Neither looks original (the surfaces are too glossy) and I wouldn’t keep either. I spent a long time looking before I got mine. I was originally targeting an XF, but this VF35 came along and the color was phenomenal and the details marginally less than an XF… plus it was a lot cheaper than even the junky XF coins I saw. It’s a cool piece, but nice ones exist… wait and you’ll do better.
@Che_Grapes said:
I don’t like either / both dates can be obtained BU and when it comes to Mercury dimes, I like ‘em shiny!!
This thread is about the 1942 over 41 overdate coin. They are not readily available in BU, and when they are, they are out of most collector's price ranges.
Spring National Battlefield Coin Show is April 12-13, 2024 at the Eisenhower Hotel in Gettysburg, PA. WWW.AmericasCoinShows.com
@Manifest_Destiny said:
First coin is original, second coin was cleaned and retoned (but a little better detail). I'd pick #1
The first one does not look completely original, IMO, and it seems like others agree. It seems more original, so I’d also keep #1 if forced to choose, but as others have said, I’d eschew both and wait for a better example.
If I were to keep one, it would be A. That being said, if you sold both, you could likely get a better specimen (one you would really like) with the funds. Cheers, RickO
@Che_Grapes said:
I don’t like either / both dates can be obtained BU and when it comes to Mercury dimes, I like ‘em shiny!!
While I agree that neither choice is, uh, choice, it's somewhere between disingenuous and absurdly unconscious for you to so blithely assert that everyone can/should buy this special coin in "BU" condition.
I preferred "B" until I saw the reverse. It has those unfortunate parallel cleaning lines running down it.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
For what it’s worth, I had a similar 42/1 not long ago. I never considered it a mere “hole filler,” but I never really loved it either. In the end, I went the upgrade route.
I happened upon a nice specimen that was not uncirculated but pleasing, and think you might consider similar as it was a slabbed AU55 from ATS. Prob needs acetone bath:
Love that Milled British (1830-1960) Well, just Love coins, period.
Everyone thank you for your comments.
Personally I thought B was cleaned however it still received a straight grade.
I will get rid of B and keep A until I find a nicer looking higher grade coin. Once I do I will get rid of A. Unfortunately, I don’t see higher grade coins often not just for the 42/41 but also the 42/41d.
Comments
IMO, sell them both and buy a higher grade.
USAF (Ret.) 1985 - 2005. E-4B Aircraft Maintenance Crew Chief and Contracting Officer.
My current Registry sets:
✓ Everyman Mint State Carson City Morgan Dollars (1878 – 1893)
✓ Everyman Mint State Lincoln Cents (1909 – 1958)
✓ Morgan Dollar GSA Hoard (1879 – 1891)
B has had a slight cleaning
Neither looks original (the surfaces are too glossy) and I wouldn’t keep either. I spent a long time looking before I got mine. I was originally targeting an XF, but this VF35 came along and the color was phenomenal and the details marginally less than an XF… plus it was a lot cheaper than even the junky XF coins I saw. It’s a cool piece, but nice ones exist… wait and you’ll do better.
I would not keep either coin. Wait for a better example to come along, and it will.
Spring National Battlefield Coin Show is April 12-13, 2024 at the Eisenhower Hotel in Gettysburg, PA. WWW.AmericasCoinShows.com
If I had to choose, I would keep A. Longer term, I would find a more original coin to replace A.
I don’t like either / both dates can be obtained BU and when it comes to Mercury dimes, I like ‘em shiny!!
First coin is original, second coin was cleaned and retoned (but a little better detail). I'd pick #1
This thread is about the 1942 over 41 overdate coin. They are not readily available in BU, and when they are, they are out of most collector's price ranges.
Spring National Battlefield Coin Show is April 12-13, 2024 at the Eisenhower Hotel in Gettysburg, PA. WWW.AmericasCoinShows.com
I would not keep either as others have said. Both don't look original. Would look for a more original looking example.
Young Numismatist/collector
73 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 44 members and counting!
instagram.com/klnumismatics
The first one does not look completely original, IMO, and it seems like others agree. It seems more original, so I’d also keep #1 if forced to choose, but as others have said, I’d eschew both and wait for a better example.
Nothing is as expensive as free money.
I thought I had posted this last night when i saw your post, but guess I didn't as it was in the drafts
.
Easy choice for me ... A
B has digs in the obverse field behind neck and looks to have been wiped "more"
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
Agree with the consensus here... I'd always see those hairlines on B. A looks like it's had a bath, but not a hard scrubbing like B got.
New website: Groovycoins.com Capped Bust Half Dime registry set: Bikergeek CBHD LM Set
If I were to keep one, it would be A. That being said, if you sold both, you could likely get a better specimen (one you would really like) with the funds. Cheers, RickO
While I agree that neither choice is, uh, choice, it's somewhere between disingenuous and absurdly unconscious for you to so blithely assert that everyone can/should buy this special coin in "BU" condition.
I preferred "B" until I saw the reverse. It has those unfortunate parallel cleaning lines running down it.
Between these two, I like A better.
For what it’s worth, I had a similar 42/1 not long ago. I never considered it a mere “hole filler,” but I never really loved it either. In the end, I went the upgrade route.
I happened upon a nice specimen that was not uncirculated but pleasing, and think you might consider similar as it was a slabbed AU55 from ATS. Prob needs acetone bath:


Well, just Love coins, period.
These always seem to lack eye appeal. First looks better.
Probably A, I don’t like the vertical hairline scratches on B
Mr_Spud
Found a 42/1 Good , in change, a couple years ago .... looks nicer in Unc
The obvious hairlines on B are a turn off to me. I vote A for now, but would sell both and buy a higher graded problem free specimen.
Everyone thank you for your comments.
Personally I thought B was cleaned however it still received a straight grade.
I will get rid of B and keep A until I find a nicer looking higher grade coin. Once I do I will get rid of A. Unfortunately, I don’t see higher grade coins often not just for the 42/41 but also the 42/41d.
Straight graded B, hmmm, I was wrong and I admit it.
bob
Love the 45, nice grades
Nice grades; I'm surprised, especially at A.