Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

How Much Confidence Does a CAC Sticker Give You When Bidding/Buying Sight Unseen?

I think most would agree that the best way to buy coins is in person where you can make your own "in hand" assessment or from a trusted dealer who's "eye" you've learned to trust. The reality is, many of us participate in online auctions or buy from dealers we're not familiar with and buy coins sight unseen. When doing so, how much confidence does a CAC sticker give you?




A couple days ago, I was looking at a dealer's website I've never purchased from that had, to put it nicely, terrible pictures. Once coin caught my eye and I'm guessing it would have turned out to be nice, but I just couldn't tell based on the picture, so I passed. But, I remember thinking, if it had a sticker, I'd feel more confident in it and probably would have bought it. Same thing happens at auctions. I don't have time to search every auction listing, so a lot of times I'll filter it down to just coins with CAC approval. I never made a conscious decision to put faith in the CAC sticker, it just seems to sort of happen. Am I crazy or do others do this too?
«1

Comments

  • Options
    bolivarshagnastybolivarshagnasty Posts: 7,359 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not enough to buy sight unseen.
  • Options
    TopographicOceansTopographicOceans Posts: 6,535 ✭✭✭✭
    Decades ago I bought all my coins sight unseen since mail order catalogs were a major source of coins.

    The idea of TPG's was to be able to trade coins sight unseen. So if you accept that premise, a CAC sticker would give it a boost.
  • Options
    BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,931 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It helps, sure, but it's pretty clear there is no universal consensus about what is nice. In my primary series, it's clear to me that our hosts, the other big TPG, the sticker people, the market, and I all have a slightly different view of what is desirable.
  • Options
    winkywinky Posts: 1,671
    It helps but I have bought coins with CAC and returned them because I didn't think they met the criteria that I wanted. I also have a 1863 H/10 in VF20 CAC and I don't think it is all that pretty of a coin.
  • Options
    lasvegasteddylasvegasteddy Posts: 10,490 ✭✭✭
    NONE
    everything in life is but merely on loan to us by our appreciation....lose your appreciation and see


  • Options
    RonyahskiRonyahski Posts: 3,120 ✭✭✭✭✭
    NONE.

    Anyway, CAC folk have different tastes than me.
    Some refer to overgraded slabs as Coffins. I like to think of them as Happy Coins.
  • Options
    lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,895 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The sticker does nothing for me.

    Lance.
  • Options
    BIGAL2749BIGAL2749 Posts: 742 ✭✭✭✭
    If buying sight unseen I'd feel more comfortable if the coin had a sticker but want a return privilege.



    I make it to enough shows that it's been rare to order online and I have yet to buy on ebay. I do buy at auctions and with no return privilege,



    I want a sticker and good photos.



    I think that's one of the reasons CAC coin do so better at auctions
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,786 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No more than it does for any other coin that has been graded or approved by a single grading company.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    TomBTomB Posts: 22,972 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If by "sight-unseen" you are writing about buying without a previous in-hand inspection and without the right to return then, no, I wouldn't feel comfortable with or without a CAC sticker on the slab. I am a supporter of CAC, but I do not like traditional sight-unseen transactions.
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • Options
    jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,943 ✭✭✭✭✭
    None,



    I would want to see the coin. I have seen coins with cac stickers that I didn't care for at all, and some that didn't get them that I truly loved.

    jim
  • Options
    hickoryridgehickoryridge Posts: 260 ✭✭✭
    very little
  • Options
    Desert MoonDesert Moon Posts: 6,342 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A CAC sticker means it is likely worth seeing in hand before making a decision on value.



    Best, SH
    My online coin store - https://desertmoonnm.com/
  • Options
    msch1manmsch1man Posts: 809 ✭✭✭✭
    To clarify, by "sight unseen", what I really mean is without "in hand, in person" inspection. In other words, buying from an online auction (e.g. Heritage, Great Collections) or from a dealer with whom you don't have any sort of a relationship with.
  • Options
    fcloudfcloud Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭
    no difference between a coin with one or without. you still need to see what you are buying... I would think if coins can turn in holders, coins with sticker can probably turn, too...

    President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay

  • Options
    coinnutcoinnut Posts: 1,434 ✭✭✭✭✭
    None
  • Options
    TrazTraz Posts: 377 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It helps me a bit but I still like to see major purchases. I usually ask someone at heritage to look at coins for me of it's an auction house. Otherwise I trust my dealers. For coins like my Stella it was a combination of heritage, a dealer, cac and me seeing it



    My minor purchases I put a good amount of faith into cac but more for the coin doctoring aspect of it.



