice coin.
That looks like a 66 to me.... Nice coin, good luster... Cheers, RickO
Nice luster, MS-66
Easily a 66. Beautiful coin.
MS64
Nice n clean - 66 in my mind here.
65 non FH. Nice coin!
Is there a grade limitation on these if they are not FH? Also you have to ask why the Segs graders did not grade it higher?
I think SEGS was right. 65.
Young Numismatist
64
65
66+
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
I grade it beautiful - 66+
64+
There's no grade limitation for non-FH examples, just as there aren't for coins with other designations, such as FB, FBL, etc.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I say 66 because of that terrific luster.
I'm in the MS66 crowd. Looks great for the few SLQ's I've seen in person.
65 No FH (can't see the ear hole in the photo) Really nice looking coin...thanks for posting!
K
66 ☺️ Beautiful coin w/o FH
66, no full head, outstanding luster and surfaces
."It's a dangerous business... going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to" -JRR Tolkien_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Outstanding BST transactions as a seller, buyer and trader with: ----- mustanggt, Kliao, claudewill87, MWallace, paesan, mpbuck82, moursund, basetsb, lordmarcovan, JWP, Coin hunter 4, COINS MAKE CENTS, PerryHall, Aspie_Rocco, Braddick, DBSTrader2, SanctionII, Histman, The_Dinosaur_Man, jesbroken, CentSearcher ------ANA Member #3214817
65, not FH
64
Everything is all right!
I'll stick with 65
Collector, occasional seller
It would be interesting to see how the grade guesses would have differed, had the coin's prior grading history not been disclosed.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
In theory, it would not matter. I know that I for one would call that coin a 66 based off of the images no matter what holder it was previously in, and I try to keep this objectivity to my grading. Of course, we all know that opinions would be influenced by the previous history no matter what.
Coin Photographer.
@MFeld , yes after i started reading comments i had the same thought…i’ll let it percolate for a few more hours then reveal…
Curious what you think it graded tho?
Based on what I can see and trying to be objective, I'll go with 66+.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Very nice, I like it a lot! I guess 66
66
Nice, 65
Many successful BST transactions with dozens of board members, references on request.
65 here, nice one!
My YouTube Channel
65+ I like it.
MS63….Gotta say i am baffled…I have taken to heart the phrase “Be curious not furious “
Is it possible whoever ever typed the grade into the label made a mistake?
Next question, course of action?
Crack out and resubmit?
Regrade?
CAC and maybe a Gold bean?
Advice please!
Whoa! There has to be something we just can't see in the true view.
See what cac says. There is something that has been missed.
Pardon me, as I don’t know the degree of your grading expertise - but if it’s not substantial, I suggest getting an in-hand assessment from an expert, if possible.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
@MFeld I have been a PCGS member since 2011 set up and sell at 6-8 shows in the PNW every year…set up a the ANA show in Colorado Springs this year…currently waiting on roughly 100 coins at PCGS…
Consider myself fairly savvy…..the true view is accurate…i graded the coin raw as a 65….
Good example of why it's best not to rush to judge before you the grade is announced
It's called Guess The Grade for a reason.
This lone guess was correct, there must be something here we don't see.
I agree with the CAC angle, that would be cool if you got a gold bean.
I'd leave it as is, if that was the case.
I did not offer an opinion as to the grade. I like the coin based on the images. And I will take a moment to complement the PCGS photo team that creates such great images. Seems the complement has greater meaning and sincerity when it is NOT my coin. I will take this moment to suggest that a full shield designation would have a far more significant impact that a full head. I see the end grade result which I thinks others have also expressed suggest it was worthy of a higher grade. So we sort of go full circle back to the strike and the shield and that is the best answer I can offer as to the grade...
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Thank you and best of luck with it.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Well, it seems that it’s a lot more fair to rush to judgment before the grade is revealed, rather than afterwards.😉
The lone 63 grade matched the assigned grade, but based on the images provided, I believe that it was incorrect.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.