$1500 by 2017. I don't think the bottom will take us under $1000 and the bottom should be in within 18 months. 2017 will usher in a new administration and the end of "the economic recovery" that left most of America behind.
It would be easy to make an argument for $900 as well but $900 gold would likely mean $10 silver and I can't see that happening barring a total meltdown.
I'm more in the gold will head lower camp. I think speculators will keep it from getting to $900.00 but that said I think it could get close. Something below the $1000 barrier, say $970.00 +-, seems to be within a reasonable expectation. At that level I would expect buying by speculators would firm up the price, along with perhaps some production cuts from the miners. I could see this happening as a slow decline over 24 months.
To get to $1500.00 or more I think we need a catalyst. What the catalyst would be I don't know but it would need to be of a serious nature and be unanticipated. It could be in the form of a terrorist act with major destruction, a serious multinational war or some other kind of very significant and unanticipated event that just rocks peoples confidence and causes intense fear. Without that kind of event I really don't see the reason for Gold to move higher from here. All the normal "reasons" that one may give as to why gold should be higher are already known and they haven't moved the metal higher. It has to be a significant blind side event IMO.
$1175 before $1250 What goes down must come up, Gold Bugs The sky could fall and man would still be digging for the answers. As a prognosticator, I reserve the right to be wrong because humble pie tastes delicious.
Once rates start to 'edge' up we may see smoe lows but I don't think it'll reach $900. There would be too many buyers sub $1,000 smelling a good deal. I think the lows (>$900) will be late in 2015 to March 2016. Then a slow but steady run to above $1,500 post inauguration January 2017.... around Sept. 8, 2017. So we'll see $1,500 before $900, but it'll be close. It's all a wag....
Quite a few key levels between 900-1100 (935, 950, 961, 988, 1000, 1024, 1032, 1044, 1089, 1100). I don't think 900 will be seen. Lots of opportunities to find important support >900.
POG down 2.34% to 1,168 just because of a jobs report that smoe postulate will force the Fed to raise rates in June to keep in line with their unemployment goal.
To what is deserving of a 279 point drop on the Dow? A possible June 1/4 point rise? It seems several quarter-point rises wouldn't matter all that much(?) I'm probably wrong, but six quarter-point hikes mean that the Fed Funds rate is still under 2%, home morts maybe around 4.5-5%. Is this a calamity in the making? Will those rates stop housing in its tracks? Drop gold to $900? IIRC gold still rose for a while in the late 70's and into January 1980 when rates rose aggressively. And gold rose again when Greenspan launched his quarter-point assault in 2004 after the benchmark hit a 46 year low of 1%.
So where is today's "neutral"? Last decade, 3% was considered "neutral."
From 8/9/04 “If the systemic risk is gone, they need to withdraw the insurance policy,” Gay said. He figures that the Fed has to raise the federal funds rate to 2 percent by the end of the year and then to at least 3 percent by next year just to get close to a level considered “neutral” for the economy. And he said the Fed will not hesitate to continue raising rates “no matter what rate of job growth we have, as it’s not negative.”
It will go where ever JP Morgan & company want it to go.....Short the paper...buy the physical...repeat....over and over again until the vault is full....then the COMEX goes belly up....paper is canceled.....physical rules....
By golly, you did tell us what you thought! The numbers weren't necessarily actionable by me, but we're doin ok.
I did buy some gold this year and plan to buy more, plus a bit more platinum. I'm figuring in the 10% loss for 2016 that you've predicted as well - I incorporated your prediction as part of my "dragging my feet" strategy" when buying, (i.e., not being in a big hurry.)
I think I might be backfilling some more of my Plats this year, the way things are going.
Haven't decided to start buying swords quite yet, but added another cool firearm.
Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally
<< <i>Quite a few key levels between 900-1100 (935, 950, 961, 988, 1000, 1024, 1032, 1044, 1089, 1100). I don't think 900 will be seen. Lots of opportunities to find important support >900. >>
First 2 supports touched. $1089 last night is the "square of 33." That was an important level on the way up in 2009.
Could make a strong case for either. Maybe it doesn't hit either for a long while?
mark
Walker Proof Digital Album Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
Originally posted by: JohnnyCache I'm more in the gold will head lower camp. .........
