What would you grade this 1884-S Morgan?

Options
cameonut2011
cameonut2011 Posts: 10,909 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited August 5, 2017 7:31PM in U.S. Coin Forum


Edited to resize images.

«1

Comments

  • CommemKing
    CommemKing Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS62.

  • Insider2
    Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    AU. Not even close to what's needed to get one of these graded Uncirculated.

  • BruceS
    BruceS Posts: 1,556 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    58

    eBay ID-bruceshort978
    Successful BST:here and ATS, bumanchu, wdrob, hashtag, KeeNoooo, mikej61, Yonico, Meltdown, BAJJERFAN, Excaliber, lordmarcovan, cucamongacoin, robkool, bradyc, tonedcointrader, mumu, Windycity, astrotrain, tizofthe, overdate, rwyarmch, mkman123, Timbuk3,GBurger717, airplanenut, coinkid855 ,illini420, michaeldixon, Weiss, Morpheus, Deepcoin, Collectorcoins, AUandAG, D.Schwager, blu62vette, morgan13, torinoCobra71, JWP, promethius88,
  • HighRelief
    HighRelief Posts: 3,729 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS63

  • CascadeChris
    CascadeChris Posts: 2,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Looks 58 from the images. Nice coin.

    The more you VAM..
  • Insider2
    Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Let's see, so far two members are at $1900 - $2300, one is at $9000 - $13,000, and one is at $35,000. What's it worth dealers?

  • AUandAG
    AUandAG Posts: 25,050 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Genuine.....or 58.

    bob

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • MICHAELDIXON
    MICHAELDIXON Posts: 6,758 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    58

    Thanksgiving 2026 National Battlefield Coin Show November 27 & 28, 2026 at the Eisenhower Hotel Ballroom, Gettysburg, PA. No Early Bird passes for this show. WWW.AmericasCoinShows.com
  • gsa1fan
    gsa1fan Posts: 5,566 ✭✭✭
    Options

    63 was my first thought.

    Avid collector of GSA's.
  • Wolf359
    Wolf359 Posts: 7,666 ✭✭✭
    Options
  • morgandollar1878
    morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    au58

    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • jtlee321
    jtlee321 Posts: 2,367 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I'm at AU-58 as well. At least that is what I am reading in the images.

  • david3142
    david3142 Posts: 3,693 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I'd say 58 but that is heavily influenced by knowing that an 84-S is about 100 times more likely to be a 58 than a 62 or 63.

  • ChrisH821
    ChrisH821 Posts: 7,151 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    58 imo

    Collector, occasional seller

  • SurfinxHI
    SurfinxHI Posts: 2,705 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Looks 63 to me, possibly pl if it's there. Hard to tell from the images.

    Dead people tell interesting tales.
  • Kove
    Kove Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Wear on the devices, wear in the fields.

    58 tops.

  • mannie gray
    mannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    58

  • jcping
    jcping Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭
    Options

    58
    In a lucky day, 58+

    an SLQ and Ike dollars lover
  • davewesen
    davewesen Posts: 6,985 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I would grade it too expensive for me to buy raw

  • BillJones
    BillJones Posts: 35,938 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I know that you are dreaming about a Mint State grading number, but it's an AU-58 because of minor rub in the obverse fields, especially on the left side in front of Ms. Liberty's face. Sorry.

    The chances of getting lucking and receiving a slab Mint State grade are not good IMO. The graders know about the price jump for Mint State 1884-S dollar too, and don't give them out easily.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Rampage
    Rampage Posts: 9,686 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I agree that the coin should grade AU58.

  • Rampage
    Rampage Posts: 9,686 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Nice coin, just not technically uncirculated.

  • amwldcoin
    amwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I think the hits on the eagle's breast will hold it back to 55.

  • logger7
    logger7 Posts: 9,869 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    55 or so; PCGS may be tougher than NGC.

  • LeeBone
    LeeBone Posts: 4,892 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Going with a straight grade I'll say it's graded 58. I have one very similar to this and the rub in the obverse fields is what holds it back. Graders are very strict on this date. If I am correct and it is a 58, save your money on trying to upgrade. JMO
    Nice coin none the less.

  • Cougar1978
    Cougar1978 Posts: 10,067 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I would say AU58

    Investor
  • This content has been removed.
  • SamByrd
    SamByrd Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    58

  • BarberFanatic
    BarberFanatic Posts: 671 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    58

    My current coin collecting interests are: (1) British coins 1838-1970 in XF-AU-UNC, (2) silver type coins in XF-AU with that classic medium gray coloration and exceptional eye appeal.
  • Insider2
    Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @BillJones said: "...but it's an AU-58 because of minor rub in the obverse fields, especially on the left side in front of Ms. Liberty's face. Sorry. "

    Bill, do you think that is "friction rub" in the field or just more of the hazy residue seen on the cheek to hide the rub and marks on the obverse. I am asking this as I did not realize the field is one of the first places to look for a loss of luster = AU.

