2004-D quarters:Extra leaf (high and low)
EagleEye
Posts: 7,677 ✭✭✭✭✭
The FUN show was abuzz about the new varieties found here in Tucson.
Extra leaf - low:
Extra Leaf -high:
These have been found in quantities of about 500 per die. None are showing up in banks, just through direct orders from the Mint. The present supply will be sent to PCGS in the next week. I sold a few sets to friends at the show for $150 each. I think they will do very well with these. I bought all I could at $50 per coin (I found none myself) and will continue to do so. This price is in anticipation of at least 5000 pieces being found. If the current supply is all that is found, these will be $500 to $2000 per coin depending on the grade.
Extra leaf - low:
Extra Leaf -high:
These have been found in quantities of about 500 per die. None are showing up in banks, just through direct orders from the Mint. The present supply will be sent to PCGS in the next week. I sold a few sets to friends at the show for $150 each. I think they will do very well with these. I bought all I could at $50 per coin (I found none myself) and will continue to do so. This price is in anticipation of at least 5000 pieces being found. If the current supply is all that is found, these will be $500 to $2000 per coin depending on the grade.
Rick Snow, Eagle Eye Rare Coins, Inc.Check out my new web site:
0
Comments
Cameron Kiefer
New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.
I feel cheated.....
<< <i>I showed Dave Bowers, and he said it was on the master die. If so, Where are they all? It is a puzzlement. They were discovered here in Tucson by a local collector, Bob Ford. Two dealers had about 400 sets initially which thay got at face value. They started selling them at $100 per set. After I offered to buy them all at that (and bought about 200 sets) they quit selling them. now they are not for sale from anyone in town and are mostly all off to PCGS. They were discovered about a month ago and kept quiet for a few weeks before the Coin World article appeared. >>
What's the word from the Mint on this? Are there any reported die changes or retooling?
J. Taylor
CONECA Member
FSNC Member
<< <i>The story in CW indicated that they were caused by die gouges. >>
More CW nonsense. Die gouges that just happen to look like the leaf, at the exact correct position for a leaf. OK, that settles that.
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
I would like to have a couple examples of each, but not sure about the prices....
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
I find it very difficult to believe that die gouges would coincidently be:
1- perfectly placed, not once but TWICE!
2- they look just like leaves on an ear of corn
3- they wound up on a coin THAT DEPICTS CORN!
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
Another thought-
I wonder if the mint sometimes does these things just for us collectors. Extra leaves on corn, Wide "AM", etc......
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
The 7 different pennies issued for 1982 removed all the wondering from my mind.
It looks like somebody forgot to water the corn and it's wilting
My posts viewed times
since 8/1/6
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
<< <i>the title sez 2004 'D'..... >>
DOH!
Showed Q.D. Bowers: "Wow!"
D. Hall: "Wow!"
J.P. Martin: "Interesting!"
All grading services will be certifying them.
So what are the possible explanations?
- Multiple master dies were prepared, and somehow working dies got made from the "wrong" ones. Only one of each type, though?
- Mint employee "freelance engraving"? Could an employee have artistically and intentionally gouged two dies?
- Struck-through caused die damage?
I can't understand how it could have been on the one-and-only master die. Both leaves could not have been there at the same time. So it doesn't seem like a filled die possibility, especially considering how many examples would have had to been struck from filled dies.
If the quantities stay low, then only one die of each type probably was used. If that turns out to be the case, I suspect that intentional die gouging by an employee would be the cause.
Other thoughts?
New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.
<< <i>If the quantities stay low, then only one die of each type probably was used. If that turns out to be the case, I suspect that intentional die gouging by an employee would be the cause. >>
I was thinking something similar. Maybe someone created a rare variety on purpose... and managed to grab a few at the end of the day. Or maybe they wanted to claim some fame when the coins started circulating... "I drew that leaf, but I didn't cut the cheese.".
I wonder if there are subtle differences elsewhere on the coins that we are missing?
<< <i>
<< <i>If the quantities stay low, then only one die of each type probably was used. If that turns out to be the case, I suspect that intentional die gouging by an employee would be the cause. >>
I was thinking something similar. Maybe someone created a rare variety on purpose... and managed to grab a few at the end of the day. Or maybe they wanted to claim some fame when the coins started circulating... "I drew that leaf, but I didn't cut the cheese.". >>
I think you are forgetting that the engraver works on a large model to make the original. No one was ever good enough to intentionally put a realistic leaf that miniscule into the hardened steel of a working or master die after that die was prepared. These are obviously three different master dies, no matter what the mint subsequently claims. It's going to be another situation like the "impossible" double dies which will call into question the mint's veracity on errors and varieties. No question in my mind, they lie. Why? No clue.
edited after pulling out the dictionary
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
1. Neither extra "leaf" appears in the Mint's own artwork (uncirc. coin image from Mint website).
2. Neither "leaf" looks appropriate artistically: angle of curves look "wrong", perspective not right for leaf from this ear.
PS> the "leafless" variety photo posted elsewhere....may be a poorly struck example and may have as much detail as the other two.
Honestly, these added "leaves" look more like two toenail clippings. YUUUUUUUCK>
-- Mike Diamond
If you can confirm that there are consistent design differences elsewhere on the coin between the up, down, and normal leaf samples, then you'd have a good case for a foul-up with two discarded master dies. But you need large samples of all three coins.
1: strike-thoughs put indentations into the coin, and these are raised. A "hub-through" would put an indentation into 1 die and that would be a raised element on the coin.
2: Die gouges are raised elements on coins (sunk into the die). I see no difference technically from a die gouge, artistic embellishment or a hub-through. As far as the cause, I said what I think it is. I don't think it is die damage, as in a gouge, scratch or whatever.
To me as a variety specialist, I must say, this is a cool naked eye variety. Much better than the 2004 DD nickels, an along the lines of the 1972 DD cent and other bold varieties. I feel certian that these will be collected alongside the state quarter set. All the albums will need to remade, though.
If these turn out to be conventional die gouges (i.e. gouges inflicted on a working die after hubbing), then hype may still elevate them to a lofty price level. After all, hype elevated the 1937-D "three-legged" buffalo nickel to ridiculous heights, when all it is is a rather humdrum case of overzealous die polishing.
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
<< <i>Who? I bet SEGS does too! But they both put any little variety on their holders. >>
I'm not saying it's right.
<< <i>From the pictures, the low leaf looks a lot like a leaf. However, the "high leaf" looks suspiciously like the raised curve on the obverse of the 2004-P Roosevelt Dimes that were for a while believed to be doubled dies. I wonder if it's possible to compare the radius of the curve between the two and see if they have the same root cause.
Sean Reynolds >>
Probably, but I don't think it is coincidence that both occur in exactly the right place for a leaf. Also, the high one ends precisely at the cheese round just as the others, and the low ends and begins precisely at the cheese round. To me, there also appears to be a crease running down the middle of the high one, another element that would have to be explained, or ascribed to a leaf design.
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
Any indication that PCGS will give this a coin #?
It looks like it should be:
14034 2004-D WI Extra leaf, High
14035 2004-D WI Extra Leaf, Low
If they have graded a Cali Quarter with these numbers they may have to do 914033 and 914034