Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

The NTC Experiment---or---is NTC as bad as we give them credit for?

keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
This all happened by accident. I know someone who recently was offered a group of coins which were all holdered by NTC. Before making a decision, he went through them and noted the holdered grade and his grade, with any notation he felt was pertinent.

I'll add that I'm generally in agreement with this gentlemans grading, especially on circulated coins which constituted the bulk of this group. Since most of the trash talking here with regards to NTC holdered coins is directed at Mint-State-Modern coinage, I'd ask that everyone try to be at least somewhat unbiased as they peruse the list. Remember, I'm posting this simply as information, not to pass judgement either way on the service.

Here's the list in no particular order:

Indian Head Cents

Date-------NTC Grade-------Our Grade-------Notes
1867----------XF-45--------------XF
1873----------AU-55--------------XF
1877----------AG-3----------------AG
1877----------G-6------------------G
1908-S--------VG-10--------------VG
1908-S--------VF-35---------------F
1909-S--------G-4------------------G------------Spotted
1909-S--------VG-8----------------VG

Lincoln Cents

Date-------NTC Grade-------Our Grade-------Notes
1909-S--------G-4----------------G
1909-S--------VG-10-------------VG-------------The holdered coin is actually a 1914-D.
1909-S--------F-15---------------F
1909-S--------VF-25-------------VF
1909-S--------XF-40-------------VF/XF
1909-S--------XF-45-------------XF
1909-S--------MS-63RD---------MS-60----------Spotted
1909-S VDB---F-12--------------F
1909-S VDB---VF-20-------------F
1909-S VDB---XF-40-------------VF/XF
1909-S VDB---MS-64RB---------MS-60/62-----Spotted
1914-D--------G-4----------------AG/G
1914-D--------VG-8--------------VG--------------The holdered coin is actually a 1909-S.
1914-D--------F-12---------------F
1922-D--------F-------------------G/AG-----------Type 3.

Washington Quarters

Date-------NTC Grade-------Our Grade-------Notes
1932-D-------AG-3---------------AG
1932-D-------AG-3---------------AG
1932-D--------G-4----------------G
1932-D--------G-6----------------G
1932-D--------G-6----------------G
1932-D--------VG-10-------------VG
1932-D--------VG-10-------------VG
1932-D--------F-15----------------F
1932-D--------VF-30--------------VF
1932-D--------XF-40--------------XF
1932-S--------AG-3---------------AG
1932-S--------F-12---------------F
1932-S--------F-12---------------F
1932-S--------F-15---------------F
1932-S--------VF-20-------------F
1932-S--------VF-20-------------F------------------Damaged with 4 rim cuts.

Bust Dollar

Date-------NTC Grade-------Our Grade-------Notes
1800----------VF-25--------------VF----------------How'd that get in there!!!!!!!!imageimageimage

Fire away with comments but no threats, please.

Al H.image

edited for the titleimage!!!
«134

Comments

  • "our grade" dosen't have numbers with it. We can't tell if they were what you though or one or two grades high for that grade level.

    Cameron Kiefer
  • tjkilliantjkillian Posts: 5,578 ✭✭✭
    Assuming your grades are correct, it seems that NTC did quite well, easily within the margin of error for coin grading. Every slabbing service makes mechanical errors. Heck, I almost bought a 1873 PCGS half dollar that was graded MS-61, but was a proof, in my eyes.

    If you get more information, please keep us updated.

    Tom
    Tom

  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    hey Cameron

    cut me some slack here, OK. we weren't trying to be a grading company and we were'nt trying to nit-pick or prove anything. simply looking at the coin and judging VF, F, XF...........where there was some question it is a split grade. otherwise it should be assumed as F meaning solid F.

    the point of this whole thing is only to provide information., no kind of assessment on our part. that's for you to do......or should i say have done. chill dude.

    al h.image
  • zennyzenny Posts: 1,547 ✭✭
    don't know if I have comments, just math.

    20% were definitely overgraded, by your standards, including the only two mint state coins.

    None were undergraded.

