Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Guess the grade- 1911 $2 1/2 Indian

jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭✭✭

OK guys (and gals), test your skills with this one. These are known for being hard to grade, so good luck!

«1

Comments

  • Options
    DoubleJCoinsDoubleJCoins Posts: 78 ✭✭✭

    I don't know gold that well, but I'll say 62

    Feel Free to Check out my eBay Listings
    stores.ebay.com/DoubleJCoins?_trksid=p2047675.l2563

  • Options
    jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Hint: Not a MS62

  • Options
    cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58 shot 62

  • Options
    clarkbar04clarkbar04 Posts: 5,010 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58

    MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,786 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU-58, shot MS-61 since you have told us that it is not an MS-62. The coin could trend higher, but that scratch in back of the Indian's nose is distractiing.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Another question: What grade do you think this would green cac at, and what grade do you think it would have a shot at a gold?

  • Options
    jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭✭✭

    All guesses have been too high so far.. looking good for a gold CAC :)

  • Options

    AU-55

  • Options
    ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 7,100 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU55?

    Collector, occasional seller

  • Options
    jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Still too high

  • Options
    TwobitcollectorTwobitcollector Posts: 4,554 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU50 Details

    Positive BST Transactions with:
    INYNWHWeTrust-TexasNationals,ajaan,blu62vette
    coinJP, Outhaul ,illini420,MICHAELDIXON, Fade to Black,epcjimi1,19Lyds,SNMAN,JerseyJoe, bigjpst, DMWJR , lordmarcovan, Weiss,Mfriday4962,UtahCoin,Downtown1974,pitboss,RichieURich,Bullsitter,JDsCoins,toyz4geo,jshaulis, mustanggt, SNMAN, MWallace, ms71, lordmarcovan,JWP,dantheman984,olah_in_MA,USMC_6115
  • Options
    jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It straight graded (not sure if ngc holdered detailed coins back then?)

  • Options
    BruceSBruceS Posts: 1,448 ✭✭✭✭✭

    could be 50 now maybe 45 then?

    eBay ID-bruceshort978
    Successful BST:here and ATS, bumanchu, wdrob, hashtag, KeeNoooo, mikej61, Yonico, Meltdown, BAJJERFAN, Excaliber, lordmarcovan, cucamongacoin, robkool, bradyc, tonedcointrader, mumu, Windycity, astrotrain, tizofthe, overdate, rwyarmch, mkman123, Timbuk3,GBurger717, airplanenut, coinkid855 ,illini420, michaeldixon, Weiss, Morpheus, Deepcoin, Collectorcoins, AUandAG, D.Schwager, blu62vette, morgan13, torinoCobra71.
  • Options
    NumivenNumiven Posts: 382 ✭✭✭
    edited May 15, 2017 2:31PM

    AU 55 or AU58 from these pictures, lighting etc..

    It does has some luster in it... any signs of dippped color?

    I have seen more bad looking coins in MS60,61 holders.

  • Options
    jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Still too high :o

  • Options
    lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 9,340 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 15, 2017 3:26PM

    Wow... I'm stumped. Its an incused design, so I typically grade these by looking at how much wear and dings are on the flats. My first impression was either 55 or 58...

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • Options
    joebb21joebb21 Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭✭✭

    cant be lower than au58

    may the fonz be with you...always...
  • Options
    tommy44tommy44 Posts: 2,341 ✭✭✭✭✭

    47 1/2

    it's crackers to slip a rozzer the dropsy in snide

  • Options
    LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭

    XF45 if someone was lucky back then.

  • Options
    jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Most undergraded coin I've owned:

  • Options
    NumivenNumiven Posts: 382 ✭✭✭

    I will buy it $50 over price guide...

  • Options
    jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lkenefic said:
    Wow... I'm stumped. Its an incused design, so I typically grade these by looking at how much wear and dings are on the flats. My first impression was either 55 or 58...

    I grade by looking at the Eagle's shoulder details, and Indian's headress strap. This one shows little to no wear in my eyes. Here is a VF30 in coinfacts to compare:

  • Options
    coinhackcoinhack Posts: 1,221 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jwitten said:
    All guesses have been too high so far.. looking good for a gold CAC :)

    Agree. In fact, if it was 2 full grades (VF30 to AU50) I would think it could still go gold.

  • Options
    stevebensteveben Posts: 4,666 ✭✭✭✭✭

    looks like a solid 30 to me.

    just kidding.

  • Options
    1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 14,156 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58 - 62 ???
    :smile:

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb, Ricko

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • This content has been removed.
  • Options
    DRUNNERDRUNNER Posts: 3,945 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That coin is AU55+. I tend to think mechanical ERROR . . . . . .

    Drunner

  • Options
    jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭✭✭

    So this would pretty much have to gold cac, right?

