Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

1922-D weak D Lincoln

coinkatcoinkat Posts: 24,491 ✭✭✭✭✭
I see the Red Book lists a weak D variety- for the 1922-D Lincoln. I am curious as I am not that serious about Lincolns- exactly how weak does the D need to be? I would think earlier varieties that feature a well defined reverse would be more desirable. Would an EF to AU example be worth sending in?

Does someone have a weak D example that they could share?

Thanks in advance and I will search to see if one was posted or if this was already the subject of another thread

Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

Comments

  • Options
    drwstr123drwstr123 Posts: 7,053 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image
    image
  • Options
    coinkatcoinkat Posts: 24,491 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks- great image

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,592 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Weak D should have barely a shadow of a D.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Great example... have seen one at a show before... not as nice as that one. Cheers, RickO
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,866 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Weak D should have barely a shadow of a D. >>



    Sadly I've seen a couple of these "weak D" 1922 Lincoln cents in certification holders. From one angle it appears that the mint mark is missing, but as you move the coin in the light, the "D" appears and is not complelely missing like it is on the three "No D" varieties.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 34,027 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Weak D should have barely a shadow of a D. >>



    Sadly I've seen a couple of these "weak D" 1922 Lincoln cents in certification holders. From one angle it appears that the mint mark is missing, but as you move the coin in the light, the "D" appears and is not complelely missing like it is on the three "No D" varieties. >>



    Isn't that the very essence of it being a "Weak D?"

    I for one would love for one of the major TPG's to publish the definitive photo essay on the cents of 1922, and what constitutes a:

    No question Variety 2 "No D" with the strong reverse;
    Legitimate Variety 1 or 3 "No D" with the weak reverses;
    "Weak D" from the Variety 1 and/or 3 dies with weak reverse;
    Any other acceptable "Weak D" die pair, if any.

    TD
    Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Also won the PNG's Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file