    5% were apparently placed in the wrong slabs.


    okay, I have one comment, "not particularly impressed."

    z
  • Was there any determination in this experiment that the holdered coins were actually cleaned or played with that wasn't annotated somewhere.
  • littlewicherlittlewicher Posts: 1,822 ✭✭
    zenny is correct in his observation that these are mostly circulated coins and the MS coins they messed up pretty bad on. Most NTC coins I've seen on ebay are uncirculated or proof coins.


    For some life lasts a short while, but the memories it holds last forever.
    -Laura Swenson

    In memory of BL, SM, and KG. 16 and forever young, rest in peace.
  • It was just an observation and not anything more. I'm chill.

    Cameron Kiefer
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    This coin was cracked out of an NTC PR68 holder:

    image

    I've bought a couple dozen NTC slabbed 1964 proof Kennedys and every single one was overgraded by a wide margin. Worse than ACG. But, who knows, maybe they only suck ass in proof Kennedys and do fine with all other series.

    Russ, NCNE
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Since most of the trash talking here with regards to NTC holdered coins is directed at Mint-State-Modern coinage, I'd ask that everyone try to be at least somewhat unbiased as they peruse the list. Remember, I'm posting this simply as information, not to pass judgement either way on the service.


    al h.image
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295
    Well, the general jist of your post is that NTC coins are accurately graded. I looked at dozens and dozens of them in Charlotte, and I don't think I saw one of them that the grade wasn't way off, or the coin had problems. Crack these coins out and send them to PCGS or NGC then tells us what they graded.
  • dbldie55dbldie55 Posts: 7,741 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My dealer recently bought a group of NTC coins in a collection. They bought and sold them for the actual grade. Some were graded correctly, but I remember the MS65 1883 No Cent Liberty Nickel as it was an AU coin. Just a tad off on that grade.
    Collector and Researcher of Liberty Head Nickels. ANA LM-6053
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,200 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I have no opinion regarding NTC but I can see that an important piece of information is missing in evaluating the ramifications of this list. This may very well NOT be a random sampling of NTC coins - ie: they may have been hand selected by the previous owner, rejecting all coins that were overgraded. Therefore, this information is not useful in the general evaluation of a grading company - all it demonstrates is that at least occasionally they grade to the same standard as a collector's friend.

    A collector with a good eye could replicate this performance from any grading company - including ACG. Likewise, if one so desired, the polar opposite could be done with even PCGS.
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    the general jist of your post is that NTC coins are accurately graded.

    hey Eric

    what did you make that assumption based on? certainly not anything in my post. did you read the opening 2 paragraphs or jump right to the coin list and think?

    Remember, I'm posting this simply as information, not to pass judgement either way on the service.

    i guess i was being somewhat prophetical when i added, tongue in cheek i might say, fire away. i can take the jabs, but before we get too far into it, my sole purpose was to present this as information and not as a commentary or anything about the service.

    such a wonderful day today, maybe i should go work in the garden or kick the dog!!image

    al h.image
    edited to fix the bold trauma!!
  • NumisEdNumisEd Posts: 1,336
    Keets, your experiment tells me only one thing: That you qualify as a grader at NTC.
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295
    I read everything, including the title of the thread: or---is NumisTrust really as bad as we give them credit for??

    Sorry, but it still looks to me as if the idea here is to give some credence to NTC, which is no better than ACG. That was one of the things I went to Charlotte for, to get a good close look at NTC Morgans, and I can tell you that their grading is a sham. TDN's post is a good explanation for what may have occured here. And for the most part, these are all highly circulated coins. As I said earlier, send them off to PCGS or NGC, or for that matter, ANACS and see what you get. I would be surprised if half of them come back with the same grades as what are on the NTC labels.
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    hey TDN

    it was random in so much as the coins were what was offered for sale. perhaps the seller did as you suggest, i have no way of knowing about that. all my intentions are is to say "this is what we saw and this is what we thought they graded" period.

    now eddie, where in the world did you come up with that???? my patience with stupid people is never very high, so make some sense, OK? you have entrenched yourself here as somewhat of the forum fool, so you don't have to audition for the part, it's already yours!! please accept this list in the spirit of helpfull information that it was given in or move on, my friend. we certainly don't need to joust on this thread.

