It is at an angle so the fields reflect. That would hide some issues but on this one it is hard to tell if it really is hiding something. Looks amazing.
Hairlines people! Im pretty sure the angle it was shot hides some of the flaws on the coins surfaces pcgs isn't that tight, that said very nice strike and details
I can see nothing of the fields in those photos. The fields are pure reflections of light. Sure the devices look good, but I can't see the fields! No way I'd bid on that coin given only those photos... well I'd bid somewhat higher than melt...
That is a doctored photo, at very least a piece held at the right angle/light to hide the truth. On the worst day of a TPG they would never be that far off. Well at least not in top five
<< <i>Given that photographic technique, any coin can be made to NOT look AU. >>
Agree. It may be heavily hairlined and the lighting angle hides the hairlines.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Typo by the seller in the listing? Straight-on lighting can hide a lot, but I think I'd see a broken cameo on the tip of the neck, eagle's breast, or rim, not to mention a mark more significant than a hairline somewhere if it is indeed a PR55.
They can play wonderful games with phtotos these days.
Here are two views of the same coin.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Comments
-Paul
The name is LEE!
.....................................................
<< <i>That coin is all but perfect. 68? Where do you see this coin? >>
Stinky Linky
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne
<< <i>Given that photographic technique, any coin can be made to NOT look AU. >>
Lance.
Better yet, let me tilt and roll it in my fingers in the light from a pinpoint source.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
Cashback from Mr. Rebates
<< <i>Holy smokes! Mechanical error, they meant 65? The two circulated Proof Morgans I've had looked nothing like that.
>>
I agree, with the exception of never having owned any proof Morgans, circulated or not.
WOW. I wasn't expecting a PR55 to look like that!
<< <i>Given that photographic technique, any coin can be made to NOT look AU. >>
Agree. It may be heavily hairlined and the lighting angle hides the hairlines.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
<< <i>
<< <i>Given that photographic technique, any coin can be made to NOT look AU. >>
Agree. It may be heavily hairlined and the lighting angle hides the hairlines. >>
A hairlined coin is still uncirculated. In myopinion it should be either Genuine or PR60. --Jerry
Lance.
Edited to add: "Looks a lot like this one."
They can play wonderful games with phtotos these days.
Here are two views of the same coin.
<< <i>A hairlined coin is still uncirculated. In myopinion it should be either Genuine or PR60. --Jerry >>
Very true. True circulation is needed for anything lower than PR60.
-Paul