Home U.S. Coin Forum

Would you send in this Ike?(I did. 68+. Trueview posted)

ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,596 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited May 14, 2018 1:17PM in U.S. Coin Forum

Trueview posted further below

I am on the fence, push me one way or the other. What do you think?
I think it's 68 material at least. (but I'm the owner)

Collector, occasional seller

«1

Comments

  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nope as that looks like tooth fairy money to me ;)

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    These need to be pretty flawless to be worth the submission, and to me it does not look like this one would get a 68 or better if sent in.

    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • YouYou Posts: 313 ✭✭✭

    66-67

  • vplitevplite Posts: 1,385 ✭✭✭

    Nice, but not worth slabbing, JMHO.

    The Golden Rule: Those with the gold make the rules.
  • COINS MAKE CENTSCOINS MAKE CENTS Posts: 1,851 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I see a 66 maybe a 67. If you are slabbing to make a profit it's probably not going to happen if your slabbing to go in your collection go ahead.

    Either way it's a nice looking coin

    New inventory added daily at Coins Make Cents
    HAPPY COLLECTING


  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I've submitted many of these and this is a 67+/shot 8 in my Ike book.

  • OldEastsideOldEastside Posts: 4,602 ✭✭✭✭✭

    72 S Ikes are the prettiest and best struck IMO

    Steve

    Promote the Hobby
  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @OldEastside said:
    72 S Ikes are the prettiest and best struck IMO

    Steve

    I agree...maybe PCGS grades these like they do 1881-S Morgans....it has to be a 69 to be a 68.....

  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 8,708 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If it doesn't have the usual scrape marks on the Eagle's head and wing edge then it might be worth submitting.

  • TonerGuyTonerGuy Posts: 590 ✭✭✭

    IDK about the grade but thats a damn good photo...

  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,414 ✭✭✭✭✭

    not enough luster, may not get over 66

  • TwobitcollectorTwobitcollector Posts: 3,530 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No

    Positive BST Transactions with:
    INYNWHWeTrust-TexasNationals,ajaan,blu62vette
    coinJP, Outhaul ,illini420,MICHAELDIXON, Fade to Black,epcjimi1,19Lyds,SNMAN,JerseyJoe, bigjpst, DMWJR , lordmarcovan, Weiss,Mfriday4962,UtahCoin,Downtown1974,pitboss,RichieURich,Bullsitter,JDsCoins,toyz4geo,jshaulis, mustanggt, SNMAN, MWallace, ms71, lordmarcovan
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Great picture and could go 67.... I would say it is worth submitting... not profit-wise... but not many Ike's look this nice... On the other hand, selling as is to speculators might bring in a higher return. Cheers, RickO

  • Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would not send it in.

  • gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If you can afford the submission than send it in.
    You will never know till the dealing is done:)

  • KkathylKkathyl Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭✭✭

    yes as far as making the grade. I would submit with a group.

    Best place to buy !
    Bronze Associate member

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,364 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The little mark on the jaw will probably knock it out of the MS-68 category. It looks more like an MS-66 or 67.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • OnastoneOnastone Posts: 4,034 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I see nice luster! Do you have any Ikes already slabbed? If not, it might be a worthy attempt, not sure if it would grade 68 as that is pretty close to perfect. Need to magnify and look much closer!

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,596 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks for the comments all.
    This is by far the nicest Ike that I have, although I don't usually pick them up so I only have a few, and none are slabbed. All I have to compare to are the PCGS and heritage photos and I am a little surprised at what is "allowed" on 68's and some of the 69's. As far as keeping or selling, probably a keeper since I do like it.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 7,928 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Now, if you find a 1971-S that looks like that, it would be worth sending in. The quality on those is typically BAD.

    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,248 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The scrapes on the rim (8:00) might keep this out of a 68 holder. Otherwise, nice!

    peacockcoins

  • JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice coin. 67

  • TreashuntTreashunt Posts: 6,747 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would never send in an Ike.

    Frank

    BHNC #203

  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,094 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice coin, but not worth the fees. Spend the money on an Ike Dansco, then start filling it with coins that are nice, but not worth grading.

  • dlmtortsdlmtorts Posts: 742 ✭✭✭

    Wow! Congrats!

  • toyz4geotoyz4geo Posts: 1,484 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ChrisH821 said:
    So I sent this one in since I just had to know... PCGS says 68+ Trueview pending :)

    Sometimes it just pays to throw it against the wall and see what sticks. Congrats. Looking forward to the TV

  • goldengolden Posts: 9,859 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice!

  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,830 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow. Way to go. I would have said 67 from the photos. Sometimes they really look phenomenal in-hand and just don't look as good in a photo.

  • CoinCrazyPACoinCrazyPA Posts: 2,899 ✭✭✭✭

    Congrats

    Positive BST transactions: agentjim007, cohodk, CharlieC, Chrischampeon, DRG, 3 x delistamps, djdilliodon, gmherps13, jmski52, Meltdown, Mesquite, 2 x nibanny, themaster, 2 x segoja, Timbuk3, ve3rules, jom, Blackhawk, hchcoin, Relaxn, pitboss, blu62vette, Jfoot13, Jinx86, jfoot13,Ronb

    Successful Trades: Swampboy,
  • Type2Type2 Posts: 13,985 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I thought it looked nice good eye.



    Hoard the keys.
  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,094 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congrats. This is why we don't grade from photos.

  • oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 12,407 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sweet! Looking forward to the TV's.

    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
  • ElKevvoElKevvo Posts: 4,125 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Ike's are great coins..congrats on the 68+!

    K

    ANA LM
  • CascadeChrisCascadeChris Posts: 2,525 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow! WTG!!!

    The more you VAM..
  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,427 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congrats!

  • topstuftopstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Too bad they weren't struck at the CC mint. It would go 70+ easy if it was a CC. >:)

  • mkman123mkman123 Posts: 6,849 ✭✭✭✭

    looking good!!

    Successful Buying and Selling transactions with:

    Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,702 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ChrisH821 said:
    So I sent this one in since I just had to know... PCGS says 68+ Trueview pending :)

    Congratulations. My only concerns were the little scratch, the reverse, and especially subdued luster.

    I guess the picture doesn't do the luster justice.

    It's an extremely nice and clean coin.

    Tempus fugit.
  • cheezhedcheezhed Posts: 5,912 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Great submission and going with your instincts.

    Many happy BST transactions
  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,596 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks! Still awaiting the TV but the cert page is live https://www.pcgs.com/cert/35495869

    @cladking The original photos were taken with one of my early attempts at axial lighting and I had a tissue over the light source. It showed the surfaces pretty well but not so much the luster. It is a very pleasing satin luster, might be what pushed it to the + grade.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • TreashuntTreashunt Posts: 6,747 ✭✭✭✭✭

    amazing, congrats.
    Just goes to show that I know nothing about Ikes.

    Frank

    BHNC #203

  • crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,000 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’ll go along with any decision you make with your coins my man. That Ike looks flawless so I hope it grades way up there for ya my coin brother :)
    Very nice

    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • 19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,491 ✭✭✭✭

    @ChrisH821 said:
    So I sent this one in since I just had to know... PCGS says 68+ Trueview pending :)

    I'm a little shocked but not a bit surprised.

    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,000 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That went well :)

    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice job.
    I thought it was a really nice coin.
    I'm not really surprised.
    Congrats!
    ☺️

  • OldEastsideOldEastside Posts: 4,602 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Way coool & Congrats

    Steve

    Promote the Hobby
  • This content has been removed.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file