    have you a short memory?? you are a poor knight and usually get knocked off your horse, high-horse that is.

    al h.image
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    hey Eric

    i edited the title so as not to mislead or be misunderstood. perhaps NTC is as bad as ACG. my experience with them was limited to MS and Proof moderns which i see as mostly overgraded, prior to this. i simply posted what we saw. if you're unable to accept the fact that a company is capable of grading correctly sometime, so be it. have some Black Cherry!!

    there will be no sending off anywhere. the coins aren't mine and i never had any thoughts of buying them, i just thought i'd come here and say.................but i see some minds are set like a steel trap and there's nothing wrong with that.

    personally Eric, oh, never mind.

    al h.image
  • NumisEdNumisEd Posts: 1,336
    Keets, my comment was short and concise and means this: Your grading opinion is comparable to NTC's grading opinion, therefore you qualify as an NTC grader.

    Let me say it another way, since you seem to be having trouble comprehending things today. Your grading opinion was just slightly better than NTC's opinion. So, either NTC graded those coins conservatively (bwuahahahahahha).......or you have loosened your grading standards.
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295
    Look, you also stated in the OP something to the effect of "NTC trash talking" which automatically leads me to believe that you do have a bias for some reason. If you knew who owned NTC and who was behind it, and their history in numismatics, maybe you would take a different approach.

    Just in case I haven't made my position totally clear, in my opinion, NTC, ACG and the new PCI exist simply to sell overgraded and problem coins to unsupecting people, mainly via online auctions. Their grading and authenication is absolutely abysmal, and if you want to believe otherwise, that is your privilege. However, any time I see anyone attempting to give any one of these three companies any sort of credence whatsoever, they will hear my opinion.
  • LincolnCentManLincolnCentMan Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭
    I've only bought one NTC coin. It was a 1909 in NTC MS67BN. It was a 63BN would be on the mark, in my opinion. I doubt anyone with reasonable experience with Lincolns could justify a grade above 64BN. That's the only NTC coin I've owned. I wont say that I'll never buy another (as I have done with ACG), but I'll certainly give little weight to their judgment.

    David
  • Hey Keets,
    How is your dog, has he bit you yet? BTW, I get what you were trying to do and say. See you in Baltimore, hopefully.image


    BUY THE COIN...NOT THE SLAB!!!
    Gary
    image
  • FC57CoinsFC57Coins Posts: 9,140
    I think what Al is saying is this - Generally speaking, we expect coins that are sent to a grading service to be accurately graded. The margin of error amongst the many coin grading companies out there can range from maybe 1-2% to as high as maybe 50% or more who knows. That means, that on a good day, and you guys know this all too well, even Numistrust, and NTC, and even ACG can get a coin right. On a bad day PCGS, NGC, and ANACS can get a coin wrong. So I read the point of this story as BUY THE COIN NOT THE HOLDER. As Lori showed earlier, she found a $1500 coin in a misgraded NTC holder. If she were to have a totally closed mind with respect to what holders to buy, she would've missed out on a great find. Just because a coin is in a holder, any holder, doesn't mean that it's fate is carved in stone. Sure, buy certain coins in certain holders on a consistent basis and you're going to get burned. Look at coins for their merit, consider the holder, and make a learned opinion as to grade and price and take your best shot at it and you might find a nice deal now and again.

    Frank
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>As Lori showed earlier, she found a $1500 coin in a misgraded NTC holder. >>



    Whoah! Where? What? That woman is having way too much goodness lately. She needs to leave some for the rest of us! image

    Russ, NCNE
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295
    Frank, that is fine and dandy if you go to shows and can look before you buy. But the truth is, NTC, ACG and PCI coins are specifically targeted to those who buy in online auctions, and sight unseen. These companies would not survive for three months otherwise. Sure, they will screw up on a very occasional coin, but I can just about bet you if you randomly bought 100 of these coins online, at least 90 of them would be overgraded or have problems. And this is the problem I have with Keets post, it is not representive of the NTC slabs that are out there.
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    hey Eric and eddie

    since we're into opinions, here's mine, Eric. no, no maybe i better not. i'll get back to eddie......hey, i better not go there either.

