Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

2015 Reverse Proof Silver Dime in March of Dimes Special Set...

BackroadJunkieBackroadJunkie Posts: 3,745 ✭✭✭✭✭
Apparently at Long Beach, they're showing a 2015 silver reverse proof dime that'll be included with the 2015 March of Dimes Special Set to be released later this year.

Anyone there? Take a picture, please...

(Edited for clarity...)

Comments

  • FullStrikeFullStrike Posts: 4,353 ✭✭✭
    Arent they supposed to release a full reverse proof set soon? What will be so special about a dime in some 3 coin set?

    And it's a Roosevelt Dime ! One of the ugliest current coins out there.
  • cheezhedcheezhed Posts: 5,990 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I haven't learned my lesson yet so I'm in.
    Many happy BST transactions
  • OPAOPA Posts: 17,141 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A reverse proof on anything that small as a Dime, does not compute.
    "Bongo drive 1984 Lincoln that looks like old coin dug from ground."
  • Timbuk3Timbuk3 Posts: 11,658 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ditto with OPA !!! image
    Timbuk3
  • jmcu12jmcu12 Posts: 2,452 ✭✭✭
    I know it is a slippery slope to being the Canadian mint, and I know my opinion is not shared by most, but I have liked the special version coins of late. Our current stuff is so boring that any "redesign"is welcome IMO.
    Awarded latest "YOU SUCK!": June 11, 2014
  • bumanchubumanchu Posts: 1,383 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I know it is a slippery slope to being the Canadian mint, and I know my opinion is not shared by most, but I have liked the special version coins of late. Our current stuff is so boring that any "redesign"is welcome IMO. >>




    Even this wears thin after a while.
    And I ain't lying this time.
  • lasvegasteddylasvegasteddy Posts: 10,432 ✭✭✭
    my question is
    just how much are they going to charge for this...what a 1/15 of an ounce of silver?

    btw
    <<< not happy with these reverse proofs...i just don't like the looks

    everything in life is but merely on loan to us by our appreciation....lose your appreciation and see


  • jmcu12jmcu12 Posts: 2,452 ✭✭✭
    It is a bit thin at this point but without some major change of design I am afraid this is all we can come to hope for... image
    Awarded latest "YOU SUCK!": June 11, 2014
  • bumanchubumanchu Posts: 1,383 ✭✭✭
    Can't wait for the reverse proof Lincoln cent in silver where they mistakenly etch the whole die and everyone thinks they have an aluminum cent, but it is a bit too heavy!

    Probably would be worth something if not many got out!

    bumanchu
    And I ain't lying this time.
  • 19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Arent they supposed to release a full reverse proof set soon? What will be so special about a dime in some 3 coin set? >>

    Yes, they are.

    I think we're about to be FLOODED with Reverse Proof Coins!

    Of course, this means only one thing.



    The quality of a reverse proof will end up in the toilet. I don't know why but the US Mint has an extremely difficult time in sustaining quality consistency! 2005 was a great year for the Satin Finish coins. But 2006 just blew chunks!

    The 2006 Reverse Proof Silver Eagles had nice, consistent fields but the 2014 Reverse Proof Kennedy kinda sucked.


    Now, if they were to "back pedal" just a WEE bit. and instead include an enhanced uncirculated version Roosevelt...........................??
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • BackroadJunkieBackroadJunkie Posts: 3,745 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>A reverse proof on anything that small as a Dime, does not compute. >>

    Actually, it does. The mint has been actively trying different finishes on different coins. They started with the relatively large ASE's, with the Reverse Proofs and Enhanced Finish special sets. Last year it was the smaller Kennedy's and the Enhanced Sacabuc. I was fully expecting a RP or enhanced clad dime this year, but I suspect them mint's end-game is a silver RP and/or EF proof set, thus the silver dime. It would make sense to mass-produce one to see how it looks and is accepted before declaring a Reverse-Proof set. (Will we see a RP/EF Jefferson or Lincoln?)



    << <i> I know it is a slippery slope to being the Canadian mint, and I know my opinion is not shared by most, but I have liked the special version coins of late. Our current stuff is so boring that any "redesign"is welcome IMO. >>

    Personally, I think it's clever that they're playing with finishes, rather than actively putting color overlays on the coins like every other mint on this planet. To me, it's no different than having an uncirc and proof version of the same coin, it's just a different die prep.