    I only buy pcgs also after having problems with ngc.
  • Options
    CharlotteDudeCharlotteDude Posts: 3,288 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Although the majority of CAC'd coins tend to be very nice for the grade, I've seen a few of them lately that turned out to be disappointing, so I much prefer to see the coin in hand before tying up a substantial sum of $.



    'dude
    Got Crust....y gold?
  • Options
    AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 25,035 ✭✭✭✭✭
    zero
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • Options
    david3142david3142 Posts: 3,686 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It helps a little. It concerns me more when a coin I like doesn't have a sticker as there's a good chance it was tried and failed. Then I'm curious to know what I might be missing.
  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Helps a LOT imo. If there's a photo, even black and white, and I like the look, then a CAC sticker is about all I need to go on. In the raw 1980's I often bought on an auction description + photo. And if one of my top notch equivalents of a JA back at that time liked the coin....it was about a 95% sure thing. There was no PCGS back then so it was my photo opinion, my agent's eye, and a catalog description. Yet that worked wonderfully 95% of the time. There were no misses, no "I messed up on that" coin.



    On MS63-MS65 gold coins it's probably a 95% sure thing with a sticker. They are very strict, especially on $20's. On choice and gem silver type coins I figure I agree with CAC about 80-85% of the time on toned coins. On dipped coins I tend to disagree with most everyone....lol. I'm surprised there's not even a single positive comment for CAC up to this point....yet their stickers seem to rule the market....interesting divergence.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    TomBTomB Posts: 22,972 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm surprised there's not even a single positive comment for CAC up to this point....yet their stickers seem to rule the market....interesting divergence.




    You must have overlooked the end of my post; I am a supporter of the CAC idea, but do not support true sight-unseen transactions.
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • Options
    JustacommemanJustacommeman Posts: 22,852 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: TomB

    I'm surprised there's not even a single positive comment for CAC up to this point....yet their stickers seem to rule the market....interesting divergence.




    You must have overlooked the end of my post; I am a supporter of the CAC idea, but do not support true sight-unseen transactions.




    I also think the language was very confusing in the OP



    Mark
    Walker Proof Digital Album
    Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
  • Options
    TopographicOceansTopographicOceans Posts: 6,535 ✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: fcloud
    no difference between a coin with one or without. you still need to see what you are buying... I would think if coins can turn in holders, coins with sticker can probably turn, too...
    So you don't believe in the MAC secret about SAE'simage

  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: TomB

    I'm surprised there's not even a single positive comment for CAC up to this point....yet their stickers seem to rule the market....interesting divergence.




    You must have overlooked the end of my post; I am a supporter of the CAC idea, but do not support true sight-unseen transactions.






    I should have been more clear. There wasn't a single + comment..... about a CAC sticker adding significant value to a sight-unseen coin transaction. I find this to be quite a divergence from the actual market place. Interesting that so many coin collectors will send their favorite retailers (who can't grade to PCGS or JA levels) to bid at auction for them....but wouldn't even consider a CAC coin to be in that same league. I think I just stepped into a time warp....back to 1985. The idea of trying to get "something for nothing" (which we all do) is also at play here. That said, I wouldn't usually want to play a big premium for a stickered coin....would rather find one cheaper not yet stickered, though at some point in time that might be difficult to do for better 4 figure and up coins.



    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    CalGoldCalGold Posts: 2,608 ✭✭
    Buying sight unseen is not a good way to go but it has become popular due to the lack of good alternatives especially for the casual collector.



    The consistent theme of dealer show reports is that there is nothing to buy on the bourse because the dealer cases are full of retreds and dreck that are not worth owning at any price or if there are nice coins they are excessively priced. So why would anyone feel happy buying anything “sight seen” at a show? Unless of course you are content paying a next grade up price for a coin that the dealer could not upgrade or a 40% mark-up over the highest price anyone was willing to pay for the same coin at auction.



    Of course you could limit your buying to auctions that you have previewed in person, absorbing the considerable cost of time and money to travel to the auction preview; time and money that may not be available to you. And your bids won’t win anything you like anyway. Those coins will be bought at crack-out prices that will leave your bid in the dust.



    And if you view a coin in hand, do you really understand what you are seeing and what you may be missing?





