Options
GTG - 1914-D Lincoln Cent
PROMETHIUS88
Posts: 3,133 ✭✭✭✭✭
Just finished up at our host. No cheating!
Loved the wood grain on this one!
8
Comments
It appears to have a slight rub above the ear and shoulder. AU58 Nice looking Lincoln!
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
Nice, I'll go 58BN.
55
62 Brown
Nice coin.
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
JWP PROMETHIUS88
Au 58, nice coin (didn't cheat if it is)
58BN
58BN is that woodgrain?
Proud follower of Christ! I love the USA! Land of the Bright and Beautiful! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
62BN
58BN
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
AU58
I could see it going AU58 or MS62BN; nice coin!
"Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
- Someone, probably
MS 62 BN. Deserves a bean imo.
“Never let yesterday use up too much of today.”
Will Rogers
AU55
What is the black spot on reverse from ?
A carbon speck (often called a "flyspeck" or "copper spot") is a tiny, dark, or black concentration of corrosion that forms on the surface of copper and bronze coins.
What Causes Them:
• Organic Debris: They usually start when microscopic particles of organic matter—such as paper dust from coin albums, cardboard holders, or human saliva/finger oils from talking or handling—land on the coin.
• Chemical Reaction: Atmospheric oxygen, humidity, and trace elements react with the trapped particle, creating a small mound of corrosion. (Note: Numismatists often debate the exact chemistry, noting that many spots are actually a form of sulfatization or copper sulfide/tarnish rather than pure carbon).
I hope this answer helps.
Au55
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
I'll say Unc. as I tend to be an optimist on these, could be high grade due to originality.
AU58. Love it. Always a woodgrain nut. Congrats.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
I'm also going to say AU55. Nice from a detail standpoint but doesn't appear to have much luster left and in addition to the reverse spot there are two additional spots on the nose and T on the face which will prevent it from getting a bean. JMHO
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase/2819
The dark spots are minor and don't detract from this coin's appeal. Should get a bean imo. It would be the centerpiece of my early Lincoln collection. I mean, L@@k at that wheat!
“Never let yesterday use up too much of today.”
Will Rogers
55
Some great eyes in the group.
AU55 BN was the result.
I had originally sent to NGC who slabbed as AU details cleaned but there was zero evidence of cleaning in my or several others opinions. I haven't really considered it for CAC but guess I could toss it in if I send some others at some point.
My first thought was 53 or 55, depending on how that carbon spot looked in person. I think PCGS is more forgiving about those on circulated copper versus uncirculated. It's a beauty, congrats on the grade.
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
It's definitely a 58 or better. I'll say 63BN.
AU-58
I think it is a 58 that was kicked down for luster and the spots to 55.
55bn
Successful BST:here and ATS, bumanchu, wdrob, hashtag, KeeNoooo, mikej61, Yonico, Meltdown, BAJJERFAN, Excaliber, lordmarcovan, cucamongacoin, robkool, bradyc, tonedcointrader, mumu, Windycity, astrotrain, tizofthe, overdate, rwyarmch, mkman123, Timbuk3,GBurger717, airplanenut, coinkid855 ,illini420, michaeldixon, Weiss, Morpheus, Deepcoin, Collectorcoins, AUandAG, D.Schwager, blu62vette, morgan13, torinoCobra71, JWP, promethius88,
AU50
Goes to show sometimes the TPG gets it wrong. AU details cleaned?! lol
“Never let yesterday use up too much of today.”
Will Rogers
My personal grade would be XF45 due to the spots and I do not see any luster evident in the TV photo, I fully expect that PCGS graded it AU50 or higher.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
It’s likely from the same cause as the ones on the obverse, that you didn’t ask about.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I read the thread first so I know the grade now. My opinion based upon wear is an AU58 because it "feels" like an AU58 even though I don't see obvious wear patterns throughout. I think it also has better luster than some folks are giving it credit for having, but i isn't a luster bomb. I really like the overall eye appeal, but the spots really do pull the coin down. My guess is that the spots are enough of a distraction that CAC would not give this a sticker, but if it were my coin I would submit it if I had coins going in.
I still really like the coin.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
55
Well, it is a glamor shot you're grading on............................
.
AU55
"When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"