    If the US Mint ever starts to color or put gold overlays on silver coins, then you can start comparing them to the RCM, Perth and the other world mints. But so far, I think they've stayed within acceptable boundaries... (For me, anyway... image)
  • OPAOPA Posts: 17,141 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>A reverse proof on anything that small as a Dime, does not compute. >>

    Actually, it does. The mint has been actively trying different finishes on different coins. They started with the relatively large ASE's, with the Reverse Proofs and Enhanced Finish special sets. Last year it was the smaller Kennedy's and the Enhanced Sacabuc. I was fully expecting a RP or enhanced clad dime this year, but I suspect them mint's end-game is a silver RP and/or EF proof set, thus the silver dime. It would make sense to mass-produce one to see how it looks and is accepted before declaring a Reverse-Proof set. (Will we see a RP/EF Jefferson or Lincoln?)



    << <i> I know it is a slippery slope to being the Canadian mint, and I know my opinion is not shared by most, but I have liked the special version coins of late. Our current stuff is so boring that any "redesign"is welcome IMO. >>

    Personally, I think it's clever that they're playing with finishes, rather than actively putting color overlays on the coins like every other mint on this planet. To me, it's no different than having an uncirc and proof version of the same coin, it's just a different die prep.

    If the US Mint ever starts to color or put gold overlays on silver coins, then you can start comparing them to the RCM, Perth and the other world mints. But so far, I think they've stayed within acceptable boundaries... (For me, anyway... image) >>



    I for one, would love to see the US Mint do an enameled colorized version of the 5 oz ATB's... The fact remains, just about every major world mint, produces some kind of colorized coin, and the popularity of those coins along with the secondary markets, is very strong.
    "Bongo drive 1984 Lincoln that looks like old coin dug from ground."
  • BackroadJunkieBackroadJunkie Posts: 3,745 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Arent they supposed to release a full reverse proof set soon? What will be so special about a dime in some 3 coin set? >>

    Gosh, what was special about that Sac and that unremarkable $1 fed note last year?




    << <i>Yes, they are.

    I think we're about to be FLOODED with Reverse Proof Coins! >>

    Agreed. However, it's just a different die finish, and the sets should be at the same price point as the silver proof set. (At least the gold buffs were the same price.)



    << <i>Of course, this means only one thing.



    The quality of a reverse proof will end up in the toilet. I don't know why but the US Mint has an extremely difficult time in sustaining quality consistency! 2005 was a great year for the Satin Finish coins. But 2006 just blew chunks!

    The 2006 Reverse Proof Silver Eagles had nice, consistent fields but the 2014 Reverse Proof Kennedy kinda sucked. >>

    I think you'd see a level of quality consistent with the silver proof set should they produce such an annual set. Just my guess.




    << <i>Now, if they were to "back pedal" just a WEE bit. and instead include an enhanced uncirculated version Roosevelt...........................?? >>

    What would be cool is having four silver dimes like the Kennedy silver set, including a silver uncirc.
  • 410a410a Posts: 1,325
    I don't like moderns, but this coin sounds pretty cool. image
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like the idea of a four silver dime set.... that would be interesting...Cheers, RickO
  • BackroadJunkieBackroadJunkie Posts: 3,745 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A couple more details announced.

    The set will consist of a 2015 proof March Of Dimes commem, and two unique silver dimes, a W-mint marked proof and a P-mint marked reverse proof.

    Still no product date, mintage or household limits.
  • BackroadJunkieBackroadJunkie Posts: 3,745 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Published in the federal register today:

    Coin.................................................Price
    March of Dimes Special Silver Set.....$61.95

    Pricing for the 2015 March of Dimes Special Silver Set

    The regular price for the proof commem will be $51.95, so the price for the W-mint proof and P-mint reverse proof silver dimes is $5 each. image

    I'm looking at these rather than the stand alone proof, I think.
  • MilesWaitsMilesWaits Posts: 5,416 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sweet!
    More pocket coins to keep my Gold Kennedy company.
    Now riding the swell in PM's and surf.
  • FullStrikeFullStrike Posts: 4,353 ✭✭✭
    That MOD $1 is about as sexy as the Special Olympics Eunice Kennedy Schriver Coin. From my limited research on the Schriver
    coin some institutional buyer scooped up 250,000 of those to prevent extreme embarrasment to the Special Olympics and
    possibly the Kennedy Family.