    IMHO, the fields on the reverse are fully lustrous with the only "discolored" surface due to loss of luster on the breast. Hard for me to imagine full field luster on one side and wear on much of the field on the other.

    Nevermind, I guess I'm being picky with my question as I don't consider myself in your league. No matter, we both agree it is AU and thank for your lesson!

  • metalmeister
    metalmeister Posts: 4,633 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Luster looks off. Could you post more pictures at an angle?

    email: ccacollectibles@yahoo.com

    100% Positive BST transactions
  • CascadeChris
    CascadeChris Posts: 2,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @metalmeister said:
    Luster looks off. Could you post more pictures at an angle?

    Looks semi-PL. Possibly has been slightly dipped before but surfaces don't look altered. That said, we're only going off of one set of images on a higher grade coin of a date that is notoriously played with to attempt deception of an even higher grade. Nice pieces are still out there raw though.

    The more you VAM..
  • roadrunner
    roadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Scuffy cheek and field. AU58 at best.

    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • metalmeister
    metalmeister Posts: 4,633 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Even with luster off. Pretty nice 84S for sure.

    email: ccacollectibles@yahoo.com

    100% Positive BST transactions
  • ricko
    ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    AU55.... could go 58 in hand... the obverse will hold it back... Cheers, RickO

  • cameonut2011
    cameonut2011 Posts: 10,909 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 6, 2017 12:38PM
    Options

    @BillJones said:
    I know that you are dreaming about a Mint State grading number, but it's an AU-58 because of minor rub in the obverse fields, especially on the left side in front of Ms. Liberty's face. Sorry.

    I would actually be happy with AU58. My concern was a genuine holder. Maybe I am being a little paranoid... I'm hoping for a straight grade.

  • cameonut2011
    cameonut2011 Posts: 10,909 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @metalmeister said:
    Luster looks off. Could you post more pictures at an angle?

    I would need to send it off to have someone else image it. I sent this piece off to Shane a few years ago, and these were his images. My personal photography skills are lacking.

  • cameonut2011
    cameonut2011 Posts: 10,909 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Thank you all! My first concern was that it might end up in a genuine holder because this is a date that is often played with by coin doctors. Since enough people think it has a good shot at AU58, I will submit it to our host and ask for True Views.

  • Coin Finder
    Coin Finder Posts: 7,805 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Au55 with PCGS, but I hope you get a 58!!!

    The court jester does not play, but gently pulls the strings…

  • morgansforever
    morgansforever Posts: 8,513 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Based on the images I'll wager 58.

    World coins FSHO Hundreds of successful BST transactions U.S. coins FSHO
  • Insider2
    Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I didn't realize it was graded. I think it is in an AU-55 slab.

    If I worked at NGC or PCGS, I should send it to the next grader as an AU-53. If I owned the grading service, I should want it slabbed as either AU-50 or AU "details" Altered Surface.

  • cameonut2011
    cameonut2011 Posts: 10,909 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Insider2 said:
    I didn't realize it was graded. I think it is in an AU-55 slab.

    That's not an ICG slab you're seeing, just a generic holder.

  • Insider2
    Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @cameonut2011 said: "That's not an ICG slab you're seeing, just a generic holder."

    I didn't think it was ICG as their insert is different. I thought it was PCGS.

  • cameonut2011
    cameonut2011 Posts: 10,909 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 6, 2017 12:56PM
    Options

    @Insider2 said:
    @cameonut2011 said: "That's not an ICG slab you're seeing, just a generic holder."

    I didn't think it was ICG as their insert is different. I thought it was PCGS.

    Nope. This was truly plucked from the wild.

  • gsa1fan
    gsa1fan Posts: 5,566 ✭✭✭
    Options

    Well prep it and send her in!

    Avid collector of GSA's.
  • golden
    golden Posts: 10,536 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Let us know how it comes back.

  • Soldi
    Soldi Posts: 2,177 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Market grading system MS63...........subjective tough TPG 60. I have seen 84-s with rub go for $$$ over 63 money. At least they ask for $$ over 63 money.

  • BillJones
    BillJones Posts: 35,938 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Soldi said:
    Market grading system MS63...........subjective tough TPG 60. I have seen 84-s with rub go for $$$ over 63 money. At least they ask for $$ over 63 money.

    If the graders do that, it will be a huge departure from the past.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • dmwest
    dmwest Posts: 959 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS60

    Don't quote me on that.

  • LRCTom
    LRCTom Posts: 857 ✭✭✭
    Options

    That looks very much like an 84-S I saw recently. In fact I'm wondering if it's the same time. In hand, just like in the picture, it looked AU-58.

    LRC Numismatics eBay listings:
    http://stores.ebay.com/lrcnumismatics

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file