To get to $1500.00 or more I think we need a catalyst. What the catalyst would be I don't know but it would need to be of a serious nature and be unanticipated. It could be in the form of a terrorist act with major destruction, a serious multinational war or some other kind of very significant and unanticipated event that just rocks peoples confidence and causes intense fear. Without that kind of event I really don't see the reason for Gold to move higher from here. All the normal "reasons" that one may give as to why gold should be higher are already known and they haven't moved the metal higher. It has to be a significant blind side event IMO.
Well lets see, we've had a terrorist event in a major european city, a near miss with the outbreak of war after Turkey shot down the Russian jet, I guess it's going to have to be door number three - something completely out of left field.
There was an article the other day in which the CEO of Rand Gold suggested that the cost of production, particularly after some miners chose to focus on capturing the low hanging fruit, was approaching being unprofitable.
I can't see it going much under $1,000. I truly believe the last 10 years created a lot of permanent gold bugs. People will start buying heavily into it once it reaches a magic number like $1,000
Originally posted by: BBN I can't see it going much under $1,000. I truly believe the last 10 years created a lot of permanent gold bugs. People will start buying heavily into it once it reaches a magic number like $1,000
Unfortunately strong demand only affects premiums while base price will continue to be set by the paper futures market. As we have recently seen premiums can increase while the base price decreases. It will take a rally in the futures market to see any surge in physical prices.
The decline from democracy to tyranny is both a natural and inevitable one.
Originally posted by: renman95 Once rates start to 'edge' up we may see smoe lows but I don't think it'll reach $900. There would be too many buyers sub $1,000 smelling a good deal. I think the lows (>$900) will be late in 2015 to March 2016. Then a slow but steady run to above $1,500 post inauguration January 2017.... around Sept. 8, 2017. So we'll see $1,500 before $900, but it'll be close. It's all a wag....
WSJ today: "Had it no been for China and Russia's CB buying cheap gold, the price would have gone below $1,000 per ounce" - Bill Hubbard
"We would not be surprised to see purchases by the China's CB for many years to come as they are underweight in gold for an economy of its size."
After six years of disclosing nothing about it gold reserves, the PRBC surprised markets in the July by announcing that its holdings of the metal had risen by more than 50% since 2009 to 1,658 metric tons...1,743 metric tons by November.
The question becomes, will the US default on $20 trillion in debt, devalue the dollar by, say 50%, or inflate to cover their mismanagement of the whole shebang? Or simply take on another $20 trillion more in debt? Wars aren't cheap, you know.
I don't think anyone really knows at this point. So, would you rather have a piece of paper with an official-looking government insignia stamped on it with gold ink, or a physical asset that's always been recognized around the whole world as being valuable?
Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally
would you rather have a piece of paper with an official-looking government insignia stamped on it with gold ink, or a physical asset that's always been recognized around the whole world as being valuable?
How about some of each? And a few other kinds of assets, too, for diversification
Thread was started when gold was $1200, or at the midpoint between $900 and $1500.
Originally posted by: jmski52 Just a hunch, but I don't think it's going to make it all the way down to $900 without a collapse in the monetary system.
collapse in the monetary system will send it to 1500. The dollar mirage is holding it down.
The decline from democracy to tyranny is both a natural and inevitable one.
Originally posted by: jmski52 Just a hunch, but I don't think it's going to make it all the way down to $900 without a collapse in the monetary system.
Originally posted by: jmski52 Just a hunch, but I don't think it's going to make it all the way down to $900 without a collapse in the monetary system.
collapse in the monetary system will send it to 1500. The dollar mirage is holding it down.
Same question----So what if there is no monetary system collapse?
Originally posted by: jmski52 Just a hunch, but I don't think it's going to make it all the way down to $900 without a collapse in the monetary system.
So what if there is no monetary system collapse?
More importantly, what if there is?
The decline from democracy to tyranny is both a natural and inevitable one.
Comments
<< <i>Also, when and why? >>
$900.
Who Knows?
So you can resurrect this thread in six to twelve months and add your usual snarky 'told you so' comments for all of us to enjoy.
<< <i>
<< <i>Also, when and why? >>
$900.
Who Knows?
So you can resurrect this thread in six to twelve months and add your usual snarky 'told you so' comments for all of us to enjoy. >>
Si Si!