    you guys have a nice day. i regret trying to be helpful. if anyone has anything unbiased or constructive about what i posted, please PM and we can enter into a reasoned discussion of what i had in hand to look at. otherwise, i guess this can die a slow death on page 7 and we can bury our heads in the sand, those who choose to do so.

    i'm anxious for the next time i see a post to buy the coin and not the holder.

    al h. image
  • FC57CoinsFC57Coins Posts: 9,140


    << <i>Frank, that is fine and dandy if you go to shows and can look before you buy. But the truth is, NTC, ACG and PCI coins are specifically targeted to those who buy in online auctions, and sight unseen. These companies would not survive for three months otherwise. Sure, they will screw up on a very occasional coin, but I can just about bet you if you randomly bought 100 of these coins online, at least 90 of them would be overgraded or have problems. And this is the problem I have with Keets post, it is not representive of the NTC slabs that are out there >>



    Eric - I think you've hit the nail on the head. And in my book when you buy coins in these holders, you might as well buy them raw. I too have looked at my share of third tier coins at auctions and shows, particularly Franklins, and like yours, my experience has been that I've not purchased one for cracking and re-submitting since I started getting seriously into my collecting. This is the main concern I have with allowing rare coins into retirement plans. You'll have a flood of unscrupulous marketers hawking this cra p and people will be taken to the cleaners. So, yes, as with other advice that has been given and will hopefully continue to be given in these boards, buyers must be very aware of what they're sinking their money into, because certified grading is merely an opinion. If you don't have some "meat on the bone" left when you get a coin graded, you're running one heck of a risk on high priced coins.

    Frank
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295


    << <i>i'm anxious for the next time i see a post to buy the coin and not the holder. >>



    This is what I am saying, you can not buy the coin and not the holder when you buy online, which, as I stated in my last post, is what these slabs are targeted for. This company sprung up from an eBay seller who hawked ACG garbage, and apparently he got tired of paying AH his "preferred" rate for seriously overgrading coins. Sure, you may find some that aren't overgraded, but I guarantee you if you buy a large random sample off eBay or any other online venue you are going to get burned.
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295
    Exactly Frank, and this is what I am most concerned about in regards to this thread. A lot of eBayers lurk here, and when you buy on eBay you are buying sight unseen, relying on the certification company's authentication and grading. Well, ACG, PCI and NTC give absolutely no guarantee of the grade or authenticity of any coin in their holders. The bottom line is, if you know how to grade and can view the coins first, that is one thing. But you are playing long shot odds buying these coins online, and usually when it comes to eBay, there are "no return of certified coins".
  • The only NTC coin I have ever seen in person was one I purchased, it was a 1868 3¢ Nickel graded MS64. After I cracked it out and took a little dissolve to the obverse to remove the PVC slime it uncovered some great luster and now resides in a NGC MS62 holder.

    image
  • NumisEdNumisEd Posts: 1,336
    Keets, you are misunderstanding me. I am not slamming you or your opinion. I think that the information that you posted was interesting. My whole underlying opinion about ALL grading services, including PCGS, is that they are all inconsistent and they all play games in order to get more money from collectors who are afraid to render their own opinions about coins.

    Long story short: grading companies are evil and they are only getting worse.
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,802 ✭✭✭✭✭
    PCI is equal to PCGS and NGC on the grade range of AG02 to about VF30. That's my experience holdering coins with PCI and PCGS and crossing PCI coins into PCGS. If the coin is within the range of AG03 to about VF30 I've had a 100% success rate crossing PCI into PCGS . 100% (out of about 200 coins tried).

    Admittingly- on the higher proof and mint state coins, especially Moderns, the grades are a couple too high. For example I had what I thought was a killer 1965 SMS in PCI MS69. Pretty nice CAM (for a 1965) and crossed with NGC. The coin arrived earlier this week and is an NGC MS67 (SMS). No CAM. Dang.

