It's a gorgeous example and quite clean. From the photos, I'd like it to be just a bit brighter for a 67, so I'll say 66. But if I were told it's in a 67 holder, I'd be fine with it. A 65 holder and I'd wonder what I'm missing.
The coin below the toning is MS-65. With the toning, MS-66.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
@BillJones said:
The coin below the toning is MS-65. With the toning, MS-66.
I see some chatter in the fields which is why I said 65. The toning is superb, but I don't think it should bump the grade a full point -- maybe a +, or it gets the higher grade in a "liner" situation.
Not sure. I'm looking at it now. Even with the normal die polish, the luster is there.
The two tiny hits on the reverse are all I can see with a glass.
I'm happy with it.
Comments
Love the tone and luster!

MS 66?
"Jesus died for you and for me, Thank you,Jesus"!!!
--- If it should happen I die and leave this world and you want to remember me. Please only remember my opening Sig Line.A beaut. MS 67
Okay, I'll bite...66. Nice rims. Peace Roy
BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW
MS66+
MS 65
65
Nice look. Can't quite tell from those images ... I'll WAG it's a 66
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
Commemoratives are outside of my area of expertise, but I'm going to say MS66
My eBay Store • Instagram • MS Toned Lincoln Cent Set • PR Toned Lincoln Cent Set
MS66
Pretty looking 65
Looks like a 67 to me. I’d buy this in an instant if I saw it for sale somewhere.
66+
awesome 67+
66
Wow nice. I’m at 67.
My current "Box of 20"
Great color - a beauty! 64+
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
66+
65+
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
XF45
It's a gorgeous example and quite clean. From the photos, I'd like it to be just a bit brighter for a 67, so I'll say 66. But if I were told it's in a 67 holder, I'd be fine with it. A 65 holder and I'd wonder what I'm missing.
It is in an old NGC 65 holder.
I think it could 66 but I will probably never try it.
The coin below the toning is MS-65. With the toning, MS-66.
Well... Just missed the deadline... was thinking MS66 though.... Cheers, RickO
65 for me.
My YouTube Channel
Personally I believe that it is a superb gem, but there may be a few grading grinches who may see it as AT.
I see some chatter in the fields which is why I said 65. The toning is superb, but I don't think it should bump the grade a full point -- maybe a +, or it gets the higher grade in a "liner" situation.
I don't think I have ever seen anyone suggest that.
I'm sure it could happen but that would be a stretch.
My first thought is 67 and so is my second. Let’s go with 67!
Not sure. I'm looking at it now. Even with the normal die polish, the luster is there.
The two tiny hits on the reverse are all I can see with a glass.
I'm happy with it.
Ooops, I lied. That is a hit on the obverse to the lower right of DIRIGO. Got to look close.
MS 66 with GREAT eye appeal!!
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
Very nice, I'll go 66.