GTG: Freshly graded PCGS Walking Liberty
DelawareDoons
Posts: 3,413 ✭✭✭✭✭
"It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."
GTG: Freshly graded PCGS Walking Liberty
This is a public poll: others will see what you voted for.
6
Comments
I would have guessed MS67+, but it wasn't an option. So...
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
WOW, full skirt lines, full thumb as good as it gets
MS-68
Mike
My Indians
Danco Set
Looks virtually flawless and lustrous. Looking at it on my phone, but having trouble finding any hits. A couple miniscule black dots. Awesome coin.
There’s barely a mark on that one. Great coin!
Coin Photographer.
I'm in the 67 camp as well
Beautiful coin. I guessed 66, but could easily be higher.
Will’sProoflikes
Sweet!
42-P is typically well struck. So I held back to 66.
That is a beautiful half. No distractions or noise, perfect fields.
Congratulations.
Super clean lustrous 66, 67 would not be a shock at all but 66 was my initial impression, I love that you put anything lower than 64 in your poll
."It's a dangerous business... going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to" -JRR Tolkien_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Outstanding BST transactions as a seller, buyer and trader with: ----- mustanggt, Kliao, claudewill87, MWallace, paesan, mpbuck82, moursund, basetsb, lordmarcovan, JWP, Coin hunter 4, COINS MAKE CENTS, PerryHall, Aspie_Rocco, Braddick, DBSTrader2, SanctionII, Histman, The_Dinosaur_Man, jesbroken, CentSearcher ------ANA Member #3214817
I submitted for grading this year a 1941 P MS Walker that looks similar to the 1942 P posted above.
My 1941 graded MS65 (I thought it would grade a 66).
So my guess for the 1942 P pictured above is MS66.
Nice looking Walker. Great luster.
Successful BST with BustDMs , Pnies20, lkeigwin, pursuitofliberty, Bullsitter, felinfoel, SPalladino
$5 Type Set https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/u-s-coins/type-sets/half-eagle-type-set-circulation-strikes-1795-1929/album/344192
CBH Set https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/everyman-collections/everyman-half-dollars/everyman-capped-bust-half-dollars-1807-1839/album/345572
I see nothing that would preclude this from being a 67....and I'm generally a little stingy on walker GTGs.
The bloom, strike, and mark free surfaces warrant it, IMO.
I voted 67, although I think it actually looks better than my '42 in a PCGS 67 slab.
Looks like an upper tier 67 to me. Nice flashy luster with a decent strike and clean fields. If it's any lower, I'd be very disappointed.
The obverse looks MS65 to me and heck a True-View shot by Phil easily adds 2 points so I can see the higher guesses.
Yikes, thats a beautiful Walker, I'm going with 67 only because it's looks like the pics are trueview and not the actual coin pics in hand .
"When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"
I'm going to wait for the results. Absolute great looking Walker with such clean fields.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
Intuition tells me that our OP is disappointed with the grade assigned so my top of the range guess is likely wrong.
"Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
What distractions do you see on the obverse that make it look 65 to you? Or is it a case of “ownership adds a point”, but lack of it subtracts one or two?
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
MS-67
That ain't no 65, and it ain't no 66 either. That's at least a 67. Nice coin.
Based on the images, many of us agree with you. But we don’t know what the coin actually looks like in hand. I’ve learned not to be too surprised when grades are revealed.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Generally agree, although I'd still be slightly shocked if it came back less than 67.
That is a super WLH and an outstanding year,...... Booming luster, just a marvelous coin. I guess MS67.... and it is a 67 to me, no matter what the label says... Cheers, RickO
67, Beautiful!
My YouTube Channel
Thanks for all the feedback so far. Will post the grade tonight along with my commentary.
"It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."
Someone had to!
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
What, about the obverse, looks 65 to you?
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
In the photo the only very tiny mark I could find is on the arm between the elbow and the hand. If the actual coin in hand looks as good as the picture I'd say MS68 or the graders needed another cup of coffee!
Very nice it’s not only about marks it strike and luster as well has two but needs just a little more strike but a very nice coin love it. I went with MS-66 but may make it into a 67 holder, I would of bought it.
Hoard the keys.
I expected a 66 minimum and figured it had a real good shot at a 67. A MS65 grade is straight up nonsense. To put it bluntly, I'm kind of livid I waited 5 months to get a 65 on this coin.
It's being cracked as soon as it's back in hand.
"It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."
Cue the several hundred responses offering you MS65 money for it...
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
65 Wow! That's why True Views are for looks, not accuracy.
"When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"
As I posted earlier: “I’ve learned not to be too surprised when grades are revealed.”
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Wonder if grader turnover is responsible? Hard to believe that grade!
"Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
I can grade and have been offered jobs as a grader. It's not a 65, nowhere near. This is just straight up botched. Guess it happens, but very frustrating. I have my issues with TV's but in this case, they're very accurate. Well struck, booming luster, free of marks, hairlines, or other defects. I'll post a gif of it once it's back in hand.
"It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."
Send to CAC for a chance at gold.
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
Yeah, thinking about it. Depends on how bogged down they are, I'm not paying $35 to try it since I know it'll green if it doesn't gold.
"It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."
Well if it greens, I'll buy it. I only have an MS62 so far.
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
I wouldn't sell it for less than 66+ money regardless of bean status.
"It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."
@Eldorado9 said: That ain't no 65, and it ain't no 66 either. That's at least a 67. Nice coin. I'd still be slightly shocked if it came back less than 67.
You may commence with your shock, however slight!!
For Walkers, 1942-P is perhaps the most submitted date, they come looking very, very nice with great luster and superb detail. At that and judging only from the picture, this coin exhibits a little central weakness on the reverse even as the obverse looks hammered. Most of the 1940's "P" mint coins look pretty good and this one looks exceptional.
Ouch! The five month wait on that one must sting a bit more than usual. I can't see a reason to call that a 65.
Coin Photographer.
Send it economy - it will get a 7 then you will get charged $10 for a “service adjustment”. Sadly, it does not work the other way — you don’t get a refund for a regular submission that gets an “economy” grade.
It was sent econ.
"It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."
Ah, ok, since you had a Trueview thought it was sent regular. Never mind.
Unless the photo is not accurate in some significant way, that does not look like a current 65 Walker to me.
The neck and face have hits and its not fully stuck up. I will say a 66 max..
Sorry about the grade. Looked very 67 to me.
As I mentioned above a similar 1941 P half I submitted in February, 2022 that I thought warranted an MS66 grade (shot 67) came back an MS65.
@Eldorado9 said: Unless the photo is not accurate in some significant way, that does not look like a current 65 Walker to me.
Then the question bears asking: Is the image in the OP an edited version of a TrueView or an image taken by the owner?? I would prefer to see an image of the TrueView for a better analysis. Opening the OP image in a different window to view a larger version it doesn't look as perfect, showing central strike weakness. Also, my experience has shown that I should trust the graders at PCGS(all 3-4 of them who assessed this coin in-hand) over a forum member viewing images of the coin, even if that might be the owner who considers himself an above average grader. Ownership skews perception no matter what we each think.
This isn't to say the coin wouldn't grade differently or higher if submitted again at any service level, but what would that prove?? Remember, this is a 1942 "P" mint coin, if it were a different date/mm combination it might be viewed differently by the PCGS graders.