MY COINS FOR SALE AT https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/collectors-showcase/other/bajjerfans-coins-sale/3876
It would be easy to make an argument for $900 as well but $900 gold would likely mean $10 silver and I can't see that happening barring a total meltdown.
why? ... because my crystal ball and neighborhood swami told me so.
it'll go down to $900. JMHO
I think speculators will keep it from getting to $900.00 but that said I think it could get close.
Something below the $1000 barrier, say $970.00 +-, seems to be within a reasonable expectation.
At that level I would expect buying by speculators would firm up the price, along with perhaps some production cuts from the miners.
I could see this happening as a slow decline over 24 months.
To get to $1500.00 or more I think we need a catalyst.
What the catalyst would be I don't know but it would need to be of a serious nature and be unanticipated. It could be in the form of a terrorist act with major destruction, a serious multinational war or some other kind of very significant and unanticipated event that just rocks peoples confidence and causes intense fear. Without that kind of event I really don't see the reason for Gold to move higher from here. All the normal "reasons" that one may give as to why gold should be higher are already known and they haven't moved the metal higher. It has to be a significant blind side event IMO.
Charles III Portrait Set
Charles IV Portrait Set
What goes down must come up, Gold Bugs The sky could fall and man would still be digging for the answers. As a prognosticator, I reserve the right to be wrong because humble pie tastes delicious.
Overdate, BestMR, Weather11AM, TDEC1000, Carew4me, BigMarty58, Coinsarefun, Golfer72, UnknownComic, DMarks, JFoot13, ElKevvo, Truthteller, Duxbutt, TwoSides2aCoin, PerryHall, mhammerman, Papabear, Wingsrule, WTCG, MillerJW, Ciccio, zrlevin, dantheman984, tee135, jdimmick, gsa1fan, jmski52, SUMORADA, guitarwes, bstat1020, pitboss, meltdown, Schmitz7, 30AnvZ28, pragmaticgoat, wondercoin & MkMan123
<< <i>
<< <i>Also, when and why? >>
$900.
Who Knows?
So you can resurrect this thread in six to twelve months and add your usual snarky 'told you so' comments for all of us to enjoy. >>
Only if I'm right
I think gold will find support near $1050 and finish the year just over $1100
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
<< <i>... but then will fall below $1000 in 2016 and finish the year near that level. >>
That should put silver around ~$12 in 2016. The day of sub-$300 tubes of eagles will return if Baley is right! It is certainly possible.
To what is deserving of a 279 point drop on the Dow? A possible June 1/4 point rise? It seems several quarter-point rises wouldn't matter all that much(?) I'm probably wrong, but six quarter-point hikes mean that the Fed Funds rate is still under 2%, home morts maybe around 4.5-5%. Is this a calamity in the making? Will those rates stop housing in its tracks? Drop gold to $900? IIRC gold still rose for a while in the late 70's and into January 1980 when rates rose aggressively. And gold rose again when Greenspan launched his quarter-point assault in 2004 after the benchmark hit a 46 year low of 1%.
So where is today's "neutral"? Last decade, 3% was considered "neutral."
From 8/9/04
“If the systemic risk is gone, they need to withdraw the insurance policy,” Gay said. He figures that the Fed has to raise the federal funds rate to 2 percent by the end of the year and then to at least 3 percent by next year just to get close to a level considered “neutral” for the economy. And he said the Fed will not hesitate to continue raising rates “no matter what rate of job growth we have, as it’s not negative.”
I knew it would happen.
<< <i>You tell me - and we'll both be rich! >>
I told you what I thought. How we doin?
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
By golly, you did tell us what you thought! The numbers weren't necessarily actionable by me, but we're doin ok.
I did buy some gold this year and plan to buy more, plus a bit more platinum. I'm figuring in the 10% loss for 2016 that you've predicted as well - I incorporated your prediction as part of my "dragging my feet" strategy" when buying, (i.e., not being in a big hurry.)
I think I might be backfilling some more of my Plats this year, the way things are going.
Haven't decided to start buying swords quite yet, but added another cool firearm.
I knew it would happen.
<< <i>Quite a few key levels between 900-1100 (935, 950, 961, 988, 1000, 1024, 1032, 1044, 1089, 1100). I don't think 900 will be seen. Lots of opportunities to find important support >900. >>
First 2 supports touched. $1089 last night is the "square of 33." That was an important level on the way up in 2009.
