Home U.S. Coin Forum

1898 Barber Quarter NGC MS67+ Will it CAC?

Hey guys I’m trying to decide what I want to do with this quarter. I’m thinking about selling it but haven’t decided yet. I know if by some rare chance I can get a CAC sticker it drastically changes the game. It’s a Super nice 1898 Barber quarter NGC MS67+. PCGS has only graded 1 in this grade and I think NGC has only graded 1 or 2 as well. I’ve included pictures of the coin what do you guys think my odds are of getting a CAC sticker. Thank you!

«1

Comments

  • DelawareDoonsDelawareDoons Posts: 3,413 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not good imho. But worth a shot.

    "It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."

  • ElcontadorElcontador Posts: 7,576 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It can't hurt to try. Sometimes, PCGS and NGC have different ideas of toning they find acceptable / attractive. There's no way I can get a feel for a toned coin without actually having it in hand.

    "Vou invadir o Nordeste,
    "Seu cabra da peste,
    "Sou Mangueira......."
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,340 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Either a cross or a CAC or both could help the value.

  • CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks for your input, Captain Obvious! B)

  • blackhorse360blackhorse360 Posts: 300 ✭✭✭

    Thank you guys for all the input. Do you think I have a pretty good chance of PCGS crossing it?

  • Eldorado9Eldorado9 Posts: 2,416 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It's a cool coin. I love the date too. I'll be honest, based on the photo, I don't see a 67+ coin. I'd say you might have low odds of crossing it into a PCGS 67+ holder. 1) The stars aren't fully struck up 2) The cheek has some stuff going on...marks etc. Doesn't mean it's not a desirable coin however.....Just might not make the 67+ grade at PCGS. That's a tough grade to attain for any MS Barber coin.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,340 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CoinJunkie said:
    Thanks for your input, Captain Obvious! B)

    No one can definitely decide from a photo. It is simply worth the attempt.

    I apologize for being unnecessarily (and unusually) succinct.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,340 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @blackhorse360 said:
    Thank you guys for all the input. Do you think I have a pretty good chance of PCGS crossing it?

    Impossible to say from the photo. It is worth the attempt.

  • bolivarshagnastybolivarshagnasty Posts: 7,351 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I don't think that JA will view this toning as a plus. Not attractive IMO.

  • coinnutcoinnut Posts: 1,432 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 22, 2021 1:38PM

    I just love how the grading companies give lofty grades to coins with negative eye appeal. No CAC from me.

  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I will say this for the naysayers. NGC photos suck as a rule.

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭✭

    When you are playing in the upper reaches of the grading scale nothing is certain. Opinions, opinions and more opinions.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • SonnyDSonnyD Posts: 190 ✭✭✭
    edited October 22, 2021 1:51PM

    You miss 100% of the shots you don't take.
    -Wayne Gretzky
    -Michael Jordan
    -Michael Scott

    Ounce by ounce the stack grows .

  • Steven59Steven59 Posts: 9,077 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @amwldcoin said:
    [I will say this for the naysayers. NGC photos suck as a rule.]

    Mostly true - coin could look much better in hand. Why not send it for the CAC?

    "When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"

  • No HeadlightsNo Headlights Posts: 2,072 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Only one opinion matters. Send it in. Good luck

  • CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bolivarshagnasty said:
    I don't think that JA will view this toning as a plus. Not attractive IMO.

    After the recent CAC'd toned Peace dollar thread, I now view anything as possible... B)

  • blackhorse360blackhorse360 Posts: 300 ✭✭✭

    Thank you guys. Your always a great help. I’m going to send it in I’ll keep you updated

  • CatbertCatbert Posts: 7,378 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’d wager it’s already been reviewed by CAC.

    Seated Half Society member #38
    "Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,617 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I don’t think so, but it may be worth a try.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,340 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Catbert said:
    I’d wager it’s already been reviewed by CAC.

    Maybe, but no one to know unless Heritage can tell you.

  • BarberianBarberian Posts: 3,795 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bolivarshagnasty said:
    I don't think that JA will view this toning as a plus. Not attractive IMO.

    A lot of the original toning JA approves of is not attractive at all. There are some real butt-ugly CAC coins out there, IMO.

