Grade this 16-D Buffalo-PCGS OGH

bestclser1 · June 26, 2008 10:24AM

Frankcoins · June 26, 2008 10:31AM

Looks like a very nice 64. Not quite the strike for a 65

ricko · June 26, 2008 10:37AM

Based on the picture (to me it is a bit washed out), I would say, at best, MS62... It may be much nicer in hand... but not what I see. Cheers, RickO

BECOKA · June 26, 2008 10:48AM

The photo looks to be hiding a lot of detail.

I think I see luster in there, the obverse strike is a little on the weak side (Typical ?) and the only major mark I see is about 5 o'clock on the obverse rim.

My guess is MS65.

OneCent · June 26, 2008 10:57AM

MS65 and beautiful!

fc · June 26, 2008 11:16AM

is that type of toning common for buff nickels of that era?

otherwise i will say ms64.

JZrarities · June 26, 2008 11:32AM

64

harvey85422458 · June 26, 2008 11:33AM

65

GoldenEyeNumismatics · June 26, 2008 11:36AM

What is that at the rim at 4 o'clock on the obverse?

MS64

robkool · June 26, 2008 11:56AM

MS64...

roadrunner · June 26, 2008 12:06PM

MS65. I see no reason why this isn't a gem coin from the photo presented. I'm not that saavy on determining the minute variations in strike that could be grade limiting, but this one appears decently struck to me.

Anyways, bestclser1 has a knack for finding powerful looking coins with high numbers.

roadrunner

SkyMan · June 26, 2008 12:14PM

I grade it purty!

jerryf43 · June 26, 2008 12:15PM

MS64

Kozman · June 26, 2008 12:49PM

Looks like AU58

yellowjacket · June 26, 2008 1:00PM

A very nice 64 with "claims" to 65.

Garrow

bestclser1 · June 26, 2008 1:30PM

Many of you are close.Did i mention it is ex-Eliasberg?

OneCent · June 26, 2008 1:43PM

<< <i>Many of you are close.Did i mention it is ex-Eliasberg?

>>

MS66 and still beautiful!

gyocomgd · June 26, 2008 1:50PM

Poorly lit and photographed, but it throws enough of the right light to convince me it has luster to burn. Nice color, too. The strike is just OK. I'll go MS64, and if that's the case I wouldn't bother cracking out trying to get 65, because it wouldn't make it....

ad4400 · June 26, 2008 11:09PM

Hard to tell from the pic. Bet it has good luster. Hard to determine any hits other than already noted on the obverse rim. Stike is so-so, but I'll still go w/ a 65 - would be awful lot of luster for a 64.

ksteelheader · June 26, 2008 11:11PM

MS63

Shamika · June 26, 2008 11:21PM

MS63 although it could be MS64 (poor image). Most definitely not a 65.

bestclser1 · June 26, 2008 11:37PM

Will give grade by tonight,Before i mentioned Pedigree,more correct answers.Coin does have very nice luster for the date.

SeaEagleCoins · June 27, 2008 12:13AM

I'd have to say MS-65...

Being in an OGH...they might have given it a 64...but it deserves a 65...at least based on the pics...

buffalohunter · June 27, 2008 12:16AM

MS62

SirAnthonyAC · June 27, 2008 12:48AM

Hi,

Sweet coin!

The horn looks to have been struck at tad weak... unless it's the photo.

If 'in hand' the coins looks like the horn was struck weak then I'd say MS62

If it's just the photo and the horn is struck better than I'd lean toward MS64

Either way... freaking nice Buffalo!

dorkkarl · June 27, 2008 4:24AM

real grade = ms-61
slabed grade = ms-63

weird digi-pics though.......

K S

bestclser1 · June 27, 2008 10:49AM

Pics and coin from Pinnacle.Coin is graded 64,definitely a shot 65 in hand.JMO,and my coin.

Grade this 16-D Buffalo-PCGS OGH

Comments

Leave a Comment