Options
Unopened 1953 proof sets on ebay.
What do the experts on the forum think of this auction? Who could the #1 expert be that the seller is talking about in the description?
Also, it seems like he could get more out of them selling them individually. I'd be interested in buying one, but not 5.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/250930074992?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649
Also, it seems like he could get more out of them selling them individually. I'd be interested in buying one, but not 5.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/250930074992?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649
0
Comments
Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
Ike Specialist
Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986
Weak details were the hallmarks of many Proof coins from the early 1940s and early 1950s. Collector complaints about a lack of luster or brightness (e.g. They didn’t like the satin finish.) prompted the mint do excessive die polishing. The mint also did not change Proof dies as frequently as they should have.
The 1953 Proof sets are a bit sharper as a general rule, but there are only a limited number of cameo coins, which are the pieces that really bring the big bucks.
<< <i>I can almost guarantee you that none of the coins in there are not cameo Proofs. They are quite the opposite. >>
Did you say that right, Bill?
Lance.
<< <i>
<< <i>I can almost guarantee you that none of the coins in there are not cameo Proofs. They are quite the opposite. >>
Did you say that right, Bill?
Lance. >>
Corrected.
Thanks
There is a known 1953 doubled date proof cent; that would also be the attraction.
Why?
1. to pristine (unless they were just removed from a Mint shipping box
2. only one band of tape, I was expecting to see the two bands crossing one another
3. date stamp on edge instead of the top of the box, black was the only color I've ever seen
4. or I could be wrong and they are all genuine, or they may be packed with the infamous washers.
me, I would not invest money to see what's inside, only to re-sell them to some other curious collector.
edit:sp
"Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
Here is a picture of the group of 1952 sets that I have.
<< <i>Not that I know anything about it, but I did look at completed auctions of unopened proof sets. The 50-52 had double tape and the 53-55 all had single tape. >>
You are correct. When I looked at my set boxes, the tape is you posted.
Once I get it, I'll take some pics and post them here.
<< <i>When it comes to proof sets my #1 expert (and personal hero) is Val Webb!! >>
I have his book on cameo coins. He actually beat Tomaska to the punch.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
<< <i>When it comes to proof sets my #1 expert (and personal hero) is Val Webb!! >>
I have his book on cameo coins. He actually beat Tomaska to the punch.
Russ, NCNE >>
I actually thought Webb's book was a better read than Tomaska's too.
<< <i>The seller will sell them individually, so I bought one.
Once I get it, I'll take some pics and post them here. >>
I did not see any note saying that the seller will see the set individually.
If he does, I want to get one too
<< <i>
<< <i>The seller will sell them individually, so I bought one.
Once I get it, I'll take some pics and post them here. >>
I did not see any note saying that the seller will see the set individually.
If he does, I want to get one too
He has more than 5. Send him an email through ebay.