  • Options
    stevebensteveben Posts: 4,666 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 15, 2017 8:59PM

    @jwitten said:
    So this would pretty much have to gold cac, right?

    there's only one way to find out!

    it's possible ngc net graded the coin for some reason i can't see (is it heavily abraided?)...but it certainly looks severely under-graded whether it "gold stickers" or not. i agree it looks AU or better in those photos.

  • Options
    jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @steveben said:

    @jwitten said:
    So this would pretty much have to gold cac, right?

    there's only one way to find out!

    it's possible ngc net graded the coin for some reason i can't see (is it heavily abraided?)...but it certainly looks severely under-graded whether it "gold stickers" or not. i agree it looks AU or better in those photos.

    The scratch looks worse at some angles, so I'm wondering if that brought it down. I still can't see it going that low though. If anything, Cac might say it shouldn't straight grade with the scratch. But there is no way it is even CLOSE to VF30.

  • Options
    BruceSBruceS Posts: 1,448 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That has to be the worst GTG we have seen in a long time. Usually the board gets It to within a few point either way. It has to be an error in labeling or a real bad photo. Crack that sucker, asap.

    eBay ID-bruceshort978
    Successful BST:here and ATS, bumanchu, wdrob, hashtag, KeeNoooo, mikej61, Yonico, Meltdown, BAJJERFAN, Excaliber, lordmarcovan, cucamongacoin, robkool, bradyc, tonedcointrader, mumu, Windycity, astrotrain, tizofthe, overdate, rwyarmch, mkman123, Timbuk3,GBurger717, airplanenut, coinkid855 ,illini420, michaeldixon, Weiss, Morpheus, Deepcoin, Collectorcoins, AUandAG, D.Schwager, blu62vette, morgan13, torinoCobra71.
  • Options
    jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 15, 2017 9:51PM

    @BruceS said:
    That has to be the worst GTG we have seen in a long time. Usually the board gets It to within a few point either way. It has to be an error in labeling or a real bad photo. Crack that sucker, asap.

    I actually bought it for the holder, and was shocked when I saw how nice the coin was (the seller pics were bad). I would rather have a gold cac on an old ngc fatty than this coin in a modern MS62 holder, honestly.

  • Options
    mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It's a 58 coin that got heavily bonked for the scratch, or a mechanical error.
    If the scratch were that distracting, it should have been bagged and not graded.

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow.... that grade defies reality... must have been a mechanical error... Certainly a much better coin than 30. Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,786 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That is one of the very early NGC "white holders" when the grades were ultra conservative. The NGC "black holder" coins were uniformally under graded from the few I've seen. Think of it as something like PCGS "rattle holder" era.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • Options
    GazesGazes Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭✭✭

    never would guess it was VF 30. Wow

  • Options
    BlindedByEgoBlindedByEgo Posts: 10,754 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 12, 2018 5:37PM

    That has to be the stupidest grader ever. Incuse is tough, but not THAT tough. Thank God it's in a no-line fattie and both coin and holder are eminently collectable :)

    My "real" grade guess was AU53.

  • Options
    jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Update: I sent the coin to CAC. Any guesses? lol

  • Options
    GazesGazes Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭✭✭

    gold sticker

  • Options
    abcde12345abcde12345 Posts: 3,404 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If not for the scrapes and slight wear I'd have guessed MS68. VF30 surprises me and all of those around me.

  • Options
    RayboRaybo Posts: 5,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jwitten said:
    Update: I sent the coin to CAC. Any guesses? lol

    Double gold sticker?

  • Options
    REALGATORREALGATOR Posts: 2,694 ✭✭✭✭✭

    plutonium sticker. CAC should just refund your money with a note: "Really? As if you need a sticker!"

  • Options
    Josh32Josh32 Posts: 138 ✭✭✭

    My first guess would be AU55.

  • Options
    SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,969 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 12, 2018 6:40PM

    Paleface grade, bad medicine, wampum lookum heap better to me.

  • Options
    Type2Type2 Posts: 13,985 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Some one got it wrong and if you bought it for that grade you did not get it wrong... Nice for the grade I don't want to hear it.



    Hoard the keys.
  • Options
    Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks for posting, but I wish you had not given any hints. Your coin is an excellent example of "Gradeflation."

    If I were CAC, I would not put any sticker on it as it is obviously under graded by today's standards.

  • Options
    BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,680 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Well, sure is better than a 30. Im rooting for some drama with a green sticker but who knows! (Just kidding)

  • Options
    HighReliefHighRelief Posts: 3,728 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Good example of why we say grading a coin is just someone's somewhat opinion. I would give is a solid AU53, that is my opinion and I am hoping to see you receive a gold bean on it.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file