    CG
  • Options
    dibdib Posts: 311
    As an internet bidder, who has to rely on pictures that aren't always 100% accurate, I always think to myself, "Well, Heritage probably sent it to CAC first and they consciously chose not to certify it". It's as simple as that, and I bet most people think the same thing. They've seeped into your subconscious, even if you haven't realized it yet. Even if you still like the coin, it puts some doubt in your mind... why didn't CAC certify it? If I'm buying on ebay I usually just assume there wasn't an additional third party who reviewed the slabbed coin.

    What bothers me is, IMO, CAC tends to have more false-positives than false-negatives... that's why I'd be wary of buying sight-unseen. Usually it's pretty easy to figure out why CAC didn't certify a coin, but it can be difficult to understand why they did certify an "OK for the grade" coin.

    Bottom line: No, CAC is not evil and out to get you. They're a business, and they've developed a smart business model to partner with auction houses to better influence your purchasing decisions.
  • Options
    ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,461 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: msch1man

    I think most would agree that the best way to buy coins is in person where you can make your own "in hand" assessment or from a trusted dealer who's "eye" you've learned to trust. The reality is, many of us participate in online auctions or buy from dealers we're not familiar with and buy coins sight unseen. When doing so, how much confidence does a CAC sticker give you?


    A couple days ago, I was looking at a dealer's website I've never purchased from that had, to put it nicely, terrible pictures. Once coin caught my eye and I'm guessing it would have turned out to be nice, but I just couldn't tell based on the picture, so I passed. But, I remember thinking, if it had a sticker, I'd feel more confident in it and probably would have bought it. Same thing happens at auctions. I don't have time to search every auction listing, so a lot of times I'll filter it down to just coins with CAC approval. I never made a conscious decision to put faith in the CAC sticker, it just seems to sort of happen. Am I crazy or do others do this too?



    For clarification, are you thinking that a CAC sticker would indicate good eye appeal to compensate for the terrible photos?


    The CAC sticker indicates solid for the grade and not necessarily good eye appeal.
  • Options
    BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,680 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well it certainly gives me some confidence that some of the best people in the industry have seen and approved of the coin. I have seen many CAC coins which I would not choose for my collection and I have a coin or two that I disagree with CAC on. That doesn't change the fact that having a CAC sticker is only adding to the body of information that you have available to you when making a purchase in the scenario noted.



    As some posters have stated they would never buy in such a situation, then having a CAC sticker on a coin is irrelevant to your buying decision.



  • Options
    ElcontadorElcontador Posts: 7,740 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: BryceM
    It helps, sure, but it's pretty clear there is no universal consensus about what is nice. In my primary series, it's clear to me that our hosts, the other big TPG, the sticker people, the market, and I all have a slightly different view of what is desirable.


    This. I NEVER buy anything unseen. I see a coin, and someone I trust who knows more than I do must give me a thumbs up and a detailed description of why he likes a coin before I consider buying it. Or, I go on what said person I trust tells me if I can't see in person. These guys have are widely respected and have been in the business for many years. I rarely buy a bad coin this way.

    In the series and grade I collect, imo, CAC is inconsistent in their standards of what constitutes a coin which is solid for the grade.
    "Vou invadir o Nordeste,
    "Seu cabra da peste,
    "Sou Mangueira......."
  • Options
    jcpingjcping Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭
    Yes, CAC stickers gave me much confidence that the coins should be correctly graded based on today's grading standards. Nevertheless, I like the coins or not, it is an entirely different story.
    an SLQ and Ike dollars lover
  • Options
    mercurydimeguymercurydimeguy Posts: 4,634 ✭✭✭✭
    Early on CAC coins were head/shoulders better, but then again so were TPG coins.

    Now about 3 out of 10 CAC coins are dogs, and sell as such for dog money.

    No different than today in the market there a lot of really nice TPG coins and some real dogs as well.
  • Options
    TwobitcollectorTwobitcollector Posts: 4,554 ✭✭✭✭✭
    NONE
    Positive BST Transactions with:
    INYNWHWeTrust-TexasNationals,ajaan,blu62vette
    coinJP, Outhaul ,illini420,MICHAELDIXON, Fade to Black,epcjimi1,19Lyds,SNMAN,JerseyJoe, bigjpst, DMWJR , lordmarcovan, Weiss,Mfriday4962,UtahCoin,Downtown1974,pitboss,RichieURich,Bullsitter,JDsCoins,toyz4geo,jshaulis, mustanggt, SNMAN, MWallace, ms71, lordmarcovan,JWP,dantheman984,olah_in_MA,USMC_6115
  • Options
    joebb21joebb21 Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just because a coin is cac'ed doesnt mean the coin would fit into my personal collection.



