Hypothetical: Strong-strike AU58 coin vs Weak-strike MS61 coin?

Which would you rather have? If you had the hammered AU coin would you try cracking it out and resubmitting it and hoping for the bump in grade or just keep it to yourself as the best struck example that you've seen? What about resale? I realize some people think there's such a thing as "AU61" looking coins too
.
-D

-D
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."
-Aristotle
Dum loquimur fugerit invida aetas. Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.
-Horace
-Aristotle
Dum loquimur fugerit invida aetas. Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.
-Horace
0
Comments
<< <i>MS61 is usually a pretty ugly grade. I'd often take an AU58 over MS60-62. Making the AU58 more enticing by saying it has a great strike only furthers that opinion. >>
Yup. Gimme the sweet 58.
Lance.
I have sold all but one of my MS61 coins but add AU58/CAC coins every chance I can.
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/gold/liberty-head-2-1-gold-major-sets/liberty-head-2-1-gold-basic-set-circulation-strikes-1840-1907-cac/alltimeset/268163
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
One should also consider that there are a significant number of collectors who are building "slider" collections and will pay handsomely for AU58 graded coins.
Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
The actual example that came to my mind when reading the OP was 1893-CC Morgans. Many coins of that date come horrible struck... even worse struck than most O-mint coins. Even as Uncs. they have no ear at all. But there's at least one die pair that was very well struck. I've passed up buying coins from AU50 to MS62 before because it's clear they're from the pancake club. IMO those aren't worth owning at 25% back of Bid.
<< <i>MS61 is usually a pretty ugly grade. I'd often take an AU58 over MS60-62. Making the AU58 more enticing by saying it has a great strike only furthers that opinion. >>
RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'
CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
<< <i>
<< <i>MS61 is usually a pretty ugly grade. I'd often take an AU58 over MS60-62. Making the AU58 more enticing by saying it has a great strike only furthers that opinion. >>
There are plenty more AU61 coins then there are AU63/64 out there. Also MS61 can be an amazing grade for classic coins esp for price consensus collectors.
<< <i>No-brainer: 58. >>
<< <i>Well struck 58, especially if I could get it for 58 money. >>
So in todays market your willing to pay the extra 30% or so the 58 will cost like the rest of us? In my two everyman sets I have not been able to get a nice 58 at guide price for a long time.
If we go strictly by the definition of MS61, I'll go with the MS coin. However, based on coins I've seen encapsulated, I'd choose AU58.
But for the marketplace, if I was going to resell, I'd definitely choose strong strike au58.
Reason being, a lot of collectors look at the weak strike ms61 as 'wear'. So this leaves me with a mediocre au50/55 coin instead of an ms61.
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)