Greece, check
Italy, Spain, Portugal not quite yet.
Ruble, check
Oil, check
Euro, check
USA pensions, not quite yet
USA entitlements, not yet
China, soon
When FEAR enters this market we are in for a ride. Nobody will be paying attention to gold. Free fall time.
mark
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
End of the year just about 5 weeks away..
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
MY COINS FOR SALE AT https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/collectors-showcase/other/bajjerfans-coins-sale/3876
So far your crystal ball is on the money. Will you rent it out for a fee?
stick to poker.... Cheers, RickO
I'm more in the gold will head lower camp.
.........
To get to $1500.00 or more I think we need a catalyst.
What the catalyst would be I don't know but it would need to be of a serious nature and be unanticipated. It could be in the form of a terrorist act with major destruction, a serious multinational war or some other kind of very significant and unanticipated event that just rocks peoples confidence and causes intense fear. Without that kind of event I really don't see the reason for Gold to move higher from here. All the normal "reasons" that one may give as to why gold should be higher are already known and they haven't moved the metal higher. It has to be a significant blind side event IMO.
Well lets see, we've had a terrorist event in a major european city, a near miss with the outbreak of war after Turkey shot down the Russian jet, I guess it's going to have to be door number three - something completely out of left field.
There was an article the other day in which the CEO of Rand Gold suggested that the cost of production, particularly after some miners chose to focus on capturing the low hanging fruit, was approaching being unprofitable.
ARTICLE
Charles III Portrait Set
Charles IV Portrait Set
Positive BST Transactions (buyers and sellers): wondercoin, blu62vette, BAJJERFAN, privatecoin, blu62vette, AlanLastufka, privatecoin
#1 1951 Bowman Los Angeles Rams Team Set
#2 1980 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
#8 (and climbing) 1972 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
I can't see it going much under $1,000. I truly believe the last 10 years created a lot of permanent gold bugs. People will start buying heavily into it once it reaches a magic number like $1,000
Unfortunately strong demand only affects premiums while base price will continue to be set by the paper futures market. As we have recently seen premiums can increase while the base price decreases. It will take a rally in the futures market to see any surge in physical prices.
The decline from democracy to tyranny is both a natural and inevitable one.
Once rates start to 'edge' up we may see smoe lows but I don't think it'll reach $900. There would be too many buyers sub $1,000 smelling a good deal. I think the lows (>$900) will be late in 2015 to March 2016. Then a slow but steady run to above $1,500 post inauguration January 2017.... around Sept. 8, 2017. So we'll see $1,500 before $900, but it'll be close. It's all a wag....
WSJ today: "Had it no been for China and Russia's CB buying cheap gold, the price would have gone below $1,000 per ounce" - Bill Hubbard
"We would not be surprised to see purchases by the China's CB for many years to come as they are underweight in gold for an economy of its size."
After six years of disclosing nothing about it gold reserves, the PRBC surprised markets in the July by announcing that its holdings of the metal had risen by more than 50% since 2009 to 1,658 metric tons...1,743 metric tons by November.
Because that's a stop on it's way to $500
I don't think anyone really knows at this point. So, would you rather have a piece of paper with an official-looking government insignia stamped on it with gold ink, or a physical asset that's always been recognized around the whole world as being valuable?
I knew it would happen.
How about some of each? And a few other kinds of assets, too, for diversification
Thread was started when gold was $1200, or at the midpoint between $900 and $1500.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
I knew it would happen.
Just a hunch, but I don't think it's going to make it all the way down to $900 without a collapse in the monetary system.
collapse in the monetary system will send it to 1500. The dollar mirage is holding it down.
The decline from democracy to tyranny is both a natural and inevitable one.
Just a hunch, but I don't think it's going to make it all the way down to $900 without a collapse in the monetary system.
So what if there is no monetary system collapse?
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
Just a hunch, but I don't think it's going to make it all the way down to $900 without a collapse in the monetary system.
collapse in the monetary system will send it to 1500. The dollar mirage is holding it down.
Same question----So what if there is no monetary system collapse?
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
Just a hunch, but I don't think it's going to make it all the way down to $900 without a collapse in the monetary system.
So what if there is no monetary system collapse?
More importantly, what if there is?
The decline from democracy to tyranny is both a natural and inevitable one.