    In fact there are probably hundreds of coins that are cac'ed but dont fit into my collection because they dont have "the look" that I want.



    This is not a knock on cac but an extra requirement for myself.





    On the other hand, at yesterday's parsippany show a dealer showed me a particular coin in a pcgs ms64 holder that was heavily doctored and played with.



    It had a spot removed, was cleaned, artificially toned, hidden scratches and just plain ugly.



    Perhaps pictures could have made the coin look semi-ok, but buying it sight unseen would have been a nightmare.



    Even the lowest CAC coins guarantees that almost all of the above problems would not be had
    may the fonz be with you...always...
  • Options
    BustCudsBustCuds Posts: 1,096 ✭✭✭


    None...Have wondered how some got the sticker in the first place. image
  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,026 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The guys with the best typically laud it. Nothing's changed in all these millenniums. The eyes are the window … And every once in a while the stiffest competition lauds his wares in conjunction with a team (environment) sharing the same goals. That supported and strengthened a market that was getting out of control. At least , to a point , not a head like a pimple. Rather a class , like the highest order.

    And let's face it boys…. CAC has assisted in cleaning up some of the _ _ _ _ that permeates our collective society. Cream rises to the top.

    Edit to add : "scum" is a 4 letter word. In diesel technology , scum rises to the top, too.
    It fuels an industry image
  • Options
    fastfreddiefastfreddie Posts: 2,954 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: jdimmick

    None,



    I would want to see the coin. I have seen coins with cac stickers that I didn't care for at all, and some that didn't get them that I truly loved.

    jim








    THIS!



    Freddie

    It is not that life is short, but that you are dead for so very long.
  • Options
    rkfishrkfish Posts: 2,617 ✭✭✭
    Learned many, many years ago to NEVER buy sight unseen! image
    Steve

    Check out my PQ selection of Morgan & Peace Dollars, and more at:
    WWW.PQDOLLARS.COM or WWW.GILBERTCOINS.COM
  • Options
    BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nope as even a with a CAC sticker it's still like a Blind Date.
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • Options
    TPRCTPRC Posts: 3,817 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: bolivarshagnasty
    Not enough to buy sight unseen.



    +1

    Tom

  • Options
    CommemKingCommemKing Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭✭✭
    None at all
  • Options
    DollarAfterDollarDollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,217 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If you're not overpaying for the coin in the first place I think it would be hard not to buy sight unseen with confidence that it's worth the money you paid. Once received, whether it meets your criteria (for eye appeal) is a whole different thing. Those people who wouldn't trust the green bean to confirm grade have obviously been burned too often and have to see the coin in hand IMO.



    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  • Options
    stealerstealer Posts: 4,039 ✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: roadrunner
    Originally posted by: TomB
    I'm surprised there's not even a single positive comment for CAC up to this point....yet their stickers seem to rule the market....interesting divergence.


    You must have overlooked the end of my post; I am a supporter of the CAC idea, but do not support true sight-unseen transactions.



    I should have been more clear. There wasn't a single + comment..... about a CAC sticker adding significant value to a sight-unseen coin transaction. I find this to be quite a divergence from the actual market place. Interesting that so many coin collectors will send their favorite retailers (who can't grade to PCGS or JA levels) to bid at auction for them....but wouldn't even consider a CAC coin to be in that same league. I think I just stepped into a time warp....back to 1985. The idea of trying to get "something for nothing" (which we all do) is also at play here. That said, I wouldn't usually want to play a big premium for a stickered coin....would rather find one cheaper not yet stickered, though at some point in time that might be difficult to do for better 4 figure and up coins.




    Old people are stubborn image
  • Options
    CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,432 ✭✭✭✭✭
    None

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think that's more a function of the look they're going for and probably not a reflection on the grading companies or CAC's ability to grade. I don't think people appreciate the value of CAC. It's even more important, from a mathematical standpoint, than the original grade by PCGS.



    To use a crude example, if PCGS misgrades a coin 10 percent of the time, with 5 percent being overgraded and 5 percent being undergraded, then there is a 1 in 20 chance that the coin you buy may be overgraded. That's a lot. If we assume CAC to have the same percentage, then the dual confirmation results in 1 in 400 chance of being overgraded.