    3 rim nicks away from Good
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,340 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Barberian said:

    @bolivarshagnasty said:
    I don't think that JA will view this toning as a plus. Not attractive IMO.

    A lot of the original toning JA approves of is not attractive at all. There are some real butt-ugly CAC coins out there, IMO.

    And so it begins...

    Poof

  • MasonGMasonG Posts: 6,261 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Barberian said:
    There are some real butt-ugly CAC coins out there, IMO.

    There are some real butt-ugly CAC coins out there, IMO.

    FIFY

  • Steven59Steven59 Posts: 9,077 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Barberian said:

    @bolivarshagnasty said:
    I don't think that JA will view this toning as a plus. Not attractive IMO.

    A lot of the original toning JA approves of is not attractive at all. There are some real butt-ugly CAC coins out there, IMO.

    And so it begins...

    Poof

    I thought with numismatics we were still allowed to express our opinions of said coins? Why the mention of "POOF" ????

    "When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"

  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,827 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 22, 2021 8:32PM

    What is going on at the cheek? Is that just toning or something affecting the surfaces?

  • DelawareDoonsDelawareDoons Posts: 3,413 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @amwldcoin said:
    I will say this for the naysayers. NGC photos suck as a rule.

    Those are HA's photos, though I don't think it changes your point much :lol:

    "It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,340 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Steven59 said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Barberian said:

    @bolivarshagnasty said:
    I don't think that JA will view this toning as a plus. Not attractive IMO.

    A lot of the original toning JA approves of is not attractive at all. There are some real butt-ugly CAC coins out there, IMO.

    And so it begins...

    Poof

    I thought with numismatics we were still allowed to express our opinions of said coins? Why the mention of "POOF" ????

    When we start down the CAC road, it always goes poof.

    It is funny, though, that you even mention CAC. Why isn't it an ugly coin in PCGS plastic? If CAC agrees with PCGS, isn't that prevailing market sentiment not anything specific to JA/CAC?

  • Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 8,468 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 25, 2021 6:19AM

    As for me - Not gonna buy that dance. Don’t see it as A or B coin. The dark toning on back of neck obv a real turnoff for me.

    However / At least take your turn at bat and give CAC a try. It’s up to him.

    Coins & Currency
  • TomBTomB Posts: 21,640 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Until you do it all we can say is "send it and find out". Anything else is blowing smoke.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • winestevenwinesteven Posts: 4,685 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1. What works in your favor is that CAC ignores pluses, so JA just has to believe it’s solid as a 67, not solid as a 67+.
    2. What works against you, as several replies have correctly pointed out, is there’s no way in the world a coin of this value was put up for sale without the owner or auction house (or selling dealer) having spent just the tiny fee to have given that a shot already!

    Based on #2, I truly believe you will not succeed in getting the sticker. But to give you peace of mind, for only a few bucks, you can give it a shot!

    Let us know how you make out.

    Steve

    A day without fine wine and working on your coin collection is like a day without sunshine!!!

    My collecting “Pride & Joy” is my PCGS Registry Dansco 7070 Set:
    https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/type-sets/design-type-sets/complete-dansco-7070-modified-type-set-1796-date/publishedset/213996
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with others, no way to predict.... Pay your money and try... Let us know what happens. Cheers, RickO

  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Well to be a nit picker and in jest it is in an NGC holder, not PCGS! :p

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Steven59 said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Barberian said:

    @bolivarshagnasty said:
    I don't think that JA will view this toning as a plus. Not attractive IMO.

    A lot of the original toning JA approves of is not attractive at all. There are some real butt-ugly CAC coins out there, IMO.

    And so it begins...

    Poof

    I thought with numismatics we were still allowed to express our opinions of said coins? Why the mention of "POOF" ????

    When we start down the CAC road, it always goes poof.

    It is funny, though, that you even mention CAC. Why isn't it an ugly coin in PCGS plastic? If CAC agrees with PCGS, isn't that prevailing market sentiment not anything specific to JA/CAC?

  • CatbertCatbert Posts: 7,378 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A better question for the OP to ask himself: will I still like the coin when it fails CAC?

    Seated Half Society member #38
    "Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
  • WAYNEASWAYNEAS Posts: 6,891 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Glad you decided to send it in.
    Wayne

    Kennedys are my quest...

