Options
**A RARE GLIMPSE OF THE BEST OF THE DR. STEVE DUCKOR BARBER HALVES**!!
saintguru
Posts: 7,724 ✭✭✭
Recently PCGS requested to photograph a dozen of the best of Dr. Steve Duckor's #1 Registry set of Barber Halves. This single collection is one of the finest sets of any type in the entire Registry.
These coins have only been dispayed once. In a rare break from his great humility Steve has asked that these be shared with collectors. It's my honor to post these for my great friend and mentor. Enjoy these amazing coins!
The DUCKOR BARBER HALVES!!
1905-O MS68 POP 1
1906-O MS67 POP 2
1894 MS67 POP 2
1901-S MS67 POP 2
1895-S MS67 POP 1
1893-S MS66 POP 1
1904 MS67 POP 1 (Ex: Dale Friend....sold to Steve because "It belongs in YOUR set!"
)
These coins have only been dispayed once. In a rare break from his great humility Steve has asked that these be shared with collectors. It's my honor to post these for my great friend and mentor. Enjoy these amazing coins!
The DUCKOR BARBER HALVES!!
1905-O MS68 POP 1
1906-O MS67 POP 2
1894 MS67 POP 2
1901-S MS67 POP 2
1895-S MS67 POP 1
1893-S MS66 POP 1
1904 MS67 POP 1 (Ex: Dale Friend....sold to Steve because "It belongs in YOUR set!"
)
0
Comments
I need to go change now.
-sm
The Maddy Rae Collection
CURRENT BST OFFERINGS
The '94 is by FARRRR my favorite coin in this group
.....................................................
I knew it would happen.
Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
ANA Member R-3147111
Menomonee Falls Wisconsin USA
http://www.pcgs.com/SetRegistr...dset.aspx?s=68269&ac=1">Musky 1861 Mint Set
Simply magical.
*
peacockcoins
<< <i>Improvable coins in that state of preservation coupled with impossible eye appeal!
Simply magical. >>
You forgot "UN".
The entertainment can never be overdressed....except in burlesque
<< <i>How can you accurately grade a pop 1 ms68 when there is nothing better to compare it too? >>
Compare it to a known MS67 and if it's better, grade it 68?
peacockcoins
Still a tough looking lady, but pretty none the less.
seriously kewl stuff ... please thank the good Doctor for allowing us to share some of his beauties
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
Simply put, Thank You
I got chills just looking at this sampling.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !
New Barber Purchases
<< <i>
<< <i>How can you accurately grade a pop 1 ms68 when there is nothing better to compare it too? >>
Compare it to a known MS67 and if it's better, grade it 68? >>
I knew that, but how do you know if its really two grades better and not just one?
peacockcoins
I seriously would consider traveling cross country to see these on display.
Later, Paul.
Later, Paul.
I give away money. I collect money.
I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.
Hey Saint, thanks for posting these !!!!!!
Sunnywood's Rainbow-Toned Morgans (Retired)
Sunnywood's Barber Quarters (Retired)
Coin's for sale/trade.
Tom Pilitowski
US Rare Coin Investments
800-624-1870
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
I hate to see a nice show-and-tell session corrupted by grading debates.
That said, I'll answer the question. There are plenty of better, similar and worse quality coins against which this one can be meaningfully compared. They're just not 1905-O half dollars.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
Dave
I must say though, that 1905-O has a pretty mushy strike. Do they all come that way for the 05-O?
Sunnywood
Sunnywood's Rainbow-Toned Morgans (Retired)
Sunnywood's Barber Quarters (Retired)
Thanks to both of you, and PCGS for this great display.
I can assure you that assembling this representative group , and the other 60 plus coins has been an endurance test that even the most avid collector would be daunted by.
How many collectors spend 20 plus years searching for the finest date in a series, and then traveling across the country to bid on the upgrade that will be even more eye-appealing than it's very nice predecessor.
And paying up to the moon when the coin deserves it.
That's how you get into the Hall of Fame. Congratulations, again.
I cannot even imagine finer looking business strike barber halves.
These are big coins and it is a miracle they were so well preserved for so long.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>How can you accurately grade a pop 1 ms68 when there is nothing better to compare it too? >>
Compare it to a known MS67 and if it's better, grade it 68? >>
I knew that, but how do you know if its really two grades better and not just one? >>
================================
Three answers IMHO:
1) The MS68/69 level implys the coins has all techicals but a striking visual impact one sees
but is hard to really objectively quantify---Sort of like trully great art that strikes you, even displayed next to other master paintings.
2) The Sevices are often aware of RAW ungraded top MS66++s and numbers of superb raw 67++'s in museums and tightly held private collections (for comparison)
3) Ultimately, and TDN/or/other classic collectors, have suggested that these superb gem plus coins are being ranked (like in a Condition Cenus)
THEN (very importantly) given a push to an seeming unsurpassable grade TO PROTECT THEM FROM silly efforts at "conservation" for a fast buck--by crackouters
distroying history, provenance, and place in future collectors study/collections. This allows a fair 2 grade difference-- But it doesn't preclude an equal coin
showing up, or even a better one, that can later be added into ranking in the Super-Grade Census.
-----------That's my take anyway, but wouldn't it be fairer to do this for Regular Coin Guys too????
I'm thinking of the glass cealing coins--50 1932D Washies stuck in MS65, those Morgans realy MS62 that can not ever get above AU58------
you know the silly cut-offs to protect prices by setting dishonest cealings--not relative rankings that differentiate fairly.
edit for spelling:
Rob
"Those guys weren't Fathers they were...Mothers."