Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

GTG! Newly graded SLQ! GRADE REVEALED!!

2windy2fish2windy2fish Posts: 1,110 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited August 16, 2022 4:27PM in U.S. Coin Forum


Fresh from our host… I cracked it out of a SEGS 65 holder…

«1

Comments

  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 4,392 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS66. I think it got a luster bump.

    Coin Photography

  • Options
    privatecoinprivatecoin Posts: 3,806 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Ms65

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • Options
    TPRCTPRC Posts: 3,817 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65

    Tom

  • Options
    WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 10,302 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • Options
    d9lowed9lowe Posts: 312 ✭✭✭✭

    63

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,734 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @d9lowe said:
    63

    Why so low?

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    PickwickjrPickwickjr Posts: 558 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Great looking quarter. I’ll say MS65 👍🏻

  • Options
    gumby1234gumby1234 Posts: 5,901 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll guess 66. Nice looking.

    Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM

  • Options
    erwindocerwindoc Posts: 5,425 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS65, no FH

  • Options
    Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 12,108 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @erwindoc said:
    MS65, no FH

    Same, still a very nice coin.

    Successful BST transactions with 177 members. breakdown, scotty1419, mattniss, bigjpst, onlyroosies, Manorcourtman, guitarwes, Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That looks like a 66 to me.... Nice coin, good luster... Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    shishshish Posts: 1,216 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice luster, MS-66

    Liberty Seated and Trade Dollar Specialist
  • Options
    rip_frip_f Posts: 368 ✭✭✭✭

    Easily a 66. Beautiful coin.

  • Options
    rokkyrokky Posts: 308 ✭✭✭✭

    MS64

  • Options
    marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,911 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice n clean - 66 in my mind here.

  • Options
    SoldiSoldi Posts: 2,177 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65 non FH. Nice coin!

  • Options
    logger7logger7 Posts: 9,682 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Is there a grade limitation on these if they are not FH? Also you have to ask why the Segs graders did not grade it higher?

  • Options
    dunkleosteus430dunkleosteus430 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think SEGS was right. 65.

  • Options
    Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 9,797 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64

    Investor
  • Options
    clarkbar04clarkbar04 Posts: 5,012 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65

    MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.
  • Options
    coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 12,486 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66+

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • Options
    CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 10,936 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I grade it beautiful - 66+

  • Options
    manlye1manlye1 Posts: 240 ✭✭✭

    64+

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,734 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @logger7 said:
    Is there a grade limitation on these if they are not FH? Also you have to ask why the Segs graders did not grade it higher?

    There's no grade limitation for non-FH examples, just as there aren't for coins with other designations, such as FB, FBL, etc.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    LostintranslationLostintranslation Posts: 154 ✭✭✭

    I say 66 because of that terrific luster.

  • Options
    AllentramAllentram Posts: 117 ✭✭✭

    I'm in the MS66 crowd. Looks great for the few SLQ's I've seen in person.

  • Options
    ElKevvoElKevvo Posts: 4,198 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65 No FH (can't see the ear hole in the photo) Really nice looking coin...thanks for posting!

    K

    ANA LM
  • Options
    ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,623 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66 ☺️ Beautiful coin w/o FH

  • Options
    WilliamFWilliamF Posts: 831 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66, no full head, outstanding luster and surfaces :)

    ."It's a dangerous business... going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to" -JRR Tolkien_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Outstanding BST transactions as a seller, buyer and trader with: ----- mustanggt, Kliao, claudewill87, MWallace, paesan, mpbuck82, moursund, basetsb, lordmarcovan, JWP, Coin hunter 4, COINS MAKE CENTS, PerryHall, Aspie_Rocco, Braddick, DBSTrader2, SanctionII, Histman, The_Dinosaur_Man, jesbroken, CentSearcher ------ANA Member #3214817

  • Options
    DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,040 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65, not FH

    When in doubt, don't.
  • Options
    AstroJoeAstroJoe Posts: 309 ✭✭✭

    64

    Joe

    Everything is all right!
  • Options
    ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 7,106 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll stick with 65

    Collector, occasional seller

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,734 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It would be interesting to see how the grade guesses would have differed, had the coin's prior grading history not been disclosed.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 4,392 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    It would be interesting to see how the grade guesses would have differed, had the coin's prior grading history not been disclosed.