  • pmh1nicpmh1nic Posts: 3,295 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Eldorado9 said:
    Just for reference, here is a PCGS MS-67. No plus. It looks pretty clean in terms of surfaces, and has a full strike.

    Did this coin CAC?

    My problem with the coin in the OP is I had to pause. This coin for me required no pause. I would be surprised if it didn't CAC.

    The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 4,079 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 23, 2021 12:30PM





    These are all CAC 67’s. The second one is a 67+. One thing I do notice, as @Eldorado9 has stated, is that these seem to have a better strike where you can see the detail in the facets of each star. Most likely yours has made a trip to JA before, since it was sold on heritage, but it couldn’t hurt to try.

    Side note- I’m in love with the last one and I had to post both obv and rev. I don’t know why but it seems like the most beautifully toned coins to my eye happen to be barber coinage.

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,027 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DeplorableDan said:




    These are all CAC 67’s. The second one is a 67+. One thing I do notice, as @Eldorado9 has stated, is that these seem to have a better strike where you can see the detail in the facets of each star. Most likely yours has made a trip to JA before, since it was sold on heritage, but it couldn’t hurt to try.

    Side note- I’m in love with the last one and I had to post both obv and rev. I don’t know why but it seems like the most beautifully toned coins to my eye happen to be barber coinage.

    I don’t think the strike of the stars would have any bearing on whether CAC would sticker the coin.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • blackhorse360blackhorse360 Posts: 300 ✭✭✭

    @Catbert said:
    A better question for the OP to ask himself: will I still like the coin when it fails CAC?

    To answer your question I love the the coin as it is now.I’m simply asking the question about the possibility.

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A few more pertinent data points to consider - the coin realized $3500 in 2015 vs an $11,500 price guide


  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,340 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Has anyone asked HA if the sent it to CAC? They would probably tell you.

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,169 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1 - I don’t care for the toning but don’t think that alone would preclude it from stickering.
    2- It looks like there is chatter on the cheek. I find it distracting and it should IMHO keep it from stickering.
    3- Throw in your next submission and let’s see. It could make for a fun thread. 😊

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,169 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @tradedollarnut said:
    A few more pertinent data points to consider - the coin realized $3500 in 2015 vs an $11,500 price guide


    There’s your answer OP. If this was a high end piece, it would certainly already have a sticker and likely would already be in PCGS plastic.

  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 24, 2021 6:16PM

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Has anyone asked HA if the sent it to CAC? They would probably tell you.

    I was told a few years ago that they generally send anything worth near $1K or more into CAC automatically.

    Yet on the opposite side of the coin...

    CAC has stickered many coins they rejected once when viewed a second time.

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,169 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 24, 2021 6:17PM

    @Broadstruck said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Has anyone asked HA if the sent it to CAC? They would probably tell you.

    I was told a few years ago that they generally send anything worth near $1K or more into CAC automatically.

    My experience has been otherwise. I bought some mint state 1850s gold that subsequently stickered on the first attempt a few years ago.

  • orevilleoreville Posts: 12,087 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @tradedollarnut said:
    A few more pertinent data points to consider - the coin realized $3500 in 2015 vs an $11,500 price guide


    Very telling. I would be very happy with this quarter as an MS-66 but no harm in trying for a CAC sticker first.

    In fact, if you fail CAC will waive their fee assuming you submit it as a collector.

    If you are successful then I would try to cross it to PCGS at 67 not 67+.

    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • P0CKETCHANGEP0CKETCHANGE Posts: 2,830 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    I don’t think the strike of the stars would have any bearing on whether CAC would sticker the coin.

    Why is that? Isn’t the strike a component of a coin’s grade?

    Nothing is as expensive as free money.

  • d9lowed9lowe Posts: 312 ✭✭✭✭

    You loose nothing by submitting it. Why not try?

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,340 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 24, 2021 7:04PM

    @cameonut2011 said:

    @Broadstruck said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Has anyone asked HA if the sent it to CAC? They would probably tell you.

    I was told a few years ago that they generally send anything worth near $1K or more into CAC automatically.

    My experience has been otherwise. I bought some mint state 1850s gold that subsequently stickered on the first attempt a few years ago.

    It is best to just ask. I don't see any reason why they wouldn't tell you, unless they simply don't want everyone asking them on every coin.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file