What would you grade this 1884-S Morgan?

7Jaguars

As others have hinted at, I'd like to see this one in hand just to see what that schmutzy stuff is on the cheek and over the obverse fields. I'm "feeling" the reverse, that's nice. Depending on that smudging cra-, I would go 58 probably. If it cleaned off and the cheek was better than I suspect, maybe 60/1.

asheland

AU58

cameonut2011

@LRCTom said:
That looks very much like an 84-S I saw recently. In fact I'm wondering if it's the same time. In hand, just like in the picture, it looked AU-58.

I have owned this for 10 years, and have never shown it publicly.

logger7

Last year I had an AU55 that upgraded to AU58, coin was semi-PL like many this date. With coins that rise substantially from AU to Unc. I would think they want the coin to be all there for a real Unc..

Shortgapbob

58.

braddick

I like the semi-prooflike surfaces although there is enough rub/chatter/wear to reward it the AU grade (if the cleaning isn't too excessive).

jdimmick

1884-s Morgans Have to be all there and then some to get the MS designation, 55 at best 58

cheezhed

This is a tough one. Of course grading from an image is impossible but put me down for 55.

coinlieutenant

Looks like a slider to me.

TheDukeK

55 to 58
Good luster but don't feel it will go MS

Numiven

From the images, it looks 68, if the luster is not broken both O and R, it might (tough) make 60.

Broadstruck

AU53 might go 55 don't see it as a 58

Jimnight

Nice 58

TennesseeDave

It looks very nice to me and I would guess that you will get an AU-58 even though it looks 62-63. As said above the grading services are extremely tough on that date and mint coin. Good Luck

lcoopie

55

hickoryridge

55-58

KollectorKing

ms58

Elmhurst

58 to 62, depends on how they feel on the day they grade it

Baley

@TheDukeK said:
55 to 58
Good luster but don't feel it will go MS

Yes, very nice AU

I'd say fifty -six and a half

segoja

58 hard to tell from the pics if its been messed with

Never MS