    In theory, it would not matter. I know that I for one would call that coin a 66 based off of the images no matter what holder it was previously in, and I try to keep this objectivity to my grading. Of course, we all know that opinions would be influenced by the previous history no matter what.

    Coin Photography

  • Options
    2windy2fish2windy2fish Posts: 1,110 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld , yes after i started reading comments i had the same thought…i’ll let it percolate for a few more hours then reveal…
    Curious what you think it graded tho?

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,734 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @2windy2fish said:
    @MFeld , yes after i started reading comments i had the same thought…i’ll let it percolate for a few more hours then reveal…
    Curious what you think it graded tho?

    Based on what I can see and trying to be objective, I'll go with 66+.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    scotty4449scotty4449 Posts: 718 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very nice, I like it a lot! I guess 66

  • Options
    jughead1893jughead1893 Posts: 2,067 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66

  • Options
    steelieleesteelielee Posts: 1,177 ✭✭✭

    Nice, 65

    ************************************

    Many successful BST transactions with dozens of board members, references on request.
  • Options
    ashelandasheland Posts: 24,474 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65 here, nice one!

    My YouTube Channel

  • Options
    MrBlusterMrBluster Posts: 380 ✭✭✭

    65+ I like it.

  • Options
    2windy2fish2windy2fish Posts: 1,110 ✭✭✭✭✭


    MS63….Gotta say i am baffled…I have taken to heart the phrase “Be curious not furious “
    Is it possible whoever ever typed the grade into the label made a mistake?
    Next question, course of action?
    Crack out and resubmit?
    Regrade?
    CAC and maybe a Gold bean?
    Advice please!

  • Options
    scotty4449scotty4449 Posts: 718 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Whoa! There has to be something we just can't see in the true view.

  • Options
    logger7logger7 Posts: 9,682 ✭✭✭✭✭

    See what cac says. There is something that has been missed.

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,734 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @2windy2fish said:

    MS63….Gotta say i am baffled…I have taken to heart the phrase “Be curious not furious “
    Is it possible whoever ever typed the grade into the label made a mistake?
    Next question, course of action?
    Crack out and resubmit?
    Regrade?
    CAC and maybe a Gold bean?
    Advice please!

    Pardon me, as I don’t know the degree of your grading expertise - but if it’s not substantial, I suggest getting an in-hand assessment from an expert, if possible.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    2windy2fish2windy2fish Posts: 1,110 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld I have been a PCGS member since 2011 set up and sell at 6-8 shows in the PNW every year…set up a the ANA show in Colorado Springs this year…currently waiting on roughly 100 coins at PCGS…
    Consider myself fairly savvy…..the true view is accurate…i graded the coin raw as a 65….

  • Options
    marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,911 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @d9lowe said:
    63

    Good example of why it's best not to rush to judge before you the grade is announced
    It's called Guess The Grade for a reason.
    This lone guess was correct, there must be something here we don't see.

    I agree with the CAC angle, that would be cool if you got a gold bean.
    I'd leave it as is, if that was the case.

  • Options
    coinkatcoinkat Posts: 24,411 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I did not offer an opinion as to the grade. I like the coin based on the images. And I will take a moment to complement the PCGS photo team that creates such great images. Seems the complement has greater meaning and sincerity when it is NOT my coin. I will take this moment to suggest that a full shield designation would have a far more significant impact that a full head. I see the end grade result which I thinks others have also expressed suggest it was worthy of a higher grade. So we sort of go full circle back to the strike and the shield and that is the best answer I can offer as to the grade...

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,734 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @2windy2fish said:
    @MFeld I have been a PCGS member since 2011 set up and sell at 6-8 shows in the PNW every year…set up a the ANA show in Colorado Springs this year…currently waiting on roughly 100 coins at PCGS…
    Consider myself fairly savvy…..the true view is accurate…i graded the coin raw as a 65….

    Thank you and best of luck with it.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,734 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @marcmoish said:

    @d9lowe said:
    63

    Good example of why it's best not to rush to judge before you the grade is announced
    It's called Guess The Grade for a reason.
    This lone guess was correct, there must be something here we don't see.

    I agree with the CAC angle, that would be cool if you got a gold bean.
    I'd leave it as is, if that was the case.

    Well, it seems that it’s a lot more fair to rush to judgment before the grade is revealed, rather than afterwards.😉
    The lone 63 grade matched the assigned grade, but based on the images provided, I believe that it was incorrect.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...