    This may be a bit of a simplification but I find that simple math usually provides a valuable perspective.









    Simple math doesn't apply here, even if it probably should. Any single top grader is accurate approx 75% of the time. Could be anywhere from 65-85%. With that logic, 3 graders at 75% accuracy (25% miss rate) should be able to earn an accuracy of 98.4% in an ideal world (.25 cubed is a .0156 miss rate). Clearly, this doesn't happen. If anything, 3 graders with 75% accuracy can at best grade at 75% accuracy day in and day out. It might even be less than that since I feel TPG's are accurate/repeatable 66-75% of the time. Math doesn't seem to apply in this world of 10-15 second grading events....at least not in gem type coins. Logic would dictate, that those people suggesting CAC has no influence in their buying decision, should also be stating that neither does the TPG's decision. In other words, it's really a raw coin market where only accurately slabbed coins get to play. I'm fine with a raw coin world. Been there, done that.



    I would agree that the additional CAC opinion is a big plus in ruling out a clunker, especially in gold. Old people aren't always stubborn. Until someone shows up with a new grading paradigm, I'll stick with the one that is currently working or not working. A slab gets you an admission ticket to the ball park. Whether you win or lose the game depends on which of the 4 bases the slabbed coin lands on (high end, average, low end, next grade down or BB'd). Enjoy the game.

    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 2nd confirmation doesn't exponentially increase the accuracy. If that were the case then a pair of 75% graders should be able to grade to 93% accuracy as a team. And we we know that is not true at the TPG's...at least in coins that are not bulk graded like ASE's. I submit that a pair of 75% graders or even a 3rd at 75% doesn't give us anything better than 75%. We can debate why that is so, as there are numerous reasons for it.



    A CAC opinion is a little different than a TPG grading event. I believe they take more time and err more to the conservative side since they are putting a buying decision on the line. CAC is there to verifty non-clunkers, and that's different than assigning a grade from scratch. Most of us do the same thing when buying a slabbed coin. Either we like it in the holder or not. Easy decision. Now crack that out and offer it to a dozen top dealers. See how much variation you get as a raw coin. It's not so easy assigning a grade when there's no label to ball park it.



    The fact remains that TPG graders and the best dealers, typically score 65-85% on grading exams. Yet why can't we get more than 75% typical accuracy from 2-3 graders and a finalizer? It's very hard for me to get the same grade 3 out of 4 times on any coin I've resubmitted. It's usually no better than 2 out of 3. Only once have I gone 3 for 3 on the same coin (all MS64's). The next owner dipped it, puttied it, then got the upgrade I couldn't. On unc seated coins I'm quite used to seeing the same coin graded differently on 2 or 3 submissions. That's teams of 3-4 graders doing that.



    Logically, a 2nd expert opinion "should" increase the accuracy exponentially. In reality, it doesn't. And that's a topic for Colonel Jessup and another thread.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 13,054 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The slab could be covered by additional opinionated services, unless I see the coin, I would not buy it.
    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The only way to get a truly accurate opinion on every coin is a record of every submission result somehow assigned to that coin slab. If it's been in 10X, all grading events shoud be recorded, ideally from all services. We can dream. One submission is not enough. In my mind it takes a minimum of 2 and usually 3 to arrive at a consensus market grade. If there's no record of those events, you've essentially started over at 1. Losing grading history is a bigger problem than a screwed up POP report.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    fcloudfcloud Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: TopographicOceans
    Originally posted by: fcloud
    no difference between a coin with one or without. you still need to see what you are buying... I would think if coins can turn in holders, coins with sticker can probably turn, too...
    So you don't believe in the MAC secret about SAE'simage



    I'm still waiting for a company to come out and verify the sticker on the holder, after all, how do we ensure the sticker company stickered the graded coin correctly. Maybe there should be a range of about 10 approval ratings, how else can we ensure every coin is graded consistently. image

    President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay

  • Options
    Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 9,746 ✭✭✭✭✭
    None, the sticker is simply an opinion (and not a TPG opinion at that) I may or may not agree with. I have my own standards as to what constitutes solid or premium quality from years on the bourse and especially what will sell. Next, is it priced at a price I can make money.

    I need to see the coin as this is critical in any buying decision.
    Investor

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file