    Will there be anyone to scoop up a couple hundred thousand of these MOD $1's ? The dimes might push sales by
    a little but how many collectors really care about Roosevelt Dimes? Oh sure theres a very vocal minority out there but
    WWLS ( what would Laura say )?

    I'm looking for the MOD coins to be a tad more popular than the recent Civil Rights coinage but nowhere near the
    boosted popularity of the Shriver coin.
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,709 ✭✭✭✭✭
    They could have done 100,000,000 circulating clad dimes with a commemorative March of Dimes theme, or done the entire year's clad mintage that way, and done much more to support the March of DImes.

    I am still undecided on these. I do support the March of Dimes because they paid for my polio-related surgery back in 1959, but I don't feel like paying an extra $15 for two dimes that mean nothing to me.
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • BigABigA Posts: 2,715 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i> I do support the March of Dimes because they paid for my polio-related surgery back in 1959, but I don't feel like paying an extra $15 for two dimes that mean nothing to me. >>



    Then just donate the 15 bucks directly to the March of Dimes
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,709 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i> I do support the March of Dimes because they paid for my polio-related surgery back in 1959, but I don't feel like paying an extra $15 for two dimes that mean nothing to me. >>



    Then just donate the 15 bucks directly to the March of Dimes >>



    Or the whole $62!
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • TopographicOceansTopographicOceans Posts: 6,535 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I haven't learned my lesson yet so I'm in. >>

    image
  • pf70collectorpf70collector Posts: 6,735 ✭✭✭
    I have the 1996 W MS in PCGS MS 68.

    This will be the first proof minted at West Point I believe, so it could have some potential. I don't collect the series, but it will be needed for a complete Roosevelt dime set.

    I don't think the reverse proof will be anything special since the mint indicated they be making reverse proof sets in the future. If they make the reverse proof set this year than this P reverse dime will not be special. If they don't make the reverse proof set this year than it will help the reverse proof in this set.

    BTW I think the reverse proof sets will not be produced every year onward. The sets could be like the satin mint sets which had a limited run.

    The mint is falling into that trap of producing too much for the collecting public. The mint made a statement about this in 2008. The reason they stopped the MS W fractionals in platinum and gold. Of course Moy is not around anymore to oversee the unlimited offerings .

    limiting products mint statement
  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,736 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not much of a risk to pop for a set though..
    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • planetsteveplanetsteve Posts: 1,425 ✭✭✭✭
    I got the Mint mailing for this yesterday, and I guess it's marginally interesting that FDR is on yet another coin, and it makes sense to sell it with the dimes... But man, that reverse showing the baby is really awful. That's a silver dollar I'll never pull out of the packaging.
  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 35,731 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The bad mint art makes the RP look great

    I'm very interested in it.

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • OverdateOverdate Posts: 7,157 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>A reverse proof on anything that small as a Dime, does not compute. >>


    It's easy, all they have to do is move the cameo molecule from Roosevelt's head to the field. image

    My Adolph A. Weinman signature :)

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,714 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A dime set sounds cool!
  • The Mailing I received says the special silver set with the dimes will be limited to 75,000
    That's very LOW for those special dimes.
  • epcjimi1epcjimi1 Posts: 3,489 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The Mailing I received says the special silver set with the dimes will be limited to 75,000
    That's very LOW for those special dimes. >>



    If it's not mint to demand, this has possibilities.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,768 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I am falling out of love with the reverse Proof coins. I have a 2014 Kennedy half set, and to me the reverse Proof is by far the least attractive coin in the group. The shiny head hides a lot of the details on Kennedy's portrait, and coin is just unattractive.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • OverdateOverdate Posts: 7,157 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I don't think the reverse proof will be anything special since the mint indicated they be making reverse proof sets in the future. If they make the reverse proof set this year than this P reverse dime will not be special. If they don't make the reverse proof set this year than it will help the reverse proof in this set. >>


    The "P" reverse proof dime will be special if the 2015 reverse proof set contains all "S" mint coins. This would mean that both dimes in the March of Dimes set would have mintages of 75,000 each, making them by far the keys to a complete Roosevelt dime set.

    My Adolph A. Weinman signature :)

  • TheRavenTheRaven Posts: 4,148 ✭✭✭✭
    I think I want these dimes.

    Pictures of them look really good.
    Collection under construction: VG Barber Quarters & Halves
  • 5 HH limit, 75K mintage

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file