Options
1917 Type I, Are these fingerprints?
DCAM
Posts: 302 ✭✭✭
DCAM
Posts: 302 ✭✭✭
Comments
Absolutely yes
+1
Latin American Collection
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Pushing up daisies.
I wouldn't dip this coin nor would I shun it.
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
I don't mind 'em much on the obverse- they kind of blend in with the texture of the wood paneling behind Liberty, a bit.
As exhibited on the reverse, however, they would be a dealbreaker for me. Not a terrible looking coin, but I'd still pass.
Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
IMO that blue toning puts it over the edge, I love it !!!!!
Yes. And that's why I've often said some of the prettiest silver coins out there got their "start" with fingerprints or were at least accelerated by them. Yet the coin community often shuns any visible trace of them. If you look hard at many nicely toned silver type coins, there's often a slight trace of them somewhere on the coin.
Roadrunner is correct. But I still hate fingerprints.
- Jim