    So, my success rate on the higher grades prove out to be a point or two off (MS68 PCI Clad Ike is now a NGC MS66- in the same grouping as the SMS Kennedy). But circulated? They're pretty good- based on my experience.

    peacockcoins

  • Interesting review. I tend to think (in general) that most grading companies can do a decent job with the circulated coins. The big errors will be found in the circulated coins where it can really cost you. I know there are quite a few circulated coins that cost quite a lot, and with those specific coins one has to be very careful.

    The big attraction to NTC or PCI is how quickly and cheaply they can turn around orders.

    I wish PCGS did not require 75 days for an economy turn around. If that time were half as long, I believe some of the other grading companies would suffer greatly.

    My only issue is if PCGS is the leader (and I think they are), why are people still submitting to NGC or ANACS. I see no great difference in cost or turnaround time when using NGC or ANACS as compared to PCGS. Am I missing something or am I misinformed?image

    Numonebuyer
  • FC57CoinsFC57Coins Posts: 9,140


    << <i>Long story short: grading companies are evil and they are only getting worse. >>



    The unfortunate problem with this statement is that without the grading companies, the hobby would be in much worse shape. Recall the headdy days of the 70's and 80's when people were losing their shirts because people in the coin business were calling anything with shine on it CH GEM BU. The grading services do set a standard, and it's up to us who are in the hobby to make sure that the standard is used. At least now we have something to cling on to. Before it was chaos. And no - I'm not talking about the coins in major collections, I'm talking about those bought by the little guy like you and me.
  • NumisEdNumisEd Posts: 1,336
    Frank, that's a good point. It's a lose-lose situation. Can't live with em' and you can't live without em'.
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The big attraction to NTC or PCI is how quickly and cheaply they can turn around orders. >>



    And, how easily one can get a problem coin in to one of their holders, or get two or three extra points on the label. If the real issue were just turnaround time, the coins would be going to NGC. See below.



    << <i>I see no great difference in cost or turnaround time when using NGC or ANACS as compared to PCGS. >>



    I don't know about ANACS, but NGC is consistently turning around economy submissions in under 30 calendar days.

    Russ, NCNE
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295
    Frank, let's not forget the worst trick in the book- you would buy a coin as "choice BU" from a dealer. A year or two down the road you upgrade the coin, and when trading it in, it mysteriously becomes AU. I remember dealers playing this slide-the-grade trick all the time. I remember clearly one day watch a guy sell four Morgans to a dealer, the dealer called them AU, and a few days later they were in his case as "GEM BU".
  • NumisEdNumisEd Posts: 1,336
    I remember dealers playing this slide-the-grade trick all the time.

    A lot of them still play this game. Not only do all of the grading services suck lately, I also think that most coin dealers suck. To be fair, I will say that there are a few really good dealers, including several whom are a part of this forum. From those dealers I buy both raw and certified coins (buy the coin not the holder). These dealers have one thing in common: honest. Unfortuanately, I can't find one nice thing to say about ANY grading service. They make me sick.
  • FC57CoinsFC57Coins Posts: 9,140


    << <i>A lot of them still play this game. >>



    And hence the best thing for us to do is to continue our process of educating ourselves in the hobby. Only when you have the "cojones" to look a dealer in the eye and disagree with him/her based on solid factual information will you ever do well in this hobby. image

    See boys - we can agree sometimes! image
  • We all saw the grading test, NTC made ACG look like a PCGS!
    You can fool man but you can't fool God! He knows why you do what you do!
  • it's al about the money. coins with big bumps in price for grade were observed to be overgraded. coins with little spread to the next grade were generally holdered correctly. the conclusion you can draw from this is that they are capable of grading correctly but choose to overgrade when there is money on the line.
    image
  • DCAMFranklinDCAMFranklin Posts: 2,862 ✭✭


    << <i>. As Lori showed earlier, she found a $1500 coin in a misgraded NTC holder. >>



    Frank- What coin are we talking about here? Are you saying Lori cracked a coin out of a NTC holder and had it holdered at PCGS at a level that will bring $1,500? Wow! I had not read of this. More details please.

