Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
So here's the story: I bought the coin in an old SEGS holder graded MS63 BN. In hand I thought it sure looks properly graded.
In fact there plenty of properly graded coins in SEGS holders.
While this coin is not perfect, it looks darn good to me (and everyone else) for 200 year old copper. Well I cracked it out and the sad exception to our opinions occurred in the NGC grading room. So the next question is: What in the photos would leave you to believe this coin is improperly cleaned?
Maybe they thought the roundish spots on the reverse and the outline in front of libertys head were some sort of residue from cleaning??? Just guessing
Are you fricking kidding me! Crack & submit to PCGS this time. How the heck can that be? It's 204 years old, its been handled a little bit already. Man that makes me mad and its not even mine, arrrggghhh!
Yeah, that's a shame. I have gotten really good at spotting cleaned coins but I still sometimes get one back as details cleaned. I wish they would give a very brief description of what/where the cleaning is.
I was kind of wondering what caused the silhouette effect around Liberty. Maybe it's related to a cleaning? Since none of the experts on the board guessed Details, it would seem to merit another shot (or three) at grading. Best of luck!
That grade actually does not surprise me. The look of the coin is somewhat off to me. I also wouldn't be surprised if it was straight graded. The look is not my cup of tea. Still a nice coin.
I can see where the red color starts and stops on face and on the left field etc. But that could have been unusual wear and tear or just rub. I'd too like to know how this assessment is made. I don't don't see no brillo marks.
@CoinscratchFever said:
I can see where the red color starts and stops on face and on the left field etc. But that could have been unusual wear and tear or just rub. I'd too like to know how this assessment is made. I don't don't see no brillo marks.
Far more times than not, cleaned coins don’t display “Brillo marks”. And often, they don’t even exhibit hairlines. It’s quite possible that those of us who thought it looked fine in the pictures would have a different opinion in-hand.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
This is exactly why I find "unc details, cleaned" to be practically useless by itself in determining net grade/ value.
There is for example unc details, cleaned net Fine because its harsh, and there is, like this coin, unc MS 64 details, maybe a little cleaned, maybe not, net unc one- point lower MS 63.. which is what it sounds like Segs did in the first place.
Comments
Technically a 64 with the look of a 63.
Couldn't agree more
Jbknifeandcoin.com
I am in love with this example
63 RD/BN
Mr_Spud
Very lovely, I'll guess 64, though it's hard to tell the extent of that vertical mark on
the cheek and behind the eye.
63RB
65BN
63rb
64RB
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
That mark behind the eye is telling me to go down a half point ... so 63RB
Edited to revise ... I looked four more times. I think I was too low. 64RB or 64BN
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
MS-64 R&B
64 BN
Check out some of my 1794 Large Cents on www.coingallery.org
64
I forgot to add BRN
64 RB?
NGC 65, PCGS 64. Both BN.
MS 65 R/B.
64rb
64BN.
64
Dave
Very pretty. I'll go with 64 RB.
Lance.
Does this change anyone's mind?
I will say 64RB...but the spots on the reverse concern me for future degradation. Cheers, RickO
I'll raise my 64RB guess to 64+RB
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I liked it as a 66 to begin with, problem was PCGS doesn't have any that high...
66RB
I am going conservative at 63, no opinion on BN vs RB
Successful transactions with-Boosibri,lkeigwin,TomB,Broadstruck,coinsarefun,Type2,jom,ProfLiz, UltraHighRelief,Barndog,EXOJUNKIE,ldhair,fivecents,paesan,Crusty...
Everyman Bust Quarters
Early Quarters
CAC Capped Bust Quarters
CAC Barber Quarters
I thought 66 RB first but then felt 65 RB would be more likely, not sure the mark on the coin would effect the grade so much. Very nice coin.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.
WAG 65RB.
I don't really know copper, but I like the look of it.
62 or 64, nice looking copper.
63 RB
64RB but could also be 65 RB nice color
NGC 65 RB
My 1866 Philly Mint Set
63+. R&B
65 Brown
My YouTube Channel
Bump from 63 to 64RB.
64 BN
11.5$ Southern Dollars, The little “Big Easy” set
So here's the story: I bought the coin in an old SEGS holder graded MS63 BN. In hand I thought it sure looks properly graded.
In fact there plenty of properly graded coins in SEGS holders.
While this coin is not perfect, it looks darn good to me (and everyone else) for 200 year old copper. Well I cracked it out and the sad exception to our opinions occurred in the NGC grading room. So the next question is: What in the photos would leave you to believe this coin is improperly cleaned?
Thanks for all of the opinions.
Maybe they thought the roundish spots on the reverse and the outline in front of libertys head were some sort of residue from cleaning??? Just guessing
Mr_Spud
Are you fricking kidding me! Crack & submit to PCGS this time. How the heck can that be? It's 204 years old, its been handled a little bit already. Man that makes me mad and its not even mine, arrrggghhh!
Yeah, that's a shame. I have gotten really good at spotting cleaned coins but I still sometimes get one back as details cleaned. I wish they would give a very brief description of what/where the cleaning is.
I was kind of wondering what caused the silhouette effect around Liberty. Maybe it's related to a cleaning? Since none of the experts on the board guessed Details, it would seem to merit another shot (or three) at grading. Best of luck!
That grade actually does not surprise me. The look of the coin is somewhat off to me. I also wouldn't be surprised if it was straight graded. The look is not my cup of tea. Still a nice coin.
I can see where the red color starts and stops on face and on the left field etc. But that could have been unusual wear and tear or just rub. I'd too like to know how this assessment is made. I don't don't see no brillo marks.
Allan Robertson could have been using it as his ball marker, doesn't mean he cleaned it...
Try at PCGS.
Far more times than not, cleaned coins don’t display “Brillo marks”. And often, they don’t even exhibit hairlines. It’s quite possible that those of us who thought it looked fine in the pictures would have a different opinion in-hand.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
This is exactly why I find "unc details, cleaned" to be practically useless by itself in determining net grade/ value.
There is for example unc details, cleaned net Fine because its harsh, and there is, like this coin, unc MS 64 details, maybe a little cleaned, maybe not, net unc one- point lower MS 63.. which is what it sounds like Segs did in the first place.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
The reverse looks to show some sort of improper rinsing - style spotting.