    Keets- I appreciate the intent of your experiment. To know that you and another collector essentially agree with the NTC grades about 80% of the time is a good bit of knowledge. Can you tell us if the seller had submitted the coins to NTC? If he did then I would consider the group of coins to be relatively "random". If not, then it brings into account the "collector's good eye" and makes the sample less random. Glad to know you are open-minded enough to actually do some work in assessing another grading service. I've not seen many NTC coins. I've bought and sold a few Franklins, both proof and business strikes, and don't find their grading of the Franklin series to be very accurate. However, I would never try and condemn any grading service for their work on only one series. I think it is important to personally assess at least 100 coins in a series and at least 8 or 9 series before you can make a good judgement of a grading service.


    image
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295


    << <i>However, I would never try and condemn any grading service for their work on only one series. I think it is important to personally assess at least 100 coins in a series and at least 8 or 9 series before you can make a good judgement of a grading service. >>



    What other series is there besides Morgan Dollars? image
  • DCAMFranklinDCAMFranklin Posts: 2,862 ✭✭
    You sound like a PROUD Morgan collector. Good for you!! image
  • Keets, Good job, even if some people can't see it for what it was!!! Some people have an agenda, and can't get off of that track....
    ...Ken
    .
    .
    .
    .This coin was in an ACG MS65FBL. I agreed with the grade, cracked it out, submitted, and.....Viola......
    ..


    image
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295
    Yes Ken, some people do have an agenda, like trying to get us to believe ACG coins aren't so bad after all.

    Sorry, but I can sit here the rest of the evening and post thirty horror stories about people who got screwed buying ACG slabs to your one.
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295
    On second thought, here is one. And every time you post a picture of that 49 Franklin and tell us how ACG got that one right, I am going to post a link to this thread where one of our members nearly got burned for $500 on this piece of garbage:

    1895-O Morgan Dollar ACG "AU53"
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,683 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I have only owned two pre-1934 NTC coins. Both came from eBay auctions. The first was an 1809 half cent NTC graded AU-50. I felt it was badly overgraded, cracked it out and sent it in to ANACS. It came back with a VF grade (I can't recall which level VF as I sold the coin as soon as it came back.) The second coin was an 1844 large cent which NTC had graded as AU-58. It had an interesting rim cud which was noted on the holder. The 1844 was a nice coin but I felt it was somewhat overgraded, cracked it out and sent it in to SEGS because of the interesting die state. SEGS graded it AU-50 and noted the Newcomb number and die state. That coin is still in my collection. At this point I would not want any more pre-1934 NTC coins in my collection.

    There have also been comments in this thread on PCI. I have several PCI coins in my collection. Of the pre-1934 pieces I would rate most as mid-range to low range of grade but not always. One coin is a 1914 Lincoln which PCI graded MS65 RED. The coin is a fully original blazer and may actually be undergraded! All of the PCI coins (including the 1914 cent) were obtained at steep discounts versus buying a PCGS coin. I rate them as good values for the money. I will but PCI coins but only when a return priv. is offered.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295
    On PCI coins, there is a big difference depending on when the coin was graded and what holder it is in. Here is the breakdown:

    Green Label, ten digit serial number- Very conservative grading, at all grades. These slabs with a PQ designation almost always upgrade a point at PCGS. All PCI slabs seem to be lumped together on eBay as far as price goes, so you can find some real steals on these slabs.

    Green Label, fourteen digit serial number- Accurate grading up to MS65. Very liberal on MS66 and above. Again, great deals can be had on these, but stay away from MS66 and over.

    Green Label, nine digit serial number- The serial numbers on PCI slabs went to nine digits when the ownership changed. Grading became atrocious, usually Morgans overgraded by at least two points, cleaned coins with no mention on the holder, and altered coins slabbed as genuine. Absolutely stay away from these slabs.

    Gold Label, nine digit serial number- Same as above, atrocious grading.
  • PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
    A nice $20,000. NTC gold coin on eBay.



    image
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295
    I was wondering when that con artist was going to start hawking NTC slabs.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file